Subject: Article “परोपदेशेपांडित्यम्” in the March 2025 issue
Thank you for publishing C.N. Vaze’s deeply thought-provoking article “परोपदेशेपांडित्यम्” in the March 2025 issue. It struck a powerful chord. The observation that we are often eloquent in advising others yet lax in applying those very principles to our own lives is not only accurate but uncomfortably familiar.
Mr. Vaze has written with great clarity on professional ethics in the past, and this piece continues that important reflection. A typical case in this context is when a peer, who shares the same ethical vows, enables the filing of frivolous complaints—not out of a sense of duty, but from rivalry, resentment, or plain indifference. These aren’t just baseless grievances; they are missiles launched from the silos of personal angst, and once fired, they initiate a procedural chain reaction. Long-drawn ethical proceedings are set in motion. Time, energy, and resources are drained not in pursuit of justice, but in managing shadows. And while these cases often crumble under scrutiny, their residue lingers—on reputations, on mental health, on the very fabric of professional dignity.
Genuine breaches must be pursued with rigor—I fully support that. But unchecked misuse erodes trust. Ethics and values must be more than just talk; they should guide our choices, especially when faced with personal agendas.
The line चित्तेवाचिक्रियायांचसाधूनाम्एकरूपता encapsulates a rare ideal—that of harmony between thought, speech, and action. As professionals, that alignment should be our guiding star. And though we may falter, striving toward that integrity gives our journey its meaning.