Arjun : (to himself) “Oh God! They have revised the Code of Ethics. We don’t know the basic Code itself! Putting more and more burden on us”. Let Bhagwan come. I will get it clarified.
(Chants) – Hey Shrikrishna, Hey Shrikrishna
Shrikrishna : (enters) Arey Arjun, what are you thinking about? Whether the ITR last date will be extended?
Arjun : No, Lord. We have now become insensitive to such issues! Last many years we only begged for extensions. Things will never improve.
Shrikrishna : Then why were you waiting for me to come?
Arjun : See Lord. We CAs are already overburdened. In that, they keep on revising our Code of Ethics. I am told, they have inserted some new clause of misconduct in Second Schedule. What is that?
Shrikrishna : I don’t know whether basically you know the distinction between First and Second Schedule.
Arjun : Lord, I knew it, but forgot.
Shrikrishna : First Schedule contains those clauses that affect you CAs among yourselves. Normally, an outsider is not adversely affected by these items of misconduct. This is the only revision in the schedules.
Arjun : That is why they say, it is of lesser gravity.
Shrikrishna : True. Therefore, punishments prescribed for 1st schedule are much milder as compared to Second Schedule misconduct.
Arjun : Tell me, what is this new clause.
Shrikrishna : Arjun, you are aware of the very familiar item of misconduct – of non-communication with previous auditor.
Arjun : Yes, very much! Many of us try to avoid that communication.
Shrikrishna : That is item (8) of Part I of 1st Schedule. Immediately following item (9) is to ensure that when there is a change in auditor, the provisions of company Law be compiled with.
Arjun : Yes, I know.
Shrikrishna : But surprisingly, there was no express item that mandates the compliance of Company Law provisions while performing the audit.
Arjun : I feel, that was implied. Had he breached the provisions, it would have been a gross negligence. Isn’t it?
Shrikrishna : True. But they have now made it explicit.
Arjun : I don’t understand the object behind this new clause.
Shrikrishna : Arjun, the objective is to uphold the sanctity of the audit process and the statutory obligations attached to the role of an auditor as mentioned under the Companies Act.
Arjun : In short, what was implicit, they have made it explicit. But Lord, my query is why only under Companies Act? Why not similar provisions for audits under other Acts? Like Co-operative societies, Charitable Trusts.
Shrikrishna : Arjun, you have made a very valued point. I agree that the Auditor must act accordingly to the provisions of the respective law under which he is doing the audit.
Arjun : Lord, there are quite a few other revisions in the Code. Just now I am busy with July ITR; but next time tell me about other important changes.
Shrikrishna : One more point, Arjun. Please note that the new clause (5) that we discussed is in Second Schedule, Part I. So its seriousness is more; as an outsider may get aggrieved by your non-compliances.
Arjun : Yes, Lord, that’s a point. Thank you.
“OM SHANTI”
(This dialogue is based on the newly inserted item no. (5) in Part I of Second Schedule. It reads as follows:
‘acts as an auditor of the company in contravention of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013’).