The IBC treats personal guarantors as a distinct class closely linked to corporate debtors. Their liability is co-extensive, meaning creditors can proceed against them directly without first exhausting remedies against the principal borrower. Supreme Court rulings clarify that a corporate resolution plan does not discharge guarantor obligations, nor does the Section 14 moratorium protect them. To ensure efficiency, insolvency proceedings for both debtors and guarantors are typically consolidated under the NCLT. Ultimately, guarantor liability remains independent, allowing creditors to pursue parallel remedies under statutes like SARFAESI
INTRODUCTION
Personal guarantees have historically been a central feature of commercial lending in India. Promoters and directors frequently provide personal guarantees to secure corporate borrowings. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 introduced a comprehensive framework governing the insolvency of corporate persons as well as individuals, including personal guarantors to corporate debtors.
The evolution of jurisprudence relating to personal guarantors under the IBC reflects an attempt by courts to reconcile traditional contract law principles with the modern insolvency framework. The central is