We ARE because we KNOW. We will be a stone – jad – if we didn’t know or much lesser in terms of intelligence. In the Indian tradition, we have the Pramaana Shashtra – the theory of knowledge – epistemology. Without going into that, we today have size of knowledge, certainly the availability of it, has increased many fold. There are still giant flaws in KNOWING and PROBLEMS with it. This piece is contemplation on knowing.
Two key types of knowing, amongst others, is Direct Perception called Pratyaksha and INFERENCE – Anumaana. Lot of times the inputs – what we see affects what we perceive and vice versa. Take media, they will make you feel that what you are seeing is all there is. Often it is content out of context that gets extrapolated. Like plague in Surat. BBC TRIED to make the world feel that India got plague when one person was detected with plague.
Our biases, conditioning, experiences, judgments colour our perception. If you like a girl, and she smiles at you, one feels she is probably attracted to you. Or when someone is honest, people feel they aren’t polite. When polite, people may think they are fake! The list is endless and cause problems. These are Errors of knowing. Someone has said: Perception is reality, but not the truth. Thoreau wrote: “It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what you see”.
Then there is the problem of not knowing but believing that we know. YouTube is filled with such people who predict everything. One woman said 21st March something major would happen, others said in 2000 the world will come to an end. Some predict stock markets or analyse politics. This is erroneous knowing or not knowing projected as knowing. Mark Twain has said it as it should be: It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.

The unknown is infinitesimal times more than known. However, it is equally true that there are more people who claim they know than those who say they don’t know. Probably most want to be ‘known’ as knower rather than otherwise. The Economist January edition in 2020 did not predict COVID effect leading to worldwide shut down nor could it tell Ukraine war despite carrying outlook for the year each year with tons of research.
Add to this muddy windshield, an item called narrative. News channels, keep the facts aside and rather project narrative or coloured facts, politicians avoid facts that lose votes, or give half facts to gain power. Ask a monkey to give you a banana in his hand for a promise of two in future or in after life, he will never give you the one he has. Humans do this all the time (mainly in case of financial and religious frauds) where they give what they have to get many more in future, and often ending up losing that too.
The great texts of India say: Those who know don’t know, those who don’t know, know (यस्यामतं तस्य मतं मतं यस्य न वेद सः). Then, is it best to be in the state of not knowing? Or is there knowing in the state of knowing?
One way to beat the problem of knowing is what the ICAI logo tells us to do – be AWAKE – Jagrat – knowledge is often past, even perception is so. Whereas to be AWAKE makes us perceive reality better with alertness as there is no presumption of certain outcome and the rest. One of the top CIO of a MF was asked about what they think about markets after the American war on Iran. He said we want to be prepared – I thought that was being alert.
In the Rig Veda, ends one of its Hymns not with answers but with questions — and perhaps that is the most honest epistemology of all. In a world drowning in information, noise, narrative, and confident uncertainty, a rare act may simply be to pause and ask: Who knows1? Not as an abdication, but as an awakening. To hold our knowing lightly, to remain alert without presumption, to sit comfortably in the vast space of what we do not yet understand — this is not ignorance. This, perhaps, beginning of wisdom. Who knows!
1 Nasadiya Sukta, 6-7









