Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

Liberalised Remittance Scheme

1.  Background

     Liberalised
Remittance Scheme [LRS / the Scheme] was introduced vide AP (DIR Series)
Circular No. 64 dated 4th February, 2004 read with Notification No.
207(E) dated 23rd March, 2004.

     LRS was
introduced as a liberalisation measure to facilitate resident individuals to
remit funds abroad for permitted capital or current account transactions or
combination of both.

     Presently, FED
Master Direction No. 7/ 2015-16 dated January 1, 2016 (updated as on 12th
April, 2017) [LRS Master Direction] and FAQs on LRS dated 11th August,
2016 [LRS FAQs], explain the provisions of the LRS.

2.  LRS Limit

    Currently,
under LRS, Authorised Dealers [ADs] may freely allow remittances by resident
individuals up to USD 2,50,000 per Financial Year (April-March) for any
permitted current or capital account transaction or a combination of both.

    Consistent
with prevailing macro and micro economic conditions, the LRS limit has been
revised in stages. During the period from February 4, 2004 till date, the LRS
limit has been revised as under:

 

Date

Feb 4, 2004

Dec 20, 2006

May 8, 2007

Sep 26, 2007

Aug 14, 2013

Jun 3, 2014

May 26, 2015

LRS limit (USD)

25,000

50,000

1,00,000

2,00,000

75,000

1,25,000

2,50,000

Subsumes
remittances for current account transactions

Previously, there
were separate limits in respect of current account transactions. With effect
from 26th May 2015, LRS limit was increased to USD 2,50,000 per FY.
The increased limit now also includes/subsumes remittance limit for current
account transactions available to resident individuals under Para 1 of Schedule
III to Current Account Transactions Rules, as amended.

Clause 1(ix) of
the Schedule III to Current Account Transactions Rules, provides ‘Any other
Current Account Transaction’. However, Current Account Transactions Rules do
not clarify the type of transactions that are covered under this residual
clause and also whether there will be separate limits for those transactions or
that they too will be subsumed within LRS limit. Specific RBI approval will be
required for any transaction above the LRS limit.

Consolidation
and Clubbing

Members of a family
can consolidate their individual remittances under the Scheme if each of the
individual family member complies with all the terms and conditions. However,
in case of capital account transactions such as opening a bank
account/investment/purchase of property, etc. consolidation by family members
is not permitted if the remitting family member is not a co-owner/co-partner in
the overseas bank account/investment/property. Apparently, this is because a
resident cannot draw foreign currency to make gift to another resident in
foreign currency even if such gift is made by way of credit to the latter’s
overseas foreign currency account held under LRS.

3.  Availability of the LRS

   LRS is available to all resident
individuals including minors
. In case of remitter being a minor, the Form
A2 must be countersigned by the minor’s natural guardian.

   LRS not available to Corporates,
Partnership firms, HUF, Trusts, etc.

  Remittance by sole proprietor under LRS

    In case of a
sole proprietorship business, there is no legal distinction between the
individual / owner and the business. Hence, the owner of the business (in his
personal name and not in the name of the business) can make remittance up to
the
permissible limit under LRS. If the owner of the sole proprietorship business
intends to remit the money from the bank account of the sole proprietorship
business, then the eligibility of the proprietor only in his individual
capacity should be considered. Hence, if an individual in his own capacity
remits USD 250,000 in a financial year under LRS, he cannot remit another USD
250,000 in his capacity as owner of the sole proprietorship business.

4.    Permissible/Prohibited
transactions under LRS

 4.1  Permissible
Capital Account Transactions

       Para A.6 of
the LRS Master directions provides that the permissible capital account
transactions by an individual under LRS are:

opening of foreign currency account abroad
with a bank;

purchase of property abroad;

making investments abroad – acquisition and
holding shares of both listed and unlisted overseas company or debt
instruments; acquisition of qualification shares of an overseas company for
holding the post of Director; acquisition of shares of a foreign company towards
professional services rendered or in lieu of Director’s remuneration;
investment in units of Mutual Funds, Venture Capital Funds, unrated debt
securities, promissory notes;

–   setting up Wholly Owned Subsidiaries and Joint
Ventures1 (with effect from August 05, 2013) outside India for bona
fide business subject to the terms & conditions stipulated in Notification
No. FEMA. 263/ RB-2013 dated March 5, 2013;

  extending loans including loans in Indian
Rupees to Non-resident Indians (NRIs) who are relatives as defined in Companies
Act, 1956.

 4.2  Permissible
Current Account Transactions

       As
mentioned earlier, limit of USD 2,50,000 per FY subsumes earlier separate
limits for remittances under Current Account Transactions Rules (viz. private
visit; gift/donation; going abroad on employment; emigration; maintenance of
close relatives abroad; business trip; medical treatment abroad; studies
abroad). Release of foreign exchange exceeding USD 2,50,000, requires prior
permission from the RBI.

 a. Private
Visits

       For private
visits abroad, other than to Nepal and Bhutan, any resident individual can
obtain foreign exchange up to an aggregate amount of USD 2,50,000, from an AD
or FFMC, in any one financial year, irrespective of the number of visits
undertaken during the year.

      Further,
all tour related expenses including cost of rail/road/water transportation;
cost of Euro Rail; passes/tickets, etc. outside India; and overseas
hotel/lodging expenses shall be subsumed under the LRS limit. The tour operator
can collect this amount either in Indian rupees or in foreign currency from the
resident traveller.

 b. Gift /
Donation

       Any
resident individual may remit up to USD 2,50,000 in one FY as gift to a person
residing outside India or as donation to an organization outside India.

 c. Going abroad
on employment

      A person
going abroad for employment can draw foreign exchange up to USD 2,50,000 per FY
from any AD in India.

 d. Emigration

      A person
emigrating from India can draw foreign exchange from AD Category I bank and AD
Category II up to the amount prescribed by the country of emigration or USD
250,000. Remittance of any amount of foreign exchange outside India in excess
of this limit may be allowed only towards meeting incidental expenses in the
country of immigration and not for earning points or credits to become eligible
for immigration by way of overseas investments in government bonds; land;
commercial enterprise; etc.

 e. Maintenance
of close relatives abroad

       A resident
individual can remit up-to USD 2,50,000 per FY towards maintenance of close
relatives [‘relative’ as defined in section 6 of the Indian Companies Act,
1956] abroad.

 f.  Business
Trip

        Visits by
individuals for attending an international conference, seminar, specialised
training, apprentice training, etc., are treated as business visits. For
business trips to foreign countries, resident individuals can avail of foreign
exchange up to USD 2,50,000 in a FY irrespective of the number of visits
undertaken during the year.

   If an employee
is deputed by the employer for any of the above and the expenses are borne by
the employer, such expenses shall be treated as residual current account
transactions outside LRS and may be permitted by the AD without any limit,
subject to verifying the bona fide of the transaction.

g. Medical
Treatment Abroad

ADs may
release foreign exchange up to an amount of USD 2,50,000 or its equivalent per
FY without insisting on any estimate from a hospital/doctor. For amount
exceeding the above limit, ADs may release foreign exchange under general
permission based on the estimate from the doctor in India or hospital/ doctor
abroad. A person who has fallen sick after proceeding abroad may also be
released foreign exchange by an AD (without seeking prior approval of the RBI)
for medical treatment outside India.

       In addition
to the above, an amount up to USD 250,000 per financial year is allowed to a
person for accompanying as attendant to a patient going abroad for medical
treatment/check-up.

 h. Facilities
available to students for pursuing their studies abroad.

       AD Category
I banks and AD Category II, may release foreign exchange up to USD 2,50,000 or
its equivalent to resident individuals for studies abroad without insisting on
any estimate from the foreign University. However, AD Category I bank and AD
Category II may allow remittances (without seeking prior approval of the RBI) exceeding
USD 2,50,000 based on the estimate received from the institution abroad

 i.  Purchasing
Objects of Art

       Remittances
under the Scheme can be used for purchasing objects of art subject to the
provisions of other applicable laws such as the extant Foreign Trade Policy of
the Government of India.

 5.    Outward remittance in the form of a DD

      The Scheme
can be used for outward remittance in the form of a DD either in the resident
individual’s own name or in the name of beneficiary with whom he intends putting
through the permissible transactions at the time of private visit abroad,
against self-declaration of the remitter in the format prescribed.

 6.    Open, maintain and hold Foreign Currency
Accounts

Individuals can
also open, maintain and hold foreign currency accounts with a bank outside
India for making remittances under the Scheme without prior approval of the
Reserve Bank. The foreign currency accounts may be used for putting through all
transactions connected with or arising from remittances eligible under this
Scheme.

 7.    Prohibitions under LRS

 7.1  Question
2 of the LRS FAQs provides that the remittance facility under the scheme is not
available for the following:

The Scheme is not available for remittances
for any purpose specifically prohibited under Schedule I or any item restricted
under Schedule II of Foreign Exchange Management (Current Account Transaction)
Rules, 2000, dated May 3, 2000, as amended from time to time.

Remittance from India for margins or margin
calls to overseas exchanges / overseas counterparty.

Remittances for purchase of FCCBs issued by
Indian companies in the overseas secondary market.

  Remittance for trading in foreign exchange
abroad.

  Capital account remittances, directly or
indirectly, to countries identified by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
as “non- cooperative countries and territories”, from time to time.

  Remittances
directly or indirectly to those individuals and entities identified as posing
significant risk of committing acts of terrorism as advised separately by the
Reserve Bank to the banks.

   In addition,
Banks should not extend any kind of credit facilities to resident individuals
to facilitate capital account remittances under the Scheme.

 7.2  Holding
Gold Abroad

        Under LRS a
person can remit for any purpose except those specifically prohibited.

       LRS Master
Direction provides a positive list of transactions permitted and FAQs of 2016
provides a negative list of transactions which are not permitted.

      Though not
specifically prohibited, it is understood that RBI is not in favour of using
remittances under LRS for holding gold abroad.

 7.3  Providing
Loans Abroad

      Due to
positive / negative list, though not specifically prohibited, it is understood
that RBI is not in favour of using remittances under LRS for giving loans
abroad.

 8.    Procedure for remittances under LRS

      The
individual should designate a branch of an AD through which all the remittances
under the Scheme will be made. The resident individual seeking to make the remittance
should furnish extant Form A2 for purchase of foreign exchange under LRS.

 9.    Overseas Direct Investment by Individuals
under LRS

      Regulation 20A of the Foreign Exchange Management
(Transfer or issue of any Foreign Security) Regulations, 2004 [FEMA 120]
provides that a resident individual (single or in association with another
resident individual or with an ‘Indian Party’ as defined in this Notification) satisfying
the criteria as per Schedule V of this Notification
, may make overseas
direct investment
in the equity shares and compulsorily convertible
preference shares of a Joint Venture (JV) or Wholly Owned Subsidiary (WOS)
outside India.

      Para 5 of
the Schedule provides that at the time of investments, the permissible ceiling
shall be within the overall ceiling prescribed for the resident individual under Liberalised
Remittance Scheme
as prescribed by the Reserve Bank from time to time.

      Explanation:
The investment made out of the balances held in EEFC/RFC account shall also
be restricted to the limit prescribed under LRS.

       A resident
individual who has made overseas direct investment in the equity shares;
compulsorily convertible preference shares of a JV/WoS outside India or ESOPs,
within the LRS limit, will be required to comply with the terms and conditions
prescribed by the overseas investment guidelines in Schedule V of FEMA 120 vide
Notification No. FEMA 263/ RB-2013 dated March 5, 2013.

       No ratings
or guidelines have been prescribed under LRS of USD 2,50,000 on the quality of
the investment an individual can make. However, the individual investor is
expected to exercise due diligence while taking a decision regarding the investments
which he or she proposes to make

 10.  Rupee Loan by a resident individual to a
NRI/PIO who is a close relative

       A resident individual is permitted to make a rupee
loan to a NRI/PIO who is a close relative of the resident individual
(‘relative’ as defined in section 2(77) of the Companies Act, 2013) by way of
crossed cheque/ electronic transfer subject to the following conditions:

 a. The loan is free
of interest and the minimum maturity of the loan is one year.

 b. The loan, though
in rupees, should be within the overall LRS limit of USD 2,50,000, per
financial year, available to the resident individual. It is the responsibility
of the lender to ensure that the amount of loan is within the LRS limit of USD
2,50,000 during the financial year.

 c. The loan should
be utilised for meeting the borrower’s personal requirements or for his own
business purposes in India.

 d. The loan should
not be utilised, either singly or in association with other person, for any of
the activities in which investment by persons resident outside India is
prohibited, namely;

–  the business of chit fund, or

–   Nidhi Company, or

–  agricultural or plantation activities or in
real estate business, or construction of farmhouses, or

trading in Transferable Development Rights
(TDRs).

 Explanation:
For this purpose, real estate business shall not include development of
townships, construction of residential / commercial premises, roads or bridges.

 e. The loan amount
should be credited to the NRO a/c of the NRI / PIO. Credit of such loan amount
may be treated as an eligible credit to NRO a/c.

 f.  The loan amount
shall not be remitted outside India.

g. Repayment of
loan shall be made by way of inward remittances through normal banking channels
or by debit to the Non-resident Ordinary (NRO) / Non-resident External (NRE) /
Foreign Currency Non-resident (FCNR) account of the borrower or out of the sale
proceeds of the shares or securities or immovable property against which such
loan was granted.

11.     The purpose of this article is to highlight the
major changes in the LRS which were brought about by Notification No. FEMA.
263/RB-2013 dated March 5, 2013 in respect of investment outside India,
Notification No. G.S.R. 426(E) dated May 26, 2015 issued by Ministry of Finance
in respect of limits under LRS and Notification No. FEMA. 341/2015-RB dated May
26, 2015 in respect of subsuming of limits under Current Account Transactions
Rules in a holistic manner. This apart, there could be some contentious issues.
However, in the absence of any official clarification, it may not be proper to
consider these.

Exports – Write-Off, Netting off Etc

Background

The
Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (“FEMA”) and Rules and Regulations issued
thereunder came in force from 1st June 2000. Since then, over last
16 years, they have undergone several changes.

Beginning
December 2015, RBI is issuing Revised Notifications in substitution of the
original Notifications issued on May 3, 2000. Previously, annually on July 1
RBI was issuing Master Circulars with shelf life of one year. In another
change, from January 1, 2016, most of the Master Circulars have been
discontinued and substituted with Master Directions (except in case of –
Foreign Investment in India, Money Transfer Service Scheme and Risk Management
and Inter-Bank Dealings). Unlike the Master Circulars, the Master Directions
will be updated on an ongoing basis, as and when any new Circular/Notification
is issued.
However, in case of any conflict between the relevant Notification and the
Master Direction, the relevant Notification will prevail.

Concept
and Scope

The
objective of this column is to revisit certain topics on a quarterly, covering
aspects or amendments in Rules or Regulations of FEMA (excluding the procedural
aspects) which may have practical significance for professional brethren. The
issues relating to write-off of export proceeds and some other issues connected
therewith are being discussed to begin with.

Export
of Goods and Services

Vide Notification No. FEMA
23(R)/2015-RB dated January 12, 2016, RBI notified Foreign Exchange Management
(Export of Goods and Services) Regulations, 2015. This Notification repeals and
substitutes Notification No. FEMA 23/2000-RB dated 3rd May 2000 which had
notified Foreign Exchange Management (Export of Goods and Services)
Regulations, 2000.

This
Article discusses the following aspects in the context of exports by domestic
tariff area units (i.e., units other than those located in SEZ).

1.  Reduction
in invoice value.

2.  Extension
of time.

3.  Write-off
of unrealised export bills.

4.  Set-off
of export receivables against import payables.

1.  Reduction in invoice value

a.  On
account of prepayment of usance bills

     Most
of the export transactions are on credit. Thus, the price negotiates also
includes certain credit period. However, sometimes the overseas importer may
desire to discharge purchase consideration before the due date if such
pre-payment is beneficial. The importer and the exporter negotiate the
consideration for such pre-payment. The consideration is generally linked to
the prevailing interest rates and the period and is by way of discount for
pre-payment by reduction in the invoice value.

     Presently,
in case of pre-payment, FEMA permits an Indian exporter to reduce the invoice
value by allowing cash discount equivalent to the interest on the unexpired
period of usance. This discount is to be calculated at the rate of interest
stipulated in the export contract. If such rate is not stipulated in the
contract, prime rate/LIBOR of the currency of invoice is to be applied.

b.  On
account of change of buyer / consignee

     Sometimes,
after the goods are shipped, it may so happen that the original buyer defaults
or does not pay for the goods. Having the goods shipped back to India will
result in substantial expenses.

     In
such case, the exporter may consider selling goods to another buyer. Therefore,
FEMA permits the exporter to transfer the goods to another buyer, whether in
the same country or any other country. Further, knowing the predicament of the
exporter, the new buyer will attempt to negotiate a lower price. Hence, for
change of buyer/consignee in such case, or selling the goods at a lower price,
the exporter is not required to obtain prior permission of RBI if the following
conditions are fulfilled.

i.  The
reduction in value of the invoice due to such change is not more than 25% of
the value of the original invoice.

ii.  The
export proceeds must be realised within 9 months from the date of export to the
original buyer/consignee.

     However,
prior permission of RBI is required if either of the above conditions are not
fulfilled. RBI may grant such permission provided:

i.   Exports
do not relate to export of commodities subject to floor price stipulations;

ii.  Exporter
is not on the exporters’ caution list of the Reserve Bank; and

iii.  Exporter
has surrendered proportionate export incentives availed of, if any.

c.  In
any other case
 

This
category covers cases of exporters who are in the business of export for more
than three years and cases of other exporters.

In
case of exporters who are in the business of export for more than three years,
banks may permit reduction in invoice value without any limit if: –

i.  Export
outstanding (excluding outstanding of exports made to countries facing
externalisation problems in cases where the buyers have made payments in local
currency) do not exceed 5% of the average annual export realisation during the
preceding three financial years.

ii.  Exports
do not relate to export of commodities subject to floor price stipulations.

iii.  Exporter
is not on the exporters’ caution list of the Reserve Bank.

iv. Exporter
has surrendered proportionate export incentives availed of, if any.
 

In
other cases, banks may permit reduction in invoice value if: –

i.   Reduction
does not exceed 25% of the value of invoice.

ii.  Exports
do not relate to export of commodities subject to floor price stipulations.

iii.  Exporter
is not on the exporters’ caution list of the Reserve Bank.

iv. Exporter
has surrendered proportionate export incentives availed of, if any.
 

If
an exporters case is not covered in either of the above situations, prior
permission of RBI needs to be obtained before reducing the value of invoice.

2.  Extension of time

Every
exporter of goods / software / services is required to realise and repatriate
the full value of exports (export proceeds) within nine months from the date of
export. In case of exports made to the exporter’s own warehouse outside India
the export proceeds must be realised within fifteen months from the date of
shipment of goods.

However,
many times it may not be possible to realise and repatriate the export proceeds
within the stipulated time. In such cases, banks are authorised to grant
extension of six months for realisation of export proceeds subject the
following conditions.

i. Export
transactions covered by the invoices are not under investigation by Directorate
of Enforcement/Central Bureau of Investigation or other investigating agencies.

ii.  Banks
are satisfied that the exporter has not been able to realise export proceeds
for reasons beyond his control.

iii.  Exporter
submits a declaration that the export proceeds will be realised during the
extended period.

iv. The
total outstanding of the exporter should not exceed US $ one million or 10% of
the average export realisations during the preceding three financial years,
whichever is higher. However, if the exporter has filed suits abroad against the buyer, extension can be granted by the banks irrespective of the amount
involved / outstanding.
 

If
an exporter’s case is not covered by any of the above situations, then
permission from concerned Regional
Office of RBI has to be obtained for extension of time for realization and
repatriation of export proceeds.

3.  Write-off of unrealised export bills

Some
stakeholders appear to be under an impression that pursuant to liberalisation,
permission of RBI is no longer required for writing off unrealised export
proceeds. In practice, this is not the case. Unrealised export proceeds only
within certain limit can be written off without obtaining prior permission from
RBI, while certain amounts can be written off only after obtaining prior
approval from RBI.

It
is pertinent to know that there are no specific provisions / formats with
respect to export of services that need to be complied with / submitted.
However, the general principles governing export of goods relating to export
realisation, etc. also apply to export of services.

Write-offs
may be full write-offs or partial write-offs. This may be necessary due to
several reasons such as, non-receipt of payment, early receipt of payment,
damage to goods in transit, export of goods of a different quality, etc.

a.  Write-off
due to non-receipt of payment

Sometimes,
it may not be possible for an exporter to realize the amounts due against the
export of goods / software / services. There may be varied reasons for this
non-realisation. In such cases the exporter is forced to write-off the
unrealised amount.

Depending
on the amount to be written off as well as certain other conditions, the
exporter can:

(a) write-off
the unrealised amount without obtaining permission from his bank or from RBI;
or

(b) approach
the bank which handled the relevant export documents and request permission to
write-off the unrealised amount; or

(c) approach
the concerned Regional Office of RBI through the bank which handled the
relevant export documents, for permission to write-off the unrealised amount.

To
qualify for write-off, either self write-off or otherwise: –

i.   The
unrealised amount must be outstanding for more than one year.

ii.  Exporter
must produce satisfactory documentary evidence to prove that he has made all
efforts to realise the unrealised amount.

iii.  Non-realisation
must be for one of the following reasons: –

a)  The overseas buyer is insolvent and a certificate
from the official liquidator indicating that there is no possibility of
recovery of export proceeds is obtained.

b)  The
overseas buyer is not traceable over a reasonably long period of time.

c)  The
goods exported have been auctioned or destroyed by the Port / Customs / Health
authorities in the importing country.

d)  The
unrealised amount represents the balance due in a case settled through the
intervention of the Indian Embassy, Foreign Chamber of Commerce or similar
Organization.

e)  The
unrealised amount represents the undrawn balance of an export bill (not
exceeding 10% of the invoice value) remaining outstanding and is unrealisable
despite all efforts made by the exporter.

f)   The
cost of resorting to legal action is disproportionate to the unrealised amount
of the export bill.

g)  The
exporter even after winning the Court case against the overseas buyer is not
able to execute the Court decree due to reasons beyond his control.

h)  Bills
were drawn for the difference between the letter of credit value and actual
export value or between the provisional and the actual freight charges but the
amounts have remained unrealised consequent on dishonor of the bills by the
overseas buyer and there are no prospects of realisation.

It
may be noted that adequate documentary evidence may be required to be provided
to substantiate the write-off.

Write-off
will not be permitted in the following cases: –

i.   Exports
have been made to countries with externalisation problem i.e. where the
overseas buyer has deposited the value of export in local currency but the
amount has not been allowed to be repatriated by the central banking
authorities of the country.

ii. Export
Declaration Form (EDF) is under investigation by agencies like, Enforcement
Directorate, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Central Bureau of
Investigation, etc.

iii.  Outstanding
bills which are subject matter of civil / criminal suit.

Limits for write-offs (by self or through bank permission)

 

 

Write-off”
by

Permitted write-off as a

% of the total export proceeds

realised during the

previous calendar year

Self “write-off” by an exporter (Other

than Status Holder Exporter)

5%

Self “write-off” by Status Holder

Exporters

10%

“Write-off” by Bank which handled the

export documents

10%

The limits stated above are
related to total export proceeds realised during the previous calendar year and
are cumulatively available in a year.

Before write-off is possible, the
exporter has to surrender the export incentives, if any, availed in respect of
the amount to be written-off and submit documents evidencing the same to the
bank.

Also, in case of self write-off,
the exporter has to submit to the bank, a Chartered Accountant’s certificate,
containing the following information: –

i.   Amount of export realisation in
the preceding calendar year.

ii.  Amount of write-off already
availed of during the current year, if any.

iii.  Details of the relevant EDF to
be written off.

iv. Details of invoice no., invoice
value, commodity exported, country of export.

v.  Surrender of export benefits, if
any, availed in respect of the amount to be written-off. 

Further, banks are required to
report the write-off of unrealised export proceeds (self-write-off or
otherwise) through EDPMS to RBI.

All cases of a write-off which are
not covered by the above criteria are to be referred to the concerned Regional
Office of RBI for its approval.

b. Write
off in cases of payment of claims by ECGC and private insurance companies
regulated by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA)

If though the Indian exporter had
not realised the export proceeds from the overseas buyer, but received the
corresponding amount from either ECGC or from an Insurance company, the bank
which handled the export documents can write-off the unrealised amount (without
any limit) after receiving an application along with supporting documentary
evidence from the exporter.

The surrender of export incentives
will be as provided in the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP). However, the amount so
realised / recovered from ECGC / insurance company by the Indian exporter will
not be treated as export realisation in foreign exchange.

c.  Write-off
relaxation

In case of write-off other than
self-write-off, realisation of export proceeds will not be insisted upon under
any of the Export Promotion Schemes that are covered under FTP if: –

i.  RBI / bank has permitted the
write off on the basis of merits, as per extant guidelines.

ii.  The exporter produces a
certificate from the Foreign Mission of India concerned, about the fact of
non-recovery of export proceeds from the buyer.

In such case the Indian exporter
is not required to surrender the export incentives that have been availed by
him against such exports.

4.  Netting off of export receivables against
import payables

At the outset, ONLY units in SEZs
are permitted to net off export receivables against import payments.

It may be noted that imports and
exports from group entities cannot be internally netted. Netting off can only
be done in cases where import / export is from / to the same entities i.e. the
two parties must be debtors and creditors of each other and not of their other
group entities.

An exporter is permitted to
set-off his export receivable against his import payable subject to the
following: –

i.   Export / import transactions
are not with ACU countries.

ii.  Set-off of export receivables against
import payments are in respect of the same overseas buyer and supplier.

iii.  Consent for set-off has been
obtained from the overseas buyer and seller.

iv. Import is as per the Foreign
Trade Policy.

v.  Invoices / Bills of Lading /
Airway Bills and Exchange Control copies of Bills of Entry for home consumption
have been submitted by the importer to the bank.

vi. Payment for the import is still
outstanding in the books of the importer.

   vii. All the relevant documents have been submitted to the bank which will have to comply with all the regulatory requirements relating to the transactions.

Overseas Direct Investments – Write-Off of Investment

BACKGROUND
The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (“FEMA”) and Rules and Regulations issued thereunder came into force from 1st June, 2000. Since then, over last 16 years, they have undergone several changes.

Beginning December 2015, RBI is issuing Revised Notifications in substitution of the original Notifications issued on May 3, 2000. Previously, annually on July 1,  RBI was issuing Master Circulars with shelf life of one year. In another change, from January 1, 2016, most of the Master Circulars have been discontinued and substituted with Master Directions (except in case of – Foreign Investment in India and Risk Management and Inter-Bank Dealings). Unlike the Master Circulars, the Master Directions will be updated on an ongoing basis, as and when any new Circular / Notification is issued. However, in case of any conflict between the relevant Notification and the Master Direction, the relevant Notification will prevail.

CONCEPT AND SCOPE
The issues relating to write-off of investments in overseas subsidiary / joint venture entity and some other issues connected therewith are being discussed in this article.

OVERSEAS DIRECT INVESTMENT
Vide Notification No. FEMA 120/RB-2004 dated July 7, 2004, RBI notified the revised Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of any Foreign Security) Regulations, 2004. This Notification repealed and substituted Notification No FEMA 19/2000-RB dated 3rd May 2000 which had notified Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of any Foreign Security) Regulations, 2000.

The purpose of this Notification is to regulate acquisition and transfer of a foreign security by a person resident in India i.e. investment (or financial commitment) by Indian entities in overseas joint ventures and / or wholly owned subsidiaries. This Notification also regulates investment by a person resident in India in shares and securities issued outside India. Updated provisions in this regard are contained in FED Master Direction No. 15/2015-16.

This article discusses the following aspects in the context of overseas investment made by an Indian party in the shares of an overseas entity.

1.    Restructuring of the balance sheet of the overseas entity involving write off of capital and receivables.
2.    Sale of shares in a WOS / JV involving write off of the investment (or financial commitment).

1.    Restructuring of the balance sheet of the overseas entity involving write off of capital and receivables

Almost all businesses suffer teething troubles and have a gestation period during which it will generally incur losses. However, over time, the business comes on track and also recoups the initial losses. Indeed, in some cases it may happen that despite the best efforts of the Indian party, the business continues to suffer losses and may require restructuring. Such instances are increasingly noticed in the post-2008 period which is marked by global economic turmoil.

If appropriate corrective action is not taken at the appropriate time, it may not only affect the viability and continuity of the business but the overseas entity may become sick and be in an irrecoverable situation although the business may have good potential. In such cases, the possible solution could be to restructure the balance sheet of the overseas entity by setting-off the past losses against the paid-up capital and reserves. However, this would also require the shareholders to write down their investment in the overseas entity.

In this background, in 2011 RBI amended Notification No. FEMA 120/RB-2004 and inserted Regulation 16A which permits the Indian Party (investors / promoters) to undertake restructuring of the overseas entity. Regulation 16A permits write-off of investment as well as receivables subject to compliance with certain conditions.

Such write off is permitted in case of both Wholly Owned Subsidiary (WOS) of the Indian Party or a Joint Venture (JV) of the Indian Party along with overseas investor(s). However, in case of a JV, the write-off is permitted only if the Indian Party holds at least 51% stake in the JV.

What can be written-off

The Indian Party can write-off the following investments / dues from the foreign entity: –
1.    Equity share capital.
2.    Preference share capital.
3.    Loans given.
4.    Royalty
5.    Technical knowhow fees.
6.    Management fees.

Available Routes for restructuring and write-off

This restructuring and write-off can be done either under the Automatic Route or under the Approval Route. The maximum amount that can be written-off under the Automatic Route as well as the Approval Route is 25% of the equity investment made by the Indian Party in the overseas WOS / JV.

AUTOMATIC ROUTE
A company listed on a recognised stock exchange in India can avail of the Automatic Route. The Indian Party is required to report the write-off / restructuring to RBI, through the designated AD Category-I Bank within 30 days of the write-off/restructuring.

APPROVAL ROUTE
An unlisted Indian Party can write-off / restructure its investment / receivables in overseas WOS / JV only after obtaining prior approval of RBI. It will need to apply to RBI, through the designated AD Category-I Bank.

Documents to be submitted
Both under the Automatic Route as well as the Approval Route, the Indian Party is required to submit the following documents together with its application.

a)    A certified copy of the balance sheet showing the loss in the overseas WOS/JV set up by the Indian Party.
b)    Projections for the next five years indicating benefit accruing to the Indian company consequent to such write off / restructuring.

2.    Sale of shares in a WOS/JV involving write off of the investment (or financial commitment)

Depending upon the business exigencies, an Indian Party may consider selling its shares in the overseas WOS / JV. Regulation 16(1) grants general permission to an Indian Party to disinvest the shares subject to certain conditions if the sale does not result in any loss.

However, it is not necessary that the sale will always result in profit. Hence, RBI has granted general permission for disinvestment of shares by an Indian Party where such disinvestment results in a loss. It may be noted that the computation of ‘loss’ in case of Notification No. FEMA 120/RB-2004 is distinct from that the computation of ‘loss’ in terms of the Income-tax Act, 1961. For FEMA purpose, the ‘loss’ is to be understood as realisation of disinvestment proceeds of shares which are less than the investment made. Thus, there would be a ‘loss’ when the disinvestment proceeds on the sale of shares are lower than the amount paid at the time of purchase of shares.

Again, disinvestment by an Indian Party in its overseas WOS / JV, resulting in a loss or write-off on investment, can be either under the Automatic Route or the Approval Route.

AUTOMATIC ROUTE
The Indian Party can avail the Automatic Route if it complies with any of the following four criteria.

1.    The overseas JV / WOS is listed on a stock exchange outside India.
2.    The Indian Party is listed on a stock exchange in India and it has net worth of not less than Rs. 100 crores.
3.    The Indian Party is listed on a stock exchange in India, it has net worth of less than Rs. 100 crores but investment in the overseas JV / WOS does not exceed US $ 10 million.
4.    The Indian Party is unlisted and the investment in the overseas entity does not exceed US $ 10 million.

Once the Indian Party qualifies under any of the aforementioned criteria, it will need to comply with the following conditions.

a.    If the shares of the overseas JV / WOS are listed, the sale should be effected through the stock exchange.

b.    If the shares of the overseas JV / WOS are not listed and they are disinvested by a private arrangement, the share price should not be less than the value certified by a Chartered Accountant / Certified Public Accountant as the fair value of the shares based on the latest audited financial statements of the JV / WOS.

c.    The Indian Party should not have any outstanding dues by way of dividend, technical know-how fees, royalty, consultancy, commission or other entitlements and / or export proceeds from the JV or WOS.

d.    The overseas concern should have been in operation for at least one full year and the Annual Performance Report together with the audited accounts for that year must have been submitted to RBI.

e.    The Indian Party is not under investigation by CBI / DoE/ SEBI / IRDA or any other regulatory authority in India.

f.    The Indian Party should submit details of such disinvestment through its Bank in Part III of Form ODI within 30 days from the date of disinvestment.

g.    Sale proceeds should be repatriated to India within 90 days from the date of sale of the shares / securities.

APPROVAL ROUTE

If an Indian Party does not satisfy the criteria / conditions mentioned above, it should obtain prior approval from RBI for undertaking divestment in its overseas WOS / JV.

SPECIFIC WINDOW IN CASE OF A LISTED COMPANY HAVING EXPORTS

In addition, Regulation 171 provides another window for write-off in case of a listed company. Thus, if the proceeds realised by an Indian Party listed on any stock exchange in India from sale of shares or security referred to in Regulation 16 (1)2  are less than the amount invested in the shares or security transferred, the Indian Party may write off the differential amount if such differential amount does not exceed the percentage approved by the RBI, from time to time, of the Indian Party’s actual export realization of the previous year.

If, however, the differential amount is more than the percentage approved by RBI from time to time, of the Indian Party’s actual export realisation of the previous year, prior permission of RBI would be required for write-off.

SIGNING OFF
As pointed out above, transfer by way of sale of shares of a JV / WOS outside India as well as restructuring of the balance sheet of JV/WOS involving write-off of capital and receivables, requires fulfillment of various conditions and also involves various compliances. It would be prudent to examine the facts carefully and in appropriate cases, wherever applicable, apply to the RBI for permission which may be granted subject to such conditions as the RBI may consider appropriate.

1    It may be noted that while Notification No. FEMA 120/RB-2004 includes Regulation 17, Master Direction No. 15/2015-16 on investment in JV/WOS does not make any mention thereof.
2    While Regulation 17 mentions Regulation 16(1), it also mentions “for a price less than the amount invested in the shares or security transferred”. A case where sale proceeds are less than investment is within the ambit of Regulation 16(1A) and not within the ambit of Regulation 16(1). Hence, Regulation 16(1) should be read as Regulation 16(1A).