Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

Society News

fiogf49gjkf0d
Lecture Meeting on Corporate Governance – recent
updates including amendments to Clause 49 of Listing Agreement on 27th
August 2014


L to R : Mr. Somasekhar Sundaresan (Speaker), Mr. Raman Jokhakar, Mr. Nitin Shingala (President), Mr. Jayant Thakur

The
lecture meeting was held at the Walchand Hirachand Hall, IMC. Mr.
Somasekhar Sundaresan, Advocate, addressed the audience on the recent
updates including amendments to Clause 49 of Listing Agreement on
Corporate Governance. More than 250 members benefited from the expert
analysis and knowledge shared by the speaker.

Advanced FEMA Conference on 6th September 2014


L
to R : Mr. Nitin Shingala (President), Mr. Gaurang Gandhi, Mr. Naresh
Ajwani, Mr. Dilip Thakkar, Mr. G. Padmanabhan (Speaker), Mr. Paras
Savla, Mr. C.D Srinivasan (Speaker), Mr. Gautam Nayak, and Mr. Hinesh
Doshi.

The International Taxation Committee of the Society
organised this Conference jointly with The Chamber of Tax Consultants.
The Conference was held at Rangaswar Hall, Y B Chavan Pratisthan. The
objective of the Conference was to offer insight into advanced level
issues on cross border transactions & intricacies involved and to
understand the RBI’s perspective on these developments.

Officials
from RBI, including Mr. G. Padmanabhan, Executive Director and Mr. C.D.
Srinivasan, Chief General Manager along with General Managers, Mr. A.
O. Basheer, Mr. Ajay Vij, Ms. Jayasree Gopalan, Ms. Tuli Roy and Ms.
Rajani Prasad responded to the questions raised by the participants at
the Conference.

The following topics were discussed at the conference:

BCAS
and CTC raised a number of concerns which are causing difficulties
under FEMA. The officials appreciated these concerns and gave an
assurance that they would be addressed. They also expressed their
concerns to the delegates. They advised the participants to look at the
spirit of the law and not just the letter of the law, to avoid lapses
under FEMA.

143 participants attended and benefited from the Conference.

Lecture
Meeting on Auditors Dilemma – Reporting requirements on Internal
Financial Controls as required under the Companies Act, 2013 and Clause
49 of the Listing Agreement on 10th September 2014


Mr. Vishwanath Venkatraman (Speaker)

The
lecture meeting was held at Walchand Hirachand Hall, IMC. Mr.
Vishwanath Venkatramanan, Chartered Accountant addressed the audience on
various aspects of Reporting requirements on Internal Financial
Controls as required under the Companies Act, 2013 and Clause 49 of
Listing agreement and section 134 of the Companies Act 2013. He also
shared his vast experience and perspective on the same. More than 150
members benefited from the expert analysis and knowledge shared by the
speaker.

Monsoon Trek on 13th September 2014


Participants of Monsoon Trek

The
BCAS Youth Group, under the aegis of the Membership and Public
Relations and Human Resources Committee of the Society organised a
Monsoon Trek for Chartered Accountants and their families along the
Jummapatti-Bekere trail near Bhivpuri, Karjat. Attended by 44
participants, the trek saw equal representation from industry and
practice, from the seniors and the youth and from men and women.
Participants enjoyed the easy walk through the lush greenery. They also
got the opportunity to network with different segments of the
profession.

18th International Tax & Finance Conference, 2014


L
to R : Mr. T. N. Manoharan(Speaker), Mr. Deepak Kanabar, Mr. Deepak
Shah, Mr. Nitin Shingala (President), Mr. Gautam Nayak, Mr. Raman
Jokhakar, Mr. Rajesh Shah

The 18th Residential International Tax
& Finance Conference which was organised by the International
Taxation Committee from 14th August 2014 to 17th August 2014 at ITC
Grand Chola, Chennai, received an enthusiastic response from over 190
participants from over 20 cities of India including Hyderabad,
Bangalore, Chennai,

Coimbatore, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Pune, Goa, Secunderabad, Jamnagar, Kolkatta, Mumbai and even Dubai.

The
Conference was inaugurated by Padamshree T. N. Manoharan, Past
President of ICAI who addressed the participants on the Role,
Opportunities and Challenges for the Chartered Accountants. His address
included inspiring anecdotes, analytical insights and subtle humor.


Mr. Pinakin Desai

Papers for Group Discussion:


Case studies on International Taxation (including royalty and Capital
Gains) by Shri P. D. Desai who dealt with issues relating to capital
gains on indirect transfers, treaty residence, GAAR, etc.. He also
presented case studies on Liquidation, Distributions and subsequent
disposals, Royalty Taxation, Source Rule, MFN impact, beneficial
ownership and Tax implications of Participation Arrangements.


Mr. T.P. Ostwal (Speaker)


Tax Challenges in Digital Economy- OECD Draft (BEPS Action 1) by Shri
T.P. Ostwal, who analysed the emerging developments in information
technology and international taxation regime. He presented business
models in digital economy and discussed opportunity in and tackling of
BEPS in digital technology. Further, he identified the tax challenges
raised by digital economy and the methods dealing with them.


Case Studies on structuring Outbound (Investment – Tax & Regulatory
Aspects) by Shri Pranav N. Sayta, who presented intricate case studies
involving issues such as acquisition of overseas entity, tax efficient
structures for such acquisition, Indian Exchange Control Regulations,
Tax Credits, Demergers, etc.


Mr. Yogesh Thar (Speaker)


Current Issues in Transfer Pricing (including Domestic Transfer
Pricing) by Shri Yogesh A. Thar, who covered issues relating to
international and domestic transfer pricing in great detail along with
practical examples and solutions covering issues relating to Equity
Infusions Transactions, Business Transfers, Common Cost Allocations,
Real Estate Transactions, Director’s Remuneration, Partner’s
Remuneration, etc.

Papers For Presentation:


Mr. Dilip Sheth (Speaker)


Prevention of Money Laundering Act – overview and impact by Shri Dilip
Sheth, who covered issues relating to property, scheduled offences,
transfer, procedural provisions and rules along with important issues
decided by the courts.


Mr. Gautam Doshi (Speaker)


Exchange Risk Management (Commercial, Regulatory and Tax aspects) by
Shri Gautam Doshi, who dealt with various types of Forex transactions,
Call and Put options, swaps, hedge, with practical examples.

The
participants gained handsomely from the knowledge and experience shared
by eminent faculties, group discussions and informal interactions. The
audience also appreciated the overall ambience and comfort at the venue.

levitra

Society News

fiogf49gjkf0d
Lecture Meeting on Issues in Taxation of Corporates and Shareholders on 25th July by Pinakin Desai


The lecture meeting was held at the K.C. College Auditorium, Churchgate. Mr. Pinakin Desai, Chartered Accountant addressed the audience on recent issues in taxation of corporates and shareholders viz., Dividend Distribution Tax, Capital gains taxation, Taxation of gifts and many more topics. More than 200 members benefited from the expert analysis and knowledge shared by the speaker. The presentation and video of the lecture is available at www.bcasonline.org & www.bcasonline.tv, respectively, for the benefit of all.

Lecture Meeting on Auditor’s Report – Recent Standards on Auditing developments, fraud reporting and other issues on 6th August 2014 by Khurshed Pastakia

The lecture meeting was held at the Walchand Hirachad Hall, IMC. Mr. Khurshed Pastakia, Chartered Accountant addressed the audience and shared his insights in respect to recent SA developments, fraud reporting and other issues from the view point of Auditors. More than 300 members and students benefited from the views shared by the speaker. The presentation and video of the lecture is available at www.bcasonline.org & www.bcasonline.tv, respectively, for the benefit of members and Web TV Subscribers.

Tree Plantation – Visit to Dharampur – 1st & 2nd August 2014

A two Day visit to Dharampur was organised by the Human Resources Committee of the Society with the help of “Vanpath Trust” (A Gandhian philosophy based NGO, at Bilpudi-), founded by Shri Bhikhubhai Vyas & Smt. Kokilaben Vyas. The couple has dedicated their entire life for upliftment of Tribals of Dharampur & thereby promoting the rural economic development from all perspective like Education/Health/Agriculture/Water management/ Environment among others. The 20 Participants planted saplings at Bilpudi in their pursuit to support the environment and take steps towards the “Green” initiative. The participants visited Shrimad Mission Ashram and a school at Matuniya Village in Kaparada Taluka.

Workshop on How to Conduct a Tax Audit on 8th August 2014

The Taxation Committee of the Society organised this



Workshop at Navinbhai Thakkar Auditorium, Vile Parle. The objective of the Workshop was to enable the participants to conduct the Tax Audits effectively keeping the relevant tax provisions and controversies in mind.

The Following Topics were discussed:

At the end of the Workshop a Brain Trust session was held where CA. Anil Sathe & CA. Himanshu Kishnadwala answered the queries to the satisfaction of the participants. 530 participants attended and benefited from the Workshop.

Workshop on “Procedures and Practical experiences in representing before CESTAT and Sales Tax Tribunal Practice” on 9th August 2014

The Indirect Taxes & Allied Laws Committee of the Society jointly with Youth Group organised this workshop followed by Moot Court at Walchand Hirachad Hall, IMC. The aim of the workshop was to encourage young talent and provide a platform to newly qualified Chartered Accountants and aspiring CA students to present their advocacy and presentation skills.

Seminar on Mind (Brain) Power on 9th August 2014

The Human Resources Committee of the Society organised this Seminar at BCAS Office. Mr. Bhupesh Dave, Trainer took the participants through the sessions by the mode of practical and real life examples.

levitra

Society News

fiogf49gjkf0d
8th Residential Study Course on Service Tax & VAT


Mr. Naushad A. Panjwani (President) lighting the lamp

The Indirect tax and Allied Laws Committee of BCAS conducted its 8th Refresher Study Course on Service tax and VAT at Khanvel Resort, Silvassa from Friday, 13th June to Sunday, 15th June, 2014. Total 138 delegates attended, out of which 56 participants were from cities other than Mumbai viz., Pune, Nashik, Aurangabad, Jalgaon, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, Chennai, Delhi, Gurgaon, Agra, Jaipur, etc. It was inaugurated at the hands of the President Mr. Naushad A. Panjwani.

There were five papers – three discussion papers and two presentation papers as under:

Lecture Meeting – The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013 on 4th June, 2014

The meeting was held at the Lotus Hall of Society’s Office. The Speakers were Senior Associate/Team Leader Mr. Abhijeet Sonawane, Solicitor, Senior Associate/Team Leader Ms. Viloma Shah, and Associate Ms. Tanisha Doshi.

The speakers explained the new Act which was enacted w.e.f. 9th December 2013. With Power Point Presentation, they covered important definitions viz. Sexual Harassment, Aggrieved Woman, who are covered under this Act, Responsibilities of the Employers.The speakers laid emphasis on formation of Internal Committee, comprising of the Independent Woman, and three other members. They also explained the importance of laying down policy guidelines, conducting appropriate training sessions and educating the members.In the interactive session, they addressed many questions from the audience.

In the opening remark, the President explained the relevance of the topic referring to the guidelines laid down in the judgement in Vishakha’s case.

Participants appreciated the relevance of the topic and felt it important to spread the qualitative education and awareness on the subject in the business environment.

Power Summit – Networking within and across Professions on 6th & 7th June, 2014


L to R : Ms. Nandita P. Parekh, Mr. Uday V. Sathaye, Mr. Narendra P. Sarda, Mr. Naushad A. Panjwani (President)

A 2-day Summit was organised by the 4i Committee of BCAS. The objective of the Power Summit was to bring together leaders of accounting firms to discuss and debate the changing paradigm of the profession and to explore whether the time for cross functional professional firms/ companies has indeed arrived. The Summit was for professional firms that want to contemplate growth through mergers, consolidation and networking and through strategic thinking and pro-active initiatives. CFO Round Table on 6th June 2014 The CFO Round Table was a unique event organised by the Managing Committee of the Society. The programme was sponsored by BCA Journal & Godrej Properties. The objective of the programme was to look at how CFOs being in the hot seat can better prepare themselves for what the future holds, and how they prepare themselves with effective risk management strategies, proper corporate governance, as well as a crystal ball to predict how an ever-changing landscape will impact the industry. Some of the Comments received are shared below:


L to R : Mr. Gautam Doshi, Mr. Naushad A. Panjwani (President), Mr. Y. H. Malegam, Mr. Nitin Shingala

• The session was very informative and I would have liked if Mr. Doshi could have spoken longer. Unfortunately, I cannot attend a similar workshop in Lonavala due to some prior commitments. Kindly let me know whether the literature discussed in this event can be made available. Thank you, Best Regards – Arnab Chakraborti, Head – Operations, Kotak Commodity Services Ltd.

• Thanks. It was my pleasure and honour to be part of the forum – Manish Jani, Great Ship Global

• Thank you for inviting me for the CFO Round Table. I benefitted greatly by listening to Gautam Bhai. Regards Sanjay Khetan, Khetan & Co.

• It was my pleasure to participate in the summit & meet with you & your colleagues. I am happy I was able to contribute to the event & learned quite a few things from other distinguished speakers as well as from the interactions at the CFO forum. All the best for BCA’s future programmes. Warm regards, Uday Phadke, Principal Advisor (Finance), Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.

• It was a good experience Mr. Panjwani and look forward to further interactions. Would be glad if the presentations can be made available. Thanks & Regards Smriti Vijay, AKER Solutions

• Very happy to be with all of you – Shailesh Haribhakti, Chairman, DH Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

• Thanks for the invite and it was really a great value add in listening to these eminent speakers – Sunil Burde, Pidilite Co.

• It was indeed a good opportunity for me to present in BCAJ, one of the premier association of our profession, for the discussion on Companies Act, 2013. Hope this continues in years to come. Regards Nambi Rajan, Thirumalia Chemicals.

BCAS Referencer 2014-15 Release Function, 7th June, 2014

Membership & Public Relations Committee organised the BCAS Referencer 2014-15 Release function. The Referencer was released at the hands of the Society’s President Mr. Naushad Panjwani. This year the Referencer is being released in two parts. The Supplement and CD will be released in August 2014 after the presentation of the Union Budget, 2014.

levitra

Society News

fiogf49gjkf0d
Seminar on Current Issues in International Taxation on 16th October 2014

L to R : Mr. Nitin P. Shingala (President), Mr. Mayur Desai, Prof. Mr. Kees Vaan Raad (Speaker), Prof. Dr. Michael Lang (Speaker), and Mr. Rashmin Sanghvi.

BCAS, jointly with CTC, organised a Seminar on International Taxation at the Status Hotel, Mumbai.

In the first Technical session, Prof. Dr. Michael Lang, Head of the
Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law of WU, Vienna
University of Economics and Business, deliberated on the subject of
“Impact of BEPS on Tax Treaties”. He explained that G20 has initiated an
action plan against Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) in respect
of avoidance of taxes by the MNCs who shift their profits/activities to a
low or no tax jurisdictions through dubious structuring and sham
transactions. The OECD, under the instruction from G20, has issued
series of action plans on various aspects of BEPS with possible
solutions. According to Prof. Lang mere changes in OECD Commentary to
address BEPS issue may not be sufficient unless countries make changes
in their bilateral tax treaties incorporating specific anti-abuse
provisions such as Limitation of Benefit (LOB) Article. He expressed
concern over the speed with which OECD is attempting to implement action
plans on BEPS. The Action Plan on “Preventing Granting Treaty Benefits”
may increase complexities. In the second Technical session, Prof. Kees
Van Raad, Chairman of the International Tax Center Leiden and Director
of the Leiden Adv LLM Program in International Tax Law, spoke on “Future
of Source Country Taxation of Active Business Income”.

Prof.
Raad discussed at length the origin of the concept of Permanent
Establishment (PE), attribution of profits to PE and its relevance or
otherwise in today’s digital world. Prof. Raad opined that there is a
gross misunderstanding as to where the profits are made, i.e., value is
created especially when sale is made in a country other than where
innovation and production takes place. Thresholds of
physical/project/agency PE are no more relevant in today’s digital
world. In any case PE was meant to be only a threshold. Perhaps we need
to relook at the entire concept of PE, he added. He said that splitting
of profits of an integrated internationally operating enterprise is
never going to be an easy task. May be then, the world needs to take the
difficult road the European Commission is walking with its Common
Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) proposal.

Intensive Workshop on Internal Financial Control as required under the Companies Act, 2013 on 17th& 18th October 2014

Mr. Y. M. Kale (Keynote Speaker)


L to R: Mr. Shivkumar Muthukrishnan (Speaker), Mr. Rajesh Muni, Mr. Y. M. Kale (Keynote Speaker), Mr. Harish Motiwalla, Mr. Himanshu Vasa, and Mr. Nitin Singhala (President).

This intensive workshop organised by the Accounting & Auditing Committee deliberated on various aspects of Internal Financial Control and helped the participants to better understand the various facets involved in developing the IFC which included:

  • scoping and materiality considerations,
  • identification of processes and sub processes,
  • design of control framework and mapping them to an acceptable control framework,
  • preparing test plans,
  • sampling strategy,
  • evaluations of controls etc.

The keynote address was delivered by Mr. Y. M. Kale. The faculties for this workshop were Ms. Preeti Dani and Mr. Shivkumar Muthukrishnan.

National Conference on Companies Act-2013 on 18th October 2014

The BCAS in association with the Federation of Andhra Pradesh Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FAPCCI) conducted a National Conference on The Companies Act, 2013 on 18th October, 2014 at Hyderabad where the following Topics were covered:


L to R : Mr. Anil Reddy Vennam, Mr. Harish Motiwalla, Mr. Mr. Abhay Kumar Jain, Mr. Shiv Kumar Rungta, Mr. C. Murali Krishna and Mr. Nitin Shingala (President)

Mr. Shiv Kumar Rungta, President, FAPCCI mentioned that Corporate Governance is an issue of vital interest to the business community and with the passage of the new Companies Act, 2013, there is now a larger focus on corporate governance. Every Director, whether independent/ non independent, executive/non-executive has a distinct role in the functioning of the company. It is only when the entire board functions effectively which results to good corporate governance and benefit minority as well as majority shareholder in the long term.

Mr. Nitin Shingala, President, BCAS also lauded the legislation of the Companies Act, 2013 and compared some of the provisions of the Act with the Sarbanes Oxley Act. Mr. Abhay Kumar Jain, Chairman, Corporate Laws, Legal and IPR Committee of FAPPCI was happy that the Joint National Conference by FAPPCI and BCAS is a momentous event and a first of its kind collaboration where both the industry and professionals have come together on a common platform which has given an opportunity to understand, work and perform the respective roles efficiently.

Mr. V. S. Raju, Advisor and Past President of FAPCCI introduced the keynote speaker Mr. Murali Krishna. The Keynote Speaker said that the Concept of True and Fair which was earlier restricted to the auditor has now been made the responsibility of the management. He also touched upon various other issues such as Internal Audit, Selection, Appointment and Rotation of auditors, Schedule III, Depreciation, Share Application Money, Independent Directors and Deposits. He felt that creating Jobs is the biggest Corporate Social Responsibility, Creating job is connected to every factor of the Economy, the GDP factor, the wellness factor or the human satisfaction index etc. He suggested for spending more on the employee, so that in turn they will spend into the economy and the whole economic system blooms and blossoms.

Lecture Meeting on International & Domestic Transfer Pricing – Recent Developments on 5th November 2014


Mr. T.P. Ostwal (Speaker)

This lecture meeting was held at the Walchand Hirachand Hall, IMC, Churchgate, Mumbai. Mr. T. P. Ostwal, Chartered Accountant shared his experience on the recent developments in International & Domestic Transfer Pricing with regards to Finance Bill 2014. He also explained the key challenges of the amendments with relevant case studies. More than 275 members gained immensely from the knowledge of the speaker. The presentation and video of the lecture is available at www.bcasonline.org&www. bcasonline.tv, respectively, for the benefit of all.

Workshop on Tax Audit (Advanced) on 8th November 2014

L to R : Mr. Kishore Karia, Mr. Ameet Patel (Speaker), Mr. Nitin Shingala (President), Mr. Mukund Chitale (Speaker) and Ms. Saroj Maniar

The Taxation Committee of the Society organised this Workshop at the Walchand Hirachand Hall, IMC, Churchgate, Mumbai. The objective of the workshop was to address the critical aspects of tax audits and the responsibilities of tax auditors with regards to the revised Forms for Tax Audit issued by the CBDT in July 2014, due to which the reporting requirements have escalated dramatically and several practical issues have arisen. The Following Topics were covered at the workshop:

levitra

Society News

fiogf49gjkf0d
Workshop on NBFC Regulations on 26th September, 2014


L to R : Mr. Raman Jokhakar, Mr. Renganathan Bashyam (Speaker), Mr. Rajesh Muni, Mr. Abhay Mehta.

The Accounting & Auditing Committee of the Society organised this Workshop at the Society’s Office. The objective of this Workshop was to sharpen the skills of participants in this specialised area of NBFCs. Besides this, the Workshop created awareness amongst the young entrants to the profession regarding the professional opportunities available in the NBFC sector.

The following topics were covered at the Workshop:

59 participants attended and benefited from the Workshop.

Lecture Meeting on Success in CA Exams by CA. Mayur Nayak on 1st October 2014

Mr. Mayur B. Nayak (Speaker)

Lecture Meeting on “Related Party Transactions– harmonising and reporting under various statutes” by CA. Gautam Doshi on 8th October, 2014


L to R : Mr. Gautam Doshi (Speaker), Mr. Raman Jokhakar, Mr. Nitin Shingala (President), Mr. Mukesh Trivedi.

Advanced Workshop on Professional Writing Skills on 11th October, 2014

The Infotech & 4i Committee of the Society organised this Workshop at the Society’s Office. The objective of the Workshop was to enhance the writing skills for aspiring writers with a focus on professional writing.


L to R : Mr. Nitin Shingala (President), Mr. Anil Sathe (Speaker), Mr. Ameet Patel, Mr. Shreyas Trivedi.

The following topics were covered at the Workshop:


35 participants attended and benefited from the Workshop.

Half-day Workshop on SEBI/Securities laws for Chartered Accountants – Introduction to Basic Concepts, important Regulations, Penalties/ Settlement and Clause 49 on 17th October 2014.


Mr. Jayant Thakur (Speaker), Mr. Sharad Abhyankar (Speaker)

The Corporate and Securities Laws Committee of the Society held its maiden workshop at Babubhai Chinai Hall, IMC, Churchgate, Mumbai on Securities Laws to present Chartered Accountants in practice and industry to this rapidly developing field.


Mr. Shailesh Bathiya (Speaker), Ms. Shailashri Bhaskar (Speaker)

Mr. Jayant Thakur presented a detailed overview of the law, regulations, guidelines, etc., highlighting recent developments. He drew attention to many recent court/SAT/ SEBI decisions and issues of concern to CAs and listed companies. Mr. Sharad Abhyankar took participants through the history of Takeover and Insider Trading Regulations. He explained important concepts in the regulations, relevant milestones, compliance and substantive issues and certain recent developments. Mr. Shailesh Bathiya provided a meticulous analysis of the new Clause 49. Highlighting the old clause, the amendments made to it in April 2014 and also the most recent amendments of September 2014, he also explained how the compliances of listed companies generally and the job of independent directors specifically has become very difficult. Ms. Shailashri Bhaskar provided a detailed analysis of the latest Regulations of 2014 relating to settlement of penalties and compounding. She led the participants through the whole procedure in detail giving practical tips and areas of concerns.


Mr. Nitin P. Shingala (President) Mr. Kanu S. Chokshi Mr. Paras Savla

60 participants attended and benefited from the Workshop.

levitra

Society News

fiogf49gjkf0d
Workshop on Mastering E Filing Compliances under Taxation & Corporate Laws, 28th January 2014 to 28th February 2014


L to R: Mr. Mandar Telang, Mr. Govind Goyal (Speaker), Mr. Ameet Patel and Mr. Suhas Paranjpe



This 15 Sessions workshop was jointly organised by the Indirect Taxes & Allied Laws Committee of the BCAS and HR College of Commerce and Economics. The objective of the programme was to enable users to gain comprehensive working knowledge on practical issues related to E-Compliances under various statutes like obtaining registration, payment of taxes or fees, submission of various forms or returns etc. are now required to be carried out electronically, using IT-oriented methods.

31 participants attended the course.

Seminar on Software Industry, 7th March 2014


L to R: Mr. Hasnain Shroff (Speaker), Mr. Naushad Panjwani (President), Mr. Kishor Karia, Mr. Gaurang Gandhi

A full day seminar on the topic “Software Industry” was jointly organised by the International Taxation & Taxation Committee of BCAS. The objective of the seminar was to understand the various nuances of direct tax, transfer pricing, indirect tax and accounting issues related to software Industry. The recent judicial pronouncements and the undercurrent of various contentious issues faced by the software industry, were also discussed.

105 participants attended the seminar.

levitra

Society News

fiogf49gjkf0d
Special Lecture Meeting & Felicitation, 8th January 2014 Mr. Porus Kaka, Senior Advocate has recently been elected as President of the International Fiscal Association (IFA). Mr. Kaka is not only the first Indian but also the first Asian to achieve this feat. As a mark of regard and acknowledgement, the BCAS took this opportunity to felicitate him for achieving this very well deserved honour by the auspicious hands of Mr. Y. P. Trivedi, Senior Advocate. While Mr. Kaka also delivered a lecture on BEPS (Base Erosion & Profit Shifting), Morality in Taxation and the Changing Effect on a CA’s life, through an excellent way law is understood now. He ended the lecture by speaking on morality in tax laws and its effect on CAs and professionals.

Senior Advocate Mr. Trivedi as the Chairman of the session concluded the program by giving his views on the topic on certain current controversies relating to the stand taken by India at the WTO.

More than 950 people benefited from the lecture with the Live Webcast facility arranged by BCAS. The members present, had an opportunity to ask questions to Mr. Porus Kaka.

presentation animated with practical instances and videos. Mr. Kaka also covered 5 international tax and transfer pricing judgements that changed the The video of the Speaker is made available at www. bcasonline.tv for benefit of all members and web subscribers.

levitra

Society News

fiogf49gjkf0d
Lecture Meetings

Filing of Returns for AY 2014-15: Amendments & Precautions on 25th June, 2014. The meeting was held at the Jai Hind College Auditorium. The speaker Mr. Jagdish Punjabi, Chartered Accountant dealt with the various aspects of filing of returns of income and amendments applicable for the same. More than 600 persons including students benefited from the expert deliberations and knowledge shared by the speaker

Founding Day Lecture on ‘Discovering our Sweet Spot in Life’ on 7th July, 2014


L to R : Mr. Rajiv Vij (Speaker), Mr. Narayan R. Pasari, Mr. Raman H. Jokhakar, Mr. Nitin P. Shingala (President), Mr. Naushad A. Panjwani, Mr. Mukesh G. Trivedi, Mr. Sunil B. Gabhawalla

The lecture meeting was held at the Walchand Hirachand Hall, IMC. Mr. Rajiv Vij, Internationally acclaimed Life & Executive Coach based at Singapore addressed the Founding Day lecture. He explained on how despite all the success and economic growth there is still an underlying occurrence of unhappiness in one’s life and how we can deal with it and still discover a sweet spot in life. More than 200 members benefited from his talk.

Three books were released on this occasion:
1. G ita for Professionals – Second edition ( English and Gujarati) by Chetan Dalal was released by Mr. Y.P. Trivedi

2. T axation of Fees for Technical Services – a Referencer by Anil D. Doshi & Tarunkumar G. Singhal ; Released by Mr. Narayan K. Varma

3. FA Qs on Accounting Standards by Abhay R. Mehta, Ashutosh A. Pednekar, Atul H. Shah, Chirag H. Doshi, Jayesh M. Gandhi, Manish P. Sampat & Nalin M. Shah ; Released by Mr. Arvind H. Dalal

Direct Tax Provisions of the Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2014 on 14th July, 2014


L to R : Mr. S. E. Dastur (Speaker), Mr. Chetan M. Shah, Mr. Narayan R. Pasari, Mr. Raman H. Jokhakar, Mr. Nitin P. Shingala (President), Mr. Naushad A. Panjwani, Mr. Mukesh G. Trivedi, Mr. Sunil B. Gabhawalla (not in frame)

Mr. S. E. Dastur, Senior Advocate, addressed the annual lecture meeting on Direct Tax Provisions of the Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2014 at Yogi Sabhagrah. Nearly 2500 members packed the auditorium to hear Mr. Dastur and 2028 viewers joined the live Web Cast. All of them benefited from the masterly analysis by the speaker. The viewers were from over 25 cities across the globe including Singapore, Salem, Melbourne, London, Erode, Abu Dhabi, Lagos, Zurich & New Jersey.

Indirect Tax Provisions of the Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2014 on 16th July, 2014

The lecture meeting was held at the Walchand Hirachad Hall, IMC. Ms. Bhavana Doshi, Chartered Accountant and Mr. Vikram Nankani, Advocate addressed the audience on various aspects of Indirect Tax Provisions of the Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2014. More than 300 Members and Students benefited from the expert analysis and knowledge shared by the speakers.


L to R : Mr. Vikaram Nankani (Speaker), Mr. Sunil B. Gabhawalla, Ms. Bhavna G. Doshi (Speaker), Mr. Nitin P. Shingala (President), Mr. Raman H. Jokhakar

Indirect Tax Provisions of the Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2014 on 17th July, 2014

The lecture meeting was held at the Walchand Hirachad Hall, IMC Ms. Bhavana Doshi, Chartered Accountant and Mr. D. B. Engineer, Solicitor and Advocate addressed the audience on various aspects of Indirect Tax Provisions of the Finance Bill, 2014 at this lecture meeting which was held jointly by the Forum of Free Enterprise & Council for Fair Business Practices. The audience included many young Professionals and Senior Members of the CA Fraternity who gained immensely from the analytical insights given by the learned faculties.

Visit to Orphanage on 2nd June, 2014


Mr. Mayur B. Nayak and Ms. Gracy M. Mendes representing BCAS.

Human Resources Committee had organised this visit to Orphanage at Parel. The Orphanage has a total 22 orphans and is managed by 7 staff members. The visitors distributed snacks to the children. They had a walkthrough of the place and were also amazed by the entertainment items presented by the orphans who specially prepared the songs & dances for the Members visiting the orphanage.

Three-Day Residential Refresher Course (RRC) on Companies Act, 2013 from 27th June, 2014 to 29th June, 2014


L to R : Mr. Harish N. Motiwalla, Mr. Manish P. Sampat, Mr. Naushad A. Panjwani (President), Mr. Anil Singhvi (Keynote speaker), Mr. Kanu S. Chokshi


Group photograph of the participants


Mr. Naushad A. Panjwani

The Accounting & Auditing Committee had organised this RRC at Fariyas Resort, Lonavala, with an aim to equip the participants with an in-depth understanding on some of the important provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 along with Rules notified thereunder. The RRC was structured in an innovative manner of building case studies around critical provisions which were analysed in depth by the participants and deftly dealt with by the speakers.


Mr. Harish N. Motiwalla

The course commenced with the inaugural address by the President of BCAS, Mr. Naushad Panjwani. He was happy with the response received to the Course from all over India and was particularly pleased to have a strong participation from the Industry. Later, the Chairman of the Accounting and Auditing Committee Mr. Harish Motiwalla, gave introductory remarks on the design and structure of the course and the purpose of selection of the topics for group discussion as well as presentation. He also acknowledged the presence of the Chief Guest of the RRC Mr. Anil Singhvi. Then there was the lighting of the lamp by all the dignitaries present to commence the course.


Mr. Anil Singhvi

Mr. Anil Singhvi in his keynote address on “Corporate Governance and Independent Directors” shared his experiences as part of the Board of various companies as well from the research work carried out on the functioning of corporate and directors. He was of the opinion that the Companies Act, 2013 is a good piece of legislation and will improve the functioning of the corporate sector.


Mr. Sudhir Soni

After the inaugural session there was a group discussion on first paper of Mr. Sudhir Soni on “Case Studies on Provisions for Related Party Transactions/Loans/Investments.” The case studies were highlighting the provisions to be complied with as well as the contentious issues which arise in implementing the relevant provisions. During the presentation on his paper Mr. Soni aptly dealt with the case studies and also covered the issues raised during the group discussion in a very immaculate manner. The session was chaired by Mr. Kanu Choksi, Co-Chairman, Accounting & Auditing Committee.


Mr. Ashish Ahuja

The last session was a presentation on the topic “Cross Border M&A, Minority Buy-Outs, Exit Options, Rehabilitation, etc” by solicitor and advocate, Mr. Ashish Ahuja. He took the participants through a comparison of the of the provisions of the earlier act and the newly introduced provisions dealing with the protection of investor rights. Mr. Rajesh Muni, past- President of BCAS Chaired this session.


The second day started with a group discussion on the paper    by    Mr.    Nawshir    Mirza    on    “Case    Studies    on    Directors, independent directors, Corporate governance (incl. schedule V – managerial remuneration).” The case studies highlighted the onerous  duties of KMPS and  independent directors while steering the company as well as the role of Board towards various stakeholders. Later,     Mr.     Mirza,     made     a     presentation on his paper and shared his vast experience as a director as well as chairman of various committees of directors, which was of immense value to the participants. Mr. Kishor Karia Past Presidents of BCas chaired this session.

In the evening, there was a presentation on the topic of “audit and accounting (incl. schedule  ii and  iii)” by Mr. Mukund m. Chitale. It was a session that will be remembered by each participant for a long time, as he dealt with the subject with his expertise in such depth that he dealt with the queries of the participants while he was going through the clauses in the act. The session was addressed by him for nearly three hours and was ably chaired by Mr. Arvind H. Dalal, a past-President of the BCAS.

The last day commenced with group discussion on paper by Mr. K. Sairam on the topic “Case studies on acceptance of deposits and CSR.” Mr. K. Sairam had circulated to the participants background material also along with the case studies.  his case studies covered all the     finer     and     contentious     aspects    which require attention as professionals and were debated in depth during the group discussion. He later addressed the  participants in the general assembly along with a presentation on the topic and also dealt with the queries raised by the participants during the group discussion. The session was chaired by the Vice President Mr. Nitin Singhala.

The concluding session was presided over by  Mr.  Kanu Choksi.  he acknowledged contribution of the faculty as well as active participants for the success of the RRC.  Some of the participants gave their views on the course and conveyed their satisfaction of the format and  structure of the course.

Jal Erach dastur Students Annual day on 28th June, 2014 – A Report

The Jal Erach Dastur students annual day is an event that is organised by the Bombay Chartered accountants society (BCas) every year.  This year the event celebrated its 7th anniversary at the navinbhai thakkar auditorium at Vile Parle (east).

This is organised by the student members of BCAS for the CA students. This platform enables CA students to come together and interact with each other.  The event commenced with a short prayer sung by the student committee members followed by the anchors introducing the honorable Chief guest, Dr. Bhaskar das, CEO of the Zee group. The chief guest inaugurated the event with the lamp lighting ceremony and spoke to the CA students at length on the importance of communication in today’s corporate world and answered the queries that the students put forth. He emphasised on the difference between volition and motivation. According to him, volition comes from within, whereas, motivation comes from without and therefore the former is more important in life than the latter. The President of the society, Mr. naushad Panjwani, welcomed students and advised them for the balanced growth in life. The Chairman of the Human Resources Committee, Mr. Mayur Nayak, delivered his address on “dare to dream.”  In his short speech, he emphasised on the need to dream big. Miss Priya  Nangalia introduced  Mr.  Narayan Varma, the Past-President of the BCAS and an ardent supporter of the students’ activities, and showed his message through a video clip as he could not remain present due to his ill health.

Mr. Raj Khona and Mr. Smith Madlani enlightened students about various students’ activities such as study Circle, monsoon treks, sports day, etc. thereafter,  a small skit was performed by students on the theme of “jan andolan”.  Post this,   the “Chandanben manganlal Bhat  elocution Competition” was  held    where    finalists    of the    elimination    round    battled    it    to    win the  coveted trophies. in the tea break, the students feasted   on the delicious  mumbai vada pav along with a cup  of tea/coffee.

The    post    break     session    witnessed     the    most    awaited    quiz round. The four selected teams from the eliminations competed    with    each    other     in    a    very    heated     time-bound    quiz    competition.    The    finalists    were    on     their     toes    while    answering    mind    boggling questions. the audiences also actively participated in     the    quiz.    The     football    scoring    approach    adopted    by     the quizmaster,    Mr.    Aashish    Fafadia    was    an    instant    hit    amongst    the    audience.    The    quiz    was    ably     scored    by    Miss    Dhwani    Shah    and    Mr.    Rajesh    Pabari.    On    completion    of     the    quiz,    a    short      audience round was held by Mr. Harshil mehta and other   students’ Committee members. The audience was in splits with most of them participating very enthusiastically and lifting up the spirits.
 
The much awaited talent round was next on the list. Nineteen     finalists     competed     with     each     other     in     various     fields    like singing, dancing and playing instruments. With the end of this round, the judges of the talent round performed and mesmerised the audience with their singing and   instrumental music.  The winners of the various contests held,  i.e.,    Elocution,    Quiz,    Essay    Writing    Competition    and    the    Talent    Show    were    distributed    prizes    and    certificates    and    were felicitated for their performances.

The entire show was very ably anchored by Mr. Pawan shukla and miss Aneri Merchant. Mr. Raj Khona was felicitated for securing highest number of registrations. Mr. Chintan shah, Mr. Raj Khona and Mr. Smith Madlani’s efforts were recognised for coordinating students’ study circles during the last year. Mr. Samarth Patil proposed the vote of thanks to Mr. Sohrab Erach Dastur for sponsoring the annual day in fond memory of his brother, the late Jal Erach Dastur, the family of the Chandanben manganlal Bhat for sponsoring the elocution Competition and all those who had contributed to making the programme a success. In all, 366 students registered for the annual day. The motto of the event – to gather CA students on a single platform to showcase their talent and their extra-curricular
skills was very well achieved.

65th Annual general Meeting, 7th July 2014,   Walchand  Hirachand Hall,   4Th FlOOR,    Indian    Merchants’    Chamber, Charchgate, Mumbai 400 020

The 65th annual general meeting of the Bombay Chartered accountants’ society was held on monday, 7th july 2014, at  Walchand  hirachand  hall,  4th  floor,  indian  merchants’ Chamber, Churchgate, mumbai.

Mr. Naushad A. Panjwani, President of the society, took the Chair. All items as per the agenda given in the notice were undertaken including adoption of accounts and appointment of the auditors amongst other things.

Mr. Mukesh G. Trivedi, hon. joint secretary, announced the results of the election of the President, the Vice President, two secretaries, the treasurer and eight members of the managing Committee for the year 2014-2015. Mr. Mukesh G. Trivedi announced the names of the following members as elected unopposed for the year 2014-2015. also, the names of co- opted members and ex-officio members were announced. the “Jal Erach Dastur awards” for best feature and best article appearing in BCas journal during 2013-14 was announced. the winners were: Bhavesh dhupelia, shabbir readymadewalla, Vijay mathur for the feature on auditing standards. Ankit V. shah and Tarunkumar singhal for the article on Powers of the tribunal to stay demand beyond 365 days.

The special edition of the journal july, 2014 on “future of india youth’s Perspective” was released at the hands of mr. arvind h. dalal, past-President of the society. the editor, mr.anil j. sathe, announced that this edition has six special articles namely “imagining india from the eyes of young Pro- fessionals”, “Gazing Through the Crystal Ball”, “Reinventing india – a youth Perspective”, “arbitration Law in india – the Way forward”, “my india” … a decade from now …” and “to- wards a healthy india.” the youth of the society who had contributed articles to this edition were felicitated by being given the special edition.

Thereafter, the outgoing and incoming Presidents, mr. nau- shad A. Panjwani & Mr. Nitin P. Shingala respectively, addressed the members.

Outgoing  president Naushad Panjwani’s speech

Incoming President, nitin shingala, all my colleagues on the dais, respected past presidents, seniors and friends.

As i stand before you for one last time as the President of BCAS, i have an option on what i speak for the next ten minutes or so. I can either spend time thanking a lot of people who i should and want to and will. Or i can give advice to the incoming team, which i shouldn’t and i won’t. and even if i did where will they listen to me. did i listen to deepak’s advice? or i could list out all the activities that were carried out by the team in the year gone by, which i don’t want to do. It’s a team achievement and i cannot stake credit or seek accolades.

What i would like  to do is to compliment  the entire  team  of managing committee members,  chairmen,  co-chairmen, convenors, coordinators, core group members, the youth group, Cassem and the other staff of BCAS and shrutika. My special gratitude to the spouses of the core group members for getting involved in many BCAS programs. I request you to help me thank all of them by applauding the splendid work done by the team. having thanked others’ spouses, if i did not thank my own spouse, mere achche din khatam ho jayenge. so thank you afsheen for your support and understanding.

I couldn’t have asked for better office bearers. And as the events of the year transpired, i saw how each one of them stood up to take charge of the challenges on hand. Showing great grit, determination and character.

Nitin, I thank you for being my confidant. Your ever smiling demeanour eased so many pressure situations. you are a Trupt aatma and i pray that you remain so forever. under your leadership BCAS will scale new peaks. They say that you must learn from the foolishness of others and nitin, for that, i am ever at your service.

Raman, your suggestions in crunch situations were like a ray of light or as they say in sanskrit – Rashmi.

Chetan, was ever so cool and he faced everything with so much Sheetalta.

Mukeshbhai, thank you for bringing so much passion and Bhavna in everything you did.

Congratulations to narayan and sunil for joining the A-Team as the new secretaries.

This year, we lost two past-Presidents in Mr. B V dalal and Mr. Navin Kishnadwala. Both have contributed immensely to the society and we will all miss them.

My transition from a practicing CA to a business leader happened when i was the secretary of the society in 2006. I soon realised that the work pressures and timings are so different that I forget being an office bearer, even contributing otherwise is so challenging. That was the reason that i kept shirking this responsibility for some time. as most know, i accepted the challenge to lead BCAS at the behest of narayan Varma and a few others. But once i got into the mindset, the support that i received from all gave me new wings.

Jab aapka hukm mila toh maine tarq mohabbat kar di, Dil magar uss pe woh dhadka ke phir qayamat kar di.

I have thoroughly enjoyed my year as president of BCAS. I have gained a lot in the process. The president’s page received a lot of accolades and i am mighty pleased with that. But writing is something i have always been comfortable with. it is public speaking that i was absolutely paranoid of. So much so that i have goofed up even while reading from a prepared speech. i had to just look at Mr. Kishor Karia in the audience to know when i goofed up and know that i had to correct myself. But being president meant that mumbling or fumbling, i had to keep speaking at all events and slowly i found my fear disappearing.

Being on the dais along with various speakers i had the opportunity to observe their style and preparation. The one speaker who impressed me the most was Mr. N. P. sarda. in one of the talks on accounting standards, for which he spoke non-stop for about two hours and kept the audience spell bound, I was amazed to see that he had no books, no speech, no presentation or even any notes. all he had was a chit of paper with two words written on it. Obviously i was curious. after the talk i took a peek and saw what those words were. Those two words were Naushad Panjwani. That was the only thing he was probably not sure if he would remember correctly.

The theme for this year’s annual report is “time.” Fittingly, so. in the journey of time, the society has grown from strength to strength. the membership has consistently grown. the pro- grams have grown manifold. Every year so many new initia- tives are incubated. the society has kept inventing and reinventing itself constantly. Each President has contributed to this in his own way. To keep up with the needs of the time we have enabled a non-past president to be appointed as a co- chairman of a committee. And I congratulate Nandita Parekh for being the first such co-chairperson.

The youth group was formed this year and, as we have seen, has rejuvenated the core group. i am happy that most committees have now included a lot of youth members. To the youth i would like to say, be bold, be respectful and be effective. have your say. Don’t lose your exuberance. Be sincere but don’t be serious. have fun.

Zindagi Zinda dili ka naam hai Murda dil kya khaak jiya karte hai

Having covered all the important aspects i could end my speech here. But just a few minutes back i proclaimed that i am no longer afraid of public speaking, hence i would like to speak for a few more minutes.

Mandir ki taraf dur se naman kar lun, Ya buth ka aakhri nazaara kar lun, Kuchh der ki mehmaan hai jaati duniya,
Tauba kar lun ya Ek aur gunaah kar lun?

I would like to touch upon two areas which i think are necessary for the society to remain relevant in these times of google and youtube. Knowledge is available there too.

I have viewed our society as a matrix organisation. While on one hand we have our domain expertise like direct tax, indirect tax, international tax, accounts etc., on the other hand, we have the various categories of our membership like the practicing CA, members from industry, the CfOS, members Presidents, seniors and fellow members. it is a great honour to be bestowed with the responsibility of leading the Bombay Chartered accountants’ society, an institution that has a glorious past and strong foundation built through selfless contribution, dedication and perseverance of from Psus, the youth, the senior CA so on and so forth. We have tried to understand the needs of each constituent and attempted to design programs for each. this is the new service level expectation. We must continue to do this and in the years to come we will see the impact of this.

To be relevant we need to be heard in the corridors of power. this year we were fortunate that the union revenue secretary Mr. Rajiv Takru sought us out through Shariq Contractor and we had a great closed door meeting with him. But this is not enough. the society is a non-political voluntary body and makes representations on behalf of the general tax payers without any vested interest of any group or industry. We must reinforce our position as such. We must be visible. We must be effective. We must stop being shy.

Before assuming office, I had sought Rajesh Kapadia’s ad- vice and the only thing he said to me was “BCAS is a very prestigious organisation and the role of the President is a huge responsibility. As the flag bearer conduct yourself with dignity.” As I reflect on the year gone by, I hope I have lived up to his advice.

Tujh ko ruswa na kiya, khud bhi pashemaan na hue, Ummeed hai Ishq ki rasm ko iss tarah nibhaya humne.

As I step down today, I am satisfied and relieved. But the realisation has already sunk in that starting tomorrow I will join the august group of past presidents. The past presidents of BCAS have continued to contribute so much to the society and I am excited by the prospect of doing my bit. And for this I will have more than a year to do so.

Sitaaron se aage jahaan aur bhi hain, Abhi ishq ke imtehaan aur bhi hain,
Gaye din ki tanha tha main anjuman mein, Yahaan ab mere razdaan aur bhi hain.

Incoming President Nitin Shingala’s speech

President  naushad,  my  dear  colleagues  raman,  muke- sh, narayan, sunil, Chetan in absentia, respected Past its founders and successive leaders. i accept this responsibil-
ity with sincerity and promise to work, andto live up to the highest expectations! my team and i are committed to work ceaselessly and tirelessly to the serve interests of the BCas, pursue our vision and endeavour that the society continues to scale new peaks.

It has been a zestful year under Naushad’s leadership with the Society’s flag continuing to fly high. With style, vigour and his trademark innovative approach, naushad put into action several path breaking initiatives such as connecting with the youth brigade, the Cfos and senior chartered accountants, besides maintaining high standards for various regular activi- ties. While facing any crisis, naushad led from the front and pursued win-win solutions. my heartiest compliments to nau- shad for his memorable leadership and an excellent year!

Peter drucker once  said,  ‘a  voluntary  organisation  ex-  ists to bring about a change in individuals and in the soci- ety.’ in today’s fast paced life, a few questions  do arise:  Why volunteer? how does it help me? Well, i found the answer to these pertinent questions in the following quote by swami Vivekananda:

“Ask nothing; want nothing in return. Give what you have to give; it will come back to you – but do not think of that now, it will come back multiplied a thousand fold.”

Friends, I am one of the countless beneficiaries to whom  the BCAS has given back what we gave, multiplied a thou- sand fold.

The  Business  Consultancy  studies  (BCs)  course  during 1998-99 brought me closer to the BCAS. Soon, I was invited to join the Core group in 2000. This BCS programme conceptualised by shri Narayanbhai, Nandita and other seniors, changed the course of many lives including mine.

I have learnt and gained a lot during the last 15 years of being in close association with the BCAS. Seniors have welcomed me with open arms and made me feel a part of this magnificent family. I have gained so many endearing friends. In hindsight, i wish i could have become active in the BCas much earlier. As a member of the Core  group,  one  gets  an  opportunity to observe the seniors closely. I found them very gracious and easily approachable, ever ready to share their knowledge and help the juniors in overcoming their difficulties.

Pradyumnabhai and arvindbhai teach us that the quest for knowledge is a lifelong commitment. At the Company Law rrC held recently, i found arvindbhai and Kishorbhai amongst the participants, ever eager to learn new developments. this made me nervous. I felt I was not learning enough! Narayanbhai teaches us how to be innovative, think big and differently for the larger good and remain forever young. Pradeepbhai shah has been a great emotional support when trupti and i needed the most. he has been helping all of us to keep our hearts and emotions in the right places. my daughter, Parnasi too, is an ardent fan and admirer of Pradeepbhai! Learning from stalwarts such as Pinakinbhai sharpens our understand- ing of core subjects. each stalwart inspires and teaches us, in his own unique manner, the qualities and the abilities that an accomplished professional must cultivate and imbibe.

Consider this modern definition of a Professional in today’s context by subroto Bagchi, a noted management thinker and an entrepreneur. he says, “…to be a Professional takes more than just aptitude. It takes a commitment to doing what’s right, not only for your business, but for the society as a whole.”

My belief in the value system became stronger by observing these stalwarts adhering to the highest standards of ethics and values. the BCAS provides the right environment and impetus through selfless mentoring to chartered accountants to be outstanding professionals.

This mentoring at the BCas is important to members from all backgrounds. Members from small and medium practices get to learn from their seniors and can find support to grow. Members from large global firms get a collaborative and neutral platform to enrich themselves with academic pursuits. members from the industry get the opportunities to spruce up their knowledge and network. the value proposition that the BCAS offers is great. We need to ensure that this message is driven home, louder and clearer, to help spread the benefits widely. I look forward to the membership and Public relations committee led by naushad to pursue this with greater fervour.

While coping with complexities in the ever changing world and the resultant uncertainty, it is helpful to understand the elements that remain constant. nicole Baker, an american researcher  in  the  subject  of  futurology,  stresses  on  three such constants that capture the essence of our social fabric regardless of the time period:

•    the drive to explore;
•    the desire for interpersonal relationships; and
•    the need to make sense of the world around us.

I find the activities of the BCAS encompass each of the above elements and the annual plan for 2014-15, circulated to you, also underscores these elements. The plan focuses on ex- ploring new frontiers of knowledge, developing outstanding professionals, mentoring and fostering relationships, and con- tributing to the nation building. I am happy to outline specific thrust areas for the ensuing year.

•    Laws, Regulations and governance
India is in the process of modernising key corporate and tax laws. We must commend and support the government in this overdue exercise. However, the journey so far has been far from satisfactory with the legislature and the bureaucracy falling short. The experience with the Companies act 2013 and its implementation so far has been very agonising. even the drafts of the direct tax code have been heavily criticised.

While we have very  high  expectations  of  “acche  din”  from our Prime minister, narendra modiji, it must be re- alised that we need to grow beyond complaining and contribute proactively. In the presidential address last month, the new government has committed to participative governance and promised to engage directly with people in policy making and administration.

our Vision statement states that the BCas shall be the catalyst for bringing out better and more effective government policies and laws and clean and efficient administration and governance. It is thus important for us to step up the efforts. My team and I look forward to working with the Chairmen of various committees to ensure that we continue to make effective representations so and that our voice is heard.

a separate committee, ‘Corporate and securities Laws’ has been set up to focus on this area of growing importance.

•    Practice Management
The  accounting  industry  presents  a  fragmented  scenario where small and medium firms constitute a large number of practitioners. Low entry barriers, low switching costs for clients and high exit barriers are the main reasons for the fragmented nature of our profession. this can be countered by helping small and medium sized firms to network and grow and adapt to the best practices. the infotech and 4i committee has been conducting annual power summits for this purpose. My team and i look forward to the committee to build further and take up new initiatives in this area, including contributing to a regular column on this subject in the BCA journal.

•    CFOs and Corporate Members
The role of Chartered accountants in the industry has been expanding into leadership. It is therefore important to build further on our initiative to reach out to and connect with the CFOs in general and various specific industry groups in particular. My team and I look forward to working with various technical committees and the membership and Public relations Committee for specific programmes for this segment.

•    Youth Group
Today’s  youth  are  tomorrow’s  leaders!  I  am  sure  that  the membership and Public relations Committee led by naushad will give further momentum to this very important initiative in the ensuing year. I call upon each one of the youth group members to benefit from this gratuitous mentoring and look forward to them as our future leaders.

•    Students
The  students  are,  after  all,  our  future. The  HR  committee is doing excellent work in this area through innovative programmes. The professors in accountancy are a vital link to the students. many of us have been lecturers in the past. the BCas needs to connect with this community in a structured manner. Another brilliant suggestion has come from nandita that the BCAS should encourage the principals to sponsor their article students for short-term internships at various ngos and at the society itself. This will help the students to widen and deepen their learning and provide a holistic experience. My team and I look forward to working with the hr committee led by mayur and nandita on converting these excellent ideas into actions.

•    Technology
All aspects of our lives, profession included, are being impacted by the ever-changing technology. We must understand and leverage the relevant technology in conjunction with our core competencies, to deliver superior services. The infotech and 4i committee has been doing a lot of work in this area. I request Chairman ameet to ensure that the committee continues to address the growing requirements of the members.

The BCAS itself has been generally proactive in embracing the technology changes. recently, our revered BCA jour- nal embraced an e-avatar. Further, the team is working to build a revamped portal to improve knowledge sharing and connecting with the members. In addition, we will continue to explore various digital mediums such as WebtV to over- come distances in dissemination of knowledge and to extend the reach of our programmes.

•    Staff and office infrastructure
Our annual report carries an important statistic about hours of education the BCas delivers. the annual hours of educa- tion have grown from approx. 25,000 in the year 1993-94 to 38,000 in 2003-04 and in 2013-14, it was little over 132,000, an increase of over 500% in last 20 years. Our staff has been putting in very hard work and we must acknowledge it. At the same time the increasing workload and expectations are re- sulting in gaps in delivery. This requires us to strengthen the team and help them build their capacity through appropriate training. The improvement in office infrastructure, including systems and processes, is a continuous mission and we are committed to pursue excellence in this area.

It’s football time and my friend, Kuntal reminded me that i must refer to this flavour of the season. Courtesy of my son mohak, i am now a part of the growing football fan club in india. Even then, i could not take the accountant out of me. So I looked at how the role of a Captain is defined. The Football association, english football’s governing body, states that as a captain, you have no special status or privileges under the Laws of the game, but you do have a degree of responsibility for the behaviour of your team. I feel the same today, with one advantage. I have many more coaches to guide and support me.

Dhishat, my other good friend, has a different perspective. He says the role of the President is more akin to that of an orchestra Conductor whose primary duties are to unify performers, set the tempo, execute clear preparations and beats, and to listen critically and shape the sound of the ensemble.

Either way, the key leadership lessons from these two examples are:

•    One must surround himself with talent; and
•    One must play the game and play the notes through sheer hard work, discipline and commitment

I must say i have been fortunate to have loads of talent in our Core group. My team and i promise to play with hard work, discipline and commitment to continue building upon our rich heritage and leave a memorable legacy.

Thank you.

Society News

fiogf49gjkf0d
Lecture Meeting on Companies Act 2013 – Implications on Auditors on 7th May, 2014


L to R : Mr. Natrajh Ramakrishna (Speaker), Mr. Chetan Shah, Mr. Kanu Chokshi, Mr. Manish Sampat

Speaker Mr. Natrajh Ramakrishna, Chartered Accountant, dealt with provisions regarding Auditor, including opportunities, and challenges under the Companies Act, 2013. More than 350 participants attended this lecture meeting. The detailed analysis and presentation was well received. The presentation and video recording of the lecture is available on the website of the society. Interested members may visit www.bcasonline.org & www.bcasonline.tv.


Lecture Meeting on ‘Wellness through a holistic approach of healing the soul, mind and body through optimum Nutrition’ on 19th April, 2014


L to R : Mrs. Trupti Shingala, Mr. Yogesh Mathuria (Speaker), Mr. Naushad Panjawani (President) , Mrs. Afsheen Panjwani.

Speaker Mr. Yogesh Mathuria, Life & Wellness Coach, enlightened the participants on the approach of holistic wellness through one’s soul, mind and body. He placed importance on one’s eating habits and conveyed tthe concept of ‘You are What You Eat.’ The audience found it very enriching and educative. Members may visit www. bcasonline.org & www.bcasonline.tv for the presentation and video recording.

2-Day Orientation Workshop designed for Students and Chartered Accountants on 18th & 19th April 2014


L to R : Mr. Chetan Shah, Mr. Jagdish Punjabi(Speaker), Mr. Mayur Nayak, Ms. Smita Acharya.

The following topics were discussed:

This 2-day orientation workshop was organised by the Human Resources Committee of the BCAS. The objective of the workshop was to give an introductory insight on a variety of topics which may guide students and newly qualified Chartered Accountants. 93 participants attended and benefited from the Workshop.

Workshop on ‘Present the Presenter Within’ on 26th April, 2014

The Human Resources Committee of BCAS organised a workshop (spread over four Saturdays), under the auspices of Amita Memorial Trust, where the Trainer, Mr. Shyam Lata dealt with various aspects of enhancing public speaking, communication and interpersonal skills. These four sessions helped the participants overcome limiting inhibitions. He guided them to develop a compelling desire, not only to express one’s ideas but to do so with conviction and assertion. 27 participants attended the workshop. They immensely benefited from the training.

levitra

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section B:
• Reclassification of loans between current and non-current
• Accounting of interest on certain borrowings on cash basis as per Court order
• Adoption of hedge accounting principles in respect of commodity derivative contracts
• Exceptional Items

Essar Oil Ltd (31-3-2013)

From Notes to Financial Statements

Notes below Schedule 7: Long Term Borrowings: The classification of loans between current liabilities and non-current liabilities continues based on repayment schedule under respective agreements as no loans have been recalled due to noncompliance of conditions under any of the loan agreements. The non-compliance of conditions under the loan agreements are primarily arising out of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 17th January, 2012 (refer note 36). This is in accordance with the guidance issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India on Revised Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956.

Repayment and other terms:

a) Secured redeemable non–convertible debentures (‘NCDs’) of Rs. 105/- each consists of:

13,868,050 (Previous year 16,918.250) – 12.50% NCDs of Rs. 105/- each amounting to Rs. 145.61 crore (Previous year Rs. 177.64 crore).

7,00,000 (Previous year 7,00,000) – 12.50% NCDs, of Rs. 100/- each on private placement basis partly paid up at Rs. 93.86 per debenture amounting to Rs. 6.57 crore (Previous year Rs. 6.57 crore).

During the year, the Company refinanced its Rupee borrowings with one of its existing lenders into an External Commercial Borrowing (ECB). This resulted in conversion of debentures having face value of Rs. 32.03 crore also into the ECD loan. Further, as per the common Loan Agreement (‘the CLA’) entered with lenders post exit from the Corporate Debt Restructuring (CDR) Scheme, the Company has agreed to pay interest on a monthly/quarterly basis, on debentures held by the erstwhile CDR lenders at a floating rate linked to the base rate of the respective bank prevailing on 8th August, 2012, with effect from 1st January, 2012, resulting in the interest rates ranging from 12.32% p.a. to 12.75% p.a. The Company is also in the process of sending offer letters to the remaining debentures holders (i.e., other than lenders) given them, inter alia, an option for prepayment of debentures along with accumulated interest in full. The principal amount of debentures is otherwise payable from December 2014 to June 2018 and accumulated interest from December 2014 to March 2027, with an option to prepay certain portion of interest at a discounted rate. As an alternative, these debenture holders can opt for revising the terms and conditions applicable to debentures in line with the terms contained in the CLA.

The Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat has, in response to the Company’s petition, ruled vide its orders dated 4th August, 2006 and 11th August, 2006 that the interest on certain categories of debentures should be accounted on cash basis. In accordance with the said petition/ order, funded/accrued interest liabilities amounting to Rs. 417.72 crore (Previous year Rs. 428.24 crore) as at 31st March, 2013 have not been accounted for. This amount carries interest rate ranging from fixed rate of 5% to a floating rate of 12.75% and is repayable from December 2014 to March 2027.

c) During the year, the Company exited Corporate Debt Restructuring Scheme resulting in termination of the MRA dated 17th December, 2004 and entered into a CLA dated 25th March, 2013 with the lenders for the loan facilities which were hitherto being governed by the MRA. The MRA gave an option, subject to consent of lenders, to the Company to prepay certain funded interest loans (the FS loans) of Rs. 2,471.63 crore on or before 24th April, 2012 without interest. The FS loan has not been prepaid before 24th April, 2012 and is now governed by the CLA.

In order to give accounting effect to reflect substance of the transaction, the FS loan was, since inception, measured by the Company in accordance with the principles of IAS 39, Financial Instruments, Recognition and Measurement, in the absence of specific guidance in Indian GAAP to cover the specific situation. In continuance of the above said principle and applying the principle of Accounting Standard AS 30, Financial Instruments, Recognition and Measurement, the FS loan has, upon signing of the CLA, been remeasured since inception, considering present value of cash flows inclusive of interest. Accordingly, the gross liability of Rs. 3,163.84 crore of the FS loans and funded interest thereon as at 31st March, 2013 (comprising of Rs. 2,126.36 crore to the banks and Rs. 1,037.48 crore to the financial institutions) have been measured at Rs. 1,833.84 crore (comprising of Rs. 1,234.34 crore to the banks and Rs. 599.50 crore to the financial institutions). Consequently, borrowing cost of Rs. 536.71 crore attributable to construction of the Refinery Project based on such remeasurement has been capitalised as part of cost of Fixed Assets and balance borrowing cost of Rs. 110.94 crore has been recognised in the statement of profit and loss.

The FS Loans of Rs. 2,471.63 crore is repayable in various installments from March 2021 to March 2026 and the Funded Interest thereon as at 31st March, 2013 amounting to Rs. 692.19 crore is repayable in 40 equal quarterly installments beginning 30th June, 2013.

A funded interest loan of Rs. 206.88 crore (previous year Rs. 206.88 crore) is payable in a single bullet payment in 2031 and is continued to be measured in accordance with the aforementioned principles at Rs. 34.95 crore (Previous year Rs. 31.67 crore).

Note below ‘Other Current / Non Current Assets’

Rs. 2,177.82 crore receivable from Essar House Limited (EHL) being the amount paid under the defeasment agreement of the sales tax liability covered by the scheme (refer note 36). The Company has agreed to recover these dues in eight equal quarterly installments along with interest, coinciding with the installment facility made available by the Hon’ble Supreme Court to the Company for repayment of the Gujarat Sales Tax dues. To secure this amount further, the Company is in the process of obtaining an additional guarantee from the parent company of EHL.

Note below ‘Revenue from Operations’

During the previous year, the Company deferred payment of sales tax/VAT liability amounting to Rs. 1,507.01 crore for the period 1st April, 2011 to 31st December, 2011 and defeased the same to a related party at its present value amounting to Rs. 528.42 crore. Sales tax/VAT amounting to Rs. 1,387.36 crore shown above as deduction from ‘Revenue from operations (gross)’ includes the defeased value of sales tax/Vat liability of Rs. 582.42 crore as per the defeasance agreement pursuant to which the assignee has undertaken to discharge the sales tax/VAT liability on the due dates. Pursuant to the Supreme Court Order dated 17th January, 2012, the Company subsequently reversed the entire amount of income recognised as an exceptional item (refer note 36).

Note on Hedge Accounting

During the year, the Company adopted hedge accounting principles of AS 30 – Financial Instruments and Derivatives for accounting of certain commodity hedges. Accordingly, Rs. 104.90 crore (gain) has been carried over to cash flow hedge reserve as of 31st March, 2013 pertaining to highly probable forecast of sales proceeds. If hedge accounting principles of AS 30 had not been adopted for the year ended 31st March, 2013, sales would have been higher by Rs. 18.48 crore, consumption of raw materials would have been lower by Rs. 5.69 crore, profit after tax would have been higher by Rs. 24.17 crore and receivables would have been lower by Rs. 80.73 crore.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India had  vide its order dated 17th January, 2012 set aside the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat dated 22nd April,     2008     which     had     earlier     confirmed     the Company’s eligibility to the Sales tax incentive Scheme (‘the scheme’) and accordingly the Company had reversed the net defeased income (net) of Rs. 778.25 crore recognised during 1st April, 2011 to 31st December, 2011 as exceptional items during     the     financial     year     2011-12.     Rs.     83.39     crore represents interest payable by the company on sales tax liability arising out of the Supreme Court order dated 13th September, 2012.

From Auditor’s Report
(a)        Note     7(ii)(c)     to     the     financial     statements     detailing the recognition and measurement of the borrowings by a Common Loan Agreement which were hitherto covered by the Master Restructuring Agreement as per the accounting policy consistently followed by the Company;     and     Note     34     to     the     financial     statements detailing the adoption of hedge accounting
principles in respect of commodity derivative contracts, as set out in Accounting Standards (AS) 30, Financial instruments: Recognition and Measurement,     in     absence     of     specific     guidance    under the Accounting Standards referred to in s/s. (3C) of section 211 of the Act.

(b)  Note 7(ii)(c) to the financial statements describing the fact about accounting of interest on certain categories of debentures on a cash basis as per the Court order.

(c)    Note     19     [footnote     (ii)]    to     the    financial    statement    regarding receivable of Rs. 2, 177.82 crore from Essar House Limited and the management plans of securing the dues as explained therein.

Direct Taxes

fiogf49gjkf0d
Explanatory Notes to the Provisions of the Finance Act, 2013 – CIRCULAR No. 3/2014 [F.NO.142/24/2013-TPL], dated 24-01-2014

The CBDT has issued a press release dated 30-01-2014 to keep in abeyance the change in the procedure for PAN allotment, which was introduced vide Circular No. 11 dated 16-01-2014. In the meantime, the old procedure of PAN application and allotment shall continue.

Relaxation of time limit for filing ITR-V – CIRCULAR No. 4/2014 [F.NO.225/198/2013-ITA. II], dated 10-02-2014

The due date for filing ITR-V form for Assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 for returns e-filed within the time allowed u/s. 139 and having refund claims is extended upto 31-03-2014

Clarification regarding disallowance of expenses u/s. 14A of the Act – CIRCULAR No. 5/2014 [F.NO.225/182/2013-ITA. II], dated 11-02-2014

CBDT has clarified that disallowance u/s. 14A shall be attracted in even if the assessee has not earned any exempt income in that particular year.

Clarification regarding scope of additional income tax on distributed income u/s. 115R of the Act – CIRCULAR No. 6/2014 [F.NO.225/182/2013-ITA. II], dated 11-02-2014

CBDT has clarified that receipts by way of redemption/ repurchase of mutual fund units of allotment of bonus units are not subject to levy of additional income tax u/s. 115R (2) of the Act.

Finance Bill 2014, introduced in the Lok Sabha on 17-02-2014

levitra

FROM THE PRESIDENT

fiogf49gjkf0d
Telangana – India’s 29th state – February 2014
Mumbai – India’s 51st state – January 2050

Dear members of BCAS family,

Bhavya Bharat:
It is said, by many analysists, that India will overtake USA in 2050 to become the second largest economy. I believe that. Many sceptics do not believe that we can achieve this on GDP basis. But I am sure many will agree that we may have more states than USA by 2050 with Mumbai becoming the 51st state of India.

Back Stroke:
There is intellectual outrage at the formation of Telangana all across; of course, outside Telangana, that is. One stroke of line across the map and conflicting emotions are displayed. Some shed tears for fear of loss of livelihood, while on the other side, a gush of happiness upon hope of progress and prosperity. Not to forget the show of indignation by us who are nowhere affected by this stroke. This is also being referred to as a master stroke by Sonia Gandhi. Will this stroke strike down the chances of Congress being stricken down by the opposition in this ensuing election? Time will tell. Going by precedence, it did not help Atal Bihari Vajpayee to come back to power when in 2000 he struck not one, not two but three strokes to bring into existence Chhatisgarh, Jharkhand and Uttarakhand.

Bharat Nirmaan:
India must be one of those rare countries whose boundaries, both external and internal has been constantly changing.

A quick recap:
It can be debated as to who amongst Ashoka, Akbar and the British gave shape to India the way it was prepartition. I have just finished reading Empire of the Moghals by Alex Rutherford and as per the author, Akbar ruled over the largest empire bordering from Samarkhand in the North, Persia in the West, Bengal in the East and Deccan in the South. Much of the North and West was lost by the Moghals very early. Pakistan and what is now called Bangladesh was separated when we attained Independence. In all, 562 princely states joined to form India. The external boundaries as we see today were crystalised as late as in 1962 when the former French and Portuguese colonies in India were incorporated into the Republic as the union territories of Puducherry (Pondicherry), Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Goa, Daman and Diu.

Bharat Punarnirmaan:
Then started the internal reformation. Bombay split into Maharashtra and Gujarat in 1960. Haryana and Himachal Pradesh were carved out from Punjab in 1966. Add to that the conversion of Union territories like Sikkim and Goa to States.

Bharat Bhugol Bhavishya:
But this is not the end. There is a proposal lying with the central government to create Avadh Pradesh, Bundelkhand, Paschim Pradesh, and Purvanchal from Uttar Pradesh. Agitations are on for a separate Bodoland, Gorkhaland and Vidharbh.

And surely, Telangana will not be the last state. Brace yourselves for many more. And there’s nothing wrong in it. All the new states mentioned above have prospered post-separation. There seems to be merit in it. Governing large states is difficult, particularly with ethnic differences and neglect of large populations. America has 50 states while it’s population is just a quarter of ours. China has 34 provinces for a population marginally larger than ours. Thus, if a segment of populace feels alienated and neglected and feel their prosperity is possible, then who are we to object? Statehood is okay, separatism is a no-no.

Bharat Vibhajan:
There are separatist movements in J&K. The Akali movement is still active from North America. Will India disintegrate like the USSR? I am confident that will never happen. We are all bound together by a strong nationalist bond. Just like our joint families are becoming nuclear families, so is our country going through the same phase.

Andhra Bhojan Bhavishya:
Coming back to Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, being a foodie and with Andhra cuisine being one of my top favourites, I am awaiting clarity on whether my favourite dishes like palakura pappu, thotakura, iguru and Kodi Guntur will now be called Andhra dishes or Telangana dishes? Will know when I next go to my favourite jaunt at Andhra Bhavan in Delhi for Andhra Meals. I am sorry for sounding selfish but that’s the only interest I have in this episode.

My father studied a different map in school, I studied another while my daughter studied yet another. I am sure my grandchildren will study a completely new map.

Here’s wishing everyone happiness and love.

With Warm Regards

Naushad A. Panjwani

levitra

FROM THE PRESIDENT

fiogf49gjkf0d
Dear members,

The on-going Supreme Court hearing in the case of Ram Jethmalani & Others vs. the Union of India has once again brought to the forefront, the issues of black money and illicit accounts in overseas banks. The likely disclosure of the complete list of those who have stashed black money abroad has triggered speculations that some prominent names, including those of politicians, may figure on this much-awaited list.

In the interim order [2011] 339 ITR 107 (SC) in this case, the Supreme Court remarked,

“The quantum of such monies may be rough indicators of the weakness of the State, in terms of both crime prevention, and also of tax collection. Depending on the volume of such monies, and the number of incidents through which such monies are generated and secreted away, it may very well reveal the degree of softness of the State.”

The Court also stated that the softer the State is, the greater the likelihood that there is an unholy nexus between the law-maker, the law-keeper, and the lawbreaker. It expressed concerns about the incapacity and failure of the State, declining moral authority and increase in volume and extent of tax evasion.

This judicial intervention in 2011 pushed the Government into a corner. Over the years the various governments did make attempts to investigate/study the problem, but rarely was any action taken to stem the menace.

• India finally ratified the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) in May 2011 after dillydallying for about six years.

• In 2011, the Government commissioned a study to assess the quantum of black money stashed in India and abroad. This study by the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP), National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) and National Institute of Financial Management (NIFM) is yet not complete.

• The Chairman, CBDT headed Committee, set up to examine measures to tackle black money in India and abroad, submitted a 109-page report in March 2012. It stated that there is no dearth of laws to deal with the menace of the black money. The Committee suggested strengthening of the existing agencies, both in terms of manpower and other resources, along with the improvement in coordination amongst various agencies.

• The Ministry of Finance published a 108-page White Paper on black money in May 2012 that presented different facets of black money and its complex relationship with the policy and administrative regime in the country. It also reflected upon the remedial measures by way of policy options and strategies to address the issue of black money and corruption in public life. The White Paper elaborates on working with the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes and through the Double Tax Avoidance Agreements and the Tax Information Exchange Agreements in dealing with black money stashed abroad.

It is ironical that the Government moves only when prodded by intense pressure brought through the judiciary or by international organisations. Even then the Government’s response, more often than not, is halfhearted, and the implementation tardy as is evident from the following examples.

• In the instant case, the UPA Government refused to follow the Supreme Court’s direction to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) and its application to set aside this direction was rejected in March, 2014.

• Delays in implementation of international standards on anti-money laundering lead the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to raise concerns about effectiveness of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

• India needs to address the issue of private sector corruption from both a legislative as well as practical perspective to fully comply with the requirements of the UNCAC. Internationally, significant anti-bribery legal framework has evolved over the last 15 years.

• The UNCAC requires criminalisation of bribery of national public officials, foreign public officials and officials of public international organisations.

• The OECD’s Anti-Bribery Convention focuses on the ‘supply side’ of the bribery transaction and has established legally binding standards to criminalise bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions.

• The G20 too has established anti-corruption working group and announced anti-corruption action plan.

• In 2013, the OECD, the UN and the World Bank jointly published “Anti-Corruption Ethics and Compliance Handbook for Business.” The objective of this publication is to serve as a useful, practical tool for companies seeking compliance with anti-corruption measures and includes business guidance instruments illustrated using real life case studies.

Greater expectations from independent external auditors are emerging in this crusade against bribery and corruption.

The OECD Council’s “Revised Recommendation on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions” requires an independent external auditor, who discovers indications of a possible illegal act of bribery, to report this discovery to management, and, as appropriate, to corporate monitoring bodies and to the competent authorities. The OECD’s consultation paper on this subject admits limitations in current Standards on Auditing in meeting the above recommendations, specifically those equivalent to SA 240 “The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements” and SA 250 “Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements.”

The Indian Government has been echoing similar sentiments expecting the auditors to contribute more in this anti-corruption fight. In his address at the International Conference organised by the ICAI in January, 2012, the then Union Minister of Corporate Affairs Dr. M. Veerappa Moily called upon the ICAI and its members to take the lead in the fight against corruption.

Increasingly, auditors are being entrusted with greater responsibilities as experienced recently with the Companies Act, 2013. The audit profession has never shied away from assuming greater responsibility. What is necessary is that, when an auditor discharges his obligation in this regard, the regulators should take the requisite action against the perpetrators of crime, protect the auditor and in deserving cases commend him. This will result in professionals doing their duty in accordance with the spirit of the law and not just the letter of the law.

The BCAS, as a principle centred organisation, under the leadership of the indefatigable Narayan Varma has been supporting the fight against corruption through RTI, a major tool in the fight against corruption, and various other activities regularly reported in the BCAJ. Many other prominent Chartered Accountants too are contributing to the fight against corruption in different ways.

Let us hope that the Modi Government extends a Clean India campaign for the eradication of black money and corruption, to help the Nation overcome this evil as well.

With warm regards,
Nitin Shingala

levitra

Cancerous Corruption

fiogf49gjkf0d
From May 2014, this feature is restarted. In June 2014 issue, I recorded one meaning of “Corruption”.

Here under are some definitions of Corruption:

• Transparency.org:

CORRU PTION IS THE ABUSE OF ENTRU STED POWER FOR PRIVATE GAIN. IT HUR TS EVERY ONE WHO DEPENDS ON THE INTEGR ITY OF PEOPLE IN A POSITION OF AUTHORITY. Some More:

• Wrongdoing on the part of an authority or powerful party through means that are illegitimate, immoral, or incompatible with ethical standards. Corruption often results from patronage and is associated with bribery.

• Dishonest behaviour by those in position of power, such as managers or government officials. Corruption can include giving or accepting bribes or inappropriate gifts, double dealing, under-the-table transactions, manipulating election, diverting funds, laundering money and defrauding investors. One example of corruption in the world of finance would be an investment manager who is actually running a ponzi scheme.

World bank writes on Governance & Anti-Corruption:
The World Bank views good governance and anticorruption as important to its poverty alleviation mission. Many governance and anti-corruption initiatives are taking place throughout the World Bank Group. They focus on internal organisational integrity, minimising corruption on World Bank-funded projects, and assisting countries in improving governance and controlling corruption.

Combining participatory action-oriented learning, capacity-building tools, and the power of data, the World Bank Institute (WBI), in collaboration with other units in the World Bank Group, supports countries in improving governance and controlling corruption. We also provide policy and institutional advice and support to countries in their formulation of action programs.

Using a strategic and multidisciplinary approach, we apply action-learning methods to link empirical diagnostic surveys, their practical application, collective action, and prevention. Concrete results on the ground are emphasized in our learning programs and clinics as well as the periodic release of the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) and country diagnostics. This integrated approach is supported by operational research and a comprehensive governance databank.

At one of the annual meeting, World Bank officials spoke extensively about corruption. It is an understandable concern: money that the Bank lends to developing countries that ends up in secret bank accounts or finances some contractors’ luxurious lifestyle leaves a country more indebted, not more prosperous.

Corruption Worldwide:
Corruption, fraud and money-laundering cost poor countries a total of $1.0 trillion a year, the anti-poverty organisation ONE said in a study released in this month. The group, founded by U2 rock group singer Bono, said the misuse of funds resulted in $38-64 billion a year in uncollected taxes alone. This in turn cost 3.6 million lives a year that could be saved if the missing money were wisely invested, nongovernment organisation ONE estimated.

Na Khaunga, na khane dunga:
• Bringing up the issue of corruption during the second leg of his daylong tour to Jammu & Kashmir last month, PM Narendra Modi said his mantra was “Na khaunga, na khane dunga (neither will I take bribe, nor will I allow anyone also to take bribe).”

(Compare above with former PM Manmohan Singh: He did not take bribe but allowed many of his ministers to take bribe)

• PM Narendra Modi described corruption as cancer that can destroy India and said people were no longer willing to tolerate it.

Addressing a gathering at a foundation stone laying ceremony for a highway, and amid slogans of Bharat mata ki jai, he asked, “Should strong steps not be taken to remove corruption?” Modi said some had pointed out that he did not speak on August 15.He reminded them that he had said “if somebody had to get any work done one would ask ‘mera kya’ (what’s in it for me). If the work is not done, one would say ‘mujhe kya’ (why do I care). This has spoiled the nation.”

Maharashtra Anti-corruption Bureau ( ACB )
• In a bid to check corruption and embarrass the offenders, the Maharashtra Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) is planning to launch a page on a popular social networking site where it would upload the pictures of those caught for taking bribes.”In a bid to intensify our action against corrupt and reach out to people, we are planning to use the popular platform of Facebook shortly”, said Director General of Police (ACB) Pravin Dixit. When asked if the court rulings prevented posting pictures of suspects at public places, Dixit said the ACB cases were different. “We have a suspect who is known and arrested after adopting legal procedures. There is no question of identification parade like other crimes. Hence, there is nothing wrong in putting up pictures on the website or elsewhere.” Dixit said.
• The Facebook page, if started, will have the pictures of the accused, besides the details of the bribe amount the accused took, valuables and other documents recovered from him or her during searches at office and home, police said. The ACB which had laid as many as 744 traps so far this year, a 114 per cent jump from the same last year, has been for the past two months publishing pictures of those caught in the act on its own website. During the 744 traps till August 16, it has arrested 1,009 government employees and their associates, who are private individuals. In the same period last year, 348 traps were laid in which 452 were arrested.

Transparency International: Corruption perception Index 2013:

In August issue of BCAJ, some details of Corruption Perceptions Index 2013 were reported. I had missed to report CPI of some more neighbouring countries. Now along with 3 which were reported hereunder are Ranking of India and its neighbouring countries:

It is interesting to note that atleast one neighbouring country, Bhutan ranks at 31, quiet high, and scores 63.

levitra

ICAI and its members

fiogf49gjkf0d
1 ITA Tribunal raises concerns about Professional Standards of ICAI Members:

In a recent order by ITA Tribunal in the case of Shri Vijay V. Meghani vs. DCIT, where there was a delay of 2,984 days in filing appeal against the order of CIT (A) due to misleading advice of a C.A. firm, the Hon’ble Members of the Tribunal have commented about the falling professional standards of ICAI Members. The author of this order being a Senior Chartered Accountant, the contents of this order should be an eye opener for all members of the C.A. profession and need introspection by our members. The relevant portion of the order in Para 9.6 is as under:

“9.6 However, if it is considered for a moment that the above said C.A. firm has really given such advice to the assessee herein and accordingly it has furnished the letter and affidavit, then, in our view, it may be showing signs of deteriorating standards with some of the Chartered Accountants in profession, which needs to be stopped on war footing by the ICAI. We have already noticed that the assessee is having connection with many tax professionals and, in all probabilities, the assessee might have had consultation with any one or more of them on the impugned problem. It is inconceivable that all the Chartered Accountants, whom the assessee might have had consultation or availed services, would have concurred with the view expressed by the above said C.A. firm. If it is presumed for a moment that all the C.A.s have concurred with the said view, then it only shows that the C.A. profession is losing its grip over the Income tax matters, which is another cause of concern for ICAI. The self study model with ‘on-site articled clerk training’ embedded in the Chartered Accountancy course aims to achieve high quality education and training through undergoing practical training, inculcating the habit of thinking, self introspection, application of mind, analytical ability etc. and they enable the C.A. students to have strong grip over the subjects and also to attain expertise in them. The commendable feature of the C.A. course is that, as stated earlier, the C.A. students are trained by the practicing Chartered Accountants during their articled clerk training program. Thus, the methodology adopted by the ICAI enabled the C.A. students to become a thorough professional with versatile knowledge and innovative mind. We notice that, in the recent past, the methodology of self study is given a go-by by some of the C.A. students and they have started depending more and more on the Commercial Coaching Centers, who undertake coaching of various subjects in the class room model. We notice that the ICAI does not appear to have taken steps to contain mushrooming growth of such coaching institutes, which indulge in manufacturing of Chartered Accountants through class room model, which may ultimately have undesirable effect on the quality of Chartered Accountants, since the habit of thinking, introspection, application of mind is replaced by spoon feeding, which kind of teaching discourages independent thinking. There should not be any controversy on the fact that the Chartered Accountants, till date, have occupied pioneer position vis-a-vis their counterparts in other parts of the World. They also contribute a lot to the building, sustenance and growth of our National economy. Any compromise on the quality of Chartered Accountants would not only affect our Country very badly, but is also expected to endanger the pioneer position enjoyed by the C.A. fraternity vis-a-vis their counter parts in other parts of the world. In our view, the ICAI should seriously taken note of these alarming practices emerging in our Country and should take appropriate corrective steps, lest the confidence reposed in C.A.s by the public should get diluted.”

Further, in Para 10 of the order it is observed as under

“Thus, it is seen that the advice claimed to have been given by the C.A. firm has been given without analysing the facts prevailing in the instant case and also without clear understanding of the provisions of the Act and their implications. We have also noticed that a C.A firm could not give such kind of advice, since it cannot forecast the outcome of an appeal filed before the Tribunal.We have already noticed that the CPE programmes have been designed by ICAI with the noble objective of enlightening the Chartered Accountants with current topics, current developments and such programmes are also aimed to continuous updating or refreshing of the knowledge of Chartered Accountants. The advice claimed to have been given by Chartered Accountants, if considered to have been really given, would create doubt about the efficacy of the CPE programmes, since such kind of advices is not expected from a Professional. Further these kind of advices claimed to have been given by a C.A. firm clearly give signals that the CPE programmes might have failed to achieve the desired objectives with some of the Chartered Accountants. It is high time that the ICAI should take note of these practicalities and should take corrective steps in order to maintain/restore the high standards and quality expected from a C.A professional.”

2. Some Ethical Issues

The Ethical Standards Board of ICAI has given answers to some Ethical Issues on pages 316 to 317 of C. A. Journal for September, 2014. Some of these issues are as under:

(i) Issue:

Can goodwill of a Chartered Accountant firm be purchased?

The Council of the Institute considered the issue whether the goodwill of a proprietary firm of a Chartered Accountant can be sold/transferred to another eligible member of the Institute, after the death of the proprietor concerned and came to the view that the same is permissible. Accordingly, the Council passed the Resolution that the sale/transfer of goodwill in the case of a proprietary firm of Chartered Accountants to another eligible member of the Institute, shall be permitted.

(ii) Issue: Can a Chartered Accountant in practice share his fees with the Government in respect of Government Audit?
The Institute came across certain Circulars/Orders issued by the Registrar of various State Co-operative Societies wherein it has been mentioned that certain amount of audit fee is payable to the concerned State Govt. and the auditor has to deposit a percentage of his audit fee in the State Treasury by a prescribed challan within a prescribed time of the receipt of Audit fee.

In view of the above, the Council considered the issue and while noting that the Government is asking auditors to deposit such percentage of their audit fee for recovering the administrative and other expenses incurred in the process, the Council decided that as such there is no bar in the Code of Ethics to accept such assignment wherein a percentage of professional fees is deducted by the Government to meet the administrative and other expenditure.

3. Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB)

ICAI has published a “Study on Compliance of Financial Requirements.” Some of the observations from this publication are given below for information of Members.

(i) Contingencies and Events occurring after the Balance Sheet Date (AS-4)

From one of the Notes to Accounts given in the Annual Report of a company, it was noted that Advances were given to certain companies which had incurred losses and their net worth had eroded. These Advances were included under the heads of “Sundry Advances” or “Sundry Debtors” on the pretext that the management was confident of recovering these dues. Therefore, no provision was made.

Observation of FRRB (P. 37)

The erosion of net worth of the companies to whom advances were given itself indicated that the amounts due may not be fully recoverable. further, future events should be considered to confirm impairment of the asset rather than expecting its recoverability. If the net worth of the companies had eroded and they were incurring losses, provision should be made unless such companies have already entered into contracts to confirm profitability in future. Non-creation on provision in these cases is contrary to the requirements of AS-4.

(ii)    Provision for Taxation for Earlier years (AS-5)

From the statement of Profit and Loss given in the Annual report of a Company, it was noticed that the provision for taxation  for  earlier  years  was  adjusted  under  the  head “appropriations.”

Observation of FRRB (p42)

Adjustments arising due to prior period items should be included in the determination of net Profit or Loss for the current period instead of showing the same as “appropria- tion” of Profits. Income tax expense relating to prior years cannot be disclosed as appropriation of profits. Hence, the profit of the Company for the year is over stated and the Statement of Profit and Loss cannot be considered to be providing true and fair view of the profit of the busi- ness. accordingly, the company has not complied with the requirements of AS-5.

4.    EAC opinion

Accounting Treatment of Liquidated Damages on Unex- ecuted Portion of Contract.

Facts
A Central public sector enterprise, registered under the Companies act, 1956 was established for manufacturing of weapon systems required for Armed Forces.

The customers of the company recover liquidated damages for delayed delivery of goods, i.e., when goods are delivered after due date. the company makes provision for liquidated damages for the unexecuted portion of contract for the period of delay from due date of delivery till the date of the accounts. the company is following this practice as a prudent policy as liquidated damages amount is quantifiable and is a definite known liability. In most of the cases, the customer extends the due date, however, with levy of full liquidated damages. At the time of payment, the customer recovers the liquidated damages amount and pays the balance amount only.  Then, the company reverses the liquidated damages provision and debits to liquidated damages recovered account (ex- pense account).

Query
from  the  above  background,  the  Company  has  sought the opinion of the expert advisory Committee of the ICAI on the following issues:

(a) Whether the provision for liquidated damages should be made or not in respect of unexecuted portion of the contract for the period of delay from the due date of delivery till date of accounts? (b) Whether such provi- sion for liquidated damages is also required to be made in case the due date falls exactly on the last date of the accounts of the financial year, viz. balance sheet date, i.e., whether one day delay is to be reckoned or not?
(c) Whether the practice is to be spelt out as a ‘major Accounting Policy’ in terms of AS1 or will it be sufficient if a financial note is appended to the statement of profit and loss or even financial note is not required to  be appended?

EAC opinion:
The Committee notes that  in the  case  of the  company, liquidated damages are recovered by the customers for the period of delay between the due date of delivery of goods  and  the  actual  date  of  delivery.   Further,  as  per the Company, there is no clause in the contact to exit from the sales contract(s) entered with the customer, with or without the payment of penalty and the past experience of the company shows that in most cases, although the customers extend the due date of delivery, the liquidated damages are recovered in full. Accordingly, the Committee is of the view that the terms and conditions of the sales contract(s) are binding and legally enforceable by the customers. In the company’s case, although it is stated that the liquidated damages are in the nature of compensatory payment, the Committee is of the view that the liquidated damages are akin to penalty and there is a contractual obligation on the part of the company to pay for liquidated damages as soon as there is a delay in the delivery of goods beyond the due date as per the delivery schedule. Further, this obligation can not be avoided by the company’s future course of actions as it does not have any realistic alternative but to settle the contractual obligation (i.e., making the payment of such liquidated damages).  Thus,  there  exists  a  present  obligation  arising from past event, viz., delay beyond scheduled delivery and settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits. Accordingly, the Committee is of the view that the company should recognise a provision in respect of liquidated damages for the period of delay between the due date of delivery of goods and the expected date of delivery of the said goods and not only for the period of delay till the date of financial statements, in the light of evidence provided by events occurring after the balance sheet date, as per paragraph 36 of AS29.

The Committee is of the view that ‘matching concept’ does not preclude recognition of present obligations as liabilities at the reporting date. the Company should disclose its accounting practice in respect of liquidated damages, considering the materiality of the items and transactions and their impact on the financial statements from the perspective of users financial statements.

[Pl. Refer page nos. 344 to 348 of C. A. Journal – September, 2014]

 
5.    ICAI news

(Note: Page Nos. given below are from C.A. Journal for September, 2014)

(i)    Database of Independent Directors:
Section 150 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for creation and maintenance of data Bank of independent directors by recognised bodies. iCai has joined with institute of Company Secretaries and Institute of Cost Accountants to operationlise a repository for independent directors. mCa has approved this initiative of ICAI.  The Repository (http://independentdirector.in) will provide opportunity to individuals who are willing to act as independent directors in Companies.  Further, it will be possible for companies which wish to select independent directors to make use of this data Bank. (P.303)

(ii)    Revised    Dates    for    Campus    Placement Programme (P. 432)

It may be noted that the revised dates for campus Placement Programme for October, 2014, are as follows:

S.

no

centre

dates

1

Mumbai & New Delhi

13th to
18th and 20th October, 2014

2

Bangalore, Chennai & Kolkata

14th to
18th and 20th October, 2014

3

Hyderabad

15th to
18th and 20th October, 2014



(iii)    Revised Minimum recommended Fees for Professional Services:

ICAI has revised minimum recommended fees which members can charge for various professional services. The details are given in CA Journal for September, 2014 (P. 424 – 430).

(iv)    Scheme for Enrolment of Overseas Citizens of India:

The Scheme for enrolment of Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) as members of ICAI has been finalised by ICAI. Under this scheme, an oCi holding professional accountancy qualification shall be recognised as a member of ICAI on completion of such examination, training and modules as listed in schedule ‘B’ to C.A. Regulations. Details of the scheme are published on P. 412-415 of C.A. Journal for September, 2014.

(v)    New ICAI Publication

Revised  Guidance  note  on  tax audit  u/s.  44aB  of  the income-tax act, 1961 (2014 edition)

Company Law

fiogf49gjkf0d
1. Amendment to Companies ( Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has notified the following amendment on 12th September, 2014 in the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules 2014. In Rule 4, in sub-Rule (6) after the words “but such expenditure” the words and comma “including expenditure on administrative overheads” shall be inserted. Consequently, the clarification (iv) in General Circular No. 21 of 2014 dated 18-06-2014 stands omitted.

2. Clarification regarding Accounting Standard – AS 10 – Capitalisation of Cost

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide General Circular No. 35/2014, dated 27-08-2014, clarified issues with respect to the capitalisation of borrowing costs in Competitive Bid power projects:

1) As per Accounting Standards AS-10 & AS-16 issued by ICAI in consultation with ASB, borrowing and other costs incurred during extended delay in commencement of commercial production after the plant is otherwise ready, should not be capitalised as it does not increase the worth of the fixed assets.

2) As per AS 16, capitalisation of some part of the project which is capable of being used while construction continues for the other units should be capitalised once that part is ready for commercial production

3) it is further clarified that AS-10 & AS-16 are applicable irrespective of whether the power projects are ‘Cost Plus Projects’ or ‘Competitive Bid Projects.’

3. National Advisory Committee

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide circular dated 18th September, 2014 constituted an Advisory Committee to be called the National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards, consisting of the Mr. Amarjit Chopra, Dr. A. S. Durga Prasad, Shri R. Sridharan and CA K. Raghu and others, to advise the Central Government on the formulation and laying down of accounting policies and accounting standards for adoption by companies or class of companies under the said Act.

The Chairperson and members shall hold office for a period of one year from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette or till the constitution of National Financial Reporting Authority u/s. 132 of the Companies Act, 2013 whichever is earlier. 4. U seful Life Of Asset The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide notification dated 29th August, 2014, substituted the following in Schedule II of Companies Act 2013 – Part A Para 3 (i), substituted;

(i) The useful life of an asset shall not ordinarily be different from the useful life specified in Part C and the residual value of an asset shall not be more than 5% of the original cost.
Provided that where a Company adopts a useful life different from what is specialised in Part C or uses a residual value different from the limit specified above, the financial statements shall disclose the difference and the justification supported by technical advice.’

In Part C under the heading Noted – the para 4 shall be substituted by:

4(a) Useful life specified in Part C of the Schedule is for the whole asset and where cost of a part of the asset is significant to total cost of the asset and useful life of that part is different from the useful life of the remaining asset, useful life of that significant part shall be determined separately.

(b) The requirement under sub-paragraph (a) shall be voluntary in respect of financial year commencing on or after 01-04-2014 and mandatory for financial years commencing after 01-04-2015.

(c) in para 7 (b) for the words ‘shall be recognised,’ the words ‘may be recognised’ are substituted.

levitra

Mantra for life

fiogf49gjkf0d
How many times, at the end of the day, do you feel exhausted though you had done nothing worthwhile? On how many occasions did you react negatively without any tangible rational reason? Did you ever conduct a self audit to ascertain why your peace was disturbed?

What are the types of commitments you make? What is the number of commitments you make? Take a closer look. Have you trivialised your existence?

Ryan Nicodemus has this to say, “Those voices inside your head won’t be quiet. All you can hear is your boss telling you to have those reports done by Friday or your daughter reminding you that there’s soccer practice this Saturday or a parent’s voice telling you that they’re going to need you to help them drop off their car at the mechanic.”

If I have to talk of one mantra for a peaceful living, it is declutter. Declutter, according to the Collins English Dictionary, means to simplify or get rid of mess, disorder, complications, etc.

External decluttering can be of the possessions/ materials which one accumulates over the period, but that is not the subject of this article. The methods deployed there can also be meaningfully utilised in internal decluttering.

One oft repeated advice is – go slower. It may seem a cliché, but slowing the pace of your acts can substantially change the dynamics.

Another great way of doing it is found in what we call “simplicity”. Mahatma Gandhiji personified simplicity. In today’s world, it is common to hear the expression, ” It is simple to be happy, but it is difficult to be simple.” However, a minimalist programme can see you through to simplicity.

How do you declutter a mind? The mind is not an Inbox which you can work upon with robotic efficiency. The mind is a complex phenomenon with layers of memories, hurts, etc. that cannot be peeled off as in the case of an onion.

Shloka 3.34 from the Gita reads thus : “Indriyasyendriyasyarthe ragadvesau vyavasthitau, Tayorna vasamagaechet tau hyasya paripanthinau”

The baggage is a creation of sense organs which cling to sense objects through the emotions of Raga and Dvesha. The Gita therefore proclaims that attachment and aversion of the sense organs for the sense objects are natural. No one should come under their clutches as these are highway robbers.

 Many a times, you harbour and dwell on your past, your actions, your decisions, your mistakes, your choices, etc. But ponder over these questions. Is that situation relevant now or ever that serious? Are you blowing it out of proportion? Was that situation in your control?

Lo and behold…it will dawn upon you that you were wasting your time, energy and thoughts over unwarranted matters. The Gita proclaims that attachment and aversion of the sense organs for the sense objects are natural. No one should come under their clutches as these are highway robbers. When you are worried, everything you are grappling with, appears to be an urgent problem. The real issue is your anxiety which makes you focus on imaginary problems. You like to project yourself as invincible and invulnerable.

In the process, you live a life of a pressure cooker without a whistle. It is better not to conceal your pains, your feelings, your anxiety or your frustrations. You do not have to worry that you shall appear like the rest of us. When you lend your ears to others and passionately listen to them, you shall find the magic working for you. This seems surprising but is true.

Giving up your past baggage shall eliminate a variety of the set patterns of thoughts. In fact, you can become more creative in all that you think and do. Lateral thinking, propounded by Edward De Bono, requires challenging of accepted concepts.

Declutter will allow you to negate a back to back, bumper to bumper existence. The deluge of activities shall be replaced by a surge of accomplishments. Decluttering will allow you to be in a “good to go” position anytime.

levitra

PART C: Information on & Around

fiogf49gjkf0d
• Misuse of plot near Mantralaya on Madame Cama Road:

An investigation using the Right to Information Act by Mumbai Mirror has found out that the 19 ministerial bungalows situated on Madame Cama Road in Mumbai, next to the New Administrative Building of Mantralaya, are illegal.

The 5-acre plot had originally been earmarked for a public garden and, in 1979, the government had even promised that the bungalows would be demolished and the plot handed over to BMC for developing the garden.

This, however, was never done. The ministerial bungalows were constructed in the 1950s and are being maintained by the Public Works Department. When Mirror sought an explanation from PWD Minister Chhagan Bhujbal, he said, “It’s a very old case. I do not remember much.”

Several prominent citizens have opined that the government must hand over the plot for the garden. Among them, architect P. K. Das, whose firm had once prepared a plan for the makeover of Nariman Point, said, “In the Development Plan for Mumbai, the land is reserved for a garden and is meant for public use. This has been taken over and built upon. The ministers’ bungalows and sheds housing PWD offices must be cleared and the land utilised for its reserved purpose. There is a comprehensive redevelopment plan for this plot by the MMRDA, which was cleared by the state’s empowered committee which is headed by the chief secretary.”

The area’s citizens group is all for a garden. Atul Kumar of the Churchgate Nariman Point Residents Association said, “The city is starved of green spaces. The government must do away with these bungalows and develop a garden on the plot.”

• Eastern Freeway:

The third phase of the Eastern Freeway up to Ghatkoper, which is thrown open to motorists in April, has witnessed a 23% increase in cost ever since work started in 2007.

“The project’s cost rose from Rs. 847 crore to Rs. 1,106 crore because of delay in rehabilitation of project-affected people and slow execution of work,” RTI activist Anil Galgali said.

Galgali had sought information about the Eastern Freeway project from the MMRDA. The work on the stretch between Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Vastu Sangrahalaya to Anik Junction was scheduled to be completed by 18th January, 2011 after the work order was issued in January 2008. “There was a delay of 29 months in executing this phase of the project,” Galgali added.

• RTI & Housing Society in Mumbai:

At a special general body meeting on Sunday 30- 03-2014, of the Salsette Catholic Society in Bandra, it expelled a member for harassment through the RTI Act.

54 of the 73 members present voted in favour of the motion to expel Leslie Almeida. Earlier, Almeida had not replied to a showcause notice issued by the society that said it would allow him to present his side. But at the meeting, the members did not give Almeida an opportunity to speak as they constantly interrupted him. The committee, however, made a 90-minute presentation on why he should be expelled.

Father Michael Goveas, parish priest at St Andrew’s Church, suggested an inquiry be set up to prove the allegations against Almeida. The society’s secretary, Cornel Gonsalves, said the society had been dragged into a personal dispute, and has been harassed with hundreds of RTI applications.

levitra

PART B: RTI Act, 2005

fiogf49gjkf0d
• RTI Humour:

Chinese scientists gave environmentalism boost by inventing a printer that uses water instead of ink on rewritable paper This printer might trigger interest in India for an entirely different reason. Given the babus’ reluctance to allow the spirit of RTI legislation to prevail, they could use this invention in their line of work. What can an RTI petition achieve when the reply comes with blank pages?

• Sad story of RTI:

RTI Activist from Pune, Vihar Durve, Sought information from DoPT about the names & addresses of RTI Activists murdered/injured/harassed/assaulted etc. during 2005 to 2013. The information received is shocking. The number of persons affected as above in more than 8 years is as high as 151. The individuals murdered are 23, which includes Maharashtra 6, Gujarat 4 and 13 from other 9 States.

In 2014 also, the number of persons Killed/ Committed Suicide in Maharashtra as per my information is 2.

• Western India RTI Convention

Western India RTI Convention

Few RTI activists met in Mumbai last month to consider the proposal to organise such Convention in Mumbai. All the activists endorsed the proposal.

The BCAS Foundation (of Bombay Chartered accountants’ Society) offered to become a platinum sponsor by contributing at least 50% of the cost of organising the Convention to be incurred.

The Department of Civic and Social Justice of Dr. Ambedkar Center for Social Justice, University of Mumbai offered to host the convention at its campus premises and to provide many other complimentary facilities. Accordingly, we, the RTI activists of MUMBAI, are pleased to hold a twoday convention in MUMBAI, the dates fixed are 7th & 8th June.

We invite RTI Activists from Maharashtra, Gujarat & Goa and other States to join and be a part of this historic event.

The Convention Convener is Bhaskar Prabhu of the Mahiti Adhikar Manch. Shailesh Gandhi is the guide, Ms. Aruna Roy shall inaugurate the convention and be with us for both the days. Anyone Interested may join as delegate. For Registration form and other details please mail to: mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com or narayanvarma2011@ gmail.com

levitra

PART A: ORDERS OF CIC & the court

fiogf49gjkf0d
• Appeal –Section 19(3) of the RTI Act:

The Appellant through an RTI application dated 19-12-2012 sought certain information regarding a notification dated 15-09-2011 by which Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd, public authority had invited the applications for dealership within the range of 2 kilometer of Bhaniyawala NH 72. The application made included queries such as how many applications have been received for the dealership; to provide name, address and telephone numbers of applicants; when was the site inspection conducted; to provide the name, strength and designation of the officers who were part of the Inspection Committee, to provide a copy of Inspection report and so on.

The CPIO furnished the information sought but the appellant was dissatisfied with the information supplied to him by the CPIO.

In the appeal before the CIC, the appellant not only requested that the full information sought be provided to him but also sought some additional information like, yardstick being followed for giving dealership in respect of highways; a copy of objection raised by the Site Inspection Committee in respect of yardstick etc.

During the hearing, the Respondents pointed out that the Appellant in his present appeal before the Commission has sought additional information which he had not sought in his original RTI application. At that stage, he is not allowed to seek information other than sought in his RTI application.

The Commission ruled:
“The Commission agrees with the Respondents that the information now sought by the Appellant in the present appeal did not form part of his original RTI application. Therefore, the Commission is not in a position to allow the disclosure of the information which had not even been sought by the appellant in his RTI application. An information seeker cannot be allowed to expand the scope of his RTI enquiry at appeal stage. No disclosure can, therefore, be directed to be made in the present appeal of the Appellant. The Appellant, however, may file a fresh RTI application, if he so desires.”

[Harish Prasad Divedi vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Appeal No CIC/LS/A/2013/001477-SS decided on 28-01-2014: (RTIR I (2014)132(CIC)]

• Section 7(9) of the RTI Act:

Section 7(9) of the Right to Information Act reads as under:

7(9) An information shall ordinarily be provided in the form in which it is sought unless it would disproportionately divert the resources of the public authority or would be detrimental to the safety or preservation of the record in question.

In the writ petition, the petitioner sought expeditious disposal of petitioner’s appeal under the Right to Information Act, 2005 as well as a direction to respondents to pay amount of ` 3,01,000/- as compensation. Petitioner had also prayed for a direction to take disciplinary action against respondent No.1.

The petitioner had sought the information under 23 different items. The petitioner stated that he is a financier who gives advances to various contactors working with Director General, Deference estates.

The Court held:
“Keeping in view the width and amplitude of the information sought by the petitioner, it is apparent that the prayers in the writ petition are nothing short of an abuse of process of law and motivated if not an attempt to intimidate the respondent.”

“In the opinion of this Court, the primary duty of the officials of Ministry of Defence is to protect the sovereignty and integrity of India. If the limited manpower and resources of the Directorate General, Defence Estates as well as the Cantonment Board are devoted to address such meaningless queries, this Court is of the opinion that the entire office of the Directorate General, Defence Estates and Cantonment Board would come to stand still.” The court then reproduced the relevant Paragraph, from the Supreme Court decision in CBSE vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay, [(2011) 8 SCC 497].

Then it quoted para 39 of the Supreme Court decision in ICAI vs. Shaunak H. Satya, [(2011) 8 SCC 781], as under:

39. “We however agree that it is necessary to make a distinction in regard to information intended to bring transparency, to improve accountability and to reduce corruption, falling u/s. 4(1) (b) and (c) and other information which may not have a bearing on accountability or reducing corruption. The competent authorities under the RTI Act will have to maintain a proper balance so that while achieving transparency, the demand for information does not reach unmanageable proportions affecting other public interests, which include efficient operation of public authorities and the Government, preservation of confidentiality of sensitive information and optimum use of limited fiscal resources.”

Consequently, the Court deemed it appropriate to refuse to exercise its Writ Jurisdiction, and the petition was dismissed. This Court was also of the view that “misuse of the RTI Act has to be appropriately dealt with, otherwise the public would lose faith and confidence in this sunshine Act. A beneficent Statute, when made a tool for mischief and abuse must be checked in accordance with law.”

[Shail Sahni vs.Sanjeev Kumar and Ors. W.P. (C) 845/2014 decided by the High Court of Delhi on 05-02-2014. (RTIR I (2014) 220 (Delhi)]

levitra

Direct Taxes

fiogf49gjkf0d
Central Government notifies the National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange Limited, Mumbai as a recognised association for the purposes of clause (e) of the proviso to section 43(5) of the Act with effect from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette – Notification No. 90 dated November 27, 2013.

Last date of payment of the December Quarter Instalment of Advance Tax for the Financial year 2013-14, extended from 15th December 2013 to 17th December 2013 for all the assesses – Order F.No 385 – 8 – 2013-IT(B) dated 13th December 2013.

Central Government has introduced Rajiv Gandhi Equity Savings Scheme, 2013 encourage investment of savings of small investors in the domestic capital market. Investment made in this scheme on or after April 1, 2013, shall be eligible for deduction under section 80CCG of the Act – Notification No. 94 dated 18th December 2013385-8-2013-IT

levitra

PART C: Information on & Around

fiogf49gjkf0d
CAG SEEKS RTI ACCESS TO GOVT FILES::

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India wants the Centre to grant to Right to information (RTI ) powers as it has been facing problems in securing details relevant to its audits of government finances and decision- making.

CAG Shashikant Sharma has written a letter of finance minister Arun Jaitley demanding that the federal auditor be given RTI powers to access information and a penal provision be included in the existing CAG’s Duties and Powers Act (DPC Act) to make it mandatory for furnishing of information in a time bound manner.

The federal auditor has issued a note on how information denial has been causing the problems.

levitra

PART B: RTI Act, 2005

fiogf49gjkf0d
THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PRO TECTION ACT, 2011:

The above Act received the assent of the President on the 9th May, 2014. The objectives of the Act are noted here under:

AN ACT to establish a mechanism to receive complaints relating to disclosure on any allegation of corruption or willful misuse of power or willful misuse of discretion against any public servant and to inquire or cause an inquiry into such disclosure and to provide adequate safeguards against victimisation of the person making such complaint and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto.

Please note that in mentioning year 2011 in the title is not my or printing mistake. The fact is that the Bill was introduced in the Parliament in 2011. It took 4 years to finally become an Act. It may also be noted that though it is now an Act, it is not in operation because no rules and regulations are notified per section 27 of the Act. The said section reads:

” 27. The Competent Authority may, with previous approval of the Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, by notification in the official Gazette, make regulations not inconsistent with the provisions of the Act and the rules made there under to provide for all matters for which provision is expedient for the purposes of giving effect to the provisions of this Act.”

It may also be noted that both the central and state Governments are authorised to make rules, The State Government is authorised to make regulations also.

levitra

PART A: Decision Of CIC

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section 19 (1) of the RTI ACT:
Vide an RTI application dated 15-05-2012 the appellant sought information on thirteen issues as contained in his RTI Application.

The first appeal was filed on 13-08-2012. As the desired information was not provided by the CPIO vide Order dated 14-08-2012, First Appellate Authority held that the Order of the CPIO is modification to this extent that the information pertaining to the undersigned is already available in public domain at SI. No. 183 of the Civil List, 2012.

Decision
It is to be seen here that the appellant, vide his RTI Application dated 15-05-2012, sought some information from the respondents on 13 issues. During the hearing of the appeal it was submitted by Sh. Harinder Dhingra, appellant that he had not been provided the required information on any issues of his RTI application dated 15- 05-2012. However, it was rebutted by the respondents by stating that the required information, as sought for, was provided to the appellant vide their letter dated 06-07- 2012. It was further submitted by the appellant that his First Appeal was decided by the same officer, in respect of whom, the information was sought and it is against the Law.

Being aggrieved by the aforesaid response, First Appeal was filed by the appellant on 13-07-2012 before the FAA (Sh. Arun Kumar Addl, Commissioner (IGI) Airport, T-3 New Delhi 37), who vide his order dated 14-08-2012, upheld the decision of CPIO. Hence, a Second Appeal was preferred before this Commission.

On careful perusal of the record, it was revealed that the appellant sought some information in respect of Sh. Arun Kumar, Addl. Commission (ING), who decided the First Appeal. It has also been corroborated by the Sh. Arun Kumar, Asstt. Commissioner & CPIO, Sh. Dalveer Solanki, Asstt. Commissioner & CPIO, present before the Commission for making the submissions on behalf of the respondents, in the case.

It is a well settled position in the eyes of Law that there should be no judge of his own cause. This is one of the principles of natural justice and no one should violate the same.

Even the Hon. Judges of the High Court & Supreme Court take care of this Rule while deciding the cases. In the present case, it is now admitted fact that the person against whom the information was sought became a First Appellate Authority and decided his own case i.e. as to whether information in respect of himself is to be provided or not to the appellant.

Thus, the First Appellate Authority (Sh. Arun Kumar) violated the principles of natural justice. It is immaterial whether he has decided the case rightly or wrongly.

In view of the above, the order passed by FAA is not legally tenable and deserves to be quashed and set aside. Therefore, it is quashed accordingly. Thus, the case is remanded back to the respondents with a direction to put up the case to another FAA (to be nominated by the head of the department in case Sh. Arun Kumar is still acting as FAA ) for its disposal in accordance to the provisions of Law, within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order under intimation to this Commission.

(Harinder Dhingra vs. O/o the Addl. Commissioner of Custom, IGI Airport, Terminal 3, New Delhi, File No. CIC/ SS/A/2012/003238/KY decided on 02-04-2014. Citation: RTIR II (2014) 238 (CIC)

levitra

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section A:
Disclosures in quarterly results (Q1 of FY 2014-15) regarding adoption of revised norms for depreciation as per Schedule II of Companies Act, 2013

Compilers’ Note:
The Companies Act, 2013 has, effective 1st April 2014, made it mandatory to apply the revised norms of depreciation as per Schedule II to the Act. Schedule II requires re-assessment of useful life of the tangible fixed assets of a company vis-à-vis the useful life mentioned by the Schedule as well as requires depreciation to be provided on separate components of fixed assets based on the components individual useful life.

Given below are some diverse practices followed by listed companies in their unaudited results (which have been subjected to limited review by the statutory auditors) for the quarter ended 30th June 2014 for calculation of depreciation as per Schedule II. The disclosures are as submitted by the respective companies to the stock exchanges.

Bajaj Auto Limited:
Consequent to the enactment of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) and its applicability for accounting periods commencing after 1st April 2014, the Company has reworked depreciation with reference to the estimated economic lives of fixed assets prescribed by Schedule II to the Act or actual useful life of assets, whichever is lower. In case of any asset whose life has completed as above, the carrying value, net of residual value, as at st April 2014 has been adjusted to the General Reserve and in other cases the carrying value has been depreciated over the remaining of the revised life of the assets and recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss.

As a result the charge for depreciation is higher by Rs.16 crore for the quarter ended 30th June 2014.

Century Textiles & Industries Limited
In accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2013, effective from 1st April, 2014, the Company has reassessed the remaining useful lives of its fixed assets. As a consequence of such reassessment, the charge for depreciation for the period is lower than the previously applied rates by Rs. 2,822 lakh, correspondingly as the transitional impact of Rs. 2,234 lakh (net of deferred tax Rs.1,151 lakh) has been adjusted to retained earnings.

TVS Motor Company Limited
During the quarter ended 30th June 2014, in accordance with Part A of Schedule II to the Companies Act 2013, the Management, based on Chartered Engineer’s technical evaluation, has reassessed the remaining useful life of assets with effect from 1st April 2014. As a result of the above, depreciation is higher by Rs. 0.71 crore for the quarter ended 30th June 2014. For assets that had completed their useful life as on 1st April 2014, the net residual value of Rs. 2.74 crore has been adjusted to Reserves.

Oberoi Realty Ltd.
The useful life of fixed assets has been revised in accordance with Schedule II to the Companies Act, 2013. The impact of change in useful life of fixed assets on depreciation expense for the quarter amounts to Rs. 323.45 lakh and on opening balance of general reserve amounts to Rs. 33.50 lakh (net of deferred tax).

Reliance Infrastructure Ltd.
During the quarter, the useful life of the fixed assets other than in respect of Electricity business has been revised in accordance with Part C of Schedule II to the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly depreciation expense for the quarter ended 30th June, 2014 is higher by Rs. 3.88 crore. Similarly, in case of assets whose life has been completed as on 31st March, 2014 the carrying value (net of residual value) of those assets amounting to Rs. 4.75 crore has been debited to General Reserve.

Exide Industries Ltd.
Effective from 1st April, 2014, the Company has charged depreciation based on the revised remaining useful life of the assets as per the requirement of Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013. Due to the above, depreciation charge for the quarter ended 30th June, 2014 is higher by Rs. 0.55 crore. Further based on transitional provision provided in Note 7(b) of Schedule II, an amount of Rs. 2.41 crore (net of deferred tax) has been adjusted with retained earnings.

PI Industries Ltd.
The useful lives of fixed assets have been revised in accordance with the Schedule II to the Companies Act, 2013 which is applicable from accounting periods commencing on or after 1st April 2014. Accordingly, an amount of Rs. 3.86 crore (net of deferred tax) representing assets beyond their useful life as of 1st April 2014 has been charged to General Reserve and in respect of the remaining assets, an additional depreciation amounting to Rs. 1.55 crore has been charged to the Profit and Loss statement for the current quarter based on residual useful life. Further, in respect of plant and machinery, management is evaluating useful life of certain components, impact of which, if any, would be accounted for in subsequent quarter(s).

Tata Coffee Ltd.
Pending detailed assessment of the useful life and clarification from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, the depreciation charge for the quarter has been provided as in earlier period. Necessary effect, if required, will be given in the subsequent quarters.

From Limited Review Report
Without qualifying our report, we draw attention to: Note regarding depreciation being provided based on existing method pending evaluation of estimated useful life as required under Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013.

Thermax Ltd.
Depreciation for the quarter has been computed based on the Company’s evaluation of useful lives of its fixed assets (including significant components thereof, if any) which in certain cases are different from those mentioned in Schedule II to the Companies Act, 2013. The auditors have qualified their report in this regard as in their opinion it is not permissible to have useful lives longer than specified for same class of assets in Schedule II.

From Limited Review Report Basis of Qualified Conclusion
Depreciation for the quarter has been computed based on company’s internal evaluation of useful lives of its fixed assets (including significant components thereof, if any) which in certain cases are more than those mentioned in Schedule II to the Companies Act, 2013. In our opinion useful lives of assets cannot be longer than those indicated in Schedule II. The impact of this on depreciation and profit and loss for the quarter under review has not been computed by the company hence we are unable to comment on the same.

Tata Steel Ltd.
During the quarter, the company and some of its subsidiaries have revised depreciation rate on certain fixed assets as per the useful life specified in the Companies Act, 2013 or re-assessed by the company based on technical evaluation. Accordingly, depreciation of Rs. 136.82 crs (net of deferred tax Rs. 69.64 crore) [Rs. 129.01 crore (net of deferred tax Rs. 66.43 crore) in the stand-alone] on account of assets whose useful life is already exhausted as on 1st April 2014 has been adjusted to retained earnings. Had there been no change in useful life of assets, depreciation for the quarter would have been lower by Rs. 22.74 crore (Rs. 22.33 crore in the stand-alone).

Tata consultancy services ltd.
The group has revised its policy of providing depreciation on     fixed     assets     effective     1st     April,     2014.     Depreciation    is now provided on straight line basis for all assets as against the policy of providing on written down value basis for some assets and straight line basis for others. Further, the remaining useful life has also been revised wherever appropriate based on evaluation.  The carrying amount as on 1st  april, 2014 is depreciated over the revised remaining useful life. as a result of these changes, the depreciation charge for the quarter ended 30th  june, 2014 is higher by rs. 6,063 lakh and the effect relating to the period prior to 1st april, 2014 is not credit of rs. 48,975 lakh (excluding deferred tax of rs. 11,890 lakh) which has been shown as an “exceptional  item’ in the statement    of    profit    and    loss.

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Pending the determination of useful life and componentisation of assets, as required under schedule ii of the Companies act, 2013, the company has provided depreciation at the rates and in the manner as prescribed in the schedule XiV of the Companies act, 1956. The impact of     the     same     is     not     quantified     and    will     be     recognised     in    subsequent quarters. the PSU oil marketing Companies, have made representation to MCA for providing extension to comply with schedule  ii of the Companies act, 2013 by mandating application only for annual accounts for   2014-15 and not for quarterly accounts during 2014-15.

From Limited Review Report
As     stated     in     Note     No.     5     of     the     financial     results,     the    company has continued to provide depreciation at the rates and in the manner as prescribed in the schedule XiV of the Companies act, 1956 pending determination of estimated useful life and componentisation of assets as required under  schedule  ii to the Companies  act 2013. As informed to us, the company has also made representation to the  ministry of Corporate  affairs for providing extension to comply with requirements schedule ii of the Companies act, 2013. The impact of this matter on    depreciation    and    profit    for    the    quarter    under    review,    is not    quantified.    Hence,    we    are    unable    to    comment    on    the    same. Based on our review conducted as above, except for the effects of the matter described in the above paragraph, …

Godrej Industries Ltd
Consequent to the enactment of the Companies  act, 2013, (the act) and its applicability for accounting periods commencing on or after 1st april, 2014, the Company has    adopted     the    estimated    useful     life    of    fixed    assets    as stipulated by schedule ii to the act, except in the case of plant and machinery where the Company, based on the condition of the plants, regular maintenance schedule, material of construction and past experience, has considered useful life of plant and machinery as 30 years instead of 20 years useful life as prescribed in schedule ii of the act.

Accordingly, the Company has re-worked depreciation with    reference    to    the    estimated    useful    lives    of    fixed    assets as prescribed by schedule ii to the act. in case of assets whose useful life has been completed based on such estimates, the carrying value, net of residual value and taxes, as at 1st april, 2014, amounting to rs. 3.67 crore has been adjusted in the opening balance of retained earnings and in other cases the carrying value is being depreciated over the remaining useful life of the assets and     recognised     in     the    Statement    of    Profit    and    Loss.    As a result of the above mentioned changes, the charge for depreciation is lower by rs. 3.07 crore for the quarter ended 30th june, 2014.

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section A:
Modified report on account on unconfirmed advances and deposits to related parties, etc. – Part II

United Spirits Ltd. (31-03-2014)

From Notes to Accounts

26. Provision for doubtful receivable, advances and deposits

Compilers’ Note
Disclosures from Notes to Accounts, Auditors’ Report and Directors’ Report for the above were reproduced in the October 2014 issue of BCAJ. Given below are the remarks/qualifications in the CARO report, and the explanation thereof in the Directors’ Report.

FROM CARO Report
Paragraph (iii) (a)
According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has granted an unsecured loan to a company covered in the register maintained u/s. 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 (‘the Act’) by way of conversion of certain pre-existing loans/advances/deposits due to the Company and its subsidiaries (refer paragraph 3 under ‘basis for qualified opinion’). The year-end balance of the loan and the maximum amount outstanding during the year amounted to Rs.13,374 million.

Further, as mentioned in paragraph 1 under ‘basis for qualified opinion’, certain parties alleged that they have advanced certain amounts to certain alleged UB Group entities and linked the confirmation of amounts due to the Company to repayment of such amounts to such parties by the alleged UB Group entities. Also, some of these parties stated that the dues to the Company will be paid/ refunded only upon receipt of their dues from such alleged UB Group entities. Considering the matters disclosed in paragraphs 1 and 4 of ‘basis for qualified opinion’, we are unable to comment whether any such arrangements represent transactions with any company/ firm/other party covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act.

Directors’ Response:
Information and explanation on the qualification at paragraph (iii)(a) of Annexure to the Auditor’s report is provided in Note 26(a) to the Statement. Further, the Management has certified to the Board that, on the basis of the Management’s current information, particulars of contracts or arrangements that are required to be entered in the register maintained u/s. 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act) have been so entered. As mentioned in Note 26(c) to the financial statement, the Board has ordered a detailed and expeditious inquiry in relation to the matters disclosed in paragraphs 1 and 4 of ‘basis for qualified opinion’ in the auditor’s report. On completion of such inquiry, appropriate action if any will be taken.

Paragraph (iii)(b):
In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions on which the above unsecured loan has been granted to the company covered in the register maintained u/s. 301 of the Act as stated in sub-Clause (a) above, are prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

Based on its assessment of recoverability, the Company has during the current year, made a provision of Rs. 3,303 million against the loan and has not recognised any interest income (amounting to Rs. 963 million on the said loan).

Further, as mentioned in paragraph 1 under ‘basis for qualified opinion’, a provision of Rs. 6,495.4 million has been made with respect to amounts due from certain parties who alleged that they have advanced certain amounts to alleged UB Group entities.

Directors’ Response:
Management informed the Board that: (i) pursuant to a previous resolution passed by the board of directors of the Company on 11th October 2012, certain dues (together with interest) aggregating to Rs.13,374 Million were consolidated into, and recorded as, an unsecured loan by way of an agreement entered into between the Company and UBHL on 3rd July 2013; (ii) the interest rate of 9.5% p.a. was in accordance with section 372A of the Companies Act, 1956, read with the circular issued by the Reserve Bank of India publishing the bank rate in terms section 49 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

The management and the nominee directors of the controlling shareholder have informed the Board that they will take all the necessary steps within their power and authority as management and directors of the Company to fully protect the interest of the shareholders in this regard.

Further, the Board has directed the management to review the underlying loan agreement(s) and/or other relevant documents (“Loan Documents”), to inter-alia assess: (i) whether any event of default(s) under the Loan Documents has occurred on the part of UBHL; (ii) the legal rights and remedies which the Company has under the Loan Documents; (iii) whether the Company should invoke any of the remedies available to it under the Loan Documents (including recalling of the entire loan); and (iv) whether there is any scope of renegotiating the terms and conditions under the Loan Documents.

In this regard, the management should expeditiously take all the necessary steps to fully protect the interest of the Company and shareholders.

Paragraph (iii)(c):
According to the information and explanations given to us, in case of the unsecured loan granted to the company covered in the register maintained u/s. 301 of the Act as stated in sub-Clause (a) above, no amounts were repayable during the year as per the terms of the loan agreement.

Considering the matters disclosed in paragraphs 1 and 4 under ‘basis for qualified opinion’, we are unable to comment on the regularity in the receipt of the principal amount and interest relating to any other loan, secured or unsecured, that may have been granted to any company/ firm/other party covered in the register maintained u/s. 301 of the Act, as a result of the transactions disclosed in paragraphs 1 and 4 under ‘basis for qualified opinion’

Directors’ Response: The Management has certified to the Board that, on the basis of the Management’s current information, particulars of contracts or arrangements that are required to be entered in the register maintained u/s. 301 of the Act have been so entered. As mentioned in Note 8 to the Statement, the Board has ordered a detailed and expeditious inquiry in relation to the matters disclosed in paragraphs 1 and 4 of ‘Basis for Qualified opinion’ in the auditor’s report. On completion of such inquiry, appropriate action, if any, will be taken.

Paragraph (iii)(d):
According to the information and explanations given to us, in case of the unsecured loan granted to the company covered in the register maintained u/s. 301 as stated in sub-Clause (a) above, there is no overdue amount of more than Rs. 1 lakh in respect of the said loan.

Considering the matters disclosed in paragraphs 1 and 4 under ‘basis for qualified opinion’, we are unable to comment whether there is overdue amount of more than Rs. 1 lakh in respect of any other loan, secured or unsecured, that may have been granted to any company/ firm/ other party covered in the register maintained u/s. 301 of the Act, as a result of the transactions disclosed in paragraphs 1 and 4 under ‘basis for qualified opinion’.

Directors’ Response: The Management has certified to the Board that, on the basis of the Management’s current information, particulars of contracts or arrangements that are required to be entered in the register maintained u/s. 301 of the Act have been so entered. As mentioned in Note 8 to the Statement, the Board has ordered a detailed and expeditious inquiry in relation to the matters disclosed in paragraphs1 and 4 of ‘Basis for qualified opinion’ in the auditor’s report. On completion of such inquiry, appropriate action, if any, will be taken.

Paragraph (iv):

In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and having regard to the explanation that purchases of certain items of inventories and fixed assets are for the Company’s specialised requirements and suitable alternative sources are not available to obtain comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventories and fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services during the year.

Except for the matter discussed below, we have not observed any major weaknesses in the internal control system during the course of the audit.

Considering the matters stated under ‘basis for qualified opinion’, we are unable to comment on the adequacy of the internal control system of the Company at certain points in time during the earlier years with respect to such instances as stated under ‘basis for qualified opinion.’

Directors’ Response: The matters stated under ‘basis for qualified opinion’ relate to the period prior to 1st April 2013. The Management believes that the Company has an internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business. The Board has instructed the Management that, depending on the outcome of the inquiry, further strengthening of the internal control system should be carried out, as may be required.

Paragraph (v)(a):

In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of contracts or arrangements entered into during the year referred to in section 301 of the Act have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that section.

However, considering the matters stated under ‘basis for qualified opinion’, particularly paragraphs 1 and 4 thereof, we are unable to comment whether the particulars of any such contracts or arrangements that may result from the transactions disclosed under ‘basis for qualified opinion’ and that need to be entered in the register maintained u/s. 301 of the Act, have been so entered.

Directors’ Response: The Management has certified to the Board that, on the basis of the Management’s current information, particulars of contracts or arrangements that are required to be entered in the register maintained u/s. 301 of the Act have been so entered. As mentioned in Notes 26(a), 26(b) and 30(f) to the Statement, the Board has ordered a detailed and expeditious inquiry in relation to the matters disclosed in paragraphs 1 and 4 of ‘Basis for qualified opinion’ in the auditor’s report. On completion of such inquiry, appropriate action, if any will be taken.

Paragraph (vii):

In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business during the year, except in relation to matters stated under ‘basis for qualified opinion’, where the internal audit system needs to be strengthened. Directors’ Response: The matters stated under ‘basis for qualified opinion’ relate to the period prior to 1st April, 2013. The Management believes that the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business. The Board has instructed the Management that, depending on the outcome of the inquiry, further strengthening of the internal audit system should be carried out, as may be required.

Paragraph (x):

The accumulated losses of the Company at the end of the year are not less than 50% of its net worth. The Company has incurred cash losses in the financial year. However, no cash losses were incurred in the immediately preceding financial year.

Directors’ Response: The Board notes that the accumulated losses of the Company at the end of the year is 52 % of its peak net worth in the previous four financial years. Therefore, the Company will be required to file a report u/s. 23 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA), The Board believes this report u/s. 23 would arise as a technical requirement under SICA and does not reflect upon the long-term prospects of the Company given the profitable nature of its business and as the accumulated losses are principally on account of exceptional items during the year.

Paragraph (xi):

In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to a bank or to any financial institution except that in case of loans due to banks, principal amounting to Rs. 410 million an interest amounting to Rs. 474 million were repaid with a delay of up to 67 days and 37 days, respectively. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the year.

Directors’ Response: The Management has informed the Board that as of 31st March 2014, there were no outstanding defaults by the Company of any dues to a bank or any financial institution.

Paragraph (xvi):

In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans taken by the Company and applied during the year were for the purpose for which they were raised.

However, considering the matters stated under ‘basis for qualified opinion’, particular paragraphs 1, 3 and 4, we are unable to comment whether any transactions relating to such matters represent application of term loans for the purpose for which they were raised.

Directors’ Response: The Management has certified to the Board that, on the basis of the Management’s current information, the Company has applied term loans taken by the Company during the year for the purpose for which they were raised. However, as mentioned in Note 26(c) to the Statement, the Board has ordered a detailed and expeditious inquiry in relation to the matters disclosed in paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of ‘basis for qualified opinion’ in the auditor’s report. On completion of such inquiry, appropriate action will be taken, as may be required.

Paragraph (xxi):

As mentioned in detail in paragraphs 1 and 2 under ‘basis for qualified opinion wherein it is stated that:

    Certain parties alleged that they have advanced certain amounts to certain alleged UB Group entities and linked the confirmation of amounts aggregating to Rs. 5,846.9 million due to the Company to repayment of such amounts to such parties by the alleged UB Group entities. Further, some of these parties stated that the dues to the Company will be paid/refunded only upon receipt of their dues from such alleged UB Group entities; and an alleged instance of a purported agreement to create a lien on certain investments of the Company as security against loans given by an Alleged Claimant to Kingfisher Airlines Limited (KFA) in earlier years was noted. However, in a letter dated 31st July, 2014 from the Alleged Claimant, it was stated that the allegation made earlier did not take into account an addendum to the loan agreement; and after examining the aforesaid addendum and the agreement, the Alleged Claimant does not have any claim or demand of any nature against the Company. Subsequently, in September 2014, scanned copies of the purported agreements were furnished to the Management by KFA.The Management has represented to us that the Company had no knowledge of these purported agreements; that the Board of Directors of the Company have not approved any such purported agreements; and it is not liable under any such purport agreements.

Pending the completion of the inquiry as mentioned in paragraph 4 under ‘basis for qualified opinion’, we are unable to conclude whether these instances can be termed as ‘fraud’ and whether there are other instances of a similar nature.

Directors’ Response: See responses to paragraphs 1 to 3 of the Auditor’s Report to the Financial Statement. As mentioned in the note 30(f) to the Statement, the Board has directed a detailed and expeditious inquiry in relation to the matters disclosed in paragraphs 1 to 5 of “basis for qualified opinion” in the Auditors’ Report. Pending the completion of such inquiry, the Board is unable to conclude whether there have been any instances of fraud against the Company. Based on the findings of such inquiry, appropriate action, including action for recovery of the Company’s assets or amounts owing to the company, will be taken.

FROM THE PRESIDENT

fiogf49gjkf0d
Dear members, 

In the landmark decision delivered on 25th September 2014 in the matter of the National Tax Tribunals (NTT) Act, 2005, the five judges bench of the Supreme Court declared the NTT Act as unconstitutional mainly on the grounds that the basic structure of the Constitution will stand violated if while enacting the legislation pertaining to transfer of judicial power, the Parliament does not ensure that the newly created court/tribunal, conforms with the salient characteristics and standards, of the court sought to be substituted. And that the constitutional conventions, pertaining to constitutions styled on the Westminster model, will also stand breached, if while enacting the legislation pertaining to transfer of judicial power, conventions and salient characteristics of the court sought to be replaced, are not incorporated in the court/tribunal sought to be created.

In this decision, the Supreme Court also held that allowing Chartered Accountants to appear on behalf of a party before the NTT would be unacceptable in law. The Supreme Court has stated that in their understanding the Chartered Accountants would at best be specialist in understanding and explaining issues pertaining to accounts which fall purely in the realm of facts, whereas the determination at the hands of the NTT is shorn of factual disputes. It observed that the NTT has to decide only ‘substantial question of law’ arising from not only the income tax laws but also a wide range of family, trust, corporate and other laws. This decision draws support from a compilation of 96 different income-tax case laws that involve substantial questions of various laws. The Supreme Court found it difficult to appreciate the propriety of representation, on behalf of a party to an appeal, through a Chartered Accountant and unfortunately bracketed them with the Company Secretaries.

With due respect to the Supreme Court, these observations seem to be misplaced. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. V. Easwar, then Judge of Delhi High Court, in an address, has acclaimed the contribution of chartered accountants in shaping of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), and I quote: ‘Several chartered accountants have worked as Members of the Tribunal in its long history of almost 72 years. There were some who became its President…

The Income-tax Act has entrusted a significant role to the chartered accountants. It has reposed immense confidence on them to certify the various claims for deductions…

…With their incisive analysis of the accounting aspect of the case, they have, if I may acknowledge with respect, admirably fulfilled the role expected of them. This is not to say that their judicial insights are any less than the judicial members. Over a period of years they also acquire a grip over the legal aspects of the case and they are second to none in conforming to the judicial norms and discipline in the discharge of their functions.’The expertise of Chartered Accountants has been recognised widely,and they are permitted to appear before not only the direct and indirect tax forums but also under other laws.With international taxation issues gaining prominence and evolution of specialised areas such as transfer pricing, a Chartered Accountant with his vigorous training and resulting expertise brings significant value tothe judicial process pertaining to the revenue matters.It is unfortunate that the highest court has not taken into consideration the pivotal role played by Chartered Accountants in ITAT as well as in their contribution in administration of tax and other laws.

Also, the Supreme Court has not addressed the core issues that plague the judicial redressal system, such as unfathomable delays and multiplicity of proceedings resulting from the existence of multiple appellate levels. The uncertainties and complexities in the judicial redressal system get further compounded by conflicting opinions at various appellate forums having independent jurisdiction across the country.

It is pertinent to note that the idea of the NTT was first mooted in 1955 by the first law commission chaired by Mr. M. C. Setalvad in 1955 and reiterated by the Wanchoo Committee in 1970 and by the C. C. Choksi Committee in 1977. The dilatory, cumbersome reference procedure which caused enormous delay in disposal of tax litigation was the main reason behind them making this recommendation. As an interim measure to the above recommendation, the Choksi Committee suggested, the desirability of constituting Special Tax Benches in High Courts to be comprised of judges with special knowledge of tax law to deal with the large number of pending tax cases.

In this decision, the Supreme Court has once again raised concerns about the growing tribunalisation of justice and rightly so. As per one count, over 100 tribunals have been setup to date by the Central and various State Governments.The Report of the Arrears Committee (1989-90), popularly known as the Malimath Committee Report, stated that the overall picture regarding the tribunalisation of justice in our country is not satisfactory.These concerns remain valid even today.

The NTT and other decisions such as in the matters of 2G and Coalgate also raise concerns about legislative and regulatory capabilities of the legislature and the executive. Commenting on the Companies Act, 2013, Justice A. K. Sikri lamented that this legislation exposes the lack of expertise in legislative draftmaking. He also said that indeterminate laws make the courts struggle to find the intent of legislature where 90 % of the parliamentarians don’t even know when the law comes, what is the law and the same is not even debated.

The BJP in its election manifesto has promised a wide range of measures to ensure justice which is prompt and accessible.It is high time the Government undertakes these comprehensive legal reforms promptly and not restrict itself to cleaning only outdated laws.

Prime Minister Modi launched the ‘Make in India’ initiative to boost our manufacturing sector and aims to improve India’s rank from 135 to 50 in ‘Ease of Business’ ranking. He is sensitising his team and his bureaucracy to not create unnecessary barriers to business and spur positivity and inspire confidence among manufacturers. In this backdrop, it appears that transforming the rigid and mechanical bureaucracy seasoned over decades will be an uphill task. The recent experience with the CBDT where it prolonged extending the due date for filing of the return of income despite a large number of representations until pressurised through various High Courts decisions, is a case in point.

At a recently held Advanced FEMA Conference, organised jointly by the BCAS and the Chamber of Tax Consultants, the Chief Guest Mr. G. Padmanabhan, the Executive Director of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), accepted that the FEMA regulations have become too complex and require a comprehensive review. The Conference provided an opportunity for participants, many from outstation, to raise their difficulties with concerned officials from the RBI directly and expert analysis from the excellent faculty.

The much deserved extension and ensuing season of festivals give us an opportunity to take a break from the routine of multi-tasking and rushing from one deadline to another and instead spend quality time with our loved ones. Let us embrace these celebrations with open hearts and relearn how to enjoy life.

Wishing you all a happy and joyous Deepavali!

With warm regards,

levitra

ICAI and its members

fiogf49gjkf0d
1 Disciplinary cases:

ICAI publication on ‘Disciplinary Cases’ gives decisions by the Disciplinary Committee. Some of these decisions are given below. Names of members are not given for the sake of confidentiality. Page Numbers given below are from the Publication Vol.I – (Part II)

(i) Re. SRK:
If this case the CIT, Mumbai, had written to the Institute that the member had conducted Tax Audit u/s. 44 AB of an assessee for A/Y: 2004-05. In this case, the assessee had claimed Rs. 3.74 crore as interest paid to Bank on Loan. Out of this Rs.3.10 crore was not paid. According to CIT this was not allowable u/s. 43B. This fact was not pointed out by the member and this amounted to gross negligence on the part of the member.

The defence of the member was that section 43B(e) of the Income tax Act was amended w.e.f. 2004 -05 whereby the interest to Bank on loans and advances, if not paid by due date, was not allowed. Prior to this amendment the provision applied to interest on term loan from bank. Moreover, the assessee had brought forward losses of Rs.10 crore and therefore there was no loss to revenue. The member pleaded that it was only due to oversight that he failed to notice this amendment and therefore failed to give effect to it in the Tax Audit Report.

The DC has held that A.Y 2004-05 was the first year wherein the said amendment was made applicable and the member should have been careful in giving effect to it. Further, due to past losses, there was no loss of revenue by this non-disclosure. The D.C. was of the view that there was negligence on the part of the member but there was no mala fide intention on the part of the member. On this basis, the member was held to be “Not Guilty” of any Professional misconduct (P. 144 – 147)

(ii) Re. TRM: In this case, the outgoing auditor of a co-operative Bank had complained that the Member had accepted the audit for the subsequent year without first communicating with him and that the Bank had not paid his fees. The defence of the member was as under.
(a) T he appointment was made through empanelment with Registrar of Co-operative Dept and not by the Bank.
(b) T he communication about the appointment was made by a letter to the previous auditor which was sent through Courier. This letter was not by Regd. Post or Speed Post but there was evidence that it was received by the previous auditor.
(c) A s regards the outstanding fees the member was informed by the Bank that the audit fees fixed by the Registrar were only Rs. 9,000/- but the previous auditor had raised bill of over Rs. 66,000/-. Hence, this was in dispute and therefore not paid by the Bank.

The DC has held as under:

(a) T here was evidence to the effect that the member had sent communication about his appointment to the previous auditor and, therefore, this charge was not proved.
(b) A s regards the Fees it was proved that there was dispute with the Bank. It was also proved that subsequently the undisputed amount of audit fees of Rs. 9,000/- was paid by the Bank to the previous auditor.

On the basis of the above finding, the D.C. held that the member was not guilty of professional misconduct (P 167 – 172).

2 Financial reporting review board (frrb):

ICAI has published a “Study on compliance of Financial Requirements”. Some of the observations from this publication are given below.

(i) Disclosure about Prior Period Items: In some published Annual Reports disclosure about prior period items is made as under.

(a) Prior period expenses and income are adjusted in respective heads of expenses and income in the Profit & Loss A/c.
(b) P rior period expenses are shown under the head of selling and administrative expenses. (c) P rior period adjustment (net) is shown in the P & L A/c.
(d) P rior period expenses are shown under the head of other expenses.
(e) D epreciation charged during the year includes an amount of depreciation pertaining to previous year.

Observation of FRRB:

The disclosures are contrary to Para 15 of AS.5. Under AS-5, the nature of prior period items is required to be disclosed in the P & L in the schedules or in the Notes. Clubbing the prior period adjustments in their respective heads does not enable the reader to understand the effect of such adjustments on the current profit or loss which is against the requirements of AS-5.

(ii) Disclosure of Depreciation Policy:
Annual Report of one of the Companies stated that “Depreciation Rates on some of the Fixed Assets have been revised so as to keep them as per the requirements of Schedule XIV of the Companies Act”.

Observation of FRRB:

When Depreciation Rates are revised during the year, it will lead to change in Accounting Estimate as provided in Para 27 of AS-5. This may result in provision of depreciation which may be of higher or lower amount then that of provision at pre-revised rates. This will have material impact on the finance statements. In this particular case, the company has not complied with Para 27 of AS-5. The Company should have disclosed the aggregate effect of the revision in depreciation rates on the Profit/Loss for the year.

3 Accounting Treatment of Expenditure incurred on Stamp Duty and Registration Fees for Increase in Authorised Capital:

(Page 249 – 253)

A company was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 as a private Limited company. The company is registered as a non-banking financial company (NBFC) (non deposit accepting) as defined u/s. 45-1A of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (RBI). The company is primarily engaged in the business of lending for purchase of equipments.

The Company’s Authorised Share Capital as on 31st March, 2013 was Rs.7,00,00,000/- The Company received share application money of Rs. 55,62,55,000/-. To be able to allot further equity shares, the shareholders of the company, have approved increase in authorised share capital to Rs. 75,00,00,000/-. The company has incurred an expenditure of Rs. 47,60,000 /-(Rs. 34,00,000 towards stamp duty and Rs.13,60,000 towards registration fees paid to the Registrar of Companies) for the said increase in authorised share capital.

Post increase in authorised capital, the Board of Directors of the company has passed a resolution for allotment of 5,56,25,500 equity shares of the company of Rs. 10/- each at par amounting to Rs. 55,62,55,000/-.

The issue relates to accounting treatment of the expenditure of Rs. 47,60,000/- incurred by the company for increase in authorised capital.

Query:
On the basis of the above, opinion of the EAC is sought by the company, whether the company can treat the whole of the expenditure incurred on increase in authorised capital as ‘share issue expenses’?

EAC Opinion:
The Committee noted from the Facts of the Case that the company has received share application money in excess of the authorised share capital and subsequently increased its authorised share capital and made allotment of shares. The Committee notes that the query raised is in relation to expenses (stamp duty and registration fee) incurred for increase in authorised share capital of the company.

After considering paragraph 5 of accounting standard (AS) 26  ‘intangible assets’ and Guidance note on terms used  in  financial  statements,  the  Committee  is  of  the view that increase in authorised share capital is an independent process which does not necessarily lead to issue of shares. The need to increase the authorised capital and to incur expenses for increasing the same would not have arisen had the additional allotment of shares was within the limits of existing authorised capital. Accordingly, the Committee is of the view that the expenses incurred on increase in authorised share capital are distinct and separate from the expenses incurred on share issue. additionally, the Committee is of the view that accounting depends on the nature of expense and the fact that the share application money was received before increase in authorised share capital will not change the nature of expense. further, increase in authorised share capital does not represent issue of additional share capital and only sets a limit for the paid up capital of a company at any given point of time. Accordingly, the Committee is of the view that the expenses incurred on increasing the authorised share capital cannot be termed as share issue expenses

Further considering the paragraph 6.2 of as 26, the Committee notes that if an expenditure does not result into acquisition of an asset, it should be recognised as an expense as and when incurred. the Committee also notes that the amount spent towards increase in authorised share capital does not give rise to any resource controlled by the enterprise. in fact, such expenses are only permitting the company to enhance the limit for the paid up capital of the company which does not ensure any flow of funds to the company. Accordingly, it does not meet the definition of an asset. Thus, the amount aggregating to rs. 47,60,000/- incurred towards stamp duty and fees paid to the registrar of  Companies should be recognised as expense in the statement of profit and loss as per the requirements of paragraph 56 of as26.

[Pl. Refer page nos. 249 to 253 of C. A. Journal – August,2014]

4    ICAI News
Note: (page numbers given below are from C.A. journal of august, 2014)

(i)    Final C.A Examination (May 2014) results (TOI 9.8.2014)
final   C.A.,   may   2014,   examination   results   were declared on 8th august 2014. a comparative chart of pass percentage for last 3 examinations is as under.

In may, 2014, examination out of 42,533 students who appeared for the examination in both Groups only 3100 passed. Names of first three Rank Holders are as under:

Group

may, 2014

november,
2013

may, 2013

Both Groups

7.29

3.11

10.03

Group I

13.50

5.67

13.79

Group II

10.66

7.35

18.65

First        : Shri sanjay nawandhar (jaipur)
Second  : Shri Kunal jethani (jodhpur)
Third    : Ms. harsha Bhatted (pune)

Our Congratulations and Best Wishes to each of the above candidates.

(ii)    New Publication of ICAI(278)
Technical guide on internal audit of it software industry.

(iii)    Ind AS Implementation (P.147)
The  president  in  his  presidential  message  has  stated that the finance minister has proposed in paragraph 128 of the Budget speech for the year 2014-15 that there is urgent need to converge current indian accounting standards  with  international  financial  reporting  standards (IFRS) and that the new indian accounting standards (ind as) converged with ifrs shall be adopted by the Indian Companies from the financial year 2015- 16  voluntarily  and  from  the  financial  year  2016-17 on mandatory basis.

Company Law

fiogf49gjkf0d
Full Version of the Circulars/Notifications can be accessed at http://www.mca.gov.in

1. Company Law Settlement Scheme, 2014
The
Ministry of Corporate Affairs, vide General Circular No. 34/2014 dated
12-08-2014, has launched the Company Law Settlement Scheme, 2014
(CLSS-2014), to enable companies who have failed to file annual
statutory documents (Annual Return and Financial Statements) an
opportunity to file them and enable them:

1. To make their default good by filing belated documents at a reduced additional fee of 25% of actual fees.

2. Avoid penal action, especially disqualification of the Directors u/s. 164(2) of Companies Act, 2013.

3.
I nactive companies can get their companies declared as ‘dormant
Company’ u/s. 455 of the Act by completing the filing at reduced penalty
and get themselves declared as ‘Dormant Company’ by filing e-form MSC- 1
at 25% of the fee for the form or apply for strike off by filing e-form
FTE at 25% of fee payable.

4. Grants immunity from prosecution
for delayed filing. Under the Companies Act, 2013 the quantum of
punishment has been enhanced for repeated defaults in section 451.

The Scheme is in force from 15th August, 2014 to 15th October, 2014.

CLSS shall not apply to the filing of belated documents other than the following:

1. Form 20B-Form for filing annual return by a company having share capital.

2. F orm 21A-Particulars of Annual Return for the company not having share capital.

3. F orm 23AC, 23ACA, 23AC-XBRL and 23ACA-XBRLForms for filing Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss account.

4. Form 66-Form for submission of Compliance Certificate with the Registrar.

5. F orm 23B-Form for intimation for Appointment of Auditors.

Further, CLSS shall not apply in the following cases:
1.
Companies against which action for striking off the name under s/s. (5)
of section 560 of Companies Act, 1956 has already been initiated by the
Registrar of Companies; or

2. Where any application has already
been filed by the companies for action of striking off name from the
Register of Companies; or

3. Where applications have been filed for obtaining Dormant status under section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013;

4. Vanishing companies.

Companies
need to file an application in the e-Form CLSS 2014 to seek immunity
for filing belated documents. After granting the immunity, the Registrar
concerned shall withdraw the prosecution(s) pending, if any, before the
concerned court.

2. Clarification With Regard Section 139 (5) and 139 (7) of Companies Act, 2013

The
Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide General Circular No. 33/2014
dated 31st July, 2014 issued clarification regarding appointment of
Auditors to deemed Government Companies as no specific provisions of
deemed Government Companies are included in the New Act. It is clarified
that the new Act does not alter the position with regard to audit of
such deemed government Companies through C & AG and thus such
companies are covered under s/s. (5) and (7) of section 139 of the new
act.

Further, the Shareholders Agreement and the Articles of
Association envisaging control, are to be taken into account to decide
whether an individual Company other than those refereed above is covered
under the provisions of s/s. (5) and (7) of section 139 of the Act.
Also, clarified that where a newly incorporated Company requires the
appointment of Auditor by the C & AG, it is the primary
responsibility of the Company to inform the same to the C & AG and
to share such intimation to the relevant Government so that the
Government can also send a suitable request to the C & AG.

3. Clarification On Transitional Period For Resolutions Passed Under Companies Act, 1956

The
Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide General Circular No. 32/2014
dated 23rd July, 2014, clarified that resolution approved or passed by
Companies under the relevant applicable provisions of the old Act during
the period 1st September, 2013 to 31st March, 2014, can be implemented,
in accordance with the Old Act, notwithstanding the repeal of the
relevant provision subject to the conditions:

(a) that the implementation of the resolution actually commenced before 1st April, 2014; and
(b)
that this transitional arrangement will be available upto expiry of one
year from the passing of the resolution or 6 months from the
commencement of the corresponding provision in the New Act whichever is
later.

It is also clarified that any amendment to the resolution must be in accordance with the relevant provision of the New Act.

4. Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014

The
Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide notification dated 14th August,
2014, issued the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Second
Amendment Rules, 2014, in exercise of the powers conferred u/s. 173,
175, 177, 178, 179, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189 and section 191 read
with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), which shall
come into force on the date of their publication in the Official
Gazette.

In the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014:

(1)
in Rule 3, in sub-Rule (6), the words and commas,“which shall be in
India,” shall be omitted whereby the scheduled venue of the Board
meeting through video conferencing or audio visual will be the place
where the recording takes place.

(2) (a) in Rule 4, (a) in sub-Rule (1), for the brackets, figure and word “(1) The,” the word “The” shall be substituted;

(b)
in Clause (iv), for the words “consideration of accounts,” the words
“consideration of financial statement including consolidated financial
statement, if any, to be approved by the Board under s/s. (1) of section
134 of the Act” shall be substituted, i.e, Audit Committee meetings for
consideration of accounts is to now read, the Audit Committee Meetings
for consideration of any financial statement including Consolidated
Financial Statement cannot be done through video conferencing.

(3) in Rule 15, for sub-Rule (3), the following sub-Rule shall be substituted, namely:-

“(3)
For the purposes of first proviso to s/s. (1) of section 188, except
with the prior approval of the company by a special resolution, a
company shall not enter into a transaction or transactions, where the
transaction or transactions to be entered into, –

a. as
contracts or arrangements with respect to clauses (a) to (e) of s/s. (1)
of section 188, with criteria as mentioned below –

i) sale,
purchase or supply of any goods or materials, directly or through
appointment of agent, exceeding ten per cent. of the turnover of the
company or rupees one hundred crore, whichever is lower, as mentioned in
Clause (a) and Clause (e) respectively of s/s. (1) of section 188;
ii)
selling or otherwise disposing of or buying property of any kind,
directly or through appointment of agent, exceeding ten per cent. of net
worth of the company or rupees one hundred crore, whichever is lower,
as mentioned in Clause (b) and Clause (e) respectively of s/s. (1) of
section 188;
iii) leasing of property of any kind exceeding ten per cent. of the net worth of the company or ten per cent. of
turnover of the company or rupees one hundred crore, whichever is
lower, as mentioned in Clause (c) of s/s. (1) of section 188;

iv)    availing or rendering of any services, directly or through appointment of agent, exceeding ten per cent. of the turnover of the company or rupees fifty crore, whichever is lower, as mentioned in Clause (d) and Clause (e) respectively of s/s. (1) of section 188:

Explanation- It is hereby clarified that the limits specified in sub-Clauses (i) to (iv) shall apply for transaction or transactions to be entered into either individually or taken together with the previous transactions during a financial year.

b.    is for appointment to any office or place of profit in the company, its subsidiary company or associate com- pany at a monthly remuneration exceeding two and half lakh rupees as mentioned in Clause (f) of s/s. (1) of section 188; or

c.    is for remuneration for underwriting the subscription of any securities or derivatives thereof, of the company exceeding one per cent of the net worth as mentioned in Clause (g) of s/s. (1) of section 188.

Explanation.-

(1)    the turnover or net Worth referred in the above sub- rules shall be computed on the basis of the audited Financial Statement of the preceding financial year.

(2)    in case of a wholly-owned subsidiary, the special reso- lution passed by the holding company shall be suf- ficient for the purpose of entering into the transactions between the wholly owned subsidiary and the holding company.

(3)    the explanatory statement to be annexed to the notice of a general meeting convened pursuant to section 101 shall contain the following particulars, namely:-
a.    name of the related party;
b.    name of the director or key managerial personnel who is related, if any;
c.    nature of relationship;
d.    nature, material terms, monetary value and particulars of the contract or arrangement;
e.    any  other  information  relevant  or  important   for the members to take a decision on the proposed resolution.”

5.    Second amendment to Companies (Management and administration) rules, 2014

The ministry of Corporate affairs has on 24th july, 2014 vide Gsr 537(e) amended the Companies (manage- ment and administration) rules, 2014 by insertion of the following:

i.    in rule 9 after sub-rule (3) – “provided that nothing contained in this rule shall apply in relation to a trust which is created, to set up a mutual fund or Venture Capital fund or such other fund as may be approved by SEBI.”
ii.    and in rule 13 the words “either value or volume of the shares “shall be and the explanation shall be omitted.
iii.    In Rule 23 (1) for the words “not less than five lakhs rupees,” the words “not more than five lakh rupees” substituted.
iv.    In rule 27, in sub-rule (1) and in the explanation, for the word “shall”, the word “may” shall be substituted.

6.    Addition to Schedule VII – of Companies act, 2013

The Central Government vide Notification dated 6th August, 2014, Gsr 568 (e) has made the following amendment to schedule Vii pertaining to Corporate social responsibility:

insertion of
“(xi) slum area development.

Explanation – for the purposes of this item, ‘slum area’ shall mean any area declared as such by the Central Government or any state Government or any other Com- petent authority under any law for the time being in force.”

7.    ‘Class of Companies “ for the purposes of Section 203 (1) of the Companies act, 2013

Vide Notification No. S O 1913(E) the Ministry of Corpo- rate Affairs has on 25th July, 2014 it has notified that public Companies having :

a)    paid up Capital of Rs. 100 crores or more; and
b)    annual turnover of Rs. 1,000 crores or more; and
c)    which are engaged in multiple businesses; and
d)    have appointed Chief Executive Officer for each such business shall be the ‘class of Companies’ for the purposes of section 203 (1) of the Companies act, 2013 which pertains to appointment of Key managerial personnel.

8. Companies (removal of Difficulties) Sixth Order, 2014

The ministry of Corporate affairs has vide s o 1894 (e) dated 24th july, 2014, issued the Companies (removal of Difficulties) Sixth Order, 2014. To overcome the difficulties arising, and resultant disharmonious interpretation of Clause 76 of section 2 pertaining to related party, due to absence of the word ‘relative’ in clause (iv), the Central Government has issued the said order and amended section 2 as follows:

“In Clause (76) in sub-Clause (iv) after the word ‘manager’ the word ‘or his relative’ shall be inserted.”

From the President

fiogf49gjkf0d
Dear members of BCAS family,

It is nearing the year end as I write this communique. Christmas and New Year are round the corner. Festivities are in the air. Many colleagues and friends are going for their vacations. Some coincide with the vacations of their children and some availing leaves before they lapse. Whatever the reason, there’s a lot of family time. A lot of happiness. A time to take stock of the year gone by. Time to make New Year resolutions and plans. Today the GM of BCAS sent me a list of proposed BCAS holidays for my approval. Likewise my office HR is finalising the holidays for our various offices.

A list which has numerous festivals. Many birthdays of Gods and Godly figures. Some occasions to commemorate victories of good over evil and freedom from slavery. All reasons to celebrate and spread happiness. Barring a couple of days of mourning the death of founders of religions, all reasons to cheer and make merry. These are formal occasions to be happy. Add to these the birthdays, anniversaries, births, promotions and many other events in our personal lives. The society that we are a part of presents us with ‘ocassions’ to be happy. Being happy is mandated. So what happens on the remaining days? Are we happy without a societal diktat? A lot of what one has read, heard, discussed and believed comes to mind.

Mind has thoughts. The heavy traffic of thoughts, some nice and some not so nice, sucks on the energy and creates a state of restlessness. Man needs a structure, a guidance if you may, to reduce the pace of thoughts, channelise them and organise the pace to be able to maintain sanity. Most of us throng to religions to satisfy this need. Many scriptures talk of this. Many modern thinkers have studied and tried to rationalise this. Some have even prescribed ways to bring peace of mind and happiness. Triumph of good over evil is the universal strand running through most religions. The most motivating and optimist belief that all will be well in the end is a very important and powerful thought that keeps us going. Then there are variants. Meditation is another way to control the mind through reaching a state of nothingness.

No thoughts. Sufism follows a similar belief, that of entering into a trance where one feels one with the God. Chanting too probably has the same impact. Various ways to achieve the same objective – control over thoughts. Hence by inference, thoughts are disturbing. May be not all, may be the pace of thoughts, the quality of thoughts and the conscious hierarchy of thoughts. I don’t know much about the chakras and kundalis but there’s a science in the segregation of various thoughts and their hierarchy. I recently had a conversation with a friend which gave me some insights into Buddhism. Buddhism believes that one is responsible for one’s own happiness or unhappiness. There are four needs that need to be fulfilled to attain happiness. The degree and hierarchy is not defined.

1. Health – it is our dharma to maintain a healthy body which houses our mind.

2. Wealth – money is important but how much and how is your choice. A simple arithmetic formula is: Resources ÷ Needs. The lesser your needs the lesser the resources needed. If the needs exceed the resources then there’s mental disturbance.

3. Relationships – there must be peace and contentment with the relations around you.
(1) Have fewer but deeper relationships and
(2) Reduce the expectations to a level where there is never any disappointment. Forgiveness plays an important part here.

4. Peace with self – this probably is the most important aspect. Morals, ethics, acceptance, detachment all are ends to reach this state. Such a simple approach. In modern times, one can see a similar analysis done by the Psychologist Abraham Maslow through his famed Need-Hierarchy theory. He ranked needs into 5 categories and concluded that as each need is satisfied, one moves from the lower needs to higher needs.
Starting from bottom and going up, these are:
1. Physiological needs – air, water, food, clothing
2. Safety needs – safe housing, job security, safety of family, property etc.
3. Belonging needs – Need for acceptance in society, family, friends, community
4. Esteem needs – respect, appreciation, recognition, rewards, etc.
5. Self-actualisation need – Peace with self.

As can be seen, it is universally recognised that left to itself, the mind can cause a havoc. Mind needs to be tamed. Thoughts need to be organised. Needs to be recognised, defined, prioritized and satisfied. Moving from one level to another. It is true that we are responsible for our own happiness. The solutions are not external. Happiness does not come from outside. What is common between meditation, music, sports, chanting, etc?

All are aimed at controlling the mind and it’s thoughts and sharpening the focus to think clearly. This makes it easy to believe that happiness is a state of mind. (No, I am not inspired by the politician who recently said something similar in the context of poverty). The other observation is that some of us are besieged with problems, much more than the others. These problems deny us the opportunity to be happy. If we were to categorise our problems into those that are God-given and those that are self-created, we would realise that the former are far fewer than the latter. Terminal illness, natural calamities, accidents caused due to negligence of others could all be in the former category.

Fights, rashness, badmouthing others, carelessness, disregard to safety, crimes, revenge, jealousy and many such are self-created problems. Apart from bringing grief along with them, they also suck your energies into resolving them and thus denying you the opportunity to do something more satisfying or self-actuating. So another mantra to be happy is to create as little problems for oneself as possible and save your strength and energy for battling challenges thrown by nature or the Almighty. Many of our griefs are due to our attachments. In many cases one has seen that on the loss of a person or possession, people lose the will to live and start living in a perpetual state of misery.

Hence if you notice, all scriptures and thinkers concur on the state of detachment being the ultimate level of a happy mind. Not very easy. Very few would have reached this elevated state of mind. Is this the state of mind they call Moksha? If proof is needed that the mind wanders, then this write up of mine is an apt example. How a list of festivals led my mind to wander into so many directions. Need to put into practice all that I have read, heard, discussed, pondered or propagated.

levitra

Direct Taxes

fiogf49gjkf0d
Wealth tax (1st Amendment) Rules, 2014 – Notification No. 32/2014 dated 23rd June, 2014

Return of Wealth for AY 2014-15 and onwards, is required to be filed in Form BB. No enclosures are required to be filed along with this form. Form BB is to be filed electronically with digital signature. Individuals and HUFs, to whom provisions of section 44AB are not applicable, have an option for AY 2014-15, to file the return in Form BB in paper form. A separate set of Instructions have been issued to guide the assessees file the return of net wealth in the new Form

A Press Release dated 4th July 2014 is issued to provide that all taxpayers are required to update and validate their taxpayer Email ID and Mobile Number on the Income tax website for their e-filing account

Revision of monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Court and Supreme Court – measures for reducing litigation – Instruction No. 5/2014 dated 10th July 2014 available on www. bcasonline.org

levitra

FROM THE PRESIDENT

fiogf49gjkf0d
Dear members,

It is indeed a great honour and aproud privilege to be bestowed with the responsibility to be the 65th President of an outstanding organisation that the Bombay Chartered Accountants’ Society (BCAS) is. The task of walking on the path carved out by the stalwarts who have led this august institution in the past and reach new milestones is formidable. In this journey, one has the unstinted support of seniors, colleagues and other members. Your warm messages of welcome and support enthuse me. The roadmap for the BCAS for the new and coming few years takes into consideration continuity from the past and expectations of various stakeholders. My acceptance address, delivered at the AGM and reproduced in this issue of journal, highlights this…

The new BCAS year began with Shri Dastur presenting his annual budget speech for a record 26th time. A packed audience of more than 2,000 listened to his comprehensive analysis of the direct tax provisions of the Finance (No.2) Bill, 2014 with rapt attention and admiration. The BCAS has started live webcast of the annual budget meeting since 2009. This year’s live webcast was viewed by over 1,500 logins simultaneously. In many offices, the live webcast was projected on a screen and watched by large groups making it difficult to estimate the total number of viewers. The feedback from the viewers is very encouraging. We will continue to adapt to changes in the technology and ensure that the BCAS continues to reach out to a larger number of the members and shrinks the geographical distances.

The Indian economy has been going through challenging times. This has culminated in lower than 5% GDP growth for two consecutive years, 2012-13 and 2013-14. Sub-5% GDP growth for two years in succession was last witnessed a quarter of a century ago in 1986-87 and 1987-88. The manufacturing sector suffered the most with the growth plummeting from 8.5% in 2011-12 to 1.2% in 2012-13 and 0.5% in 2012-13. With hope to see Achche Din, India gave a decisive mandate in favour of Modi Government and the expectations from the new Government are sky high.

In the budget speech, the Finance Minister Mr. Arun Jaitley referred to aspirational Indians and the neomiddle class demanding better living standards. Also described as an aspirational volcano, the rising India is now assertively demanding improvement in quality of governance that includes better infrastructure, more opportunities, greater choices, and enhanced safety and security. In the past, there have been always gaps in promises made by the ruling combine and the deliveries on ground. The Finance Minister has used to the word “growth” 31 times in one of the longest budget speech in history. It is important that the new Government pursues an all-inclusive growth agenda relentlessly and aggressively to channelise energy of young and rising India in the right direction.

The tax proposals in the Finance Bill carry a significant imprint of the bureaucracy. The tax compliance and dispute resolution remain painful and attempts to address these concerns seem to be inadequate. Aware that the budget will be required to be approved in a very short time, the team BCAS worked very diligently to submit its post-budget memorandum on direct tax and indirect tax proposals. Once again, the Parliamentarians have rushed in approving the Finance Bill without critical and detailed examination of various provisions, some of which appear to have not been thought through entirely. Until and unless the legislative process becomes truly participative and collaborative, the confusion created through continuous tinkering of the laws and bureaucratic red tape will remain a challenge and ease of doing business in India, a mirage!

Several finance ministers have stressed on the need for friendly and conducive tax administration. However, in reality this remains a distant goal. The report of the Committee for Reforming the Regulatory Environment for Doing Business in India chaired by Mr. M. Damodaran submitted last year states: “Despite protestations of an improvement in mind-set, the needless adversary relationship between assessing authorities and the taxpayers continues to be a fact of life. This is further compounded by a perverse incentivisation system in which gross tax collections are treated as a major indicator of good performance.”

The following statistics in this year’s budget documents perhaps quantify the scale of this challenge. The statement of Revenue Forgone states that the Incometax Department received 6,18,806 corporate returns electronically up to 31-03-2014 for the financial year 2012-13, i.e., assessment year 2013-14. These companies reported total corporate tax payable of Rs. 2.64 lakh crore inclusive of dividend distribution tax. In comparison, the receipts budget states the collection of corporation tax at Rs. 3.56 lakh crore during FY 2012-13. Does it mean probably Rs. 1 lakh crore of tax, i.e., nearly 28% of gross corporate tax receipts, is excess collected allegedly through coercion which the government is required to refund subsequently with interest? It is pertinent to note that the tax refunds excluding interest have been increasing over last several years. It amounted to Rs. 83,766 crores during financial year 2012-13 as stated in Report No. 10 of 2014 pertaining to direct taxes by the CAG.

The Tax Administration Reforms Commission (TAR C) in its nearly 600 paged First Report has detailed several actions to enhance effectiveness and efficiency of the tax administration including steps required to contain and obviate the disease of corruption. There is no dearth of ideas, suggestions and plans. The current disturbing state of affairs has resulted from lack of commitment, sincerity and determined efforts. There is a greater need to start the cleansing process from higher echelons.

Our Prime Minister Narendra Modi inspired the cadre of his party with the slogan “Congress mukt Bharat” and achieved a historic win. The citizens of India now hope the Modi Government and the elected representatives will push for “Corruption mukt Bharat” with greater vigour that will herald truly happy celebrations of the Independence Day for the country.

Wishing you a very happy Independence Day in advance!

With warm regards,
Nitin Shingala

levitra

Indirect Taxes

fiogf49gjkf0d
MVAT UPDATE

MVAT Notification

LA BILL XIX OF 2014

By this Bill, the State has introduced Maharashtra Tax Laws [Levy, Amendment and Validation] Act, 2014, pro-posing amendments to the Maharashtra Stamp Act, Maharashtra Purchase Tax on Sugarcane Act,1962, Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employment Act,1975, Maharashtra Tax on Luxuries Act,1987 Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002.

levitra

ICAI and its members

fiogf49gjkf0d
1. CPE Credit

Under the existing regulation of the ICAI members in practice have to obtain CPE credit for 90 hours in a block of three years (including 60 Hours of structured CPE credit). Members not in practice have to obtain CPE credit for 45 hours (unstructured CPE credit). For structured CPE Credit members have to attend seminars/conferences/ workshops organised by the ICAI, Regional councils, Branches of the ICAI, CPE study circles etc. Attendance at Courses Organised by other reputed C.A. Societies, C.A. Associations, Chambers etc., are not recognised for structured CPE Hours. One, Shri Arun Anandagiri, has filed an application before Competition Commission of India alleging abuse of dominant position by ICAI u/s. 4 of the competition Act, 2002, by imposing unfair and discriminatory conditions with respect to its CPE scheme.

The Commission has passed an order dated 28-02-2014 stating that there seems to be force in the allegations of the applicant that the restriction put by the ICAI in not allowing any other organisation to conduct the CPE seminars for CPE credits, creates an entry barrier for the other players in the relevant market. The commission has also noted that the ICAI is not conducting the CPE seminars and conferences on not-for-profit basis as in the accounts of ICAI for F.Y. 2012 – 13 the gross revenue from such activity was Rs. 45 crore.(i.e., 8% of its total revenue).

Accordingly, the Commission has directed the Director General (D.G.) to investigate the matter further and report to the Commission within 60 days. After receipt of the report from the D.G. the Commission will pass the final order.

2. Disciplinary Cases:

The Disciplinary Committee (DC) of ICAI has decided some cases about professional or other misconduct of members. These are reported in the publication “Disciplinary Cases VOI – I.” Page Nos. given below are from this book. Names of members are not given in order to maintain confidentiality.

(i). Case of SCS:

In this case, the complainant had alleged that (a) the member submitted wrong Income-tax Return prepared by him to the tax authorities without approval of the Company, (b) he charged fees for preparing financial reports and tax return and also charged for filing revised return of income, (c) in spite of repeated requests, the member did not give copies of the tax returns to the company, (d) he was paid Rs. 25,000/- for formation of a new company. He did not do anything in this respect and was absconding, (e) he was in possession of the Books, Vouchers, PAN Cards and Digital Signatures of Directors, copies of Tax Returns, Company’s Seal etc., and was not returning these Books, Vouchers, documents etc.

The DC noted that both the complainant and the Member did not appear at the time of hearing. They did not cooperate in the inquiry and did not furnish any statements apart from the complaint and the annexures. Further, the name of the member was removed from the Register of Members for non-payment of Fees to the ICAI. Yet, the member used to practice in two different firm names without being a partner in the firm. From the facts stated in the complaint and annexures, the committee came to the conclusion that the member was guilty of professional and other misconduct under Clause (2) of Part IV of First Schedule, CIause (7) of Part I and CIause (1) of part II of the Second Schedule to the C.A. Act. On this basis, the DC directed for removal of the name of the member from the Register of Members for a period of five years. (P. 135 to 142 – Part I)

(ii) Case of MJD:

In this case, the complainant had alleged that the member was maintaining accounts of the Firm and also acted as its Tax Auditor. Further, the member was also in active business association with the firm and the company which had taken development rights from the Firm. He was also in possession of the accounting records of the complainant but was denying the same.He refused to audit the accounts of the firm and represent the firm in subsequent years which caused huge financial loss to the Firm.

The DC observed that the member was engaged in carrying out the day-to-day business affairs of the company, being a director of the company while he was holding COP without obtaining permission of the ICAI. Further, he was maintaining accounts of the firm and acting as Tax Auditor of the Firm. It was pointed out that as per the Guidance Note on Independence of Auditors, “members are not permitted to write the books of their auditee clients.” After hearing the parties and examining the evidence on record, the DC held that the member was guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (11) of Part I of the First schedule and Clause (4) of Part I of the second schedule to the C.A. Act.

The DC noted that there were two complaints filed against the member. In the first complaint the Board of Discipline had already held the member guilty under Clause (11) of Part 1 of First schedule and directed to remove the name of the member for seven days. In view of this, in the present complaint the DC decided to “Reprimand” the member (P. 1-7 of Part I).

(iii) Case of Ms. BKD:

In this case, the member had audited accounts of a Cooperative Housing Society. In the complaint by some members of the society it was alleged that (a) the member had secured the audit through her father who was paid Accountant/Consultant of the society and (b) the member had done other illegal audits of other Housing Societies with the help of her father.

During the hearing before the DC, the member pleaded guilty and requested the DC to take a lenient view. The member submitted that she had conducted the internal audit on verbal communication from the Management Committee. However, the audit report was given in the same format as the statutory audit report. Further, she had not conducted audits of any other Housing Society as she was not on the panel of Auditors for co-operative societies. The Managing Committee had signed the annual accounts of the society and no discrepancy was pointed out by the Complainant.

The DC noted that there were certain disputes amongst the members of the society which led to the filing of this complaint. There was no resolution of the Managing Committee for the appointment of the member as statutory or internal auditor and the member had not verified this fact. On verification of the financial statements, it was noticed that they appeared to have been drawn up for statutory purposes and not for Internal Audit. However, the DC noted that there were no irregularities or deficiencies in the Financial Statements and the member had carried out her duties in a diligent manner. The present complaint was due to disputes between the members and not due to any negligence in discharging audit function by the member. On this basis, the DC held that the member was not guilty of any professional misconduct. (P. 139-143 of Part II )

3. Some Ethical Issues:

The Ethical Standards Board has given answers to some Ethical Issues on Pages 1762 – 1764 of C.A Journal for June, 2014. Some of these issues are as under:

(i) What are the measures available to a Professional Accountant in case a conflict of interest arises?

A professional accountant in public practice should take reasonable steps to identify circumstances that could pose a conflict of interest. Such circumstances may give rise to threats to compliance with the fundamental principles.

A professional Accountant should evaluate the significance of any threats. Depending upon the circumstances giving rise to the conflict, he should ordinarily notify the client/all known relevant parties.

The additional safeguards would be the use of separate engagement teams, clear guidelines for members of the engagement team on issues of security and confidentiality. Regular review of the application of safeguards by a senior individual not involved with relevant client engagements should also be considered.

(ii)    What is independence?
Independence requires:

Independence of Mind – The state of mind that permits the expression of a conclusion without being affected by influences that compromise professional judgment, allow- ing an individual to act with integrity, and exercise objectivity and professional skepticism.

Independence in Appearance – The avoidance of facts and circumstances that are so significant that a reasonable and informed third party, having knowledge of  all relevant information, including safeguards applied, would reasonably conclude that firm’s or a member of the assurance team’s integrity, objectivity or professional skepticism had been compromised.

(iii)    What is the Conceptual Framework to Independence?

It is to be applied to specific circumstances and relationships. It gives various examples about the threats to independence that may be created by specific circumstances and relationships and also provides how professional judgment is used to determine the appropriate safeguards to eliminate threats to independence or to reduce them to an acceptable level depending on the characteristic of the individual assurance engagement.

4.    EAC Opinion:

Treatment of Commission Cost Paid to Agent in Relation to Projects

FACTS:
A company is involved in the business of designing, engineering and erection of ethanol, brewery, water and wastewater treatment plants. The company caters to both domestic and international markets. The revenue recognition of the company is governed by Accounting Standard (AS) -7, ‘Construction Contracts’ for the above mentioned line of business.

The company executes projects in international and do- mestic markets for the above mentioned business. In certain cases, the company appoints agents to undertake certain activities. The services rendered by the agent form an integral part of the project right from inception of project till the timely execution and completion of the project. The agent provides various services in the nature of procurement support, vendor short listing, and technical services etc., which are an integral part in the execution work of the project and as such. The costs towards sales commission are specific for that contract and essential for smooth execution of the project. These costs would be incurred only where the project activity is carried out for that particular contract.These are specificially identified for each project and considered in the total estimated cost of the project.

The company further stated that it presently pays compensation to these agents  for  the  services  rendered  in the form of ‘sales commission’ by entering into individual agreements with them. The sales commission is decided as a percentage of contract value and the same is accrued in the books of account in proportion to the contract revenue of the respective project.

The company has also informed the committee that although the commission costs are not explicitly charged to the customer as a separate cost, these form part of the total project cost and are considered while deciding the order value. As such they are not specifically reimbursable from the customer on one to one basis.

The commission paid to the agent is treated as direct cost of the project and included in the total estimated cost of the project as sales commission cost.

QUERY:
The Company has sought the opinion of the EAC on thefollowing issues:
(i) Whether the treatment adopted by the company, of including the commission cost as part of project cost, as explained above is correct; (ii) If the treatment adopted is correct, whether the cost would be classified as direct cost of the project or cost allocable to the project; (iii) If the treatment adopted is not correct, under what head these costs can be classified under indirect expenses; and (iv) Whether the treatment adopted by the company to calculate percentage of completion including the sales commission cost comply with the revenue recognition principle as envisaged under AS7?

EAC OPINION :
The Committee after considering paragraphs 15, 19 and 20 of Accounting Standard (AS) 7, ‘Construction Contracts,’ notes that contract costs include the costs directly related to a specific contract as well as the costs that are attributable to contract activity in general and can be al- located to the specific contract.

The Committee notes from the Facts of the Case that so far as the activities of the agent related to execution of the contract activity, such as procurement support, project coordination and other technical services are concerned, the Committee is of the view that these activities are directly related to the construction contract and therefore, costs pertaining to these activities should be treated as costs that relate directly to the specific contract. Similarly, activities of the agent related to finding the prospective customer and obtaining the contract, etc can also be treated as directly related to the contract as in the case of the Company, the costs pertaining to these activities are payable only on obtaining the contract.

The Committee notes from the Facts of the Case that the agent, in the case of the Company, not only provides services in relation to securing of the contact, procurement support and other technical services relating to the execution of the project, but also facilitates and arrange ad- vance payments from the customer and ensures timely collections from them. The Committee is of the view that activities relating to the facilitation and arrangement of advance payments and final collections from the customer and other similar activities are of the nature of administration costs, which cannot be considered as attributable to construction activity and accordingly, cost of these activities should not be treated as the cost directly related or that attributable to a construction contract Therefore, the Committee is of the view that if the commission cost paid to the agents is a composite commission, the company should assess whether the latter activities and the cost in respect thereof are material and if it is so, attempt should be made to estimate the cost pertaining to these activities considering the factors such as, the cost that would have been incurred had the agent performed only these activities, etc. Accordingly, the cost incurred on selling and administration activities should not be included in contract cost.

As regards to including the commission cost for determining the stage of completion, the Committee notes from paragraph 30 of AS 7, that only those contract costs that reflect work performed should be included in costs incurred upto the reporting date. However, as per the Facts of the Case, related commission is accrued in proportion to contract revenue. In other words, such costs are not being recognised considering the performance of related services rather than the same is being recognised on the basis of contract revenue. Accordingly, the Committee is the view that inclusion of commission on this basis is not correct; rather, it should be recognised considering the performance of related service provided the commission so determined is ‘contract cost’.

[Page Nos. 1792 to 1795 of C. A. Journal – June, 2014]

5.    ICAI News:

Following announcement is made by ICAI at P.1873 of C.A. Journal for June, 2014.

It has come to the knowledge of some members that certain entities, while inviting tenders for services of chartered accountants for the assignment of statutory audit, are mentioning accounting and book keeping related works in the scope of works required to done by the auditor.

Members are hereby advised not to undertake such assignment since it is violative of the provisions of ‘Code of Ethics’ and ‘Guidance Note on Independence of Auditors’ for auditor of an entity to do book keeping work of the entity. The said prohibition in the case of Companies is further also mentioned in section 144 of the Companies Act, 2013.

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section B:

• Disclosure as per AS 29 SKF India Ltd (year ended 31st December 2013)

From Notes to Financial Statements
Additional disclosures relating to other provisions (as per Accounting Standard 29)

(Rs. in million)

(i) Provision for disputed statutory and other matters: This represents provisions made for probable liabilities/claims arising out of pending disputes/litigations with various regulatory authorities and those arising out of commercial transactions with vendors/others. Above provisions are affected by numerous uncertainties and the management has taken all the efforts to make a best estimate. The timing of outflow of resources will depend upon the timing of decision of cases.

(ii) Provision for warranties: A provision is estimated for expected warranty claims in respect of products sold during the year on the basis of a technical evaluation and past experience regarding failure trends of products and costs of rectification or replacement. The timing and amount of cash flows that will arise from these matters will be determined at the time of receipt of claims.

(iii)The provision for other obligations is on account of coupons given on products sold by the Company and other retailers and distributors incentive schemes. The provision for coupons is based on the historic data/estimated figures. The timing and amount of the cash flows that will arise will be determined at the time of receipt of claims from customers.

• Disclosure of foreign currency exposures and contracts
Nestle India Ltd. (year ended 31st December 2013)

From Notes to Financial Statements

(a) Category wise quantitative data*

(b) All the forward contracts are for hedging foreign exchange exposures relating to the underlying transactions and firm commitments or highly probable forecast transactions.

(c) Foreign currency exposures remaining unhedged at the year-end*

• Disclosure under AS 18 regarding dependence on Related Party Transactions

Honeywell Automation India Ltd (year ended 31st December 2013)

From Notes to Financial Statements

Note below AS 18 disclosures

The Company generates a large percentage of its sales and profits from its business with the Honeywell group (Honeywell), its major shareholder. Sales to Honeywell accounted for approximately 30% and 35% of our total net sales in the fiscal years 2013 and 2012 respectively. The Company’s ability to maintain or grow its business with Honeywell depends upon a number of performance factors. However, the Company cannot be assured that its level of sales and profits associated with its relationship with Honeywell will continue. Honeywell-specific business consideration (independent of its shareholding in the Company), including changes in Honeywell’s strategies regarding utilisation of alternate opportunities available to it to source products and services currently provided by the Company (including from alternate sources which Honeywell may acquire or develop within its own group), may also reduce the level and/or mix of Honeywell’s business with the Company.

levitra

PART C: Information on & Around

fiogf49gjkf0d
BMC Loses Rs. 100 Crore:
The BMC may have lost around Rs.100 Crore because developers weren’t being charged extra taxes for water and sewage disposal at under construction sites.

Following an RT I query from a city based activist, municipal commissioner Sitaram Kunte has now ordered an enquiry. Officials began collecting the levy from builders three months ago, but they were supposed to start collections in June, 2012.

For most of the past two years, the BMC didn’t ask builders for these taxes, even though water was supplied for projects, according to responses to activist Anil Galagali’s RT I query. BMC sources said around Rs. 100 crore may have been lost because these taxes weren’t collected. Meanwhile, officials recently began recovering the charges from builders, and in three months have collected Rs.19.6 crore from ongoing projects.

Sheila Dikshit’s appointment as Governor:
Files moved at breakneck speed for the appointment of the former Delhi CM Sheila Dikshit as Kerala governor. In a bid to beat the election code of conduct, sitting Kerala governor Nikhil Kumar resigned, Karnataka governor HR Bharadwaj was handed interim charge and finally Dikshit appointed as Kumar’s successor all in the space of few hours on March 4. The code of conduct was to come into effect a day later.

The information disclosed by the home ministry was in response to an RTI plea filed by activist SC Agarwal. According to the documents made public, home minister Sushil Kumar Shine recommended appointment of Dikshit as Kerala governor following a one line resignation from Kumar. In his letter dated March 4 to President Pranab Mukherjee, Kumar said, “I resign as governor of Kerala with immediate effect.” He did not ascribe any reason for his resignation.

Not only was Kumar’s resignation accepted the same day but in the next few hours, President’s secretary Omita Paul shot off a letter and warrant to Bharadwaj asking him to take additional charge. A few hours later, Paul issued a warrant under the hand and seal of the president and a letter appointing Dikshit as Kerala Governor.

Thane Badlapur CR Stretch has Just two ambulances:
Central Railway (CR) authorities are under the spotlight for failing to provide basic transport facility to ferry the injured to the hospitals. Responding to a Right To Information (RT I) query by city advocate Suyash Pradhan about the availability of ambulance services outside each station on the CR line, the authorities said that private ambulances are parked round-the clock only at Thane and Dombivali stations between the Thane-Badlapur stretch. “At other stations, ambulances are on call basis and the list of private ambulances service providers is circulated to all stations to be summoned as and when required,” said senior divisional commercial manager Narendra Patil. “Commuters between Thane-Kalyan contribute in crores to the CR from the purchase of season tickets and monthly pass. The safety of the commuter should ideally be paramount. In the last one year alone 546 accidents were reported close to Kalyan station. The frequency of the fatalities due to commuters falling off trains between Diva and Thane is scary and there is a direct need to have a 24/7 ambulance outside these stations,” Said Pradhan.

levitra

PART B: RTI Act, 2005

fiogf49gjkf0d
WESTERN INDIA RTI CONVENTION 2014 DECLARATION:

As citizens and activists committed to building a transparent and accountable democracy we have gathered together from more than 15 States and Union Territories across the country in the city of Mumbai to celebrate our victories, and to discuss and strategies to squarely face current challenges. In this Western India RT I Convention, we pledge our commitment to protect our constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights and particularly emphasising the freedom of speech and expression which is the bed rock of a free and democratic society in the absence of which our right to information would lose much of its meaning and value. On this day the 8th of June, 2014, we express our solidarity with all RT I users, activists and their families who have suffered attacks on them and resolve to defend our right to access information and express our opinions without fear and pledge in particular to struggle to achieve our collective vision as follows-

WE, TH E PART ICIPANTS OF TH E WESTERN INDIA RT I CONVENTION, HEREBY DECLARE TH AT:

1. E ven after nine years of the enactment of the Right to Information Act (RT I Act), governments have failed to implement this law to our expectations. Governments must take immediate and effective steps to establish a regime of transparency at all levels of the administration.

2. It is a matter of great concern that even after nine years of the enactment of the RT I Act, several states and competent authorities have rules which are contrary to the letter and spirit of the RT I Act and curb people’s right to seek information in many ways. We demand that the governments and competent authorities work towards installing a uniform regime of Rules under the RT I Act across the country.

3. A large number of public authorities have failed in fulfilling their obligation to proactively provide information to people u/s. 4 of the RT I Act. All public authorities must urgently fulfill this responsibility. We demand that the Government of India, all state governments and public authorities immediately implement the guidelines framed by the Task Force on section 4 implementation set up by the DoPT in 2013, including the adoption of all the templates developed by the Task Force.

4. T he government must undertake steps to create awareness about the RT I Act among people, especially amongst the disadvantaged segments of society such as women, dalits, adivasis, all kinds of minorities and differently-abled persons. Even after more than nine years of enactment of the RT I law, awareness levels among people and a functional knowledge of the RT I Act, is low. A Peoples’ Monitoring Study of the RT I Regime In India, undertaken by RAAG, NCPRI and other groups, based on an analysis of 4000 RT I applications filed between 2005 and 2008, has found that only 6% of RTI applications were filed by women. RT I must be introduced in the educational curriculum to spread awareness amongst the youth.

5. A ll six national Political Parties must immediately comply with the June 2013 order of the Central Information Commission, which had declared them ‘public authorities’ under the RT I Act and therefore, must implement the provisions of the RT I Act, including section 4, also appoint public information officers and appellate authorities to dispose RT I applications and appeals received from the people. All other political parties registered with and recognised by the Election Commission of India must proactively take steps to implement the RTI Act within their offices.

6. T he Central and State Governments must ensure that the Whistle Blowers Protection Act (WBP Act), enacted in May 2014, is operationalised immediately. Model WBP Rules for implementing this law must be made in a transparent, consultative and participatory manner, to establish a comprehensive framework for protecting whistleblowers across the country. It is the moral responsibility of the Government to protect RT I activists and users who are attacked, and take swift legal action against those responsible for these attacks. Protection must be provided to their families and adequate compensation must be paid in such cases. It is also the obligation of governments and information commissions to ensure that, whenever an RT I applicant is attacked, the information that was being sought by him or her is put in the public domain on and any pending appeal followed up on a priority basis. All persons demanding transparency in public interest who are attacked must be treated as human rights defenders. Instances of murders, physical attacks on RT I users must be investigated and the accused prosecuted under the law in a timely manner.

7. We demand that Parliament immediately enact an effective grievance redress law which provides a timebound, decentralized and comprehensive framework across the country, for addressing day-to-day complaints of people about the non-delivery of rights and entitlements against public authorities based on best practices developed in various States and Union Territories across the country that are implementing similar laws.

8. In order to move from transparency to accountability, the government must ensure that the rules of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, are framed in a transparent manner and the Lokpal is operationalised to function in an independent and empowered manner to tackle corruption. We also call upon our elected representatives in Parliament to enact all pending anti-corruption Bills in order to make India compliant with the provisions of the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC).

9. We are deeply concerned about the increasing influence of the corporate sector over governments in decision making processes relating to developmental issues. All public authorities must take immediate steps to ensure transparency in the functioning of private entities that utilise or control public resources or public assets or provide public services. Information about all public-private-partnership projects (PPPs) must be accessible under the RT I Act at every stage of the project. Explanations about cost inflation of PPP projects must be disclosed proactively in terms of section 4(1)(c) of the RT I Act. Further, the government must frame appropriate guidelines and rules to ensure a practical framework for accessing information about the private sector bodies u/s. 2(f) of the RT I Act.

[Out of 21 items, in the Declaration, 9 are reported herein above, balance will be reported in the next month’s article.]

levitra

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section A:
• Qualification regarding significant financial exposure to subsidiaries

United Breweries (Holdings) Ltd: 31-3-2013
From Notes to Accounts
32 Investments:

a) The Company has pledged 2,24,51,587 shares of United Spirits Limited,1,49,61,610 shares of Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited, 62,69,728 shares of UB Engineering Limited, 19,46,33,555 shares of Kingfisher Airlines Limited and 34,20,239 shares of McDowell Holdings Limited to secure the borrowings of the company along with the borrowings of subsidiary companies and an associate company.

b) Investment as on 31st March, 2013, includes 21,870,156 shares of Kingfisher Airlines Limited, 7,196 shares of McDowell Holdings Limited,1,00,00,000 shares of Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited and 24,46,352 shares of United Spirits Limited held in custody of lenders after they have invoked the pledge of these shares.

c) 2,18,70,156 shares of Kingfisher Airlines Limited, 2,15,000 shares of McDowell Holdings Limited, 1,00,00,000 shares of Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited, 24,46,155 shares of United Spirits Limited held by the Company and pledged with banks for credit facilities extended to Kingfisher Airlines Limited have been sold by them, subsequent to Balance Sheet date.

d) T he Company’s investment of Rs. 26.512 million with IDFC Mutual Fund is given as a lien to secure the borrowings of an associate company.

e) The investment in subsidiaries (including step down subsidiaries) have been considered as long term strategic investments and diminution in their market value/net worth, though significant is considered temporary and hence no provision is considered necessary.

36.The Company, over the years has advanced significant amounts to subsidiaries including overseas subsidiaries aggregating to Rs. 1,709.556 million (Per year Rs.1,627.300 million) which have not yet been repaid. Even though there is erosion in the net worth of these subsidiaries, the Management is of the view that all the amounts are ultimately recoverable, taking into consideration their business plans and growth strategies.

40. Events occurring after the date of the Balance sheet

a) Kingfisher Airlines Limited (KFA) lenders have sold the following investments belonging to the company:

i) 24,46,155 equity shares in United Spirits Limited
ii) 2,15,000 equity shares in McDowell Holdings Limited
iii) 1,00,00,000 equity shares in Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited
iv) 2,18,70,156 equity shares in Kingfisher Airlines Limited

b) KFA lenders have invoked company’s Corporate Guarantee and demanded payment of dues, due from KFA amounting to Rs. 64,932.900 million

c) The Company and others have filed a suit in the Hon’ ble Bombay High Court against the Consortium of Lenders who have advanced loans to Kingfisher Airlines Ltd., inter alia seeking the following reliefs:

i) for a declaration that the corporate guarantee agreement and pledge agreement, both dated 21st December, 2010 and executed by the Company are void ab-initio and non-est;

ii) for a permanent order and injunction, restraining Consortium of Bankers, their servants, agents or assigns, or any other person claiming by, through or under them or any of them, from acting upon, in furtherance or in any manner giving effect to the impugned notices dated 16th March, 2013, or from taking any other or further steps to act upon or in furtherance of the Pledge Agreement dated 21st December, 2010 save and except in accordance with the procedure set out in Clause 8.1 of the MDRA, including issuing a notice thereunder.

iii) for a permanent order and injunction restraining Consortium of Bankers, their servants, agents or assigns, or any other person claiming by or through or under or any of them, from acting upon or in furtherance of the Corporate Guarantee dated 21st December, 2010 given by the company and Pledge Agreement dated 21st December, 2010.

iv) that an order and decree for damages of sum of Rs. 31,996.800 million as set out in the particulars of claim be awarded to the plaintiffs.

v) that the maximum limit under the Companys’ Corporate Guarantees be Rs.16,014.300 million for reasons set out in the Suit.

43. The Company along with its subsidiaries has significant financial exposure on various counts to Kingfisher Airlines Limited (KFA). Although KFA’s license has expired on 31st December, 2012, under Civil Aviation Regulations, KFA has period of 24 months to reinstate the same. As at 31st March, 2013, the financial exposure includes equity investment of Rs. 20,953.043 million, loans and advances Rs. 23,592.484 million and other receivables Rs. 3,104.505 million and corporate guarantees to banks/ aircraft lessors, some of which have been invoked. Such invocations are being contested in court. The Management is reasonably confident that none of the guarantees would eventually devolve upon the Company. The ultimate diminution of investments and non-recovery of loans and advances are not presently quantifiable and hence no provision has been considered in the accounts.

From Auditors’ Report
Basis for Qualified Opinion

a) The company has significant financial exposure to Kingfisher Airlines Limited (KFA). These exposures are in the form of investments in equity of Rs. 20,953.043 million, loans and advances of Rs. 23,592.484 million, other receivables of Rs. 3,104.505 million and corporate guarantee of Rs. 89,643.800 million. KFA’s licence to operate the airline business stands suspended (refer note 43 to financial statements). Its net worth is completely eroded. It is under severe financial stress and has defaulted in honouring its financial obligations on several counts. Having regard to the financial condition of KFA, the company has discontinued charging it interest, guarantee/ security commission and logo fee.

Consortium of Lenders of KFA led by State Bank-of India have recalled’ their loans. They have invoked the corporate guarantee of Rs. 64,932.900 million and demanded the company to honour its obligation under its guarantee agreements (refer note 40 to financial statements). Certain aircraft lessors of KFA have invoked the corporate guarantee given by the company and have also instituted-proceedings u/s. 433/434 of the Companies Act, 1956 before the Honourable High Court of Karnataka (refer note 42 to financial statements). Above factors have resulted in substantial erosion in carrying value of company’s investments in KFA and significantly impaired the recovery of loans and advances made to them. Similar losses may also arise on account of invocation of corporate guarantee given by the company. The management has not quantified and provided for erosion in the value of investments and the probable losses. Had the company made such provisions, the loss disclosed in the Statement of Profit and Loss would have been higher by such amount and the carrying amount of investments and loans and advances would have been lower by that amount

b) Company carries Investments in certain subsidiaries. The carrying value of such investments is Rs. 700.610 million. There are significant declines in the carrying value of these investments but the company has not quantified and provided for such declines. Had the company provided for such decline, the loss stated in the Statement of Profit and Loss would have been higher by such amount and the carrying value of those investments would have been lower by an equal amount (refer note 32(e) to financial statements).

a)    Certain subsidiaries owe to the company Rs. 1,709.556 millions. Net worth of these companies are  eroded,  significantly  impairing  the  recovery  of such loans and advances. Company has not quantified and provided for the probable loss. Had the company provided for such loss, the loss stated in the Statement of Profit and Loss would have been higher by such amount and the loans and advances stated in the Balance Sheet would have been lower by that amount (refer note 36 to financial statements).

QUALIFIED OPINION
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matter described in the “Basis for Qualified Opinion” paragraph, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
….

EMPHASIS OF MATTER

Attention is invited to the following;
a)    Note 40 (a) to financial statements dealing with sale of pledged investments by lenders of Kingfisher Airlines Limited.
 (b) to financial statements dealing with invocation of corporate guarantee by lenders of Kingfisher Airlines Limited.

FROM DIRECTORS’ REPORT
With reference to observations in the Auditors Report regarding accrual of guarantee/security commission from an Associate Company (erstwhile subsidiary), inclusion of interest from Subsidiaries and Associates, non-provision for loans and advances to certain Subsidiaries and an Associate Company and for decline in value of investment in certain Subsidiaries and an Associate Company, the relevant notes to the accounts comprehensively explain the management’s views on such matters.

ICAI and its members

fiogf49gjkf0d
1. Some Ethical Issues

The Ethical
Standards Board of ICAI has given answers to some Ethical Issues on
pages Page 610 to 612 of C A. Journal for Novemberg 2014. Some of these
issues are as under:

(i) Issue:

Whether sponsorship or prizes be instituted in the name of a Chartered Accountant or a firm of Chartered Accountants?

An
individual Chartered Accountant or firm of Chartered Accountants can
institute or sponsor prizes, provided that the designation ‘Chartered
Accountant’ is not appended to the prize and the Clause (6) of Part I of
the First Schedule to the C. A. Act, regarding advertisement and
publicity is complied with.

(ii) Issue
Can a Chartered
Accountant in practice give the date of setting up the practice or date
of establishment on the letterheads and other professional documents,
etc.?

Council direction under Clause (7) of Part I of the
First Schedule to the C. A. Act, prescribes that the date of setting up
of the firm on the letterheads and the professional documents etc.
should not be mentioned. However, in the website, the year of
establishment can be given on a specific “pull” request.

(iii) Issue
Can
a Chartered Accountant in Practice accept original professional work
emanating from a client introduced to him by another member?

The
first schedule Part 1 Clause (6) (J) of C.A. Act prescribes that a
member should not accept the original professional work emanating from a
client introduced to him by another member. If any professional work of
such client comes to him directly it is his duty to ask the client that
he should come through the member dealing with his original work.

(iv) Issue

Can a Chartered Accountant in practice also practice as an Advocate?

Under
the first schedule Part I Clause(7) of the C.A. Act, the council has
prescribed that a practicing C.A. who is otherwise eligible may practice
as an Advocate subject to permission of the Bar Council. In such a
case, he should not use the designation ‘Chartered Accountant’ in
respect of the matters involving the practice as an Advocate. In respect
of other matters, he can use the designation ‘Chartered Accountant’ but
he should not use the designation ‘Chartered Accountant’ and ‘Advocate’
simultaneously.

2. EAC Opinion

Disclosure of the Revenue as per AS 9

Facts:
A
company is primarily engaged in the business of owning and running
hotels and resorts. The company receives bookings for the hotel and
resort rooms and related facilities from individuals, corporates and
travel agents.

The company has a tariff card (rate list) for all
the room types which is inclusive of all taxes. Ideally, when a
customer approaches the company, he is offered the tariff rate. However,
the company has been using various marketing strategies to attract
guests. As a strategy, the company offers discounts to the guest
discretionally, based on various factors. The company has observed that
when the guest is given a discount, he feels happy about it and becomes a
loyal customers of the resort. This strategy has given to the company
an edge over its competitors and thereby helped the company to increase
its turnover year on year.

The Company has further stated that it is currently recognising revenue at tariff rate and is treating discount as an expense.

Query:
The
Company has requested the EAC to clarify how disclosure of the revenue
would be in compliance with the disclosure required in AS9 (Revenue
Recognition).

Opinion:
The Committee notes that the
basic issue raised by the Company is the accounting treatment of the
discount(s) allowed by the company and its presentation in the statement
of Profit and loss as per AS 9.

After considering the
definitions of ‘cash discount’ and ‘trade discount’ as given in the
Guidance Note on Terms used in Financial Statement issued by ICAI, the
committee is of the view that trade discount is not encompassed within
the definition of revenue since it represents a reduction of cost and
accordingly, the revenue is determined and recognised after deducting
the trade discount. Further, the Committee after considering the
definition of ‘Revenue’ given in Accounting Standard (AS 9) ‘Revenue
Recognition’ is of the view that the revenue is the charge made to
customers which in case of trade discount is the amount of net of
discount. Accordingly, the Committee is of the view that the
presentation by the company to present the revenue on gross basis and
then to present the trade discount as expense is not correct and is not
in accordance with the requirements of AS 9.

[Pl. Refer page nos. 643 to 645 of C. A. Journal – November, 2014]

3. Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB)

ICAI
has published a “Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting
Requirements”. Some of the observations in this publication relating to
compliance with Accounting Standard (AS) 5 are given below for the
information of Members.

(i) Treatment of Foreign Exchange Loss / Gain (P.43)

It
was noticed that one of the Notes to Accounts given in the Financial
Statements stated that the company has opted to capitalise the Foreign
Exchange Loss/Gain on reporting of Long Term Foreign Currency monetary
items used for depreciable assets retrospectively w.e.f. 01-07-2007 in
view of GSR 225(E) dated 31-03-2009 issued by the Central Government as
regards AS-11, Consequently Rs.xxx lakh (including Rs.xxx lakh relating
to previous years) has been added to the cost of depreciable assets.

Observation of FRRB
Referring
to Para 32 of AS.5 (Net Profit and Loss for the period, prior period
Items and changes in Accounting Policies) it was evident that there are
two distinct aspects for dealing with the situation. The first requires
disclosure of change in the accounting policy which has a material
effect and the second aspect requires the disclosure of the impact of
such changes on the financial statements. In the case of company the
above note indicated that there was a change in an accounting policy but
the impact of such change was only partly disclosed. In this case such a
change had two fold impact due to write back of exchange difference of
earlier years viz., the aggregate impact due to the write back and
additional depreciation thereon on the profit or loss for the year. The
above note only discloses aggregate impact but does not disclose the
impact on the profit or loss of the current year. To this extent
requirement of AS-5 has not been complied with.

(ii) Disclosure of Extra – Ordinary Items (P.45)

In one of the Financial Statements, there is the following note in the Notes to Accounts:-

“FCCB
were considered as non-monetary liability during the previous period,
but keeping in view the provisions of AS-11 and the principle of
prudence as enunciated in AS-1, the foreign exchange loss of Rs.xxx
million arising out of revaluation in respect of outstanding FCCB of USD
xxx million as on 31.03.2008 has been recognized and charged to Profit
and Loss Account of the year as an extra ordinary item”.

Observation of FRRB
Referring
to Para 4.1 and 4.2 of AS-5, it was observed that the foreign exchange
gain or loss arising on outstanding balance of FCCB is an ordinary
activity since FCCB is taken by the company as a part of its business
only. Therefore, classification of the gain or loss on such foreign
exchange fluctuations as extra – ordinary item amounts to non–compliance
with the requirements of AS-5

(iii)    Adjustment of earlier year’s provision against general Reserve (P. 46)

In the case of a company excess depreciation charged in earlier years and Leave Encashment liability  of  earlier years was adjusted against credit balance of General Reserve.

Observation of FRRB
Referring to Para 15 of AS-5, FRRB has observed that the Prior Period items should have been accounted in the Profit and Loss Account instead of adjusting them against the general reserve. Further, it was also noted that no disclosure has been made with regard to such adjustments either in the related schedules or in the notes to the accounts explaining the reasons for such adjustment against the General Reserve.

4.    ICAI news
(Note: Page Nos. given below are from C.A. Journal of November 2014)

(i)    National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards (NACAS)

This Committee has been recently reconstituted by the Government under the Chairmanship of C.A. Amarjit Chopra (Former President of ICAI). This committee will advise the Government on Accounting Standards as con- verged with International Financial Reporting Standards which are to be adopted in India from next year (2015-16) on a voluntary basis by companies in India. These stan- dards will become mandatory in 2016-17 (P. 598)

(ii)    ICAI initiative in E- learning

The following 10 hi-tech initiatives have been launched.

(a)    ICAI Mobile App – Information about all announce- ments, photo gallery, videos, news and other infor- mation about ICAI.

(b)    Flexi Working Portal for Women Members- To help women members to find suitable opportunities Part-time/Flexi-Hours Jobs and Jobs with work- from-Home option.
(c)    ICAI Knowledge Portal – Offers access of latest publications, announcements, articles, journals etc.

(d)    ICAI Video Podcast – Consists of audio, video, PDF, and ePub files that can be subscribed to and downloaded or streamed on line.

(e)    ICAI cloud campus – For students in India and abroad who can get education and training at their doorsteps.

(f)    ICAI Publications Online – ICAI Publications, ICAI stationery items and ICAI E-learning CDs can be delivered at your home.

(g)    ICAI E-learning – This is available to members, students and non-members. It is a self-paced, in- teractive and captivating learning experience.

(h)    ICAI Digital Library – This is a repository of various digital Publications, E-books, Journals etc.

(i)    ICAI Embraces Social Media – You can follow ICAI on Facebook, Twitter, You Tube and Google to catch up on the latest news, important announcements, press releases and updates.

(j)    ICAI TV – you can hear the President’s latest speech, lectures by professionals and important announcements through DTH Service (P. 640-641)

(iii)    Get C.A. Journal at your Residence

Members can apply to Editorial Board to get C.A. Journal at Residential Address (P. 652)

(iv)    ICAI News Publications.

(a)    Handbook of Auditing Pronouncements Compendium of Engagement and Quality Control Standards (As on 1st October,2014) Volume 1.A

(b)    Compendium of Statements on Auditing (VoL 1.B)

(c)    Compendium of Guidance Notes (VoL – II) ( P. 727– 728)

Company Law

fiogf49gjkf0d
1. Amendment to Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013 pertaining to Activities to be undertaken under Corporate Social Responsibility.

The Ministry of Corporate affairs has vide Notification dated 24th October 2014 made the following amendment to the said Schedule:

(i) In item (i) after the words “and sanitation” the words “including contribution to the Swach Bharat Kosh set up by the Central Government for the promotion of sanitation” is inserted
(ii) In item (iv) after the words ”and water” the words including contribution to the Clean Ganga Fund set up by the Central Govt. for the rejuvenation of river Ganga “ is inserted.

2. Amendment to Companies ( Accounts) Rules 2014

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has on 14th October 2014 issued a notification to amend the Companies (Accounts) Rules 2014, whereby:

The following proviso is inserted after the existing proviso ” Provided further that nothing in this rule shall apply in respect of the preparation of Consolidated Financial statement by an wholly-owned subsidiary, other than a wholly owned subsidiary whose immediate parent is a Company incorporated outside India.

Provided also that nothing contained in this rule shall, subject to any other law or regulation, apply for the financial year commencing from the 1st day of April 2014 and ending on the 31st March 2015, in case of a company which does not have a subsidiary or subsidiaries but has one or more associate companies or joint ventures or both, for the consolidation of financial statement in respect of associate companies or joint ventures or both, as the case may be.”

3. Clarification on matters relating to the Companies ( Cost Records and Audit ) Rules 2014.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide General Circular No. 42/2014 dated 12th November 2014 made clarification about Rules 5(1) and 6(2) of the Companies (Cost records and Audit) Rules 2014 pertaining to the maintenance of cost records and filing of the notice of appointment of Cost Auditor in Form CRA-2 since there has been a delay in the availability of the said form. The date of filing of the CRA-2 without penalty/late fee has been extended to 31st January 2015. Further, it is clarified that Companies that have filed the Form 23C for the year 2014-15, need not file the fresh CRA 2 for the financial year 2014-15.

4. Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs and Foreign Currency Bonds (FCBs) – Clarifications regarding applicability of provisions of Chapter III of the Companies Act, 2013

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has issued clarifications vide Circular No. 43/2014 dated 13th November,2e 2014, for applicability of provisions of Chapter III of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act) to the issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs) and Foreign Currency Bonds (FCBs) by Indian companies exclusively to persons resident outside India in accordance with applicable sectoral regulatory provisions, in consultation with Ministry of Finance and SEBI.

The issue of FCCBs and FCBs by companies is regulated by the Ministry of Finance’s regulations contained in Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (Through Depository Receipts Mechanism) Scheme, 1993 (Scheme) and Reserve Bank of India through its various directions/regulations. It is, accordingly, clarified that unless otherwise provided in the said Scheme or the directions/regulations issued by Reserve Bank of lndia, provisions of Chapter III of the Act shall not apply to an issue of a FCCB or FCB made exclusively to persons resident outside India in accordance with the above mentioned regulations.

5. Extension for Company Law Settlement Scheme 2014

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has issued clarifications vide General Circular No. 44/2014, Dated: 14.11.2014, that it has further extended the COMPANY LAW SETTLEMENT SCHEME, 2014 (CLSS-2014) upto 31st December, 2014.

The Ministry has vide General Circular No. 41/2014, issued clarification u/s. 164(2) of the Companies Act 2013. It has clarified that disqualification of Directors pursuant to Clause 164(2) (a) of the Companies Act, 2013 will be applicable for only prospective defaults in case of Companies who have filed Balance Sheets and Annual Returns on or after 01.04.2014 but before the CLSS -2014 came into force i.e., 15.08.2014

6. Extension of time for holding Annual General Meeting (AGM) u/s. 96(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 – Companies registered in State of Jammu and Kashmir.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has issued clarifications vide Circular No. 45/2014 dated 18th November 2014, that in view of the exceptional circumstances, advised the Registrar of Companies Jammu & Kashmir to exercise the powers conferred on him under third proviso to section 96(1) of Companies Act 2013 to grant extension of time upto 31st December 2014 to those companies registered in the state of Jammu and Kashmir who could not hold their AGM’s (other than the first AGM0 within the stipulated time.

7. Right of persons other than retiring directors to stand for directorship – Refund of deposit u/s. 160 of the Companies Act, 2013 in certain cases.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide General Circular No. 38/2014, dated 14th October 2014 issued the clarification that for Companies registered u/s. 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 (corresponding to section 25 of Companies Act, 1956), the manner in which the amount of deposit of Rs. 1 lakh received by them under sub-section (1) of section 160 of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act) is to be handled if the depositor fails to secure more than 25 % of the total valid votes. Since the law is silent in the matter, the Board of directors of a section 8 company is to decide as to whether the deposit made by or on behalf of the person failing to secure more than 25 % of the valid votes is to be forfeited or refunded

8. Amendment to the Companies( Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide Notification dated 14th October 2014 amended the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, by inserting after Rule 10, the following

“10A. For the purposes of Clause (i) of sub-section (3) of section 143, for the financial years commencing on or after 1st April, 2015, the report of the auditor shall state about existence of adequate internal financial controls system and its operating effectiveness: Provided that auditor of a company may voluntarily include the statement referred to in this rule for the financial year commencing on or after 1st April, 2014 and ending on or before 31st March, 2015.”

9. Clarification on matters relating to Consolidated Financial Statement.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide General Circular No. 39/2014 dated 14th October 2014 issued clarification on matters relating to manner of presentation of notes in Consolidated Financial Statements to be prepared under Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 (Act). It is clarified that Schedule III to the Act read with the applicable Accounting Standards does not envisage that a company while preparing its CFS merely repeats the disclosures made by it under stand-alone accounts being consolidated. In the CFS, the company would need to give all disclosures relevant for CFS only.

10. Change of Forms

E-form DIR-3C, replacing e-form DIN-3 has been introduced by MCA for filing. This form is for intimating DIN of Directors to ROCs. Some of the companies were facing issues in filing of the forms due to non-availability of signatory details of the Directors in MCA portal. In this regard, Companies which do not have any of their Directors/Signatory details registered in the MCA21 system and who are desirous of filing DIR-3 Form are advised to get atleast one authorised signatory registered by contacting the concerned Registrar of Companies. ROCs have been requested by the MCA to allow entry of details from their offices also.

b) Form ADT-1 (Information to the Registrar by Company for appointment of Auditor, erstwhile Form 23B) is available for filing w.e.f 20th Oct 2014. ADT-1 should not be filed as attachment to Form GNL-2.

11.    Amendment to Company Law board (Fees on Applications and Petitions) Rules, 1991

 
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 642 read with sub-section (2) of section 637A of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and the removal of difficulty Orders issued by the Central Government u/s. 470 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government has vide notifica- tion dated 3rd November 2014 amended the Company Law Board (Fees on Applications and Petitions) Rules, 1991 whereby in the Company Law Board (Fees on Applications    and    Petitions)    Rules,    1991,    in    the    Schedule,    after serial    number    33    the    following    shall    be    inserted,    namely:

34

2(41) of the

Companies Act, 2013

Allowing
any period other than April to March as financial year.

5,000

35

58 and 59 of the

Companies Act, 2013

 

 

36

73(4) of the

Companies Act, 2013 read with
section 76

Rectification of register
of

members

500

37

74(2) of the

Companies Act, 2013

Directing
the company to pay the sum due or for any loss or damage incurred as a result
of such non-payment.

100

 

74(2) of the

Companies Act, 2013

Allow
further time as considered reasonable to the company to repay the deposit.

5,000


12.    Companies (Central government’s) general Rules and Forms Amendment Rules, 2014

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide Notification dated 7th November, 2014 made an amendment to the Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and cations and Petitions) Rules, 1991, in the Schedule, after serial number 33 the following shall be inserted, namely:
 
Forms, 1956, whereby in Rule 12A, for the brackets and words “(Accounts) in the Department of Company Affairs”, the words “in the Ministry of Corporate Affairs” are substituted.

PART C: Information on & Around

fiogf49gjkf0d
Compensation of Rs. 5 lakh:
The Maharashtra State Information Commission (SCIC) has awarded a compensation of a whopping Rs. 5 lakh to a right to information applicant. The compensation is to be paid by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) to Ambernath resident, Nitin Desai for the harassment meted out to him while providing information to him. The amount is the highest ever compensation given to an individual in the state as of now.

Earlier, a compensation of Rs. 1 lakh was given to a charitable trust by state chief information commission. In 2013, it became the highest ever compensation to be given till date. The Rs. 5 lakh compensation order was delivered on 30th October by the state information commissioner (konkan beach), Thanksi Thekkekara. The compensation was awarded after the applicant was first denied information and then given misleading information.

Desai had sought information on the transformer installed on his land. Around 300 sq. ft. of land was taken up to install the transformer and it could not be used. Desai sought information about the permission. The information was sought in 2012. However, MSEDCL’s public information officer (PIO) did not provide any information.

During the hearing, the PIO stated that verbal permission was taken from the applicant before using the land. The commissioner stated, as per rules, provision for verbal permission did not exist at all. During the hearing, a show cause notice was served on the PIO asking why a compensation of Rs. 20 lakh should not be provided to the applicant. During the hearing, the commission was of the view that Rs. 5 lakh compensation should be provided by public authority from its expenses and a report of the same should be given to the commission by 1st December, 2014. A fine of Rs. 25, 000 was also imposed on the PIO.

levitra

PART A: Decision Of CIC

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section 5(4) of the RTI Act- Denial of Information:

[Shri Prithvi M. vs. ICAI, File No. CIC/SS/A/2013/001875/ KY, dated on 27.08.2014]

Decision:
“It would be seen here that the appellant, vide his RTI Application dated 08.02.2013, sought information from the respondents on three issues as contained therein. Respondents vide their response dated 08.03.2013, allegedly provided the required information to the appellant on all issues. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid response, FA was filed by the appellant on 26.03.2013 before the FAA, who vide order dated 25.04.2013, upheld the decision of CPIO. Hence, a Second Appeal before this Commission.

It is pertinent to mention here that the CPIO, vide his response dated 08.03.2013, provided the required information to the appellant against issue no. 1 only. Further, learned FAA, vide his order dated 25.04.2013, disposed of the FA by upholding the views of CPIO. However, it is to be seen here that required information against issues no. 2 & 3 were not provided on the ground of non-availability of the record in respondent’s office.

On being queried by the Commission, as to why the required information was not provided to the appellant against issues no. 2 & 3. On this very aspect, it is submitted by Smt. Seema Gerotra, Deputy Director & PIO, that the records are not available in PIO’s office. However, the relevant information pertaining to issues no. 2 & 3, is available in the office of CBDT.

In view of this, it is clear that the information sought by the appellant, against issue no. 2 & 3, is in existence in the Public Authority of her sister’s Branch i.e. CBDT. For this, PIO of ICAI could have easily invoked section 5(4) of the RTI Act 2005 for obtaining the required information. However, it could not be done by the PIO concerned for reasons best known to her.

The Commission heard the submissions made by respondents at length. The Commission also perused the case-file thoroughly; especially, nature of issues raised by the appellant in his RTI application dated 08.02.2013, respondent’s response dated 08.03.2013, FAA’s order dated 25.04.2013 and also the grounds of memorandum of second appeal.

By virtue of position above and in the circumstances of the case, the Commission is of the considered view that the respondents have failed to provide the required information to the appellant, even after lapse of eighteen months period. Thus, the respondents have, deliberately, defeated the very purpose of the RTI Act 2005 for which it was legislated by Parliament of India. As such, the Commission feels that appellant’s second appeal deserves to be allowed against issues no. 2 & 3 of the RTI application dated 08.02.2013. Therefore, it is allowed accordingly.

In view of the above, the respondents are hereby directed to provide the complete and categorical information, against issue no. 2 & 3 only, to the appellant, within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order under intimation to this Commission. If need be, Section 5(4) of the RTI Act 2005 be also invoked in the matter”.

levitra

PART B: RTI Act, 2005

fiogf49gjkf0d
PEOPLE’S MONITORING OF THE RTI REGIME IN INDIA 2011-13:

In the last issue of BCAJ I had noted as under:

P.S. RTI Assessment and Advisory Group (RAAG) and Samya Center for Equity studies (SAMYA) have published in October 2014 the work titled “PEOPLE’S MONITORING OF THE RTI REGIME IN INDIA: 2011-13 running into 177 pages. Next issue, we will summarise the same. Look forward to it. Briefly looking into the contents of compilation, running into 177 pages of 11 chapters & 10 annexures, I plan to serialise it and cover 1 or 2 chapters in each issue.

This study is part of an ongoing series of studies on various aspects of the implementation of the RTI regime in India. The current study covers the period 2011-13.

Hereunder is the summary of the KEY FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS before I summarise the chapters.

A. Improving awareness: There is poor awareness about the RTI Act, worse in rural areas than in urban areas. In only 36% of the rural focus group discussions (FGDs) and 38% of urban FGDs, was there even one participant who had heard of the RTI Act in the state headquarters, and in Delhi, 61% of the respondents interviewed through street corner interviews said that they had heard about the RTI Act.

B. Gender concerns: The participation of women in the RTI process, especially as applicants, has been minimal, with a national average of 8%. Many reasons can be attributed for this gender imbalance, but there is no scientific understanding of why so few women file RTI applications. If RTI means of empowerment, then there should be a special focus on ensuring that women are aware of the RTI Act and willing and able to use it.

C. The rural-urban divide: Only 14% of the applicants were from rural areas, even though over 70% of India’s population lives in rural areas. Though the sample might have a bias in favour of urban areas, even after adjusting for such a bias, the proportion is too small. Awareness levels about the RTI also seem low in rural areas.

D. Grievance redress mechanism: 80% of respondents in rural FGDs, and 95% in urban FGDs, said that they wanted to use the RTI Act in order to seek redress of their grievances. Analysis of RTI applications showed that at least 16% of the applicants were seeking information that was aimed at getting action on a complaint, getting a response from a public authority, or getting redress for a grievance.

E. Ineffectual first appellate process: Except for first appeals filed with the central government or Delhi government, there is less than 4% chance of getting any information by filing a first appeal.

F. Threats to applicants: Applicants, especially from the weaker segments of society, are often intimidated, threatened and even physically attacked when they go to submit an RTI application, or as a consequence of their submitting such an application.

G. Reducing the need to file RTI applications: Certain public authorities, especially those with extensive public dealing (like municipalities, land and building departments, police departments, etc.) receive a disproportionate share of RTI applications compared to other public authorities. In some cases, there is resentment among PIOs as they have to deal with a large number of RTI applications in addition to their normal work.

H. Proactive disclosure: Despite a very strong provision for proactive (suo motu) disclosure u/s. 4 of the RTI Act, there is poor compliance by public authorities. This forces applicants to file applications for information that should be available to them proactively, and consequently creates extra work for themselves, for the concerned public authorities, and for information commissions. 65% of the PA premises inspected did not have a board with the required proactive disclosures and 59% did not have any publications or other material available in their office which the public could inspect in order to access the information that should be proactively available.

I. Record Management: One major constraint faced by PIOs in providing information in a timely manner is the poor state of record management in most public authorities.

J. Training of PIOs: Nearly 45% of the PIOs have not received any training on the RTI Act. In fact, the PIOs interviewed identified lack of training as their number one constraint. A much larger proportion of non-PIO civil servants, who have to provide information to the PIOs or function as first appellate authorities, have not been oriented and trained towards facilitating the right to information.

K. Delays and pendency: There are huge and growing delays in the disposal of cases in many of the information commissions, with pendency of cases growing every month. At the current levels of pendency and rate of disposal, an appeal filed today with the Madhya Pradesh SIC would be taken up for consideration only after 6 years, while the West Bengal SIC would come to it after nearly 17 years! The main reasons behind the delays seem to be the paucity of commissioners in some of the commissions and the low productivity of some of the other commissioners, mainly due to inadequate support. The additional fact that there is no legally prescribed time limit for disposing second appeals not only allows ICs to be indifferent about delays but also prevents appellants from approaching the high court.

L. Enforcing orders: Often, orders of information commissions are not heeded to by the concerned public authority and even penalties that are imposed are not recovered. Many commissions do not have workable methods of monitoring whether their orders have been complied with; leave alone for ensuring that they are complied with.

M. Imposing penalties: A very small proportion of the penalties imposable under the RTI Act (less than 3.7% on the basis of our current estimate) are actually imposed by commissions. Though further research needs to be done on this aspect, preliminary data suggests that there is a correlation between the number of penalties imposed and both the willingness of PIOs to make information available, and the number of appeals and complaints that land up with information commissions.

N. Practicing transparency: Unfortunately, many of the information commissions do not themselves follow the requirements of section 4 of the RTI act. Most of their websites are outdated with very sparse details and much of the required information missing.

O. Independence of commissions: Many information commissioners feel that their dependence on the government for budgets, sanctions and staff seriously undermines their independence and autonomy, and inhabits their functioning.

P. Composition of commissions: The composition of information commissions across the country has a bias towards retired government servants. It is desirable to have a more balanced composition so that diverse expertise is represented in the commission.

Q.    Rationalising rules:
All states and union territory governments (a total of 34), all the high courts (23) and legislative assemblies (29), the central government, the Supreme Court and both houses of Parliament have a right to make their own rules. This can result in 90 different sets of rules in the country. In addition, the 28 information commissions also have their own procedures, as formulated by the appropriate governments, resulting in a total of 118 sets of rules relating to the RTI in India! Consequently, an applicant is confronted with the often insurmountable problem of first finding out the relevant rules and then attempting to comply with the application form, identity proof, or mode of fee payment requirement, which differ from state to state and are often virtually impossible to comply with.

R.    Monitoring and advisory body: The mechanisms for monitoring the implantation of the RTI Act, and for receiving and assimilating feedback, are almost non- existent.

S.    Information publication scheme:
There is an Information Publication Scheme provided for in the statute in Australia and later adopted by UK too. In this scheme the Information Commission asks each agency to publish its own information on its functioning. The Commission guides the agency and approves the publication scheme.

T.    Political parties and the RTI: Nepal has included the functioning of a political party and only NGO with full/part government funding in the agencies whose information can be accessed.

U.    Selecting information commissioners:
Process of appointment of information commissioners is comparatively more participatory and open in Canada and Scotland. Both countries go through a series of approvals by the Parliament of candidates who are com- petitively short-listed. The transparent process helps in legitimising the position to a much greater degree than appointments that are seen to come through de- liberations of the Prime Minister or government alone.

V.    Implementing IC orders: The orders of the Information Commission are binding on the agency in UK. If necessary, it can issue what are known as enforcement notices which, if not implanted, are treated as contempt of court for the purpose of punishment.

W.    Accountability to Parliament: Information Commissions in Canada and UK submit detailed annual reports of their activities to the Parliament. This makes them accountable to the Parliament and also helps in making their activities transparent and available for public scrutiny.

Above are 23 Key Findings. On each finding, the publica- tion gives their recommendations, which are not reproduced here. If any reader desires to have them, a soft copy would be forwarded to him/her.

    Report of The Committee To evolve Model Format for RTI Replies:

The Committee constituted vide DoPT O/M/No. 10/1/2013-IR dated 16th October, 2014 to evolve a model format for giving information under the RTI Act, held its meeting on 29th October, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. After ex- amining in detail the provisions of the RTI Act, the ex- isting generally followed by the CPIOs in  replying  to RTI applications, the Committee has made the following observations:

X.    There is neither any provision in the RTI Act or RTI Rules for a model/standard format of RTI applica- tion nor any provision for a model/standard format for reply to the RTI applications.

II.    Presently, neither any standard practice nor any standard format is being used by the CPIOs in reply to the RTI applications.

In view of the above observations, the Committee has made the following recommendations:

a)    There should not be a model/standard format for reply to the RTI application, as there is no such provision in the RTI Act or the RTI rules.

b)    Moreover, keeping in view that there is no standard format for RTI applications, there could not be a standard format for their reply.

c)    However, the following points can be uniformly ad- opted by the CPIOs while replying to the RTI applications:

i.    The name, designation, official telephone no. and email id of the CPIOs should be clearly mentioned.

ii.    In case the information requested for is denied, rea- sons for denial quoting the relevant sections of the RTI Act should be clearly mentioned.

iii.    In case the information pertains to other public author- ity and the application is transferred u/s. 6(3) of the RTI Act, details of the public authority to whom the ap- plication is transferred should be given.

iv.    In the concluding Para of the reply, it should be clearly mentioned that the First appellate Authority will reply within 30 days of receipt of reply of CPIO.

v.    The name, designation, address, official telephone no. and e-mail id of the First Appellate Authority should also be clearly mentioned.

vi.    Wherever the applicant has requested for certified copies of the documents or records, the CPIO should certify the documents or records by putting a seal of his name, designation and signing with date. Above the seal, the remarks that “documents/records pro- vided under the RTI Act” should be endorsed.

Indirect Taxes

fiogf49gjkf0d
5. Notification No. VAT-1514/CR-69 & 69(1)/Taxation- 1 dated 22-08-2104

Notifies capital goods and parts and components thereof under schedule entry C-107(2A) wef 01-09-2014 and amends the government order Finance Department No. VAT -1507/CR/93/Taxation-1 dated 21-01-2008 wef 01-09-2014.

6. Notification u/s. 42 of the MVAT Act (Retailer Composition Scheme) VAT-1514/CR 58/Taxation dated 21.8.2014 & Trade Circular 17T of 2014 dated 20-09-2014

By this notification new retailer composition scheme introduced in place of old scheme wef 01-10-2014. Now in new retailer composition scheme two options have been provided for payment of composition amount. If dealer opts to pay composition amount on total turnover of sales including tax-free goods then 1% and other option is 1.5% of total turnover of sales of taxable goods. Present dealers who are in composition scheme also have to apply in Form 4A before 31st October, 2014 and opt for the composition scheme otherwise not eligible for new composition scheme and old retailer composition scheme shall expire on 30-09-2014. Trade Circular No. 17T explains eligibility, rate of tax and conditions for composition scheme for retailer.

7. Notification u/s. 31A (2) of the MVAT Act (Tax Collection at source on Minor Minerals) VAT 1514/CR 68/Taxation-1 dated 21-08-2014

Notifies authorities and rate to collect amount from the dealer who has been awarded quarrying lease/permit in respect of minor minerals.

8.Notification under entry 2A of Schedule A appended to MVAT Act.No.VAT 1514/CR-59/Taxation -1 dated 21-08-2014

Notifies spare parts of air crafts for the purpose of Schedule A Entry No. 2A appended to MVAT Act.

9. Trade Circular 16T of 2014 providing E payment facility for Professional Tax, Luxury Tax and Sugarcane Purchase Tax through GRAS dated 17-09-2014

Sales Tax department has decided to accept payments under Professional Tax EC & RC, Luxury Tax and Sugarcane Purchase Tax through Government Receipt Account System (GRAS). Portal https://gras.mahakosh.gov.in/salestax available from 18-09-2014. At present it is optional. Detailed procedure for making payment is explained in the Circular.

levitra

Ethics and u

fiogf49gjkf0d
(This is one more example of alleged negligence or lack of due diligence)

Shrikrishna (S) — Yes, My dear Partha, what happened to those digital signatures misplaced in your office?

Arjun (A) — Oh Lord, you are Great and kind hearted. I realised that you were testing my devotion towards you, my Lord. I had very anxious moments; but thanks to your mercy, those small pen-drives were located in some working files! God saved me!

S — But then, did you take precautions that we discussed?

A — Of course, yes. Immediately, I obtained necessary letters from all clients who left their tokens with us. I returned most of them to the respective clients. I don’t want any more headache!

S — Good. But then, why are you again looking so tense?

A — Hey Bhagwan! It’s another true story that has frightened me.

S — What is that?

A — My friend is a company secretary. Earlier, he was in a corporate job; but now on his own. He is in deep trouble!

S — Why? What happened to him?

A — He had a client. A small private limited company. The promoters-directors were only a couple. Husband & wife.

S — It is very common. I have seen it in many CAs. But they are not aware that this may be a serious misconduct in terms of clause (11) of First Schedule.

A — Yes. We had discussed it once. But here, they were lay-persons; not CAs or CS’s. Otherwise, I know that it would amount to engaging in other business without seeking permission from the Council.

S — Ok. Then what next?

A — They inducted one more person as a director who promised them to bring some business from abroad.

S — Good. Then?

A — He remained a director for a couple of years; but nothing materialised as promised by him.

S — Then there must be unpleasantness.

A — Yes. The company spent a sizeable amount on exploring the potentials as advised by him. He was drawing a remuneration too!

S — Wasteful!

A — The company had engaged a company secretary as an adviser. He was not involved in the company’s activities on a day-to-day basis. One fine morning, the couple informed him that the third director had tendered his resignation.

S — As expected!

A — Yes. And the CS was asked to complete the formalities of ROC. He advised them that a board meeting should be held. Now that the only continuing directors were husband and wife – staying together (!) – he showed the meeting of the same date and uploaded form No.32 – recording the resignation of the third director.

S — Very normal. But in the so called Board meeting, was that third director invited?

A — No. According to the CS, there was no need. He had resigned and it was pointless calling him. It was a formality that the other directors accept his resignation. Relations were not smooth; but the reality was obvious that he did not contribute anything to the business.

S — You mean that the resignation was a natural consequence of the situation.

A — Exactly. But now that third director has turned around and says that he had not resigned! The signature on the letter is not his! He alleges that it was forged.

S — Oh! The CS had obviously not attempted to verify the signature.

A — True. In practice, we have to proceed in good faith. Everytime we cannot afford to be suspicious. We never consider it necessary to verify signatures of our clients – like a banker does.

S — So now, it is a lesson! But tell me, was the signature at least similar to that in the company’s records?

A — That’s the unfortunate part. There is a variation. But all this is revealed now. At that point of time, when a respectable business-couple produces a letter, and asks to complete the formalities, should the company secretary disbelieve them?

S — True. But this is ‘kaliyug’! Good faith has no place in today’s era. And, from a professional, expectations are more. It is perhaps the ‘professional scepticism’ that gives credibility to a professional’s work.

A — Agreed. Our CAs are also uploading company law forms. This is an eye-opener to all of us.

NOTE:
The above dialogue between Shri Krishna and Arjun is based on Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule which is reproduced below.

Clause (7)     of Part I of Second Schedule states that a CA in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he – “does not exercise due diligence, or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties”.

levitra

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section A:
Multiple schemes of arrangement effected during the year Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (31-03-2014)


Scheme 1
From Notes to Accounts

Pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement (‘The Scheme’) between Mahindra Trucks and Buses Limited (MTBL), a subsidiary of the Company, and the Company, as sanctioned by the Honourable High Court of Bombay vide its order dated 7th March 2014, the entire assets and liabilities, duties and obligations of the Trucks Business of MTBL was transferred to and vested in the Company, from 1st April, 2013 (the appointed date). The scheme became effective on 30th March, 2014.

The accounting of this arrangement was done as per the scheme approved by the Honourable High court of Bombay and the same has been given effect to in the financial statements as under:

(a) The assets and liabilities of the Trucks Business of MTBL were recorded in the books of the Company at their book values.

(b) MTBL reorganised its Equity Share Capital and Securities Premium account by writing off it’s accumulated losses and the excess of assets over liabilities given up, first against Securities Premium Account and the Balance against the reorganisation of Share Capital by reducing the face value and paid up value of the Equity Share Capital of Rs. 10 each to Rs. 0.20.

(c) Consequent to the transfer of Trucks Business, the Company reorganised its investment cost in MTBL in proportion to the net worth of the remaining business of MTBL and the net worth of the Trucks Business leading to a reduction in investment value of Rs. 819.79 crore.

(d) The excess of the reduction in investment value over the assets taken over amounting to Rs. 565.85 crore was debited to General Reserve.

The result for the year ended 31st March, 2014 also include a tax benefit of Rs. 297.78 crore arising from the carry forward unabsorbed past losses (including unabsorbed depreciation) and deferred tax positions of the Trucks business of MTBL.

The current year figures are therefore not strictly comparable with that of the previous year.

Scheme 2
From Notes to Accounts

The Board of Directors of the Company during the year approved entering into a transaction in the Auto Components business with CIE Automotive S.A., Spain (CIE). The transaction is to be completed in parts.

The first part involving the following has been completed during the year:

(a) The Company transferred its entire shareholding in Mahindra Gears & Transmissions Private Limited at a fair value determined by an independent valuer to its wholly-owned subsidiary Mahindra Investments (India) Private Limited (MIPL). The excess of Rs. 23.62 crore over the cost has not been recognised in these results having regard to the principles of prudence and the substance of this transaction, and will be dealt with on completion of the related parts.

(b) The Company sold 99.4% of its holdings in Mahindra CIE Automotive Limited (MCIE) (formerly known as Mahindra Forgings Limited) and 100% of its holdings in both Mahindra Composites Limited (MCL) and Mahindra Hinoday Industries Limited (MHIL) to one of the subsidiaries of CIE at a price that is lower than the carrying value of these investments by Rs. 147.76 crore, which amount has been debited to the Investment Fluctuation Reserve (IFR). IFR is expected to be credited, having regard to the substance of the transaction, with an amount not less than the amount debited above, when the second part of the transaction, described below, takes place.

(c) Consequently MHIL, Mahindra Forgings International Limited, Mahindra Forgings Europe AG, Gesenkschmiede Schneider GmbH, JECOJellinghaus GmbH, Falkenroth Umformtechnik GmbH, Stokes Group Limited, Stokes Forgings Dudley Limited, Stokes Forgings Limited, Mahindra Forgings Global Limited, Schoneweiss & Co. GmbH ceased to be subsidiaries of the Company. MCL ceased to be an associate of the Company.

MCIE ceased to be a subsidiary and became an associate of the Company.

(d) The Company acquired a 13.5% stake in CIE through its wholly owned subsidiary Mahindra Overseas Investment Company (Mauritius) Limited (MOICML), making it an associate of the Company, in view of its contractual representation on the Board of CIE.

(e) Completion of open offer by CIE through its subsidiary in both MCIE and MCL.

The second part of the transaction involves the merger of Mahindra Ugine Steel Company Limited, Mahindra Gears International Limited and Mahindra Investments (India) Private Limited, and MHIL, MCL and a CIE subsidiary with MCIE effective 1st October, 2013 through Schemes of Arrangement u/s. 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. On completion of both parts above:

(a) CIE will hold approximately 53% in MCIE;

(b) The Company will hold 20.04% in MCIE; and

(c) The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary MOICML, will hold 13.5% in CIE.

levitra

Direct Taxes

fiogf49gjkf0d
Due date for obtaining and filing tax audit report for the assessment year 2014-15 is extended to 30th November, 2014 – Notification No. F.No.133/24/2014-TPL dated 20th August, 2014

CBDT extends the due date for obtaining and filing the tax audit report u/s. 44AB of the Act for non-transfer pricing assessees to 30th November, 2014 since new formats have been issued for tax audit report. It has been clarified, that the tax audit report filed till 24th July, 2014 in the old format will be treated as valid reports.

Committee constituted for deciding on cases covered under the retrospective amendments relation to transfer of assets – Notification No. F.No. 149/141/2014-TPL dated 28th August, 2014

CBDT has passed an order u/s. 119 of the Act constituting a Committee consisting of three members of the CBDT viz. i) Joint Secretary (FT&TR-I), (ii) Joint Secretary (TPLI) and (iii) Commissioner of Income-tax (ITA ).

Any case pertaining to period before 1st April, 2014 wherein the AO feels that income deems to accrue or arise in India through transfer of capital assets in India as covered under the Amendments made u/s. 2 (14), 2(47), 9(1)(i) and section 195, such case would be referred to this Committee subject to conditions prescribed. The AO needs to seek approval from the Committee for any action in this matter. The Committee after giving an opportunity to the assessee, shall endeavor to decide the reference within 60 days of the receipt of the reference in writing, a copy of which would be given to the assessee. The decision of the Committee would be binding on the AO. The AO would proceed in the matter following the directions of the Committee.

CBDT has issued an office memorandum to all the officers instructing them to maintain the schedule of appointment given to the tax payers and not wasting their time by making them wait. – F.N.: DIR(Hqrs)./Ch.DT/20/2013 dated 22nd August, 2014

levitra

FROM THE PRESIDENT

fiogf49gjkf0d
India has witnessed an excellent equity market performance in 2014, with the combined market capitalisation of India’s publicly listed companies on BSE touching the Rs.100 lakh crore(One followed by fourteen zeros) mark during November. India now ranks 9th on the league table of market capitalisation with an increase of 39 % so far this year. By far, this is the highest growth in this year compared to the other nine countries in the top 10 list.

Even as the Indian stock market has achieved this remarkable feat, the primary market, considered as a benchmark for new capex in the economy, continues to languish. The capital raised through public and rights issues in 2013-14 by the private sector amounted to Rs.11,681 crore of which capital raised through IPO’s consisted only of Rs.1,236 crore. The comparable data for the half year ended September 2014 at Rs.4,335 crore and Rs.1,031 crore respectively, shows no significant improvement. In stark contrast, the capital raised by the private sector 20 years ago during 1994-95 was much higher at Rs. 26,417 crore even as India’s GDP has increased by nearly ten times over these 20 years.

Another worrisome factor is the very low investment inequities by retail investors. While India reports very high household savings rate of over 20 %, less than 1 % of India’s population invests in equities. The proportion of these total household savings that make it to capital market is less than 2 %.

The below par performance of the primary market remains a concern and is also a symptom of structural bottlenecks faced while doing business in India. The jobless growth witnessed under UPA-I Government reaffirms the need for structural reforms and qualitative improvement in governance to usher in sustainable growth.

A vast majority of today’s youth graduating through rote learning prefer to be job-seekers rather than becoming job-givers and compound this challenge. Even Chartered Accountants are not an exception to this. In the last ten years ending 31st March 2014, the total membership of the ICAI increased by 1,13,055, out of which 80,363, i.e., 71 % of the members opted not to obtain a certificate of practice.

Indeed, it is time for the Modi Government to accelerate the much-promised reforms. The ‘Make in India’ campaign needs to go beyond the rhetoric and ensure de-bottlenecking of procedural and bureaucratic hurdles. The Finance Minister has promised that a whole set of second-generation reforms will be unveiled in the next Union Budget.

Every year, the Taxation and Indirect Tax Committees invite suggestions from the members for inclusion in the prebudget memorandum. The response, however, has been not so encouraging. The dedicated team of committed volunteers at the BCAS burns the mid-night oil to prepare a thoughtful pre-budget memorandum and submits the same to the Government authorities. Let us hope that the new Government will give due consideration to all the suggestions received and implement the deserving ones.

It appears that most Citizens are happy to complain but do not come forth to contribute and respond to government initiatives. This is partly due to inertia and partly due to cynicism. It remains to be seen how the new initiative by Prime Minister Modi through www.MyGov.in is able to bring about a change in this attitude.

The recent enactment of mandatory voting by persons in local body elections by the Government of Gujarat has erupted into a controversy with liberals, calling it totalitarian and some lawyers calling it unconstitutional. The Fundamental Duties of the Citizen in Article 51A of part IV of our Constitution were enacted by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976. Experts are of the view that the constitution does not make any provision to enforce the performance of these duties. Perhaps, we need to take a revisit to this issue and strike an equitable balance between the rights and the duties of the Citizen.

At the recently concluded G20 Brisbane Summit in Australia, a major concern remained around the uneven global recovery not delivering the jobs needed. The leaders agreed to a detailed action plan, aimed at raising the global growth, to deliver better living standards and quality jobs for people across the world. They have set up an ambitious goal of lifting G20’s GDP by at least an additional 2 % by 2018.

The G20 Summit also acknowledged that corruption continues to represent a significant threat to global growth and financial stability. It destroys public trust, undermines the rule of law, skews competition, impedes cross-border investment and trade, and distorts resource allocation. The summit reaffirmed its commitment to building a global culture of intolerance towards corruption. The action plan outlined includes ensuring transparency of beneficial ownership, combating bribery through effective criminal and civil laws and enforcement, private and public sector transparency and integrity and international cooperation. The Summit also identified high-risk sectors such as extractives sector, customs, fisheries and primary forestry, and construction sectors and resolved to identify and develop international best practices to address the risk of corruption. The elaborate agenda of the G20 Summit has resulted in a compilation of a long wish list. The critics have termed the 800-plus policy proposals as a catalogue of measures that are old, vague or unlikely to be implemented and that G20 has failed to deliver on its 2010 commitments. It remains to be seen how G20 Summits travel beyond the annual sojourn and photo opportunities.

The residential programmes pioneered by the BCAS have gained immense popularity over the years. For the past several years, the residential programmes dedicated to specialised subjects such as International Tax, IFRS and Service Tax, are being organised for the targeted group of participants. Last year, the BCAS team pioneered innovation once again. Two residential programmes dedicated to specific age groups were organised-Senior Chartered Accountants’ Meet for seniors above the age of 60 years and Youth RRC for young chartered accountants below 35 years. Both these programmes received encouraging response and are being repeated in 2015 as well.

The conclusion of the annual tax filing season for AY 2014-15 brings a much needed relief to the members. It is time to enjoy the winter chill and ring in the New Year. At this time of the year, we eagerly look forward to the much coveted Annual Residential Refresher Course for learning and bonding in a relaxed atmosphere.This time the 48th RRC will be held from 8th to 11th January 2015 at the scenic Udaipur, and we look forward to seeing some of you there.

levitra

Cancerous Corruption

fiogf49gjkf0d
Vigilance Awareness Week:

Central Vigilance Commission observes this year’s Vigilance Awareness Week from 27th October to 1st November, 2014.

The Income-tax department also organised, on 28-10-2014, an interactive meeting of senior officials, with stakeholders to mitigate potential areas of corruption.

• Mr. Rajiv, Central Vigilance Commissioner in his message wrote:

In its endeavour to fight corruption, the Central Vigilance Commission mandates observance of Vigilance Awareness Week every year. While reaffirming our commitment to eradicate corruption, we need to enlist the support and participation of all stakeholders and seek their active co-operation in fighting the menace of corruption. The Commission hopes that such initiatives would be an effective anti-corruption measure.

The theme chosen for this year’s Vigilance Awareness Week is “Combating Corruption–Technology as an enabler”. A combination of e-governance, web-enabled technologies and transparent policy initiatives by Government Departments/Organisation can provide an efficient and effective service delivery system to the citizens. Innovative technologies of social media promote citizens’ participation and enable reporting instances of corruption.

The Commission believes that transparency and objectivity in governance hold the key to combating corruption. Effecting systemic changes with simplified procedures, minimum discretion and optimum use of technology is the way forward. The commission expects all organisations to undertake technological initiatives relevant to their fields to facilitate fairness and equity in governance.

• The Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi in his message wrote:
It is needless to point out that the integrity of public servants and transparence in public offices is utmost necessary in making transparent and efficient administration free of corruption.

• The President Shri Pranab Mukherjee wrote:
Corruption is a complex problem that needs a multi– faceted action. One of them is the use of technology that can help promote openness and transparency. Use of modern technologies can play an important role in eliminating human interface in service delivery systems. It is the collective responsibility of citizens as well as government departments to adopt technology initiative in combating corruption to maximise benefits.

Corruption of MLAs etc.:
An NGO by the name PRAJA aims at enabling accountable governance. It’s October 2014 issue reports on perception of citizens about corruption of MLAs, BMC officials, police officials and improvement of quality of life.

While the Mumbaikars’ perception about corruption of MLAs has increased by 17% they believe that their quality of life has decreased by 13%.

Supreme Court–Govt. cannot punish civil servants who expose corruption:
The Supreme Court in September ruled that any civil servant who exposes corruption and other illicit acts by knocking on the doors of a court cannot be subjected to disciplinary proceedings.

A bench of Justices, J. Chelameswar and A. K. Sikri, said that if a bureaucrat files a petition, alleging that the government was lax in discharging its constitutional obligations of establishing the rule of law, his or her conduct does not imply that he or she failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty, or indulged in conduct unbecoming of a member of the service.

“Clearly the rule only prohibits criticism of the policies of the government or making of any statement which is likely to embarrass the relations between the government of India and a foreign state or the government of India and the government of a state. Allegations of maladministration, in our opinion, do not fall within the ambit of any of the three categories (warranting disciplinary actions),” said the bench.

It added, “The right to judicial remedies for the redressal of either personal or public grievances is a constitutional right of the subjects of this country. Employees of the state cannot become members of a different and inferior class to whom such right is not available.”

The court issued the ruling while quashing disciplinary proceeding against IAS officer Vijay Shankar Pandey. The proceeding had been initiated against Pandey under charges of misconduct after he joined a campaign to bring back black money stashed abroad. He had actively participated as a member of a social group that filed a PIL and prompted the Supreme Court to pass a judgement on setting up a special investigation team to retrieve black money. He also gave his personal affidavit in the matter.

The bench said that the purpose behind these proceedings appeared “calculated to harass the appellant since he dared to point out certain aspects of maladministration in the Government of India.”

“The whole attempt appears to be to suppress any probe into the question of black money by whatever means, fair or foul. The present impugned proceedings are nothing but a part of the strategy to intimidate not only the appellant but also to send a signal to others who might dare in future to expose any maladministration,” it noted.

Gabriel Kuris (GK)
GK is a senior research specialist at Princeton University’s research centre, Innovations for Successful Societies.

Some months before he was in India, and in conversation with a journalist, he said:

“In democracies, if people want government action against corruption, they need to demand it through their voices and their votes. It’s easy for parties to make empty promises; voters need to hold them accountable.

The political class is resistant to the idea of a strong antigraft watchdog. The war against corruption is not just a war against politicians. Anti-Corruption-Agencies (ACAs) have many arrows in their quiver, and there are tactics that don’t single out and threaten individuals. Prosecution alone cannot reform a faulty system. ACAs in Botswana, Mauritius and Indonesia have made great strides by partnering with ministries and offices.

Real programmes against corruption requires preventive reforms and educational efforts that desire societal change.”

National Portal of India:
Fight corruption with the help of Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). If anybody is involved in corrupt practices report it now. You can use the following options to raise your voice:

• Call to the CVC toll free helpline number: 1800-11-0180 (All India)/011-24651000 (9:30 AM – 6 PM – Monday – Friday)
• Send a blank SMS or “VIGEYE” to 09223174440 to get an SMS containing the registration link in your mobile. You have to register first, before filing a complaint.
• Register your mobile phone directly with the CVC.
• File an online complaint register with CVC.
• Attach audio/video/photo evidence with your online and mobile complaint.

Users can also check the Status of the complaint filed by them with the Commission.

So get ready, be vigilant and take an initiative to fight against corruption.

Why Corruption?

“Nobody is corrupt with their own family. Corruption is happening because there is no sense of belonging. We need to create that belonging through satsangs as Gandhi did. Lack of spirituality is leading to corruption.” —Sri Sri Ravi Shankar.

levitra

ICAI and its members

fiogf49gjkf0d
1 Disciplinary Cases

(i) ICAI vs. Ved Prakash Verma (2014) 48 Taxmann. com245 (Delhi)

In this case, the member (CA) was an auditor of a Company. He was in possession of the records of the Company. The Disciplinary Committee (DC) of ICAI found the member guilty of professional misconduct on charges of filing of Bogus Forms 2,32 etc., with ROC appointing certain persons as Directors of the Company. Further, it was found that he was taking undue interest in the company’s matters after he resigned as its Auditor. The Council accepted the report of the DC and referred the matter to the Delhi High Court with a recommendation that the name of the Member be removed for a period of six months.

On appeal, the Delhi High Court has held that the DC and the Council of ICAI was justified in holding the member guilty of professional misconduct. The Court also held that such findings by members of the DC and the Council had to be given weightage, as they are experts with regard to the matters pertaining to CA Profession and they knew the intricacies of the professional matters due to their knowledge and personal experience. Hence, the High Court held that the name of the member be removed from the membership of ICAI for a period of six months.

(ii) SATYAM CASE:

On p. 451 of C.A. Journal for October, 2014, the President of ICAI has stated that soon after the SATYAM SCAM was exposed, disciplinary action was initiated against the Statutory Auditors, CFO and Head of Internal Audit Department of the Company. The Disciplinary Committee (DC) found the CA Members guilty of professional misconduct and awarded maximum punishment of removal of their names from the Register of Members of ICAI permanently and also imposed a fine of Rs. 5 lakh on each of them. The Appellate Authority has decided all cases, except one, and has upheld the decision of the DC of ICAI.

Considering the importance of this case and other similar cases, the Council of the ICAI should publish the orders of the DC and the Appellate Authority in the C.A. Journal for the information of our Members. By such publication, the Members will become aware of the facts of such cases and the reasoning adopted by the DC to award punishment. This will also ensure that our members become cautious while performing their professional activities and do not make similar mistakes in the future.

(iii) Case of Shri SB.

(Reported in Disciplinary cases Vol.I Part II published by ICAI – Page 239 – 242).

In this case, the Member was the owner of a flat which he agreed to sell to the Varanasi Branch of the ICAI. He collected Rs. 5,75,000/- from the said Branch and agreed to get the flat transferred to the name of the Branch. There was a delay of more than 10 years in getting the transfer of the flat to the Branch. However, during this period, the Branch was in possession of the flat and carried on its activities from there without payment of any charges. In the Disciplinary proceedings, the DC noted as under:

(a) The member had explained the difficulties in registration of the flat in the name of the Branch.

(b) I n the meantime, the member had entered into an agreement with the Council of the ICAI that in view of the difficulty in getting the registration in the name of the Branch, the member should take possession of the flat and pay Rs. 11 lakh (Rs. 5,75,000/- advance plus interest) to the ICAI.

(c) The member had paid this amount to the ICAI.

In view of the above, the DC was of the opinion that since the member had paid the above amount with interest to ICAI there was no mala fide intention on the part of the member. Therefore, the DC held that the member was not guilty of professional or other misconduct.

2 Some Ethical Issues
The Ethical Standards Board of ICAI has given some answers to some Ethical Issues on Pages 462 – 464 of CA Journal for October, 2014. Some of these issues are as under:

(i) Issue No.1: A Chartered Accountants firm issued circulars to non-clients that a Chartered Accountant who was the former partner in-charge of Taxation of one of the largest accounting firms of the world had joined them as partner. Can they do it?

Response: Clause (6) of Part 1 of the First Schedule to the C.A. Act prohibits solicitation of clients or performing work either directly or indirectly by circular, advertisement, personal communication or interview or by any “other means”. The issuance of circular to persons who are not clients but may require services of a chartered accountant would be tantamount to advertisement, since it is solicitation of professional work by making roving enquiries. As per Clause (7) of Part I of the First Schedule, the usage of the words “one of the largest accounting firms of the world” and the specification of specialisation in “taxation” would also amount to advertisement and, thus, constitute professional misconduct.

(ii) Issue No.2: Whether the word “Chartered Accountants” and name of city after the name of the members of the Institute be mentioned in the articles contributed by such members and published in the Institute’s Journal?

Response: There is no restriction in the Code of Ethics for mentioning the word “Chartered Accountant” and also the name of the city in an article contributed by a member in the Institute’s Journal as well as in newspapers and other periodicals.

(iii) Issue No.3: Whether the information contained in the website of the Chartered Accountants and /or Chartered Accountants’ firms can be circulated on their own or through e-mail or by any other mode or technique?

Response: Sub-Para (3) & (4) of Para (m) under Clause (6) of Part 1 of the First Schedule to the C.A. Act, as appearing in the Code of Ethics, 2009 prescribes that the Chartered Accountants and/or Chartered Accountants’ firms should ensure that none of the information contained in the website be circulated on their own or through e-mail or by any other mode or technique except on a specific “pull” request. The Chartered Accountants and/or Chartered Accountants’ firm would ensure that their websites are run on a “pull” model and not a “push” model of the technology, to ensure that any person who wishes to locate the Chartered Accountants or Chartered Accountants’ firms would only have access to the information and the information should be provided only on the basis of specific “pull” request.

3 Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB)
ICAI has published a “Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements”. Some of the observations from this publication relating to “Inventories” are given below for information of Members.

(i) Treatment of MODVAT Credit Receivable on Inputs (p. 18)

It was noticed that in Financial statement, while showing the item of Inventories, it has been stated that the Cost of Raw Materials includes amount of MODVAT as per past practice consistently followed.

Observation of FRRB
As per Para 34 of the Guidance Note on Accounting Treatment for Excise Duty, the Inventory of inputs should be valued at net of input duty. In other words, specified duty paid on inputs will not form part of the cost of inventories. The debit balance of MODVAT/CENVAT Credit Receivable (inputs) Account should be shown as an asset under the head “Advances”. Therefore, including MODVAT Credit in the Cost of Inventories is not in accordance with the ICAI Guidance Note.

(ii) Treatment of Excise Duty in Inventory valuation (p. 18 – 19)

In the Annual Reports of some companies, certain noncompliances were observed with respect to treatment of Excise Duty in Inventory valuation as under

    In respect of stocks lying in factory, in respect of which State Excise Duty is not determinable as the rates vary depending on places from where dis-patches are made, the excise duty is accounted on clearance of such goods. This method of accounting has no impact on results of the year.

    Excise Duty has been accounted on the basis of those goods which are cleared on payment of Excise Duty.

    The Company has not provided for Excise Duty on closing stock of Finished Goods and accordingly, the said amount has not been included in the valuation of Finished Goods.

    No provision is made for estimated liability on unsold finished goods lying in the factory premises on the reporting date.

Observation of FRRB

Referring to Para 7 of AS-2 (Valuation of Inventories) and Para 18 of the Guidance Note on Accounting Treatment for Excise Duty FRRB has observed as under:

The liability for excise duty arises when the goods are manufactured. Hence, it is necessary to create a provision for liability of unpaid excise duty on stock lying in factory or bonded warehouse.

Therefore, liability for Excise Duty should be provided when the goods are manufactured rather than when the same is paid or at the time of clearance of goods from the factory/bonded ware house.

For determining cost of finished goods in stock on reporting date, the amount of Unpaid Excise Duty should be included in the valuation of such goods.

Therefore, in cases of companies whose Annual Reports were reviewed as stated above, the accounting policies followed for valuation of invento-ries of finished goods were not as per AS-2 as well as the above Guidance Note.

4. EAC Opinion:

Accounting Treatment of Raw materials sent to Manu-facturer by the Company for getting Finished Product

Facts

A Government Company is engaged in the business of transmission of power from the generating units to different State Electricity Boards (SEBs) through its transmission network. The company owns and operates more than 90% of India’s inter-state power transmission system (ISTS). It operates a network of 96,229 circuit kilometers of interstate transmission line, 158 EHV AC and HVDC sub stations. The company intends to continue rapidly increasing its capacity to maintain and grow its leadership position and adding more transmission lines and substations. For the construction of transmission lines, one of the ma-jor material is the conductor. The company is not manu-facturing the conductor. It is being purchased from the various manufacturers in India. Aluminium is the main raw material to manufacture the conductor.

The Company purchases aluminium from an aluminium manufacturer. The aluminium is being supplied directly to the manufacturer of conductor on endorsement in favour of manufacturer by the company. The company also raises the invoice for sale to the conductor manufacturer. The company does not collect any payment from the manufacturer of conductor at this stage against the aluminium supplied and shows it as trade receivable in its books.

The company has stated that the manufacturer, after processing aluminium along with some other raw materials and consumables (purchased by manufacturer at its own cost) like steel, wire, grease etc., manufactures the conductor and supplies it to the company and raises the invoice with full value of conductor as per the contract entered with the company. The company pays the invoice amount after deducting the cost of aluminium already supplied to the manufacturer for the conductor.

Query:

On the basis of the above, the opinion of the EAC is sought by the company on the question as to whether procurement of aluminium from the supplier be accounted for as ‘purchase of goods’ and aluminium given to the manufacturer may be accounted for as ‘sale of goods’ in the statement of profit and loss, or procurement of aluminium may be accounted for as input raw material as ‘construction stores’ in the balance sheet. Additional cost charged by the manufacturer for conversion of aluminium into conductor may be included under ‘construction stores’ as and when charged or simply as contract cost as and when incurred.

Opinion:

The Committee notes that the basic issue raised by the querist is whether the supply of raw material (viz. aluminium rod) by the company to the manufacturer for manu-facturing conductors to be supplied back to the company should be regarded as sale by the company. In other words, whether the supply of raw material to the manufacturer can be considered as an independent transaction from the transaction of purchase of the conductors from the manufacturer, given the fact that such conductors would be manufactured only by using the raw material supplied by the company.

The Committee noted that in the case of the Company, the aluminium rods are procured by the company and supplied to the manufacturer of conductor for conversion into finished product, i.e., the conductor.

The Committee after considering substance over form is of the opinion that transactions and events are account-ed for and presented in accordance with their substance i.e. the economic reality of events and transactions and not merely in accordance with their legal from. In other words, it is the ‘economic reality’ that is important in ac-counting and not only the ‘legal reality’.

From the Facts of the Case, the Committee notes that al-though the legal form of the transaction is that the company is raising invoice on the manufacturer has also taken an insurance policy in its name for the goods supplied to it, the substance of the transaction is that the company still retains effective control on the aluminium rods transferred to the manufacturer and significant risks and rewards relating to ownership of raw material (aluminium) are not transferred to the manufacturer.

Therefore, in view of the Committee, there is no sale to the manufacturer. In fact, the company pays to the manufacturer only for conversion of aluminum rod into con-ductor. Accordingly, the Committee is of the view that no revenue from sales should be recognised on dispatch of raw materials to the manufacturer. Rather, the company should treat them as its own inventory and should ac-count for it accordingly. The company should also make adequate disclosures so as to clearly disclose that such inventory is lying in the premises of the manufacturer for finished product, conductor.
 
[Pl. Refer page nos. 492 to 498 of C. A. Journal – October, 2014]

5. ICAI News

(Note: Page Nos. given below are from CA Journal for October, 2014)

    C.A. Regulations

Draft Notification dated 10.09.2014 published on P. 567 – 568 proposes to amend CA Regulations 28E, 39, 39A and 48. The same will come into force on the date to be notified hereafter.

    CA Intermediate (IPC) MAY/JUNE 2014 Examina-tion Results (p. 573)

Our Greetings and best wishes to all the above three and other candidates who have cleared the IPC Examination.

PART C: Information on & Around

fiogf49gjkf0d
Information on Sheila Dikshit:
The CIC has directed the Delhi government to make public a 2008 Lokayukta order that indicted former chief minister Sheila Dikshit on charges of misuse of public funds. Lokayukta Manmohan Sarin’s order had charged Dikshit with using funds for publicity and printing photos on loan forms for Delhi Swarojgar Yojna. Sarin had sought then President Pratibha Patil’ permission to recover Rs. 11 crore for the misuse of funds, which was rejected. The CIC order came after activist S C Agarwal sought information on the issue.

Robert Vadra’s land deal in Haryana:
Gurgaon resident Dharamvir Yadav filed an RTI application in 2013, which revealed that separate building plans for both plots in May field Garden (N29 owned by Vadra and N30 by a private company) were approved in November 2010. But work on a single structure–the guesthouse– straddling both plots commenced in 2011. Yadav claims the building was completed by March 2014. After this, Satpal Thakran, another resident of the same township, filed an RT I query in May this year seeking more details on the plots, but these got stonewalled by authorities who cited Vadra’s request not to disclose details. The TO I is now in possession of correspondence between the Haryana Urban Development Authority, Municipal Corporation of Gurgaon and District Town Planner over Change of Land Use permissions and occupation certificates, which show how rules were bent at every stage.

The Times of India had reported on how RT I pleas to uncover details of a plot registered in the name of Vadra were stonewalled. ToI now has documents which prove that not only was a single structure built on two plots of land ( one owned by Vadra, the other private company), but also that a change of land permission from residential to commercial was sought only after the building was completed, both of which are in gross violation of the law.

Maharashtra State Police Transfer rules:
Under the state police transfer rules, officers cannot be transferred before they complete two years in one post unless under exceptional circumstances. But an RT I query shows that 147 of the 150 transfers this year, from January to September, were under “exceptional” circumstances. This was revealed following a query filed under RTI Act by former central information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, who asked for information on the number of deputy superintendents of police and officers above being transferred before their tenure was over this year. The data provided showed that only three out of 150 transfers were according to the law.

The transfers have raised questions about political interference in state policing with senior officers often found queuing up at politicians’ offices to choose postings. Some of the “exceptional reasons” cited are health problems and the distance between home and work place.

The data provided by the state police headquarters under RTI Act shows that 33 officers were transferred in February and 91 in June, just two months after the Parliament elections. On 23rd August, more officers were shifted, and all fell under the “exceptional” category.

Papers on First chief CIC’s resignation:
The Central Information Commission, entrusted with monitoring of record-keeping in government bodies, has lost the records relating to the resignation of the first Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah who headed the institution for nearly five years. In an RTI response, the transparency panel said the lost files related to Habibullah’s resignation are not readily traceable, raising questions about record-keeping in the CIC. “The concerned file containing the communication relating to then Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah regarding his resignation are not readily traceable though efforts have been made. The information will be provided as an when available,” Sushil Kumar, Deputy Secretary at the CIC, said in response to RTI application filed by Commodore (retd) Lokesh Batra. Batra told PTI that around 20th October, 2009 Habibullah had resigned to join as Chief Information Commissioner of Jammu and Kashmir.

Ajit Pawar makes RTI application:
NCP leader Ajit Pawar made use of the Right to Information (RTI) Act to scrutinise a large number of files that former chief minister Prithviraj Chavan had cleared in just 15 days.

Pawar, who was Chavan’s deputy in the Congress-NCP government, said that he had already filed RTI queries over the files from the urban development department. “Files stuck for a long time were suddenly cleared in the past 15 days. What suddenly happened?” he said. “As an ordinary citizen, I have sought information about the decisions taken in the urban development department.” [Source – news items published in The Times of India]

levitra

PART B: RTI Act, 2005

fiogf49gjkf0d
On 12-09-2014, RTI Foundation day, very interesting statistics are compiled by RTI Assessment & Analysis Group (RAAG) and National Concern for Peoples’ Right to Infor mation (NCPRI). Here under, I report some of them:

RTI Rules:
India has one Right to Information (RTI) Act but 118 separate sets of rules formulated independently by states, courts, information commissioners, Parliament and state assemblies that run a maze around the legislation.

The rules dictate varied fees, application format, number of words, type of identity proof required and mode of payment making the process of seeking information a complex one.

For instance, 34 states and union territories have prescribed application fee of Rs. 10. But cost of pursuing an RTI application could range between Rs. 50 to Rs. 100 excluding cost of information. Haryana charges Rs. 50 for all RTI applications while Arunachal Pradesh charges Rs. 50 for most applications but Rs. 500 for information related to bids, tenders or business contracts.

Only Andhra Pradesh has cut down on the fees—Rs. 10 for cities, free of cost for village level and Rs. 5 for subdistrict level. Sikkim charges Rs. 100 for both first and second appeal, while filing a first appeal in Madhya Pradesh costs Rs. 50 and a second appeal Rs. 100. While the central government has mandated Rs. 2 per photocopy, Chhatisgarh has limited the number to 50 pages while Arunachal charges Rs. 10.

To complicate things further, inspection of documents is allowed free of cost by some states for the first hour and then charges of Rs. 5 are levied in Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Sikkim and Uttarakhand. The cost of inspection of documents in Daman and Diu is Rs. 100 a day for a maximum of 3 hours and if the information sought is older by a decade or more, the public authority can charge an additional Rs. 25 an hour. States have also placed odd restrictions on the format of the application. In Karnataka, Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra the length of the RTI application cannot exceed more than 150 words while the Centre has mandated a 500 word limit.

There are similar inconsistencies in rules related to proof of identity required by public authorities. While the RTI act does not mandate any proof of identity section 3 does say that only Indian citizens can use the law. This has led to states like Goa, Gujarat, Odisha, Sikkim insisting on identity proof of the applicant.

RTI users & where do they live:
Maharashtra Government’s notification:


On 17th October, the Maharashtra Government issued a notice directing all government departments not to part with information unless it is in “public interest.” “The notification violates the RTI Act and seems to be designed to promote corruption,”

(Author’s Note: Compare this with the judgement reported under part A in this issue. I believe that the notification is against the spirit of the RTI Act and is also illegal)

levitra

Direct Taxes

fiogf49gjkf0d
Clarification regarding transfer of technical manpower in case of units eligible for deduction u/s. 10A/10AA of the Act applicable to the software industry – Circular No. 14 dated 8th October, 2014

As per the provisions of Section 10A/10AA of the Act read along with Circular no. 12/2014, if upto 20% of technical manpower is transferred from existing unit to new SEZ unit within the first year of commencement of business, it will not be construed as splitting up or reconstruction of an existing business. The upper limit of 20% has been enhanced to 50% of the total technical manpower actually engaged in software development or IT enabled products at the end of the financial year. Alternatively the assessee can also demonstrate that it employed new technical manpower in all its units put together which is at least equal to 50% of the technical manpower of the SEZ unit in the previous year. If either of the two conditions are fulfilled deduction u/s. 10A/10AA of the Act cannot be denied.

A – 12 Point Memorandum has been issued by the CBDT to the assessing officers to ensure a non-adversarial tax regime – F. No. 279/ Misc./52/2014-(ITJ) dated 7th November, 2014 (full text available on www.bcasonline.org)

Erstwhile Bank Term Deposit Scheme,2006 has been revived as Bank Term Deposit (Amendment) Scheme, 2014 effective 13th November, 2014 with the investment limit of Rs. 1,50,000/- u/s. 80C of the Act – Notification No. 63/2014 dated 13th November, 2014

levitra

PART C: Information on & Around

fiogf49gjkf0d
The PMO to Seek Modi’s Nod To Disclose ‘Riot’ Letters To Vajpayee:
The Prime Minister’s Office will take the nod of Gujarat government and chief minister Narendra Modi for releasing the correspondence exchanged with the then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee after the post – Godhra Riots in 2002.

The information was earlier denied by the central public information officer of the PMO citing section 8 (1) (h) of the Right to Information Act, without giving any reasons, which exempts information that would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders.

The decision was overturned during the appeal before his senior Krishan Kumar, director Prime Minister’s Office, where the applicant had objected to the response of the CPIO saying he failed to give germane reasons behind denial of information.

The applicant had also underlined that the correspondence was 11 years old and was not likely to have an impact on the investigation, apprehension and prosecution of offenders. Upholding the reasons given by the applicant, the appellate authority directed the CPIO to provide additional details with regards to the case.

“As regards contention that the grounds for exemption claimed under section 8 (1) (h) are not tenable, CPIO is directed to obtain fresh inputs in this regards and provide the same to the applicant within 15 working days”, Krisnan Kumar, director and appellate authority had decided. In the last response to six and a half month old RTI application, Rizwi said after the appeal decision that the matter was referred to the office for fresh inputs.

“It is informed that third party (Gujarat Government and Modi in the present case) consultation under Section 11 (1) of the RTI Act is underway on a similar request and response regarding disclosure of information in this regard will be provided to you after due process as envisaged in section 11 of the Act is completed ,” he said.

Gadkari and I.T Department:

BJP has called an RTI reply from the income tax department, which said no investigation was pending against former party president Nitin Gadkari, as a “clean chit” to the leader.

The I.T. department, however, says its investigation in the matter of Purti Sugar and Power Ltd. is actually over and the matter is now at the stage of assessment.

Sources in the I.T. department said Gadkari was never the focus of investigation as he had a minority stake in the company. “The investigation was against Purti group which had received dubious investments through shell companies. Gadkari came in the limelight as he is the founder – promoter of the company”, said an I.T. officer. The RTI query, filed by one Sumit Dalal in February, asked the department,” Is any inquiry/investigation pending against Mr. Nitin Gadkari?” After initially refusing to reply, the Nagpur I.T. department, following an appeal, replied in April that no inquiry was pending against Gadkari in its Department.

Citing the RTI reply, BJP is called the case a political conspiracy to frame Gadkari at a time when he is about to be elected president of the party for a second term.

Spice jet Lies

1. Advertising professional Anil D’Souza writes “I was booked on Spice jet flight SG – 109 from Delhi to Mumbai on May 23 last year, which was scheduled for departure at 10:10 am. On reaching the airport at 8 am, a few of us were told that the flight had been advanced by five hours and that SMSes had been sent to the passengers informing the changes”.
“I was told by the airline staff that they couldn’t find my mobile phone number or e mail ID. I flew to Delhi on a Spice jet flight and received the information/updates through SMSes and e mails. Did they lose my contact details all of a sudden?” he asked.

2. D’Souza spent around Rs. 9,000 on an Indigo ticket to return to Mumbai. (The Spice jet flight costed him around Rs. 6,000) he was refunded Rs. 8,269.80 by the airline two months later. After the airline rejected his claim of additional compensation, he filed a query under the RTI Act and demanded to know the status of the flight in question from the DGCA.

3. ”Replying to the RTI query, the DGCA said that the flight SG – 109 had been cancelled on May 23. I was shocked at the airline’s blatant bluff and have initiated action in the consumer court. I will also initiate criminal proceedings against Spice jet”’ he said.

A senior Spice jet official said that the flight had indeed been advanced by five hours. “It was operated under a different flight number. Nevertheless, we will probe the matter,” the official said. D’Souza, however, insists that the airline had been lying to him for the past 10 months. “I wrote to Spice jet demanding an explanation and got a reply from the airline’s customer relations executive, who wrote that the flight in question had been rescheduled due to ‘operational reasons.’ He further said that as per the airline records, only travel agency/portal landline number were updated as flyers’ primary numbers”, D’Souza said. Determined to make the airline pay for the ‘lapse’, he said, “I will make sure the airline submits the proof of having contacted all the passengers booked on that flight. It is obvious that the flight didn’t take off.

levitra

PART B: RTI Act , 2005

fiogf49gjkf0d
Hunt For The Mole

An RTI activist got a shock of his life after he received a call soon after he submitted an application under the RTI Act. The activist had sought information in connection with the MLA Funds. The activist was removed from the organisation. Undeterred by the reprisal, the activist has approached Chief Information Commissioner Ratnakar Gaikwad to demand action against the information officer who disclosed his identity. It is not the first time that the identity of people seeking information under RTI Act has been revealed to a rival party. From the time an RTI activist submits an application to secure information on a new project; he receives threatening calls from the builder. In several cases the builder uses illegal means to ensure that the RTI application is not processed or delayed indefinitely. It’s high time that the Chief Information Commissioner issues fresh instructions on the secrecy, said Pune based RTI activist Vijay Kumbhar.

levitra

PART A: ORDERS OF CIC & the court

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section 6 (1) of the RTI ACT:
The appellant submitted an RTI application dated 28th December 2012 before the CPIO, Health Department. UT Chandigarh seeking copies of his Casual Leave Applications w.e.f 1/1/2007 – 28/12/2012 along with Annexures. Appellant also sought Casual Leave Applications of Shri Harbans Singh for the same period.

Decision Notice:

“After hearing both the parties, Commission directs the CPIO, Malaria Wing (Health Department) to obtain the requested information from the holder of the information namely CPIO, Civil Dispensary, Sector – 38 where the appellant was previously posted and also from all the other Public Authorities where the appellant was during the period 2005 – 2010 pertaining to his C.L. record and to provide the same to the appellant within three weeks of receipt of the order.

Commission accepts the explanation of the CMO, In charge, Govt. Civil Block Hospital regarding the delay in providing information pertaining to the fourth C.L. application of the appellant and condones the same. Commission draws the attention of the CPIOs and the appellant to the observations of the Apex Court in the matter of Central Board of Secondary Education and Anr. vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay and Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 6454 of 2011 dated 9.8.2011, [RTIR III (2011)242 (SC)] where in it has been observed that:

“37. The right to information is a cherished right. Information and right to information are intended to be formidable tools in the hands of responsible citizens to fight corruption and to bring in transparency and accountability. The provisions of RTI Act should be enforced strictly and all efforts should be made to bring to light the necessary information under Clause (b) of Section 4 (1) of the act which relates to securing transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities and in discouraging corruption. But in regard to other information, (that is information other than those enumerated in section 4 (1) (b) and (c) of the Act), equal importance and emphasis are given to other public interests (like confidentiality of sensitive information, fidelity and fiduciary relationships, efficient operation of governments, etc.). Indiscriminate and impractical demands or directions under RTI Act for disclosure of all and sundry information (unrelated to transparency and accountability in the functioning of public authorities and eradication of corruption) would be counter – productive as it will adversely affect the efficiency of the administration and result in the executive getting bogged down with the non – productive work of collecting and furnishing information. The act should not be allowed to be misused or abused, to become a tool to obstruct the national development and integration, or to destroy the peace, tranquility and harmony among its citizens. Nor should it be converted into a tool of oppression or intimidation of honest officials striving to do their duty. The nation does not want a scenario where 75%of the staff of public authorities spends 75% of their time in collecting and furnishing information to applicants instead of discharging their regular duties. The threat of penalties under the RTI Act and the pressure of the authorities under the RTI Act should not lead to employees of a public authorities prioritizing ‘information furnishing’, at the cost of their normal and regular duties.”

Appellant was directed to desist from misusing the cherished right given to him under the transparency Act in future.

Appellant/Complainant: Ramesh Kumar vs. Health Department (Malaria), UT Chandigarh; appeal no: CIC/ DS/A/2013/000927 decided on: 11.12.2013: citation: RTIRI (2014) 49 (CIC)]

Section 19 (8) (a) of the RTI ACT:

Vishwas Bhamburkar the applicant had filed an application on14.5.2011 with the PIO in the Ministry of Tourism, PSW Division, seeking an authenticated photo copy along with the file nothings of the Project Report for Development of Ayurvedic Health Resort and Herbal Garden at Vgamon, which was submitted by the Department of Tourism, Government of Kerala in December, 2005 and was bearing file number 426/D(CN) dated 20.02.2006.

The PIO in his reply informed the applicant that the said project report had not been received in the Ministry of Tourism. Being dissatisfied with the reply furnished by the PIO, the respondent preferred an appeal before the First Appellate Authority. The following was the order passed by the First Appellate Authority:

“The noting initials on the cover page of the Project Report produced by Shri Bhamburkar suggest that the Report was received in MOT. However since it is only a photo copy, its authenticity cannot be taken for granted. CPIO& Asstt. DG (PSW) is directed to make thorough search for the said Project Report and records pertaining to its receipt and movement in the Ministry. If the report is traced, its authenticated copy will be supplied by the CPIO to the applicant. If the Report is not traceable, but records are found which confirm that the Report was received in the MOT, a report may be lodged with the Police regarding the missing documents. An intimation to this effect may then be conveyed to the applicant by the CPIO. In case neither the Project Report nor any records of its receipt in Ministry are available, the applicant may be so informed by the CPIO. Action has to be taken within 15 days”.

Being dissatisfied the applicant filed second appeal before the Central Information Commission.

In this regard, the Commission observed that either the PIO or some other officer could be hiding the information or the report being submitted could be forged or it could be a conspiracy by which the report and all associated papers were taken away from the Government. Being aggrieved from the order of the Commission, the Union of India is before the High Court of Delhi by way of the writ petition.

The order of the High Court of Delhi is summarised as under:

“The learned counsel for the petitioner assailed the order of the Commission primarily on the ground that the Right to Information Act does not authorize the Commission to direct an inquiry of this nature by department concerned though the Commission itself can make such an inquiry as it deems appropriate. Reference in this regard is made to the provisions contained in Section 19 (8) of the Act. A careful perusal of sub section (8) of Section 19 would show that the Commission has the power to require the public authority to take any such steps as may be necessary to secure compliance with the provisions of the Act. Such steps could include the steps specified in clause (i) to (iv) but the sub – section does not exclude any other step which the Commission may deem necessary to secure compliance with the provisions of the Act. In other words, the steps enumerated in clause (i) to (iv) are inclusive and not exhaustive of the powers of the Commission in this regard.”

“The Right to Information Act is a progressive legislation aimed at providing, to the citizens, access to the information which before the said Act came into force could not be claimed as a matter of right. The intent behind enactment of the Act is to disclose the information to the maximum extent possible subject of course to certain safeguards and exemptions. Therefore, while interpreting the provisions of the Act, the Court needs to take a view which would advance the objectives behind enactment of the Act, instead of taking a restricted and hyper – technical approach which would obstruct the flow of information to the citizens.”

“This  can  hardly  be  disputed  that  if  certain  information is available with the public authority, that information must necessarily be shared with the  applicant  under the act unless such information is exempted from disclosure under one or more provisions of the act. it is not uncommon in the government departments to evade disclosure of the information taking the standard plea that the information sought by the applicant is not available. ordinarily, the information which at some point of time or the other was available in the records of the government, should continue to be available with the concerned department unless it has been destroyed in accordance with the rules framed by that department for destruction of old record. therefore, whenever an information is sought and it is not readily available a thorough attempt needs to be made to search and locate the information wherever it may be available. it is only in a case where despite a thorough search and inquiry made by the responsible officer, it is concluded that the information sought by the applicant cannot be traced or was never available with the government or has been destroyed in accordance with the rules of the concerned department that the PIO would be justified in expressing his inability to provide the desired information. even in the case where it is found that the desired information though available in the record of the government at some point of time, cannot be traced despite best efforts made in this regard, the department concerned must necessary fix the responsibility for the loss of the record and take appropriate departmental action against the officers/officials responsible for loss of record. unless such course of action is adopted, it would be possible for department/office, to deny the information which otherwise is not exempted from disclosure, wherever the said department/office finds it inconvenient to bring such information into public domain, and that in turn, would necessarily defeat the very objective behind enactment of the right to information act.”

“Since the Commission has the power to direct disclosure of information provided, it is not exempted from such disclosure, it would also have the jurisdiction to direct   an inquiry into the matter wherever it is claimed by the PIO that the information sought by the applicant is not traceable/readily traceable/currently traceable.  Even  in a case where the PIO takes a plea that the information sought by the applicant was never available with the government but, the Commission on the basis of the material available to it forms a prima facie opinion that the said information was in fact available with the government, it would be justified in directing an inquiry by a responsible officer of the department/office concerned, to again look into the matter rather deeply and verify whether  such  an information was actually available in the records of the government at some point of time or not. after all,     it is quite possible that the required information may be located if a thorough search is made in which event, it could  be  possible  to  supply  it  to  the  applicant.  fear  of disciplinary action, against the person responsible for loss of the information, will also work as deterrence against the willful suppression of the information, by vested interests. it would also be open to the Commission, to make an inquiry itself instead of directing an inquiry by the department/office concerned. Whether in a particular case, an inquiry ought to be made by the Commission or by the officer of the department/office concerned is a matter to be decided by the Commission in the facts and circumstances of each such case.

In the case before the High Court of Delhi, the PIO, who appeared before the Commission admitted that the photo copy of the report made available to the Commission was signed by the concerned Joint Secretary and director at the relevant time. Prima facie, they would have signed the documents only if they had received either the original report or its copy. the endorsement made on the cover of the documents would show that the report /copy on which endorsement was made was signed by the Secretary, Tourism, Government of Kerala. Had a thorough inquiry been made by inquiring from the concerned officer to find out as to where, when and in what circumstances they had signed the documents, it could have been possible to locate the report in the records of the government.”

For the reasons stated hereinabove, the court found no merit in the writ petition and the same was dismissed.    it is directed that a thorough and meaningful inquiry in terms of provisions of the directions of the Commission be carried out by an officer not below the rank of a Joint Secretary to the Government within eight weeks from today and a copy each of the said report to be provided to the Commission as well as to the respondent before the Court.

The  petitioners  were  directed  to  circulate  a  copy  of the order to all the CPIOs /PIOs of the Government of India and other Public Authorities, within four weeks for information and guidance.

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section B:
• Reporting in case of previous years’ financial statements audited by another firm

SKF India Ltd. (year ended 31st December, 2013)
From Auditor’s Report
Other Matter

The financial statements of the Company as at 31st December, 2012 and for the year then ended were audited by another firm of chartered accountants who, vide their report dated 21 February, 2013, expressed an unmodified opinion on those financial statements.

• Basis of preparation of financial statements (in view of section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013)


Infosys Ltd (year ended 31st March, 2014)
From Significant Accounting Policies

The financial statements are prepared in accordance with Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principal (GAAP) under the historical cost convention on the accrual basis except for certain financial instruments which are measured at fair values. GAAP comprises mandatory accounting standards as prescribed by the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006, the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent notified) and the Companies Act, 1956 (to the extent applicable) and guidelines issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). Accounting policies have been consistently applied except where a newly issued accounting standard is initially adopted or a revision to an existing accounting standard requires a change in the accounting policy hitherto in use.

• Disclosure for Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
Infosys Ltd (year ended 31st March 2014)
From Notes to Accounts

Claims against the company not acknowledged as debts include demands from the Indian Income tax authorities for payment of additional tax of Rs. 1,548 crore (Rs. 1,088 crore) including interest of Rs. 430 crore (Rs. 313 crore) upon completion of their tax review for fiscal 2006, fiscal 2007, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. These income tax demands are mainly on account of disallowance of a portion of the deduction claimed by the company u/s. 10A of the Income-tax Act. The deductible amount is determined by the ratio of export turnover to total turnover. The disallowance arose from certain expenses incurred in foreign currency being reduced from export turnover but not reduced from total turnover. The tax demand for fiscal 2007, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 also includes disallowance of portion of profit earned outside India from the STP units and disallowance of profits earned from SEZ units. The matter for fiscal 2006, fiscal 2007, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 are pending before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Bangalore. The company is contesting the demand and the management including its tax advisors believes that its position will likely be upheld in the appellate process. The management believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and result of operations.

As of the Balance Sheet date, the Company’s net foreign currency exposures that are not hedged by a derivative instrument or otherwise are nil (Rs. 1,189 crore as at 31st March, 2013).

The foreign exchange forward and options contracts mature between 1 to 12 months. The table below analyses the derivative financial instrument into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period as of the balance sheet date:

The Company recognised a gain on derivative financial instruments of Rs. 217 crore and Rs. 68 crore during the year ended 31st March, 2014 and 31st March, 2013, respectively, which is included in other income.

levitra

Direct Taxes

fiogf49gjkf0d
TDS under section 195 of the Act relating to payments to non-residents – Instruction no. 2/2014 dated 26 .02.2014 (available on bcasonline.org)

Ex-post facto extension of due date for filing TDS/TCS statements for FYs 2012-13 and 2013-14 for Government deductors -Circular No. 07/2014 dated 4th March, 2014

CBDT has extended the due date of filing of the TDS/TCS statement as prescribed under Section 200(3) /proviso to Section 206C(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A/31AA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 to 31.03.2014 for a Government deductor and mapped to a valid AIN for –

(i) FY 2012-13 – 2nd to 4th Quarter
(ii) FY 2013-14 – 1st to 3rd Quarter

CBDT extends the due date of payment of final installment of advance tax to 18th March 2014 –F.No.385/8/2013-IT(B) dated 14 th March 2014

levitra

Ethics and u

fiogf49gjkf0d
Shrikrishna (S) — Arjun, you are looking worried today.

Arjun (A) — Yes. This is September. Virtually a killing month for all CAs.

S — This is every year’s ‘crying’. Why don’t you plan well in advance?.

A — Very easy to say so. But in reality, every month there is some compliance or the other. And consequences of defaults are very harsh. You have to be on your toes constantly.

S — But the tax-audit date has been extended? Isn’t it?

A — T rue; but I am not sure whether the deadlines for filing returns will be extended. Then what is the use? I wonder why the Government does not clarify things well in time.

S — A ll CAs are sailing in the same boat. Granted that it worries you. But you are rather tensed up today. What is the matter?

A — A ctually, nowadays all the returns and other forms are to be submitted on-line. They are to be uploaded.

S — So what?

A — F or this, all the clients are keeping their digital signatures in our custody only.

S — Why?

A — Because all the returns are completed only in the last two days only. And when we are slogging, the clients are enjoying themselves abroad or at hill-stations.

S — Oh, I see. So you take all their tokens of digital signatures in your custody and use them! Is it not?

A — Exactly. And just now, my office informs me that two such signatures are misplaced. Not traceable!

S — O h! It is very risky. But why do you take such a risk? Is there any documentation for keeping it with you? Do you have any written instructions to use them? Otherwise, under the IT Act, it is an offence.

A — I didn’t come across any such provision in Income Tax Act. Is it in DTC?

S — N o Arjun. IT means Information Technology Act, 2000.

A — I have never read it.

S — Actually, using another person’s digital signature in his absence and without his specific consent is a serious offence. It is like a forgery. See section 42 of Information Technology Act. It says that the digital signature can be used only by the subscriber or person authorised by him to affix it.

A — O h, my God! Then what should we do?

S — E very time, you should take a letter from the client that he is handing over the token or the CD of digital signature to you. And there should be a specific instruction authorising you to use it. And when you return it, take his acknowledgement. It may be misused or wrongly used and the blame may come on you.

A — But now what should I do? Their returns are to be filed now. Fortunately, there is no proof that they have handed over to my office.

S — I t is embarrassing. Actually, you should have not only proper documentation but all signs should be kept under lock and key; under the control of a very responsible person.

A — What are the consequences under that Information Technology Act?

S — Penalty is in the form of compensation upto Rs. 25,000 to be paid to the affected person.

A — Baap Re!

S — N ot only that. But it amounts to negligence or lack of due diligence in discharging your duties.

A — I t is a double jeopardy.

S — Y es. And the tension that the misplaced digital signature may be misused is all the more disturbing.

A — I wonder how I will tell those clients that their digital signatures are not traceable! It is a question of my reputation.

S — That’s right. In Bhagavad Geeta also I told you the same thing. Loss of reputation is more harmful than even death. Now it is high time that you focus on systems in your office.

A — It is an eye-opener. Small lapses lead to heavy damage. Usually after our tax audits, we relax, and wake up only next year. But this year, I should change this. I must focus on housekeeping and get better organised. I am convinced that this is a serious professional misconduct and if I were in the client’s position, I would be very much upset.

S — Good. This is a lesson which should change your functioning. All the best to you.

Note: The above dialogue between Shri Krishna and Arjun is based on Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule which is reproduced below. This dialogue aims at bringing out those small things that we take for granted. Such small things and lack of documentation can lead to big problems in future. It thus becomes very important to inculcate a habit of documentation not only within us but also amongst our office staff.

Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule states that a CA in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he –

“does not exercise due diligence, or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties”. Be very cautious and see to it that nothing is done in ‘good faith’ without proper documentation/safeguards.

levitra

PART C: Information on & Around

fiogf49gjkf0d
Govt. to challenge SCIC order against CP Rakesh Maria :
The state government has decided to challenge Chief Information Commissioner Ratnakar Gaikwad’s order to institute a judicial probe against Police Commissioner Rakesh Maria for providing misleading information to the widow of a police officer gunned down by Pakistani terrorists in the November, 2008 attacks.

The CIC’s order against Maria had accepted slain officer Ashok Kamte’s wife, Vinita Kamte’s allegations, that there were discrepancies between two copies of call logs of wireless conversation between the control room and Kamte’s van, in which he was shot down by terrorists along with the then Maharashtra ATS chief Hemant Karkare and encounter specialist Vijay Salaskar.

She had charged that there was a delay in sending help to her injured husband and his colleagues and that the call logs were tampered with to hide this. She had also alleged that information about who directed her husband and his colleagues to follow the terrorists into the Cama Hospital lane, where they were ambushed, was denied to her.

RTI activist Anil Galgali said the CIC had exceeded its brief in ordering the judicial inquiry.”Gaikwad has been appointed by the state government to give information and thereby give justice. But he has no powers to order an inquiry. The job of the State Information Commission is to provide information. They have failed in that,” he said.

No plan to strip Saif of Padma Shri:
The home ministry denied any move to strip actor Saif Ali Khan of his Padma Shri award, conferred on him in 2010, in the wake of a Mumbai court framing charges against him for assaulting an NRI businessman at a city hotel.

“The home ministry’s reply to the RTI filed by SC Agarwal to know the status of his own complaint, stating that the matter is under examination, is a routine response to any query that relates to a pending complaint. The home ministry has to call for necessary records from the state government or the court to validate the charges made in the complaint… this takes time and the merits of the complaints are finally decided on the basis to be under examination,” a senior home ministry official said.

Above was in reply to SC Agarwals RTI application to the home ministry

Gifts to PM Manmohan Singh:
From a fancy Bose music system to a glittering Piaget ladies wrist watch, former PM Manmohan Singh took home some 101 unique pieces of gift items that were given to him by heads of states whose countries he visited in his official capacity, an RTI query has revealed. But the government has refused to share details of Singh’s pay and perks, his parting comments or names of countries that gave the presents. Singh is permitted to retain gifts under the Foreign Contribution (Acceptance or Retention of Gifts or Presentations) Regulations, 1978 and its Rules, 2012.

levitra

PART B: RTI Act, 2005

fiogf49gjkf0d
RTI & Political Parties: On 3rd June 2013 full bench of CIC passed a detailed Order (53 pages) holding that 6 political parties:
1) Indian National Congress/ All IndiaCongress Committee (AICC)
2) Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP)
3) Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM)
4) Communist Party of India (CPI)
5) Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and
6) Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP)

are covered as “public authority” under the RTI Act (Covered in my article of July 2013). Last para of the order reads as under:

93. The Presidents, General/Secretaries of these Political Parties are hereby directed to designate CPIOs and the Appellate Authorities as their headquarters in 06 weeks time. The CPIOs so appointed will respond to the RTI applications extracted in this order in 4 weeks time. Besides, the Presidents, General/Secretaries of the above mentioned Political Parties are also directed to comply with the provision of section 4(1) (b) of the RTI Act by the way of making voluntary disclosures on the subjects mentioned in the said clause.

It appears that none of the said 6 parties acted on the above direction.

The Commission had issued notices on 7th February and 25th March, to these parties seeking their detailed comments on the complaint by Agarwal that they had not complied with the orders of the CIC. The notice had been sent to the chiefs of Congress, BJP, BSP and NCP and to the general secretaries of CPI and CPI-M.

In what could spell trouble for Congress president Sonia Gandhi, the Delhi HC in August, 2014 issued direction on a petition accusing her failure to abide by a Central Information Commission directive.

HC directed the CIC to decide in six months a complaint against Gandhi that she hasn’t implemented the transparency panel’s direction making political parties answerable under the RTI Act. The court acted on a petition filed by RTI activist R. K. Jain who had earlier approached the Commission with his complaint against Gandhi saying that party had returned his RTI application without furnishing details that were asked.

Now in the month of September 2014, The Central Information Commission (CIC) has issued showcause notices to BJP President Amit Shah and Congress chief Sonia Gandhi, along with the heads of four other political parties, asking why an inquiry should not be instituted for non-compliance of its order to implement the RTI Act.

levitra

PART A: Decision Of CIC & High Court

fiogf49gjkf0d
In this article, I cover a few decisions of CIC and one of H.C, basically to inform briefly the views of CIC/H.C on the subjects covered.

Section 2(f) – Information:
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in WP(C) No. 7265/2007 dated 25th September 2009 has observed as follows:

“Information as defined in section 2(f) means details or material available with the public authority. The later portion of section 2(f) expands the definition to include details or material which can be accessed under any other law from others. The two definitions have to be read harmoniously. The term held by or under the control of any public authority in section 2(j) of the RTI Act has to be read in a manner that it effectuates and is in harmony with the definition of the term information in section 2(f) of the RTI Act. It is well settled that an interpretation which renders another provision or part thereof redundant or superfluous should be avoided. Information as defined in section 2 (f) of the RTI Act includes in its ambit, the information relating to any private body which can be accessed by any public authority under any law for the time being in force. Therefore, if a public authority has a right and is entitled to access information from a private body, under any other law, it is information as defined in section 2(f) of the RTI Act.”

[WP (C) No. 7265/2007 dated 25th September 2009]

Section 2(f) – Information:
After hearing both the parties and on perusal of documents, the Commission observes that as deserving as the appellant might be for the post of Social Worker, he cannot ask interrogative questions from a public authority under the Act. The public authority is not bound to answer queries like whether he would be considered for the post since he has crossed the age limit or whether he will be granted any age relaxation and whether his merit will be considered or not. Interrogative queries viz. “How/Why/ When” do not come under the ambit of the RTI Act.

In Dr. Celsa Pinto vs. Goa State Information Commission (W.P.No. 419 of 2007), the High Court of Bombay, in its order dated 03.04.2008, held:

“The definition (of information) cannot include within its fold answers to the question “why” which would be the same thing as asking the reason for a justification for a particular thing. The Public Information Authorities cannot expect to communicate to the citizen the reason why a certain things was done or not done in the sense of a justification because the citizen makes a requisition about information. Justifications are matter within the domain of adjudicating authorities and cannot properly be classified as information.”

[G. Senthil Kumar vs. Dr. Raman, DoH, Directorate of Health & Family Welfare Services, Puducherry – File No. CIC/SS/A/2013/000838-YA: Decided: 28.05.2014]

Section 6(1) &7(1) of the RTI Act:
This matter pertains to an RTI application dated 03-05- 2012 filed by the Appellant, seeking information on twelve points. The CPIO responded on 04-06-2012 and asked the Appellant to deposit photocopying charges, amounting to Rs. 48, to obtain the information running into 24 pages. The CPIO also asked the Appellant to deposit postal charges of Rs. 25.

We note that no further action pending on this RTI application on the part of the Respondents. We also note that the CPIO erred in asking for postal charge of Rs. 25. Accordingly, we direct the CPIO that in case the Appellant deposits the amount of Rs. 48, the information running into 24 pages should be provided to him, within 15 days of deposit of the above amount by him.

[Navneet Singhania vs. CPIO, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Regional Office: Ranjeet Avenue, Amritsar – File No. CIC/VS/A/2012/000711/SH: Decided 05-05-2014]

Section 7(1) of the RTI Act:
The Appellant stated that the FAA had not given him a personal hearing despite his request to that effect. In this context, we advice the FAA that in the interest of natural justice, he should give a personal hearing, in case requested by a person filing an appeal to him on an RTI matter.

The Appellant has drawn our attention to the fact that the CPIO has not been mentioning his name in his replies to RTI applications. In this context, we inform the Respondents the decision of the Commission that the CPIOs and FAAs should mention their name, address, telephone and fax number in all correspondence on RTI matters. The CPIO is directed to ensure compliance with the above decision of the Commission.

[Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury vs. CPIO, Union Bank of India, Lucknow – File No. CIC/VS/A/2013/001508/SH: decided on 23-05-2014]

If readers appreciate this kind of my write ups, I shall continue whenever any landmark decision is not available.

levitra

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section A:
Modified report on account on unconfirmed loans, advances and deposits to related parties, etc. (Part I)

United Spirits Ltd (31-3-2014)


From Notes to Accounts

26. Provision for doubtful receivable, advances and deposits

26(a) Certain parties who had previously given the required undisputed balance confirmations for the year ended 31st March 2013,claimed in their balance confirmations to the Company for the year ended 31st March 2014 that they have advanced certain amounts to certain alleged UB Group entities, and that the dues owed by such parties to the Company will, to the extent of the amounts owing by such alleged UB Group entities to such parties in respect of such advances, be paid/refunded by such parties to the Company only upon receipt of their dues from such alleged UB Group entities. These dues of such parties to the Company are on account of advances by the Company in the earlier years under agreements for enhancing capacity, obtaining exclusivity and lease deposits in relation to Tie-up Manufacturing Units (TMUs); agreements for specific projects; or dues owing to the Company from customers. These dues wereHI duly confirmed by such parties as payable to the Company in such earlier years. However, such parties have now disputed such amounts as mentioned above. Details are as below:

In response to these claims, under the instruction of the Board, a preliminary internal inquiry was initiated by the Management. The results of this inquiry were as follows:

i. One party (which falls under (a) above), who owes certain amounts to the Company, has disputed an amount of Rs. 2,240.7 million (including interest claimed by it as due from an alleged UB Group entity), alleging that it had advanced monies to such alleged UB Group entity based on an understanding that, to the extent of the amounts owed to it from such alleged UB Group entity in respect of such advance, it could withhold from the amounts payable by it to the Company, and such party has said that it would not pay its dues to the Company to the extent of the amounts claimed by it from such alleged UB Group entity as mentioned above, unless it received repayment of the amount advanced by it to such alleged UB Group entity along with interest.

ii. Certain parties (which falls under (a) above), who owes certain amounts to the Company, have disputed an aggregate amount of Rs. 984.5 million (including interest claimed by them as due from alleged UB Group entities), alleging that they had advanced monies to such alleged UB Group entities and that, to the extent of such dues from such alleged UB Group entity as mentioned above, unless it received repayment of the amount advanced by it to such alleged UB Group entity along with interest.

iii. Certain other parties (which fall under [(b) and (c)] above) changed their original stand and acknowledged that their dues from the alleged UB Group entities were based on transactions that were independent of their dealings with the Company. These parties have subsequently provided appropriate confirmations of the relevant balances due from them to the Company. The related balances are Rs. 2,681.8 million.

iv. In addition to the above, there is an additional party, being a TMU, whose allegations are on a similar basis to those of the parties mentioned at (iii) above and who has subsequently provided an appropriate confirmation of the balance due from it to the Company. However, this party’s undertaking has closed down and the related balance of Rs. 648.5 Million (including interest) has been provided in the current year.

v. The claims made in relation to the advances to the parties (including the additional party) mentioned above may indicate that all or some of such amounts may have been improperly advanced from the Company to such parties for, in turn, being advanced to the alleged UB Group entities. The aforesaid, however can only be confirmed by a detailed inquiry which has been authorised by the Board as mentioned below.

vi. The Company is proposing to more fully inquire into the allegations or claims by the parties in detail and does not acknowledge the correctness of the same. In any event, the Management does not believe that the parties referred to above are entitled to withhold payment/ repayment to the Company as claimed by them. The Management further believes that the Company is entitled to recover all the above amounts, including those disputed by certain parties as mentioned in notes (i) and (ii) above, as and when due from these parties. However, the Management has also examined the financial capability of some of these parties, based on which the Management has concluded that the ability of these parties to pay, and consequently the recoverability of, the relevant amounts is doubtful. After considering the above and other considerations and though the above claims were received only when the Company sought balance confirmations from the relevant parties for the year ended 31 March 2014, as a matter of prudence, a provision has been made in the accounts in respect of the dues from these parties (including interest claimed up to the various dates of the balance confirmations from these parties) as detailed below, and as these transactions relate to the period prior to 1 April 2013 they have been reflected as prior period items in the financial statements:

Based on the current knowledge of the Management, the Management believes that the aforesaid provision is adequate and no additional material adjustments are likely to be required in relation to this matter.

As mentioned in Note 26(c), the Board has: (i) directed a detailed and expeditious inquiry into this matter and (ii) authorised the initiation of suitable action and proceedings as considered appropriate by the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (MD) for recovering the Company’s dues. Appropriate other action will also be taken commensurate with the outcome of that inquiry.

Pending completion of the inquiry mentioned in note 26(c), the Company is unable to determine whether, on completion of the inquiry, there could be any impact on these financial statements; and these financial statements should be read and construed accordingly.

26(b) Certain pre-existing loans/deposits/advances due to the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries from United Breweries (Holdings) Limited (UBHL) which were in existence as on 31st March 2013, had been taken into consideration in the consolidated annual accounts of the Company drawn up as of that date. Pursuant to a previous resolution passed by the board of directors of the Company on 11th October 2012, such dues (together with interest) aggregating to Rs.13,374 million were consolidated into, and recorded as, an unsecured loan by way of an agreement entered into between the Company and UBHL on 3rd July 2013. Further, the amounts owed by UBHL to wholly-owned subsidiaries have been assigned by such subsidiaries to the Company and are recorded as loan from such subsidiaries in the books of the Company. The merger of one of such subsidiaries with the Company is currently under process. The interest rate under the above mentioned loan agreement dated 3rd July 2013 is at 9.5% p.a. to be paid at six months intervals starting at the end of 18 months from the effective date of the loan agreement. The loan has been granted for a period of 8 years and is payable in three annual installments commencing from the end of 6th anniversary of the effective date of the loan agreement.

Certain lenders have filed petitions for winding up against UBHL. UBHL has provided guarantees to lenders and other vendors of Kingfisher Airlines Limited (KFA), a UB Group entity. Most of these guarantees have been invoked and are being challenged in Courts. The Company has also filed its affidavit opposing the aforesaid winding up petitions and the matter is sub-judice.

The management has performed an assessment of the recoverability of the loan and has reviewed valuation reports in relation to UBHL prepared by reputed independent valuers that were commissioned by UBHL, and shared by UBHL with the Company. As a result of  the abovementioned assessment and review by the management, in accordance with the recommendation of the management, the Company, as a matter of prudence, has  not  recognised  interest  income  of  Rs.  963.069 million  and  has  provided  Rs.  3,303.186  million  towards the  principal  outstanding  as  at  31st  march  2014.  the management believes that it should be able to recover, and no further provision is required for the balance amount of rs. 9,956.806 million, though the Company will attempt  to  recover  the  entire  amount  of  rs.14,223.061 million. however, the management will continue to assess the recoverability of the said loan on an ongoing basis.

26(c) the Board has directed a detailed and expeditious inquiry in relation to the matters stated in Notes 26(a), 26(b) and 30(f), the possible existence of any other transaction of a similar nature; the role of individuals involved; and potential non-compliance (if any) with the provisions of the Companies act, 1956 and other regulations applicable to the Company in relation to such transactions. The Board has directed the managing director (“md”) to engage independent advisers and specialists as required for the inquiry. The Board has also authorised the MD to take suitable action and proceedings as considered appropriate by him for recovering the Company’s dues. Appropriate other action will also be taken commensurate with the outcome of that inquiry. On the basis of the knowledge and information of the management, the management believes that no additional material adjustments to the financial statements are likely to be required in relation to the matters mentioned above in this note. However, pending completion of the detailed inquiry mentioned above, the Company is unable to determine the impact on the financial statements (if any), on completion of such detailed inquiry, and these financial results should be read and construed accordingly.

30(f) Subsequent to the balance sheet date, the Company received a letter dated 5th may 2014 from the lawyers  of an entity (alleged Claimant) alleging that it had given loans amounting to rs. 2,000 million to Kfa at an interest rate of 15% p.a. purportedly on the basis of agreements executed  in  december  2011  and  january  2012.  this matter came to the knowledge of the Board for the first time only after the management informed the Board of the letter dated 5th may 2014. the letter alleges that amongst several obligations under these purported agreements, certain investments held by the Company were subject to a lien, and requires the Company, pending the repayment of the said loan, to pledge such investments in favour of the alleged Claimant to secure the aforesaid loans. the Company has responded to this letter received from the lawyers of the alleged Claimant vide its letter dated 3rd june 2014, wherein the Company has disputed the claim and denied having created the alleged security or having executed any document in favour of the alleged Claimant. the  Company  has  reiterated  its  stand  vide  a  follow-up letter dated 28th july 2014 and has asked for copies of purported documents referred to in the letter dated 5th May 2014. Subsequent to the above, the Company has received a letter dated 31st july 2014 from the alleged Claimant stating that in light of certain addendums to the aforesaid purported agreements (which had inadvertently not been informed to their lawyers) the alleged Claimant has no claim or demand of any nature whatsoever against inter alia the Company, including any claim or demand arising out of or connected with the documents / agreements referred to their lawyer’s letter dated 5th May 2014. The Company has replied to the alleged Claimant vide a letter dated 6th august 2014, noting the above mentioned confirmation of there being no claim or demand against the Company, and asking the alleged Claimant  to immediately provide to the Company all the alleged documents referred to in the letter dated 5th may 2014 and the addendum referred to in the letter dated 31st july 2014, and to also confirm the identity and capacity of the signatory to the letter dated 31st july 2014.

Subsequently, in September 2014, the Company obtained scanned copies of the purported agreements (including the purported power of attorney) and various communications between KFA and the alleged Claimant. these   documents   indicate   that   while   the   purported agreements may have sought to create a lien on certain investments of the Company, subsequently, the Alleged Claimant  and  KFA  sought  to  negotiate  the  release  of the purported obligation to create such lien, which was formalised vide a second addendum in September 2012.

The Management has verified from a perusal of the minutes of meetings of the board of directors of the Company that the board of directors of the Company at the relevant time had not approved or ratified any such purported agreement. the management has represented to the Board that till the receipt of scanned copies of the purported agreements in September 2014, the Company had no knowledge of these purported agreements. The management, based on legal advice received, does not expect any liability or obligation to arise on the Company out of these purported agreements.

From auditors’ report (given in italics in the original report) Basis for Qualified Opinion
1.    As stated in Note 26(a) to the financial statements, certain parties who had previously given the required undisputed balance confirmations for the year ended 31st march 2013, alleged during the current year, that they have advanced certain amounts to certain alleged UB Group entities and linked the confirmation of amounts due to the Company to repayment of such amounts to such parties by the alleged uB Group entities. Also, some of these parties stated that the dues to the Company will be paid/refunded only upon receipt of their dues from such alleged UB Group entities. These dues of such parties are on account of advances by the Company in the earlier years under agreements for enhancing capacity, obtaining exclusivity  and  lease  deposits  in  relation  to  tie-up Manufacturing Units; agreements for specific projects; or dues owing to the Company from customers. These claims received in the current year may indicate that all or some of such amounts may have been improperly advanced from the Company to such parties for, in turn, being advanced to the UB Group entities. however, this can only be confirmed after a detailed inquiry. Based on the findings of the preliminary internal inquiry by the management, under the instructions of the Board of Directors; and Management’s assessment of recoverability, an aggregate amount of rs. 6,495.4 million has been provided in the financial statements and has been disclosed as prior period items. Based on its current knowledge, the management believes that the aforesaid provision is adequate and no additional material adjustments to the financial statements are likely to be required in relation to this matter. As stated in paragraph 4 below, the Board of directors have instructed the management to undertake a detailed inquiry into this matter. Pending such inquiry, we are unable to comment on the nature of these transactions; the provision established; or any further impact on the financial statements;

2.    As stated in Note 30(f) to the financial statements, subsequent to the balance sheet date, the Company received a letter dated 5th may 2014 from the lawyers of an entity (alleged Claimant) alleging that the alleged Claimant had advanced loans amounting to rs. 2,000 million to Kingfisher Airlines Limited (hereinafter referred  to  as  “KFA”),  a  UB  Group  entity,  in  an earlier year on the basis of agreements, executed in december 2011 and january 2012, through which the Company was alleged to have created a lien on certain investments in favour of the alleged Claimant as security for the aforesaid loans. The letter alleged that KFA had defaulted in repayment of the foresaid loans as well as interest of Rs. 790 million due thereon and demanded that the Company should pay the aforesaid amounts and pending such repayments, create a valid pledge on the specified investments. The Company responded to the aforesaid letter vide its letters dated  3rd  june  2014  and  28th  july  2014,  wherein the Company denied knowledge of the purported loan transactions and the purported agreements for the creation of security on such investments held by  the  Company. A letter  dated  31st  july  2014  was received from the alleged Claimant wherein they have stated that the notice sent earlier did not take into account an addendum to the loan agreement; and after examining the aforesaid addendum, they have no claim or demand of any nature against the Company. In September 2014, scanned copies of the purported agreements and certain related documents were  obtained  by  the  Company.  These  documents indicate that while the agreements may have sought to create a lien on certain investments of the Company; subsequently, the Alleged Claimant and KFA sought to negotiate the release of the lien, which was formalised vide a second addendum in September 2012.

The  management  has  represented  to  us  that  the Company had no knowledge of these purported agreements; that the Board of directors of the Company have not approved any such purported agreements; and it is not liable under any such purported agreements. We are unable to conclude  on the validity of these agreements; any required compliance with the provisions of the Companies act, 1956; and any consequential impact of the same;

3.    As stated in Note 26(b) to the financial statements, the Company and its subsidiaries had various preexisting loans/advances/deposits due from united Breweries (holdings) limited (hereinafter referred to as “uBhl”). During the current year, pursuant to a previous resolution passed by the Board of directors on 11th october 2012, these dues (together with interest) were consolidated into an unsecured loan aggregating rs. 13,374 million vide an agreement dated 3rd july 2013.

The loan has been granted for a period of 8 years with a moratorium period of 6 years. Certain lenders have filed petitions for winding-up against UBHL. UBHL has provided guarantees to lenders and other vendors of Kingfisher Airlines Limited, which have been invoked and  are  currently  being  challenged  in  courts.  the Company has also filed its affidavit opposing the aforesaid winding up petition and the matter is sub- judice. Based on its assessment of the recoverability of the loan, the Company has made a provision of rs. 3,303 million against the loan outstanding and has not recognised the interest income of Rs. 963 million on the loan. Given the various uncertainties involved with respect to the litigations involving UBHL as aforesaid and the extended period  for  repayment  of  the  loan, we are unable to comment on the level of provision established;

4.    As stated in Note 26(c) to the financial statements, the Board of directors have instructed the management to undertake a detailed inquiry in relation to the matters stated in the paragraphs above; the possible existence of any other transaction of a similar nature; the role of individuals involved; and potential non-compliance (if any) with the provisions of the Companies act, 1956 and other regulations applicable to the Company. The Board has also instructed the management to engage independent advisers and specialists, as  required, for the inquiry. As the inquiry is yet to be carried out, we are unable to comment on any further adjustment that could be identified as a result of the inquiry; its resultant impact on the financial statements; and any potential non-compliances with the provisions of the Companies act, 1956 and other regulations; and

5.    Though the observations in paragraph 1 above relate to claims received in the current year, the underlying transactions were entered into in earlier years. Accordingly, the financial statements of those earlier years and consequently the opening balances may be incorrectly stated to that extent. Further, the detailed inquiry as referred to in paragraph 4 above may result in further adjustments that may have an impact on the opening balances.

Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India. …

From Directors’ Report
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSES TO OBSERVATIONS, QUALIFICATIONS AND ADVERSE REMARKS IN AUDITOR’S REPORT

The Statutory Auditors have qualified their opinion in relation to the matters specified in Notes 26(a), 26(b), 26(c) and 30(f) of the Financial Statement as follows:

1.    Auditor’s observations under Paragraph 1 of the Auditor’s report to the financial statement (“the Statement”): Not reproduced

Director’s Response: Information and explanation on the qualification on paragraph 1 of the audit report is provided in Note 26(a) to the Statement. In particular, as stated in note  26(a),  the  transactions  referred  to in the said note are on account of amounts that were advanced by the Company in the earlier years and were duly confirmed by the relevant parties as payable to the Company in such earlier years, but were disputed by such parties for the first time when the Company sought balance confirmations from them for the year ended 31st march 2014. This was brought to the attention of the Board after 31st march 2014. Accordingly, as mentioned in note 26(a), as a matter of prudence, the amounts mentioned in the note 26(a) have now been provided for. Since the transactions referred to in the said note 26(a) were entered in to prior to 31st March 2013, they have been reflected as prior period items in the financial statements.

Further, as mentioned in Note 26(a), the Board has:
(i)    Directed a detailed and expeditious inquiry into this matter and (ii) authorised the initiation of suitable action and proceedings as considered appropriate by the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (MD) for recovering the Company’s dues. Appropriate other action will also be taken commensurate with the outcome of that inquiry.

2.    Auditor’s  observations  under  Paragraph   2   of   the  Auditor’s  report  to  the  financial   statement: not reproduced

Directors’ Response: Information and explanation on the qualification at paragraph 2 of the audit report is provided in Note 30(f) to the Statement. In particular, as stated in note 30(f), the claim is based on documents purportedly executed by the Company in the months of december 2011 and january 2012. however, the claim was received by the Company only after the year  ended  31st  march  2014.  this  matter  was  only thereafter brought to the knowledge of the Board by the management. a letter dated 31st july 2014 was received from the alleged Claimant wherein they have stated that the notice sent earlier did not take into account an addendum to the loan agreement; and after examining the aforesaid addendum, they have no claim or demand of any nature against the Company. Subsequently, in September 2014, the Company obtained scanned copies of the purported agreements (including the purported power of attorney) and various communications between KFA and the alleged Claimant. These documents indicate that while the purported agreements may have sought to create a lien on certain investments of the Company, subsequently, the Alleged Claimant and KFA sought to negotiate the release of the purported obligation to create such lien, which was formalised vide a second addendum in September 2012.

The Management has verified from a perusal of the minutes of meetings of the board of directors of the Company that the board of directors at the relevant time had not approved or ratified any such documents. accordingly, the Company has, in its responses to the alleged Claimant, disputed the alleged  claim  and denied having created the alleged security or having executed any document in favour of the alleged  Claimant.  Further,  the  management,  based on legal advice received, does not expect any liability or obligation to arise on the Company out of these allegations.

3.    Auditor’s observations under Paragraph 3 of the Auditor’s report to the financial statement: Not reproduced

Directors’ Response: Information and  explanation  on the qualification at paragraph 3 of the  audit  report is provided in Note 26(b) to the Statement. In particular, as stated in note 26(b), the management has performed an assessment of the recoverability  of the loan and has reviewed valuation reports in relation to UBHL prepared by reputed independent valuers that were commissioned by UBHL, and shared by UBHL with the Company. As  a  result  of the above mentioned assessment and review by the management, in accordance with the recommendation of the management, the Company, as a matter of prudence, has not recognised interest income of Rs.  963  million  and  has  provided  Rs.  3,303  million towards the principal outstanding as at 31st march 2014.  The  management  believes  that  it  should  be able to recover, and no further provision is required for the balance amount of Rs. 9,957 million, though the Company will attempt to recover the entire amount of Rs.14,223 million. However, the management will continue to assess the recoverability of the said loan on an ongoing basis.

Further,  the  Board  has  directed  the  management  to review the underlying loan agreement(s) and / or other relevant documents (“loan documents”), to inter-alia assess: (i) whether any event of default(s) under the loan documents has occurred on the part of UBHL;
(ii) the legal rights and remedies which the Company has  under  the  loan  documents;  (iii)  whether  the Company should invoke any of the remedies available to it under the loan documents (including recalling of the entire loan); and (iv) whether there is any scope of renegotiating the terms and conditions under the loan documents.

In this regard, the management should expeditiously take all the necessary steps to fully protect the interest of the Company and shareholders.

4.    Auditor’s observations under Paragraph 4 of the Auditor’s report to the financial statement: Not reproduced

Directors’ Response: Information and  explanation  on the qualification at paragraph 4 of the  audit  report is provided in Note 26(c) to the Statement.     In particular, as stated in note 26 (c) above, in addition to commissioning the inquiry, the Board has also authorised the md to take suitable action and proceedings as considered appropriate by him for recovering the Company’s dues. Appropriate other action will also be taken commensurate with the outcome of the inquiry commissioned by the Board. on the basis of the current knowledge and information of the management, the management believes that no additional material adjustments to the financial statements are likely to be required in relation to the matters mentioned above in notes 26(a), 26(b) and 30(f). However, pending completion of the detailed inquiry mentioned above, the Company is unable to determine whether, on completion of such detailed inquiry, there could be any impact on the financial statements.

5.    Auditor’s observations under Paragraph 5 of the Auditor’s report to the financial statement: Not reproduced

Directors’ response: Information and  explanation on the qualification at paragraph 5 of the audit report is provided in Note 26(a) to the Statement. In particular, as stated in note 26 (a), while the claims referred to in note 26(a) were received only when the Company sought balance confirmations from the relevant parties for the year ended 31st march 2014, the transactions referred to in the said note were entered in to prior to 31st march 2013 and therefore, they have been reflected as prior period items in the financial statements. Further, as stated in note 26(a) (iii), the management has stated to the Board that, on the basis of their current knowledge, no additional material adjustments to the financial statements are likely to be required in relation to the matters mentioned in the said Note. As mentioned in Note 26(c) to the financial statement, the Board has commissioned the inquiry referred to in note 26(c). Upon completion of the inquiry, the Board will consider impact on the financial statements, if any.

Compilers’ note
The Auditors’ Report also contains qualifications in the CARO report, which are in turn explained in the Directors’ report. the  same  will  be  reproduced  in  the  next  issue of BCAJ.

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section A: Reporting in case of Managerial Remuneration in excess of statutory limits

1) Jyothy Laboratories Limited (31-03-2013)

From Notes to Financial Statements

Employee benefit expenses include Rs. 1, 113.72 lakh paid/payable during the year towards remuneration payable to its Whole Time Directors. The maximum remuneration payable under para (1) (B) of Section II of Part II of Schedule XIII of the companies Act, 1956(‘Act’) is Rs. 192 lakh. Based on the legal advice received by the Company, management has computed the maximum remuneration payable to Whole Time Directors amounting to Rs. 1, 025 lakh.

The company has filed an application with the Central Government and is in the process of obtaining necessary approval from shareholders for remuneration payable to its Whole Time Directors. Pending receipts of such approval, the excess remuneration paid to the directors is held in trust by the said Directors.

From Auditor’s Report

Emphasis of Matter

Without qualifying our report, we draw attention to Note 40 to the Financial Statements regarding managerial remuneration amounting to Rs. 1,113 lakh paid/provided during the year of which Rs. 921 lakh is in excess of the limits prescribed under Schedule XIII of the companies Act, 1956. As informed to us, the company has filed an application with the central government and is in the process of obtaining necessary approval from shareholders for approval of such excess remuneration.

2) Gillette India Limited 30-6-2013)

From Notes to Financial Statements


Commission to Non – Executive Directors

During the current year, an aggregate amount of Rs. 80 lakh has been paid as commission to the Non – Executive Directors which is within the overall limits of commission payable to such directors under schedule XIII to the Companies Act, 1956. The said payment constitutes 53% of the aggregate amount of Rs. 153 lakh (excluding service tax of Rs. 19 lakh) which is payable to the Non – Executive Directors and is provided for in the financial statements.

The aggregate amount of Commission of Rs. 172 lakh (including service tax Rs. 19 lakh) payable and charged for the year in the financial statements as is stated above, exceeds the maximum amount payable based on 1% of the net profits of the Company amounting to Rs. 148 lakh (as per computation below) for the year ended 30th June, 2013, by an amount of Rs. 24 lakh (including service tax of Rs. 3 lakh). The said excess amount of Rs. 24 lakh which is provided but not paid, is subject to by approval of the Members of the Company by way of a special resolution at the ensuing 29th Annual General Meeting of the Company, and the Central Government.

During the previous year ended 30th June, 2012, also the Company had to paid commission to Non – Executive Directors amounting to Rs. 160 lakhs, of which an amount of Rs. 48 lakh (including service tax of Rs. 10 lakh), being amount in excess of 1% of net profits for the year ended 30th June, 2012. This was paid during the current year and the same was ratified by the members at the 28th Annual General Meeting of the Company. The Company has made an application to the Central Government on 3rd January, 2013 for the waiver of the excess commission, which is as yet pending for approval by the Central Government.

Computation of Net Profit in accordance with section 349 and section 309 (5) of the Companies Act, 1956 (not reproduced here)

From Auditor’s Report

Emphasis of Matter

We draw attention to Note 36(b) to financial statements regarding excess commission provided but not paid to the Executive Directors amounting to Rs. 24 lakh (including Rs. 3 lakh of service tax), which is subject to the approval of the members at the ensuring Annual General Meeting of the company and the Central Government. Further, as reported for previous year ended 30th June, 2012, the Company had provided excess commission amounting to Rs. 48 lakh, (including service tax of Rs. 10 lakh) which was since ratified by the members of the company at the 28th Annual General Meeting of the company and paid during the current year, application for which is as yet pending for approval with Central Government.

3) Jindal Stainless Limited (31-03-2013)

From Notes to Financial Statements

i. For the remuneration amounting to Rs. 16.20 lakh and Rs. 18.11 lakh paid to whole time director for the years 2008-09 and 2009-10 respectively, company’s representation is pending before Central Government;

ii. For the remuneration amounting to Rs. 63.60 lakh and Rs. 160.57 lakh paid to whole time director for year 2011-12 and 2012-13 respectively, company’s representation is pending before the Central Government.

From Auditor’s Report

Emphasis Of Matter

Note no. 51(C) (i) regarding pending necessary approvals for managerial remuneration as explained in the said note.

4) Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited (31-12-2012)

From Notes to Financial Statements

On the basis of a legal advice, the Company is of the view that the appointment and payment of remuneration to Mr. Arun Sawhney, CEO and Managing Director for the full year ended 31st December 2011 is in accordance with the conditions stipulated under the Notification no. GSR 534(E) dated 14th July 2011 read with the clarification dated 16th August 2012 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

From Auditor’s Report

Emphasis Of Matter

Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 37 of the financial statements, wherein it has been stated that on the basis of a legal advice, the company is of the view that the appointment of and payment of remuneration to Mr. Arun Sawhney, CEO and Managing Director for the full year ended on 31st December, 2011 is in accordance with the stipulated under notification no. GSR 534(e) dated 14th July 2011 read with the clarification dated 16th August 2012 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

5) Network 18 Media & Investments Limited (31-03-2013)

From Notes to Financial Statements

Managerial remuneration paid, up to 31st March 2013, by the Company amounting to Rs. 26,388,400 (31st March 2012 – Rs 20,100,400) is in excess of the limits prescribed under the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”). The Company is in the process of obtaining the necessary approvals as per the Act.

From Auditor’s Report

Qualified Opinion

The company has paid Rs. 2, 63, 88,400/- as managerial remuneration to its Managing Director upto 31st March 2013 (upto 31st March, 2012 Rs. 1, 01, 00,400/-), which is in excess of the limits prescribed under the Act. Had the company accounted for the remuneration in accordance with the Act, the net loss after tax for the year ended 31st March, 2013 would have been lower by Rs. 2,63,88,400/- and short term loans and advance would have been higher by Rs. 2,63,88,400/-. Our report on the FS for the year ended 31st March, 2012 was also qualified in respect of this matter.

From Director’s Report
In regard to reservations/qualifications in the Auditors’ Report, the relevant notes on the accounts are self- explanatory and therefore do not call for any further comments of Directors. However, your Directors wish to offer the explanations in regard to note no. 6 of the Auditors Report. It is clarified that the Central Government has partially accepted the Company’s application for approval of the remuneration paid to the Managing Director and the Company has filed a representation for reconsideration of the matter and approval is awaited.
6) Mafatlal Industries Limited (31-03-2013)

From Notes to Financial Statements

Mafatlal Denim Limited (MDL), the erstwhile company which has amalgamated with the Company had re – appointed Mr. Rajiv Dayal as Managing Director & Executive Officer and Mr. Vishad P. Mafatlal as Joint Managing Director of MDL with effect from 1st April, 2011 for a term of 5 years. Managerial Remuneration of Rs. 139.28 lakh had been paid during the year 2011-12. As stipulated by the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 requiring the approval of the Central Government for the appointment and remuneration of Managerial personnel in the case, inter alia, of a company that is in default in payment of its debts, erstwhile MDL had made the applications to the Government on 20th June, 2011 seeking approval for re – appointment and payment of remuneration to Mr. Rajiv Dayal and Mr. Vishad P. Mafatlal.

The erstwhile MDL was technically in default to SICOM Limited, a secured lender pending the Sanction of the section 391 Scheme pending before the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court. SICOM declined to give their No Objection Certificate for the re – appointments for the reason that they already had their debts adjudicated by the Hon’ble Debt Recovery Tribunal, Mumbai. The Government rejected the applications of MDL on 23rd September, 2011 for the reason that MDL had not submitted No Objection Certificate from SICOM, one of the secured lenders. MDL has made an application for reconsideration, as default to the secured lenders no longer exists.

Subsequently, SICOM Limited assigned the entire Debt in favour of M/s. Mishapar Investments Limited (another Company that amalgamated with the company) on 26th July, 2012. Thereafter, MDL obtained the No Objection Certificate from the said assignee and approached the MCA once again on 5th September, 2012. Pursuant to the said letter, MCA advised MDL to file applications afresh. Accordingly, MDL has filed Fresh Applications on 25th October, 2012 and awaits their approval.

From Auditor’s Report

Qualified Opinion
Attention is invited to Note no. 32.1 (a) to the financial statements, in the earlier year, erstwhile Mafatlal Denim Limited (the Amalgamating Company) had made representation to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs against the rejection of application u/s. 269, 198, 309 and 310 of the Act, relating to re – appointment and payment of remuneration with effect from 1st April, 2011 to 31st March, 2013. The said approval is pending from the Ministry Of Corporate Affairs and accordingly, we are unable to comment on the impact, if any arising out of the same in these financial statements.

From Director’s Report

The specific notes forming part of the Accounts referred to in the Auditor’s Report are self – explanatory and give complete information.

ICAI and its members

fiogf49gjkf0d
1. Disciplinary Cases.

The Disciplinary Committee (DC) of ICAI has decided the following cases and held the concerned members as guilty of professional misconduct. These cases are reported in the publication of ICAI “Disciplinary Cases” which has been published for the information of Members only. The names of the Members are not given in order to maintain Confidentiality.

(i) Case of Mr. A.C.

In this case, the Firm of Mr. ‘A.C’ audited the accounts of ST Pvt. .Ltd. It was reported by R.B.I. that the Company carried on the business of NBFC without obtaining NBFC registration from RBI. This contravention of NBFC Regulations was not reported by the auditors. On inquiry, the D.C. found the member guilty of professional misconduct under clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule to C.A. Act. In its order dated 12-09-2011, the Disciplinary Committee has Reprimanded the member

(ii) Case of Mr. M.J.

In this case the member was statutory auditor of a Nationalised Bank. He also conducted the Revenue Audit of the same Bank. When this fact was brought to the notice of ICAI, inquiry was made by the D.C. After a detailed enquiry, the D.C. held that the member was guilty of professional misconduct under clause (4) of Part I and clause (3) of Part II of the second schedule to the C.A. Act. After considering the facts of the case and submissions of the member the D.C. decided on 12-09-2011 to issue a “letter of caution” to the member advising him to be more careful in future in complying with Code of Ethics of the Institute.

(iii) Case of Mr. M.K.

In this case the member was a partner of C.A. firm ANA. He had ceased to be a partner w.e.f. 01-07- 2007. But, he continued to sign several official documents of the C.A. firm after his resignation from the firm. He also conducted statutory audit of one of the clients of the C.A. firm after his resignation and collected Audit Fees from the client in his personal name. On complaint by a partner of the C.A. firm, the D.C. after inquiry, held the member guilty of professional misconduct under clause (2) of Part IV of first Schedule to C.A. Act. By its order dated 12- 09-2011, considering the facts and submissions, the D.C. has “Reprimanded” the member.

2. Some Ethical Issues

The Ethical Standards Board of ICAI has given answers to some Ethical Issues as under, on pages 858 – 860 of C.A. Journal of December, 2013.

(i) Issue No. 1:

Whether the office of a Chartered Accountant is permitted to go in for ISO 9001-2000 certification or other similar certifications?

There is no bar for a member to go in for ISO 9001- 2000 certification or other similar certifications. However, the member cannot use the expression like “ISO Certified” on his professional documents, visiting cards, letter-heads or sign boards etc.

(ii) Issue No. 2:

Whether communication with previous auditor is necessary in case of appointment as statutory auditor by nationalised and other Banks?

Clause (8) of Part I of the First Schedule to the CA Act is equally applicable in case of nationalised and other Banks and also to Government agencies.

(iii) Issue No. 3:

Whether communication by the incoming auditor is mandatory with the previous auditor in respect of various audit assignments, like the concurrent audit, revenue audit, tax audit and special audits etc?

The requirement for communicating with the previous auditor would apply to all types of audits viz. statutory audit, tax audit, internal audit, concurrent audit or any other kind of audit. The Council has laid down detailed guidelines in this regard and the same are appearing in the Code of Ethics, 2009 edition.

3. EAC Opinion:

Recognition of Free of Cost Equipment Provided by a Contractee to the Contractor.

Facts:
A company is a defence public sector undertaking under the Ministry of Defence and is engaged in the construction of Warships and Submarines. For a particular class of ship construction, the company entered into an agreement with the buyer for the construction and delivery of 3 ships. The company has agreed for construction of 3 ships on ‘Fixed Price’ basis with variable component in respect to certain items.

The buyer intimated to the company that certain equipments, out of variable cost items, will be supplied by him at ‘free of cost’ for installation on board of ship. There are certain equipments for which orders are directly placed and also paid by the buyer. These equipments are known as “Buyer Furnished Equipment” (BFE) and are delivered to the company ‘free of cost’ for installing in the ship. The labour cost of installation is included in the fixed price component of the contract.

Query:
From the above, the company has sought the opinion of the EAC on the following issues: (i) Whether the Buyer Furnished Equipment’s (BFE’s) cost can be considered as inventory (simultaneously creating liability to the buyer) and then on issue to ship can be taken in WIP, so that accretion to WIP will be recognised as revenue (ii) Whether BFE’s value can be considered as a part of sale value in the year of delivery.

Opinion:
The Committee has noted before any item can be recognised as an inventory, it should meet the definition of ‘asset’ as given in paragraph 49 of the Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements issued by ICAI i. e. “An asset is a resource controlled by the enterprise as a result of past events from which future economic benefit are expected to flow to the enterprise”.

The Committee has also noted from the Facts of the Case that orders in respect of BFEs are directly placed by the buyer and also payment in respect of them is made by the buyer. These are then supplied to the company for installing in the ship and the buyer pays installation charges which are included in the contract price. Thus, the company has neither incurred any cost on BFEs nor any amount is recoverable on account of such equipment except installation charges. Accordingly, the EAC is of the view that such equipments are not ‘assets’, that may be a considered as a part of its contract workin- progress. In fact, after installation in the ship, BFEs are returned to the buyer after completion of the ship. Thus, these are only held by the company in the capacity of a bailee. Since, these cannot be considered as ‘asset’, therefore, these can neither be considered as ‘inventory’ nor as work-in-progress.

Accordingly, these cannot also be considered as a part of sale value or revenue of the company as no consideration would be receivable in respect of the cost of such equipments. (Refer pages 886-888 of C.A. Journal for December, 2013).

4. The Financial position of ICAI

The Summarised Audited Income and Expenditure Account for 2012-13 and Balance Sheet as at 31.3.2013, as published with 64th Annual Report of the Council, is as under.

There are following three Notes to Accounts which are significant.

“(i) The Institute is registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and eligible for exemption of income under section 11 of the Act. In financial year 2009-10, the assessing Officer denied Exemption u/s 11 of the Act and raised demand of Rs. 51.70 crore. The Institute had filed appeal against the said Order of Assessing Officer before CIT (A) who allowed the Appeal vide Order dated 12.09.2013.

(ii)    The Institute has filed SLPs before the Hon’ble Supreme Court against the Orders of the Hon. Delhi High Court, in the Writ Petition filed by the Institute for the financial year 2006-07 against the Orders passed by DGIT(E) denying exemption U/s 10(23C) (iv) of the Income Tax Act, wherein the High Court held  that  the  activities  of  the  Institute  fall  under the category of “advancement of any other object of  general  public  utility”  within  the  meaning  of Charitable Purpose” as defined in section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  The Hon’ble Court also observed in the same Orders that the Institute is also engaged in the educational activities as it conducts various Post Qualification Professional courses for its Members.   It has been pleaded that the main activities of the Institute are Educational Activities and other activities carried on by the Institute will only fall under the category of “advancement of any other object of general public utility”.  The Income Tax  department  has  also  filed  a  SLP  against  the order of the Delhi High Court for the financial year 2006-07. The Apex court has tagged the said matter along with the Institute’s SLP and granted leave to appeal.

(iii)    In respect of the proposed Nagpur Centre   of Excellence, during the financial year 2012-13, a sum of Rs. 9.75 CRORE was paid to M/s. Luxora Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. towards Centre of Excellence project at Nagpur through two separate – principal and supplementary agreements. Supplementary agreement has since been cancelled by executing deed of cancellation. A total refund of Rs. 5.87 crore out of Rs. 9.75 CRORE has been received till the finalization of Accounts. For balance sum due amounting to Rs. 3.88 crore, a cheque dated 07- 10-2013 has been received from the vendor. The cancellation of principal agreement shall be done after credit of the balance amount. The net effect of this transaction shall be accounted for on receipt of balance consideration and stamp duty”.

5.    ICAI News:

(Note: Page Nos. given below are from C.a. Journal for december, 2013)
(i)    Companies Act, 2013 not Applicable for May 2014 Examinations:

The  Companies  Act,  2013  notified  in  the  Official Gazette    on    August    30,2013.       (with    partial enforcement of only 98 sections of the Companies Act, 2013 from 12TH September, 2013) shall not be applicable to the May, 2014 examinations of  both Intermediate (IPC) and Final Courses. (Page No: 855)

(ii)    DVD of 61 years of C.A. Journal

DVD containing 61 years of C.A. Journal has been released.  This  contains  Journal  Issues  for  July, 1952 to June 2013 in searchable mode. Readers can search  the  contents  through  key  words  relating to   Accounting,   Auditing,   Taxation   etc.   besides searching by month, year, category, author etc. This DVD will be available for sale by the Institute on 1st January, 2014 onwards. (Page No: 832).

Mantra for life

fiogf49gjkf0d
When we enter an amusement park like Disney Land or Imagica, our aim is to experience the maximum and make the best of the day. The first thing we do on entering the park is to pick up a map of the amusement park and plan the route for the rides to be taken depending on our own preferences. If, for a single day to be spent in a small amusement area, we do not start and move without a map and a route plan, what in the world makes us believe that we can go about our lives without the help of a map and a plan? In ‘life planning,’ the map is not available off the shelf as in an amusement park. Maps resemble your goals which are derived from your values. You have to prepare your own map. Once the map of goals is ready, the journey has to be planned. But again, in the journey of life, we cannot have an exactly predefined route. Planning your life is not about bringing rigidity in the way you want to live. It is about clarifying why and what you want to do with your life, and then plan to realise that vision. It is more of a compass which shows you the direction towards your own goals. Unexpected circumstances and events happen, but you know ultimately where you are heading and that keeps you enthused and unbaffled.

We only live once within a limited time slot. A moment gone is gone forever. You cannot relive that moment. You cannot rewind that moment. You cannot repair that moment even though it passed just one second ago. You cannot manufacture a single second. There are only two things about time which is under your influence. One is to make the best use of the time available to you and second, is to take optimum health precautions so that your time slot does not shrink. When we are at a funeral of someone we know, we realise the temporal nature of life and are jolted for a brief moment. But soon, this great realisation wanes off.

Life is too precious to be spent on watching television shows, tapping the screens of smart phones, cribbing about work, babbling about climate change, gobbling food, attending mindless functions and forwarding messages on Whatsapp. Life is much more than this.

Life is about your heart’s calling for experiences, love, play, passion and purpose. The heart doesn’t speak, it vibrates. Take time to be silent. Feel those vibrations with all your awareness. These vibrations are buried deep below the layers of our sensual entertainment, our showy possessions, our borrowed wisdom, and our societal definitions of success. All these layers have to be peeled off. As these layers are peeled off, the vibrations start throbbing. It is impossible for you to ignore them anymore.

To be able to function with vigour, you need a healthy mind and body. Health gives you time and freedom. And yes, money is the sixth sense without which you cannot make good use of the other five. Money is a thing, but not everything. Fame, power and sensual gratifications are like salt water – the more you drink, the thirstier you get. Understand the basics, set your goals, plan for them and act. The sooner you start, the better.

Planning helps you make the best use of the available time and resources to achieve your ‘goals in life’ and ‘goals of life’. Time wasted is a portion of life wasted. Wastage of resources is wastage of your potential. When the ‘day plan’ flows from your ‘life plan,’ the magic begins. Your ‘life plan’ serves as an inspiration for the ‘day plan.’ Then, you don’t carry the plan. The plan carries you.

Try it. All I want to say is, it’s urgent.

levitra

Lecture Meeting

fiogf49gjkf0d
Lecture Meeting on Success in CA Exams by Nilesh Vikamsey on 19th March 2014

Speaker
Mr. Nilesh Vikamsey, Chartered Accountant dealt with various aspects of
getting success in CA Exams. He explained various methods with examples
for preparing for various subjects in better ways. More than 350
students benefited from the expert analysis and knowledge shared by the
speaker. The presentation and video of the lecture is available at
www.bcasonline.org & www. bcasonline.tv, respectively, for the
benefit of all Students, Members and Web TV Subscribers.

Lecture Meeting on Taxation of Expatriates on 9th April 2014

Speaker
Mr. Sushil Lakhani, Chartered Accountant explained various aspects of
Taxation of Expatriates both inbound as well as out bound expatriates.
At this lecture meeting, a publication titled “Taxation of Expatriates
(Including certain Non-Tax aspects)” was also released at the hands of
Mr. S. E. Dastur, Senior Advocate. The publication has been Coauthored
by Mr. Sushil Lakhani, Mr. Nitin Shingala, Mr. Nandkishore Hegde &
Ms. Niji Arora, Chartered Accountants. This publication was the 25th
Publication under the auspices of Shailesh Kapadia Publication Memorial
fund.

More than 300 participants benefited from the speaker’s
vast knowledge and experience. The presentation and video of the lecture
is made available at www.bcasonline.org & www.bcasonline. tv,
respectively, for the benefit of all members and Web TV subscribers.

Other Programs:

Full day Workshop on “Practical Issues in Tax Deduction at Source” on 21st March 2014

A
full day workshop was organised by the Taxation Committee of BCAS. The
objective of the workshop was to keep the Members & Students updated
with recent changes in the regulatory as well as compliance aspects of
TDS provisions.

The following topics were discussed:

536
participants benefited from the Workshop. The video of the full
workshop is made available at www.bcasonline.tv for the benefit of all
Students,

Members and Web TV Subscribers.

Human Resources
Committee of BCAS organised this workshop where the learned speaker Mr.
Mihir Sheth, Chartered Accountant dealt with the various aspects of
good business etiquettes. The objective of the workshop was to make
participants deal with many such protocols and business etiquette
practices which can help them to carry effortlessly while dealing with
their counter part from other countries.

36 participants
attended the workshop and gained immensely from the knowledge shared by
the speaker. Seminar on Charitable Trust on 22nd March 2014 A full day
seminar on “Charitable Trusts” was organised jointly with The Chamber of
Tax Consultants. The objective of the seminar was to understand various
statutory provisions relating to Formation, Registration, Taxation and
Compliance by the Charitable Trusts and to discuss and deliberate upon
the various issues faced in day to day practice. 127 participants
attended the seminar.



Professional Accountant Course Batch XVI, Convocation on 25th March 2014

Human
Resources Committee of the Society and HR College of Commerce &
Economics has successfully completed XVI Batch of Professional
Accountants Course. The convocation was held at HR College where
participants shared their experiences with dignitaries present on the
dais like Mr. Nitin Shingala.

levitra

ICAI And Its Members

fiogf49gjkf0d
The Disciplinary Committee (DC) of ICAI has decided some cases. These cases are reported in the publication of the ICAI “Disciplinary Cases” VOL- 1. The page Nos. Given below are from this book. The names of Members are not given, in order to maintain confidentiality.

(I) Case of Mr. T. G.

In this case, a Public Sector Bank had complained that the Member, being the concurrent auditor of a Branch, failed to report in their Audit Report for January about certain exceptional and fraudulent transactions. If reported, the Bank could have averted the huge loss suffered by it. Some of the items of high withdrawals by certain parties, some return of large value clearing cheques, kite flying operations of the above parties and some of the other irregularities were listed by the Bank in its complaint.

The defence of the Member was that these irregularities started prior to his appointment as a concurrent auditor. He was not getting enough co-operation from the Branch Staff. Therefore, after submitting the report for one month he had resigned. Further, in one month’s audit it was not possible to unearth a deliberately concealed irregularity. After a detailed inquiry, the DC was not satisfied with the explanation given by the Member and held him guilty of professional misconduct under Clauses (7) and (8) of Part I of the Second Schedule to C.A. Act. However, the DC considered the facts that (i) although the Member was appointed as a concurrent Auditor for the year, he conducted audit for one month only and then resigned, as he did not get sufficient co-operation from the staff of the Branch, (ii) in one month’s span it was not feasible to unearth a perpetual fraud which had been going on for many years and (iii) the role of the member was limited to one month’s audit. On these facts, the DC awarded punishment by way of ‘Reprimand’ only . (P. 114 – 125 of Part I of Vol. -I ) (ii) Case of Mr. S. S. G. In this case, the Excise Intelligence Department had reported that (a) the Member had given an opinion to S.A. Ltd. that no service tax was payable by the company, (b) the Company did not deposit this tax which amounted to evasion of the service tax of about Rs. 142.45 crore and (c) the member had admitted that he had isued the opinion. Before the DC, the Member explained that he was appointed as a retainer of the Group. He also stated that the opinion was given to the company on the query whether the services provided by the company would be liable to service tax under the head Advertising Agency. Thus, the scope was limited to this one category of service. Further, the opinion was not given to the Excise Department but to the company. The Member also explained that this opinion was based on the decision in the reported case of Advertising Club vs. CBEC ( 6 STT 196-MAD). After a detailed enquiry, the DC accepted the submission of the Member and held that he was not guilty of professional misconduct. (P. 98 to 103 of Part II of Vol.I). (iii) Case of Mr. S. J. In this case, the Joint Commissioner of Sales tax filed the complaint against the Member. It was alleged that the Member had certified two different sets of financial statements of BPP Ltd. for 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07 in the name two Firms viz. M/s. J & D and M/s. M.R. & Co. The first set signed in the name of M/s. J & D was filed by the company with the bank and the second set was filed with the Sales Tax Department. This amounted to Professional Misconduct. Before the DC, the Member explained as under: (a) The firm of M/s. J & D was dissolved on 01-04-2005 when it merged with M/s. M.R. & Co. (b) He had signed financial statements of BPP Ltd. as

(ii) Case of Mr. S. S. G.

In this case, the Excise Intelligence Department had reported that (a) the Member had given an opinion to S.A. Ltd. that no service tax was payable by the company, (b) the Company did not deposit this tax which amounted to evasion of the service tax of about Rs. 142.45 crore and (c) the member had admitted that he had isued the opinion. Before the DC, the Member explained that he was appointed as a retainer of the Group. He also stated that the opinion was given to the company on the query whether the services provided by the company would be liable to service tax under the head Advertising Agency. Thus, the scope was limited to this one category of service. Further, the opinion was not given to the Excise Department but to the company. The Member also explained that this opinion was based on the decision in the reported case of Advertising Club vs. CBEC ( 6 STT 196-MAD). After a detailed enquiry, the DC accepted the submission of the Member and held that he was not guilty of professional misconduct. (P. 98 to 103 of Part II of Vol.I).

(iii) Case of Mr. S. J.

In this case, the Joint Commissioner of Sales tax filed the complaint against the Member. It was alleged that the Member had certified two different sets of financial statements of BPP Ltd. for 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07 in the name two Firms viz. M/s. J & D and M/s. M.R. & Co. The first set signed in the name of M/s. J & D was filed by the company with the bank and the second set was filed with the Sales Tax Department. This amounted to Professional Misconduct. Before the DC, the Member explained as under:

(a) The firm of M/s. J & D was dissolved on 01-04-2005 when it merged with M/s. M.R. & Co.
(b) He had signed financial statements of BPP Ltd. as Partner of M/s M.R & Co. for 2004-05 to 2006-07.
(c) The financial statements, alleged to have been signed by him as partner of M/s. J & D for these three years and filed by the company with the Bank were forged by someone. The firm of M/s. J & D was not in existence from 01-04-2005 onwards.

The DC, after examining the evidence produced before it, came to the conclusion that the financial statements filed by the company with the Bank, which were alleged to have been signed by the Member as partner of J & D were forged by someone. On this finding, the DC held that the Member was not guilty of professional misconduct ( P. 111 to 117 Part II of Vol. I).

levitra

Direct Taxes

fiogf49gjkf0d

New tax returns forms notified – Notification no- 28/2014 [S.O. 1418(E) dated 30th May, 2014 – Income tax (Sixth amendment) Rules, 2014

New forms ITR 3, ITR 4 , ITR 5, ITR 6 and ITR 7 have been notified.

Further Rule 12 has been amended with effect from 1st April, 2014 to provide mandatory electronic filing of audit report u/s.10AA, 44DA, 50B and 115VW from A.Y. 2014- 15.

Agreement for Exchange of information for collection of taxes between the Government of India and the Government of the Principality of Liechtenstein to have effect for all requests made in respect of taxable periods beginning on or after 1st April, 2013 – Notification No. 30 /2014 dated 6th June 2014

Cost inflation index for F.Y. 2014-15 is 1024 – Notification No. 31 /2014/ [F.No. 142/3/2014- TPL] dated 11th June, 2014

levitra

ICAI and its members

fiogf49gjkf0d
1. Disciplinary Cases:

The Disciplinary Committee (DC) of ICAI has decided that some cases have been awarded punishment for professional or other misconduct. These cases are reported in the publication of ICAI “Disciplinary Cases” Vol-I. The Page Nos. given below are from this Book. The names of members are not given in order to maintain confidentiality.

(i) Case of Mr. O. P. P.

In this case the member had obtained a Tax Audit assignment of 13 Societies of Sahakari Banks in a particular District in the name of M/s RRCO, a C. A. Firm in which he was a partner. This was without informing the other partners of the firm. He prepared the letter heads of the Firm on his computer and prepared the seal of his firm. He submitted the Tax Audit Reports, using the above letter heads and seal etc. and affixed the signature of his partner on Audit Reports and related documents.

The above bogus Audit Reports and related documents were submitted to the Bank and the Income-tax Department. He collected the fees from the Bank and issued receipts. The amount was also collected by him personally without informing the Firm and other partners.

At the time of hearing before the D.C. the member did not appear. He also did not submit a written statement. The D.C., after considering the records held him guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (2) of Part IV of First Schedule to C. A. Act. On consideration of the facts of the case D.C. awarded punishment by way of Removal of the Name of the Member for a period of 3 months (P. 89-95 Vol. I Part I).

(ii) Case of Mr. J. L. K.

In this case the ROC informed ICAI that the Inspection u/s. 209A of the Companies Act was carried out in the case of R. L. Ltd. During the course of this inspection it was noticed that the member (Statutory Auditor) had failed to point out the following violations of the Companies Act:

(a) He did not report about Impairment of Investments;

(b) He did not report about non-provision of loss on Investment.

At the time of hearing before the D.C. the member stated that he had made an application u/s. 621A of the Companies Act for compounding the offence before the R.O.C. He also made submissions and tried to explain that AS-26 was not applicable in this case. However, on further questioning by the D.C., the member admitted his guilt and requested that D.C. may take a lenient view in the matter.

On consideration of the information received from the R.O.C. and submissions made by the Member, the D.C. held that the Member was guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (7) and (9) of Part 1 of the Second Schedule to the C. A. Act. With regards to the facts of the case the D.C. awarded punishment by way of “Reprimand” to the Member. (P. 96-103. Vol. I Part I).

(iii) Case of Mr. R. K. K.

In this case the Member was a full-time employment of CB Ltd. Simultaneously, he was also holding a Certificate of Practice (COP) and was carrying on the C. A. profession in the name of R. K. & Co. The Complainant alleged that during the course of his C. A. practice, he was also carrying on the Attest Function. This was not permitted under the C. A. Act and Regulations.

Before the D.C., the Complainant did not attend. The Member attended and submitted that it was his mistake which happened inadvertently. As soon as he came to know that he cannot do the attestation work under Regulation 190A he stopped doing attestation work.

The D.C. noted that the Member had taken permission of the Institute to hold COP while in fulltime employment. Therefore, it was his mistake to have done attestation work. However, the D.C. accepted the explanation of the Member that the said attestation work was undertaken due to the ignorance of the amendment in Regulation 190A and no mala fide intention on his part was proved. In view of this, the D.C. gave the benefit of doubt to the Member and held him Not Guilty of Professional Misconduct. (P. 33 – 36 Vol. I Part II).

2. Some Ethical Issues:

The Ethical Standards Board of ICAI has given answers to some Ethical Issues on Pages 1325-1326 of C. A. Journal for March, 2014. Some of these issues are as under:

(i) Issue No: 1

Whether a statutory auditor is eligible for appointment u/s. 217(6) of the Companies Act with the duty of seeing that the provisions of s/s. (1) to (3) of section 217 are complied with, particularly with regard to “Directors Responsibility Statement?”

The Companies Act, 1956 requires the Directors to prepare the Directors’ Responsibility statement regarding the fulfillment of their responsibilities to prepare the financial statements of the company in accordance with the applicable accounting standards and other generally accepted accounting policies and principles. The auditors’ responsibility is to express opinion on the financial statements, based on their audit. In view of the above, the question of asking the statutory auditor to certify the Directors’ Responsibility Statement does not arise.

(ii) Issue No: 2

Whether a member in practice will be liable in a case where he was alleged to have signed two balance sheets on two different dates for the same financial year, the first one with a clean report and the second one with a qualified report?

The action of the Chartered Accountant in signing the two Balance Sheets on two different dates for the same financial year will constitute as a professional misconduct under Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule to the C. A. Act which states that a member in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties.

(iii) Issue No: 3

Can a Chartered Accountant receive his professional fees in advance partly or in full?

There is no bar in the C. A. Act or in the C. A. Regulations as well as Code of Ethics in taking the fees in advance.

3. EAC Opinion:

The consolidation of ESOP Trust in the stand-alone financial statements, the treatment of investment in their own shares for EPS calculation in the stand-alone financial statements and the treatment of ESOP Trust in the financial statements for tax audit purposes:

Facts:
A listed Company “A” Ltd., has the statutory year ending on 31st December. In the year 2011, the company started the new Employee Stock Option (“ESOP”) Scheme, whereby, the employees would be granted options (directly linked to individual, team and company performance) at an exercise price equal to the face value of the share (currently at INR 5). The company has created a Trust for this purpose, as the “ESOP Trust” or “ESOPT”. The ESOP Trust obtains its fund through a loan from the company, which it utilises for the purchase of the company’s shares. It receives shares from the company by way of fresh allotment. The ESOP Trust then allocate shares to employees for exercise of their right in exchange of cash and repays its loans.

The Company has drawn attention to Paragraph 45 of the “Guidance Note on Accounting for Employee Share based Payments” issued by the ICAI which states that as per the Accounting Standard (AS)- 21 “Consolidated Financial Statements,” the Trust created for the purpose of administrating the employee sharebased compensation should not be considered for consolidation. Therefore, the consolidation of gratuity trust, provident fund trust, etc., is not required. While Clause 22A.1 of SEBI (Employee Stock Option Scheme and Employee Stock Purchase Scheme) Guidelines, 1999 requires that the accounts of the Trust should be included in the stand-alone financial statements of the company as if all the transactions of the Trust are those of the company. Therefore, the loan given by the company to the ESOPT will not appear in the company’s stand alone financial statements. Further, the shares held by the trust at the year end, the face
value of the shares should be shown as a deduction from the share capital and excess amount paid, over and above the face value, should be shown as deduction from security premium with details explaining the facts.

Further, the company has to prepare a separate
financial statement u/s. 44AB of the Income -tax Act,
1961 for the year ended 31st March. The company
being listed has also to follow the SEBI Guidelines.
Therefore, while preparing the annual accounts it
will follow the SEBI Guidelines and, while preparing
financial statements for 31st March, it will follow ICAI
Guidance Note
Query:

On the basis of above facts, the company has sought
the opinion of the EAC on the issues (i) whether, in
the stand-alone financial statements of the company
for the year ended 31st December, the loan given by
the company to ESOPT should be shown as “Loans
to ESOPT” under “Assets” or operations of the
ESOPT should be included in the stand-alone financial
statements of company. If the operations of ESOPT
are included in stand-alone financial statements
of the company, then, how to disclose shares of
the company held by ESOPT? (ii) In the stand-alone
financial statements of company, for the purpose of
calculating basic and diluted earnings per share, how
do we consider investment in their own shares? (iii) Will
the above treatment also be followed in the financial
statements prepared u/s. 44AB of the Income-tax Act,
1961 for the year 31st March, i.e., the company requires
to follow the requirements of the ICAI’s Guidance
Note or the SEBI Guidelines?
EAC Opinion:

The Committee is of the view that, in case of listed
companies, if there are certain differences between
“ the Guidance Note “ issued by ICAI and the “SEBI
Guidelines” then to what extent will the requirement
of the SEBI Guidelines differ from the Guidance Note,
the SEBI Guidelines will prevail?
Though the ESOPT itself may prepare its own financial
statements, e.g., to meet the regulatory requirements,
the stand-alone financial statements of the company
should portray the picture as if the company itself
is administrating the ESOP Scheme The Committee
is of the view that this has two reasons viz; (i) the
company should recognise any expense arising from
the employee share based payment plans , and the
operations of the ESOPT are included in the standalone
financial statements of the company in so far
as the ESOP is concerned. In such a situation, in the
stand-alone financial statements of the company, the
“Loans to ESOPT” will not appear at all, i.e., loans to
ESOPT in the books of company should be eliminated
against the loan from the company as appearing in the
books of Trust. (ii) The amount representing the grant
date, intrinsic value of the options yet to be exercised
by the employees, will be added to the “Investment in
shares of the company” and the sum may be described
as “Shares held in trust for employees under ESOP
Scheme”. This should be presented as a deduction
from the share capital to the extent of face value
of the shares and Securities Premium to the extent
of amount exceeding the face value of shares. The
company should give a suitable note in the Notes to
Accounts to explain the nature of this deduction.
As per the facts of the case, the Committee notes, that
the employees would be granted stock options which
are directly linked to individual, team and company
performance. Therefore, the Committee is of the view
that such performance base employee stock options
should be treated as contingently issuable equity
shares under AS 20 and the principles enunciated in
AS 20 in respect of options and contingently issuable
equity shares are equally applicable for shares allotted
to ESOPT which, in turn, will be allotted in the future
to employees on exercising their options. For the
purpose of calculating basic EPS in the stand-alone
financial statements of the company, the shares
allotted to the ESOPT should be included in the shares
outstanding, only when the employees have exercised
their right to obtain shares, after fulfilling the requisite
vesting conditions. The shares allotted to the ESOPT
are treated as potential equity shares for the whole
or part of a particular reporting period depending on
the conditions. If the requisite-vesting conditions are
not fulfilled, the shares allotted to the ESOPT against
granted options should be considered for calculating
diluted earnings per share. When the shares are
allotted to the ESCOPT are considered for calculation
of basic and diluted EPS in both the situations, they are
weighted.
Lastly, the Committee is of the view that, for the
accounting year, the financial statements should be
in accordance with the SEBI Guidelines, while the
financial statements for the financial year should be
in accordance with the Guidance Note of ICAI. The
financial statements for the financial year should
adopt the same accounting policies and accounting
standards that have been adopted for preparing the
annual accounts that were laid at the AGM.
4. New Committees of Council for 2014-15:


(i) Our New President and Vice-President

Shri K. Raghu (Bangalore) has been elected as our
President and Shri Manoj Fadnis (Indore) has been
elected as our Vice-President for 2014-15 on 12th
February, 2014. We convey our greetings and best
wishes to both for a successful term of office.

(ii) New Committees for 2014-15

4 New Standing Committees and 36 other Committees
of the Council of ICAI have been constituted as per
details on Pages 1404-1407 of the March, 2014 C. A.
Journal.
5. ICAI News:

(Note: Page Nos. given below are from the C. A. Journal for March,
2014)
(i) Suggested Amendment in Auditors’ Report u/s
227(3) of Companies Act, 1956.

Reference is invited for Announcement on Page 1414-
1416. On Pages 1415-1416 the following amendment is
suggested.
“Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
As required by Section 227(3) of the Act, we
report that:
(a) ………………………………………..
(b) …………………………………………
(c) …………………………………………
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Statement
of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement
comply with the Accounting Standards notified under
the Companies Act, 1956 read with the General Circular
15/2013 dated 13th September ,2013 of the Ministry
of Corporate Affairs in respect of section 133 of the
Companies Act, 2013.”

(ii) Comparision of Firms:

Reference is invited to the following Announcement
on Page 1422.

“It has been brought to the notice of some
members that certain entities are seeking
details of the Chartered Accounts firms, for the
purpose of making ranking of the various firms
through comparison of different parameters.
In this regard, members are hereby informed
that the sharing of details of their C. A. firms, in
the aforesaid manne,r does not fall within the
permitted categories, and would therefore be
violative of Item 6 of Part – I of First Schedule to
The C. A. Act. Further, as it is known beforehand,
that the information regarding firms would be
used for ranking purposes, the sharing of such
details would tacitly result in claiming superiority
of one firm over other, which is prohibited in
terms of the Advertisement Guidelines of the ICAI
under Item 7 of Part – I of first Schedule to The
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Members are,
therefore, advised to abstain from such sharing
of details of their Chartered Accountants firms.”

(iii) Applicability of Guidelines on Sexual
Harassment:


“Attention of the members and firms of
Chartered Accountants registered with the ICAI is
hereby drawn to the specific guidelines laid down
by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in certain
reported cases. In terms of the said relevant
judgement, followed by the enactment of The
Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace
(Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013,
the guidelines so formed shall be applicable to
organisations/bodies/associations/institutions
and persons registered/affiliated with ICAI
including, the office of ICAI its organs at different
levels/locations and offices of members and firms
registered with it. Accordingly, all concerned are
required to follow the aforesaid guidelines in
letter and spirit. (P. 1423)


(iv) Amendment in AS-11:

Reference is invited to Announcement on Page
1424. As members are aware Para 46-46A has been
introduced in AS-11 applicable to Companies. Now ICAI
has announced that these Para 46 and 46A shall be
deemed to be introduced in AS 11 as applicable to noncorporates
also.
(v) New Branches of ICAI:

The following New Branches of ICAI have been opened
on 10-02-2014 (P. 1419-20)
(a) Bharatpur (CIRC) (b) Kurnool (SIRC)(c)
Ranigunj (EIRC)
(vi) New Publications of ICAI:
(a) Educational Material on Indian Accounting
Standard (Ind AS 7) Statement of Cash Flows
(P.1425)
(b) Technical Guide on Internal Audit of
Petrochemical Industry (P. 1425)
(c) Technical Guide on Internal Audit of
Beverages Industry (P. 1426)
(d) Guidance Note on Audit of Banks (P. 1429)
(vii) Revision in Fee of Expert Advisory
Committee:The Fees to be paid for obtaining
Opinion of Expert Advisory Committee have
been increased. Revised Fees w.e.f. 01-04-2014
will be as under: (P.1429)
(a) Listed Companies Rs. 75,000/-
(b) Any Enterprise having
Annual Turnover exceeding Rs. 75,000/-
Rs. 50 Cr.
(c) Any other case Rs. 37,500/-
(viii)
Limit on Tax Audit Assignments:

Council of ICAI has
increased the limit on Tax Audit assignments u/s.
44AB of the Income-tax Act from 45 to 60 w.e.f 01-
04-2014. This increased limit will apply to Tax Audits
to be conducted during F.Y: 2014-15 and onwards.

Company Law

fiogf49gjkf0d
The Central Government has on 27th February, 2014 notified the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules 2014 which shall come into force on 1st April, 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility Clause is applicable to every company having net worth of Rs. 500 crore or more, or turnover of Rs. 1,000 crore or more or a net profit of Rs. 5 crore or more.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has amended Schedule VII to the Companies Act. The Schedule contains activities which may be included by Companies in their Corporate Social Responsibility Policies. In Schedule VII for items (i) to (x) and entries relating thereto, the following items and entries shall be substituted:

i. Eradicating hunger, poverty and malnutrition, promoting preventive health care and sanitation and making available safe drinking water;

ii. Promoting education, including special education and employment enhancing vocation skills especially among children, women, elderly and the differently abled and livelihood enhancement projects;

iii. Promoting gender equality, empowering women, setting up homes and hostels for women and orphans; setting up old age homes, day care centers and such other facilities for senior citizens and measures for reducing inequalities faced by socially and economically backward groups;
iv. Ensuring environmental sustainability, ecological balance, protection of flora and fauna, animal welfare, agroforestry, conservation of natural resources and maintaining quality of soil, air & water;

v. Protection of national heritage, art and culture including restoration of buildings and sites of historical importance and works of art, setting up public libraries, promotion and development of traditional arts and handicrafts;

vi. Measures for the benefit of armed forces veterans, war widows and their dependants;

vii. Training to promote rural sports, nationally recognised sports, Paralympic sports and Olympic sports

viii. Contribution to the Prime Minister’s National relief Fund or any other fund set up by the Central Government for socio-economic development and relief and welfare of the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes and minorities and Women;

ix. Contributions or funds provided to technology incubators located with academic institutions which are approved by the Central Government;

x. Rural development projects.

levitra

PART C: Information on & Around

fiogf49gjkf0d
Professional Information seekers:

In
a bid to ward off the alleged menace of “professional RTI
complainants”, four assistant commissioners of the BMC have adopted a
strategy. These officers, posted guards and got CCTV cameras installed
at various ward offices to check their entry into the premises.

These professional complainants have lodged their grievances on building violations at least 200 times in more than four wards.

Assistant
commissioners termed this as a moneymaking venture. “This has become a
business for them (professionals). They lodge complaints and extort
money from people. They try to create an atmosphere of fear by either
threatening the civic officials or the people.”

An advocate,
named and shamed in a list of “professional RTI complainant
(extortionist)”, prepared by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, has
been vindicated after the civic body apologised, saying that his name
had been wrongly included in the list.

“It is humiliating for me
to be branded as a professional complainant. I complained about this to
the BMC chief and the state’s chief information commissioner,” said
advocate, Pankaj Pande.

The BMC then gave a clean chit to Pande stating that his name was included in the list by mistake.

RTI Activists not dead:

AAP
Chief Arvind Kejriwal’s obituary reference to four RTI activists at a
large public gathering in Ahmadabad left his supporters red-faced as
three of them are alive.

He said the four were killed for asking
awkward questions and hailed them as martyrs for the cause of society.
Kejriwal got the first victim’s name right, Amit Jethava, who was killed
outside the high court, the other three- Bhagu Dewani (Porbandar),
Minakshi Goswami (south Gujarat) and M Bhambhani (Diu)-in fact survived
attacks provoked by their activism.

Sanjay Dutt’s parole:

The
Yerwada jail authorities have refused to disclose details of Sanjay
Dutt’s parole to an RTI applicant, saying the actor had requested that
the reasons supplied in his application for parole be kept private.

Oshiwara
resident, Ramesh Patil, had made an RTI application to the jail in
October last year, asking to know the specific illness for which Dutt
was granted a 14-day furlough in September, which was extended by
another two weeks.

The jail’s reply to Patil also said that Dutt
was a “third person” and that Patil had nothing to do with the actor,
and had no locus standi to ask for details of the actor’s parole.

This
forced Patil to move the Appellate Officer for RTI at the jail;
expressing his objection to the unsatisfactory reply he was given.

Following
this, Patil was called for an RTI hearing on 11th February at Yerwada
jail. At the hearing, the authorities merely repeated what they had
communicated to him earlier. According to Patil, he was also shown a
letter allegedly written by Dutt requesting that his personal details be
kept private from unknown persons.

“Dutt is not a third person
but a convicted criminal undergoing punishment in jail; how can the jail
authorities say he is a ‘third person’? On 21st March, when Dutt is due
to return to Yerawada Central Jail, he would have spent 118 of his 305
days of imprisonment-almost 40% of the time he is supposed to serve
either on furlough for the treatment of his leg pain, or on parole
sought citing his wife Manyata’s illness. This clearly means any convict
can now write a letter and can escape from imprisonment, and if this is
the law, then I think it needs to be amended immediately,” Patil said.

levitra

PART B: RTI Act , 2005

fiogf49gjkf0d
RTI & CPA:

A City consumer forum has ruled that Complaints on RTI cannot be entertained under the Consumer Protection Act.

RTI & Political Parfies:

Political Parties, including the Congress and BJP, have ignored a four-week deadline set by the Central Information Commission (CIC) and could be liable for Rs. 25,000 fine or even de-registration.

The Commission had issued a showcause notice on 7th February to six national political parties – Congress, BJP, NCP, BSP, CPI and CPM – seeking an explanation on why they had not complied with its 3rd June order which mandated that the six parties came under the Information Act and must appoint public information officers to respond to RTI queries.

A full bench of the Commission had declared that the six political parties were substantially funded indirectly by the Central Government and they had the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they performed public functions.

The Commission had given them six weeks to comply with the RTI Act but so far none of the parties has followed the direction, prompting RTI activist Subhash Agrawal, who was one of the petitioners in the case, to file three non-compliance complaints before it.

Agrawal said the Commission should hold an early hearing and recommend stringent action, including deregistration of the parties, by the Election Commission.

The CIC can also fine the parties up to Rs. 25,000. The CIC inaction has been preceded by the government bringing a bill to exclude political parties from the ambit of RTI Act. Though the bill was tabled in Lok Sabha and received support from a House panel, it was finally not taken up.

The stringent opposition to “weakening” the Act and the message that political parties were against transparency led to the bill being put on hold. However, the CIC has dragged its feet in taking any action against parties clearly in violation its own order. (Courtesy: Times of India dated 10-03-2014)

Congress Manifesto:

Congress will release its election manifesto on 21st March; a document that the party believes will win it votes in the tough battle. Sonia Gandhi is scheduled to release the manifesto in the company of her son, Rahul.

One key issue is of reservation in the private sector, a poll promise from Congress in UPA-2. Congress also wants to hammer home its rights based approach like RTI, NREGA, etc., by promising those on health, pension and sanitation.

Maharashtra Information Commission:

With the appointment of new IC, Maharashtra now has 7 IC as under:

Maharashtra Information Commissioners

1. Ratnakar Gaikwad – Chief Commissioner, Mumbai
2. Ravindra Jadhav – Amravati
3. D. B. Deshpande – Aurangabad
4. Ms. T. F. Thekekara – Konkan
5. Ajitkumar Jain – Greater Mumbai
6. P. W. Patil – Nasik
7. M. H. Shah – Pune

levitra

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section B:

Revision of Consolidated Financial Statements pursuant to subsequent amalgamation of 2 subsidiaries with another subsidiary

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (31-03-2013) From the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The
consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended
31st March, 2013 were earlier approved by the Board of Directors at
their meeting held on 28th May, 2013 on which the Statutory Auditors of
the Company had issued their report dated 28th May, 2013. Consequent to
the Order dated 26th July, 2013 of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay
sanctioning the scheme of arrangement u/s. 391 and 394 of the Companies
Act, 1956 for amalgamation, with effect from 1st September, 2012, the
appointed date, of Sun Pharma Medication Private Ltd and Sun Pharma
Drugs Private Ltd into Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited (SPLL), all
wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, the financial statements of
SPLL were revised only to give effect to the said scheme of arrangement,
effective from 1st September, 2012. In view of the above, the earlier
approved consolidated financial statements are revised only to
incorporate the revised financial statements of SPLL.

From Auditor’s report on Consolidated Financial Statements (Extracts)

(a)
The consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended
31st March, 2013 were earlier approved by the Board of Directors at
their meeting held on 28th May, 2013 which were audited by us and our
report dated 28th May, 2013, addressed to the Board of Directors,
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Consequent to the Order dated 26th July, 2013 of the Hon’ble High Court
Bombay sanctioning the Scheme of arrangement for amalgamation of two of
the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, namely, Sun Pharma
Medication Private Limited and Sun Pharma Drugs Private Limited into
another wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, namely, Sun Pharma
Laboratories Limited, the financial statements of Sun Pharma
Laboratories Limited were revised to give effect to the said
amalgamation, effective from 1st September, 2012, the appointed date. In
view of the above, the earlier approved consolidated financial
statements are revised by the Company to incorporate the revised
financial statements of Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited. (Refer Note 56)

(b) Apart from the foregoing event, the attached consolidated
financial statements do not take into account any events subsequent to
the date on which the consolidated financial statements were earlier
approved by the Board of Directors and reported upon by us as aforesaid.

Our opinion is not qualified in respect of these matters.

Dated: 28th May, 2013 (9th August, 2013 as to effect the amendment discussed in the ‘Emphasis of Matter’ paragraph above).

Effect of amalgamation not given in view of pending approvals from all High Courts

Tech Mahindra Ltd. (31-03-2013)

From the Notes to the Financial Statements

The
Board of Directors of Tech Mahindra Limited in their meeting held on
21st March, 2012 have approved the scheme of amalgamation and
arrangement (the “Scheme”) which provides for the amalgamation of
Venturbay Consultants Private Limited (Venturbay), Satyam Computer
Services Limited (MSAT), C&S System Technologies Private Limited
(C&S), Mahindra Logisoft Business Solutions Limited (Logisoft) and
CanvasM Technologies Limited (CanvasM) with Tech Mahindra Limited
(TechM) u/s. 391 to 394 read with Sections 78, 100 to 104 and other
application provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The Scheme also
provides for the consequent reorganisation of the securities premium of
TechM. The Appointed date of the Scheme is 1st April, 2011.

The
Board of Directors of TechM has recommended to issue two fully paid up
Equity Shares of Rs. 10 each of TechM for every 17 fully paid Equity
Shares of Rs. 2 each of MSAT. As the other amalgamating companies are
wholly owned by TechM/MSAT, no shares would be issued to shareholders of
these companies.

The Bombay Stock Exchange and the National
Stock Exchange have conveyed to the Company, their no-objection under
Clause 24(f) of the Listing Agreement to the said Scheme. TechM has also
received approval of Competition Commission of India for the said
Scheme. The Scheme was approved by the requisite majority of the equity
shareholders of TechM and MSAT in the court convened meetings held on
7th June, 2012 and 8th June, 2012 respectively. A Separate Special
Resolution was also passed at the above mentioned meeting of the equity
shareholders of TechM held on 7th June, 2012, whereas the requisite
majority of the equity shareholders approved the reduction of its
securities premium account. Thereafter, TechM, Venturbay, C&S,
Logisoft and CanvasM had filed Petitions on 25th June, 2012 respectively
with the Honourable Bombay High Court seeking approval for the proposed
Scheme. The Petitions were admitted by the Honourable Bombay High Court
on 20th July, 2012 and the Honourable Bombay High Court has approved
the Scheme of Amalgamation and passed an order to that effect on 28th
September, 2012. MSAT had filed its Petition on 27th June, 2012 with the
Honourable High Court of Andhra Pradesh, and the said petition was
admitted on 9th July, 2012. Hearing in the matter is concluded before
the Honourable High Court of Andhra Pradesh closed for summer vacation
and the order is awaited.

The merger is effective only on the
last of the dates on which the certified copies of the orders of the
High Court of Judicature at Bombay and the High Court of Judicature at
Andhra Pradesh are filed with the Registrar of Companies (‘ROC’), Mumbai
and Pune, Maharashtra, and the ROC, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
respectively; and as the Approvals of High Court of judicature at Andhra
Pradesh is yet to be received, the effect of the merger is not
considered in the financial statements.

levitra

FROM THE PRESIDENT

fiogf49gjkf0d
Dear members of THE BCAS family,

As I sit down to write my last communication with you as the President of the Society, I have only one feeling – a feeling of utmost satisfaction. I have thoroughly enjoyed the privilege of communicating with you. Your response, feedback and critique have motivated me to air my views freely and frankly. On my part, it was a conscious decision to not reproduce ‘society news’ and more importantly, not to try and sound like an expert on a host of topics, most of which I know precious little about. Instead, I have used this medium of communication by sharing with you my thoughts in, what I would like to believe, a responsible manner. I thank the Publisher, Mr. Narayan Varma and the Editor, Mr. Anil Sathe for giving me a freehand.

You may wonder why I need to thank someone for the ‘freedom of expression’ accorded to me. Isn’t this my fundamental right? What’s the necessity to be thankful for something I was born with? But certain events of the recent times have left me wondering if this freedom of speech and expression could really be taken for granted.

For lack of any other index or benchmark, consider this – as per the 2013 World Press Freedom Index, India ranks a miserable 140th, out of the 179 countries on the list. Going by the number of books banned in India (example: The Satanic Verses), the number of art galleries vandalised (example: M F Husain’s paintings), the number of scholars condemned (example: Ashis Nandy) and the number of films censored (example: Ram Leela), it seems to me that the freedom of expression is not as much a right but a rare and precious privilege. In today’s times, when even the posts, likes and sharing on Facebook has met with dire consequences (example: Pune incidents), responsibility in using this privilege is the need of the hour.

I have often been plagued by questions on this fundamental right. What about you? Have these incidents irked you? What views have you formed from this? Is freedom of expression an absolute right? What does the law on this say? Is it a right that must be used at all times? Must one exercise every right just because it exists? Should one be tolerant to another’s views? My views have evolved over time and the evolution still continues.

We all know that Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, 1949 guarantees the freedom of speech and expression. But how many of us know that there are exceptions to this freedom? Anything that affects the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order or decency and morality or relates to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence, is prohibited. While most of these are unambiguous enough, there are a few grey areas, viz., public order, decency and morality.

The standards of decency and morality vary from time to time, place-to-place and person-to-person. At times, the greatest of issues go unnoticed while in other cases, the slightest provocation is enough to create a law and order crisis. I will admit, I am sometimes tempted to shout out to get heard, if only to vent frustration. Giving up my fundamental right of freedom of speech looks like a big thing then. But then, I wonder about the possible consequences. By speaking my mind, am I spreading hatred, creating animosity, causing harm to life and property and general mayhem? If so, then must I exercise restraint?

What wouldn’t we give for people to be tolerant and respectful of our right to say what we feel! But for that to be possible, we must first educate ourselves. If we want the right to speak, then we must also fulfill our duty to hear views which are divergent from ours. If we don’t agree with an ideology, let us learn to fight back with reason and not power. Let’s learn to attack the ideology and not the person. Alas, this isn’t the situation presently. Till the society matures, we will have to use our judgement and discretion on what we say out loud.

If I were to do a cost-benefit analysis of exercising my freedom of expression, here’s what I will ask: What do I achieve by speaking my mind? If my saying something wouldn’t impact the situation, will it affect anyone else? Will that effect be positive or negative? If it wouldn’t affect anyone else, will it help me in any way? If the good coming out, using my freedom of expression outweighs the bad, nothing in the world could, or should, stop me from saying what I feel. But if not, then I need to step back. As they say in Gujarati “Na bole nav gunn”.

Like me, all of us would be coming across such situations daily. What we forward or like on Twitter, WhatsApp and Facebook, all in the name of humor, has so much potential to cause discord. We ridicule communities by labeling them dumb, stingy and what not. We involve religious leaders/figures in our jokes. We forward half truths, unconfirmed ‘news’ and help spread fear and falsehood. What’s the good that is achieved?

Before I start sounding too preachy, let me however highlight that this phenomenon is not peculiar to just our country. Almost all democracies face this dilemma. Boycotts, fatwas and excommunications are rampant all around. Let us work towards creating an environment where all are free to speak their minds. Let’s educate ourselves so that we can identify and distinguish a mischief monger from amongst us and either let law take its course or ignore him completely as a non-serious person. Let’s abhor violence or taking law in our hands.

Over the last year, I have tried to air my views. I have tried to cover a wide range of topics, all with the intent of promoting a debate and hearing views different from mine. Fortunately, I have the satisfaction of succeeding in that. Your responses to my communiqué have been overwhelming. To those who encouraged me, thank you. To those who disagreed, I respect your views. As Voltaire said, “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” And If I have ,despite having no intention to do so, hurt anyone’s sentiments or sensibilities, I offer my apologies.

I thank you all and hand over this space to the incoming President, Nitin Shingala. I am sure you will give him as much love and affection as I received from you. Communicating with you has become a habit and I will miss you all.

Here’s wishing everyone happiness and love.

With Warm Regards

levitra

PART C: Information on & Around

fiogf49gjkf0d
BMC’s reluctance to provide information:

A classic case of efforts by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) officials to dissuade citizens from seeking details under the Right to Information (RTI) Act has come to light.

On 3rd September, Aftab Siddique, prominent activist from Khar, sent an RTI request to the municipal commissioner, seeking information about the number of Ganpati mandal permissions this year.

The commissioner’s office replied on 10th September, directing her to apply to the deputy commissioners. The deputy commissioner (removal of encroachment) and deputy commissioner Zone II.

Accordingly, she applied to both the deputy commissioners. The deputy commissioner (removal of encroachment) Anand Wagralkar informed her on November 8 that, as per a circular issued by the BMC, the information can be had only from the deputy commissioner Zone II, Kishore Kshirsagar.

Kshirsagar is the nodal officer for all matters related to Ganesh mandals.

Instead of collating the necessary information from the ward officers and providing it to Siddique, Kshirsagar gave copies of her application to all the 24 ward officers of Greater Mumbai. Siddique was shocked when 10 of the ward officers called her the same day – on 27th November.

“How am I supposed to be present at 10 ward offices the same day? This is nothing but an effort to sabotage my RTI, Kshirsagar has failed in his duty to obtain the information and pass it on to me,” she added.

Kshirsagar was unavailable for comment. His office said he was busy on a tour of the wards in zone II. Siddique said she wanted the information since several illegal Ganesh pandals were put up.

The spirit of the RTI Act is destroyed by such hostile attitude. Even though Kshirsagar may not be the primary Public Information Officer (PIO) under the law, he could have easily parted with the information, which must have been with him in his capacity as the nodal officer for Ganesh mandals.” she observed

Section 8 (1) (h) of the RTI Act:

The Prime Minister’s Office has refused to disclose communication exchanged between former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi during the 2002 Gujarat riots even after 11 years.

Responding to an RTI application, the PMO cited section 8(1) (h) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders.

The PMO did not give any reasons as to how disclosure of the information would attract section 8(1) (h) of the RTI Act even though the Delhi High Court has made it clear that cogent reasons must be given while denying information under the clause.

Section 2(h) of the RTI Act:

The Supreme Court has admitted ADAG Relianceled power distribution companies’ appeals seeking quashing of the Orissa High Court order that declared them as ‘public authorities’, thus bringing them under the purview of the RTI Act.

Reliance Infrastructure owned three discoms, engaged in the distribution and retail supply of Electricity in 23 districts of Orissa since 1999, had challenged the order arguing they are exclusively private bodies, and not public authorities within the meaning of section 2 (h) of the RTI Act, 2005.

levitra

PART B: RTI Act, 2005

fiogf49gjkf0d
Withdrawals of the Orders of CSIC:

State information commissioner Ratnakar Gaikwad on 4th December withdrew an order issued last month that imposed certain qualifications on obtaining building plans approved by the BMC under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

Gaikwad said the latest decision was taken “with a view to avoid confusion and practical difficulties in securing information about building plans”. Nonetheless, he urged that caution be exercised when demands for the plans of public utilities or buildings are made. “The authorities must consider if there may be some danger to national security or public safety if these plans are given.” If the answer is yes, the requests in such cases “should be declined as per the provisions of the RTI Act”.

This was the second time Gaikwad withdrew an order on the issue. Following criticism, an order dated 26th September was cancelled on 21st November and a new one issued. But that too met with disapproval. “The language and structure of both the orders perhaps made them look like blanket ban on disclosure of information relating to building plans, which was never the intention of the Commission and the Commission expresses regrets for it,” said Gaikwad.

While explaining the rationale behind the September order, Gaikwad said it was not taken suo motu. “Subhash Desai (Shiv Sena MLA) wrote to the Commission pointing out serious lapses committed by PIOs while furnishing information about building plans and violations of sections 8(a,d), 9 and 11 of the Act, which were dangerous for the country’s security.”

Desai enclosed news items that described how Maoists, through proxies, obtained information under RTI in Jharkhand and misused it for extortion, leading in some cases to the killing of contractors. The MLA requested the Commission not to provide information on public buildings. “Since the Commission was of the same opinion, an order was issued on 26th September.”

• Ms. Sushma Singh is appointed as chief central Information Commissioner w.e.f. 19-12-2013 Now the strength of the Commission is 9 memberschief CIC and 8 Information Commissioners as under:

• Shri Rajiv Mathur
• Shri Vijai Sharma
• Shri Basant Seth
• Shri Yasovardhan Azad
• Shri Sharat Sabharwal
• Mrs. Manjula Prasher
• Shri. M. A. Khan Yusufi
• Prof Madabhushanam Sridhar Acharyulu.

levitra

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section B:
• Creation of Reserve for Corporate Social Responsibility

Power Finance Corporation Ltd (31-03-2013)

From Notes to Accounts

The Company has formulated a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy in line with the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises (Department of Public Enterprises) vide Office Memorandum F.No.15(3)/2007 -DPE(GM)-GL-99 dated 09-04-2010. As per the CSR policy of the Company, a minimum of 0.5% of the consolidated profit after tax of the previous year will be allocated every financial year for CSR Activities, and Company was creating CSR provision for this purpose up to FY 2011-12. Now, the Expert Advisory Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has given opinion that unspent expenditure on CSR activities should not be recognized as provision, but a reserve may be created as an appropriation of profits. Accordingly, CSR provision of Rs. 16.39 crore (amount unspent as at 01-04-2012) has been reversed to the credit of the statement of profit & loss through prior period account, and CSR reserve of Rs 18.36 crore has been created as appropriation of profit, the details of which are as under:



Coal India Ltd (31-3-2013)

From Notes to Accounts
CSR Reserve
As per CSR Policy of the company a reserve equivalent to 2.5% of the retained profit of previous year is created for meeting expenses relating to CSR activities of Coal India Ltd. The same is utilised for execution of CSR activities in the states which are not covered by any subsidiary company and also for supporting CSR activities in loss making subsidiaries.

The subsidiaries of CIL also create a reserve equivalent to 5% of the retained earnings of previous year subject to a minimum of Rs. 5 per tonne of coal production of previous year, for meeting expense relating to CSR activities in the state to which the subsidiary belongs.

ECL & BCCL although have earned profits in the relevant previous year are still having accumulated losses which does not make it possible to create such reserves. As such, CSR reserve created by CIL continues to be utilised for CSR activities of ECL& BCCL also.

The actual expenses incurred and accounted for during the year is Rs. 23.73 crore transferred to General Reserve from CSR Reserve as utilised.

Further CSR expenses of Rs. 1.67 crore charged to statement of profit & loss in earlier years and remaining to be transferred to General Reserve from CSR Reserve is also transferred to General Reserve during the year.

• No provision for impairment of Goodwill arising on Consolidation

Mahindra Forgings Ltd (31-3-2013)

From Notes to Accounts of CFS

Goodwill amounting to Rs. 60,065 lakh arises on consolidation of wholly owned subsidiaries the subsidiaries namely MFGL and MFIL and their step down subsidiaries Mahindra Forgings Europe AG (MFE AG) and its wholly owned subsidiary companies namely Jeco Jellinghaus GmbH, Schoneweiss & Co GmbH, Gesenkschmiede Schneider GmbH and Falkenroth Unfirmtechnik GmbH (collectively referred to as step-down subsidiaries). Due to downturn in the economic situation in Europe, the market demand declined significantly impacting the sales and profitability of MFE AG and the step down subsidiaries.

Necessary actions are being taken in MFE AG to:

• Improve the operating efficiencies and align the cost structure in line with current market demand.
• Enhanced Focus on exploiting the synergies of business in Europe and India.
• Closely monitor the performance with increased periodic reviews to facilitate timely corrective actions to improve profitability.

The management also considers the current market situations, to be temporary and expects that together with its above actions the company should turnaround its performance in the next few years planned.

Therefore, in the opinion of the management, there is no impairment of the goodwill.

From Auditors’ Report on CFS
Emphasis of Matter

We draw attention to Note no. XXVI(8) of the consolidated financial statements and for the reasons detailed therein the management of the Company does not perceive any impairment in the value of Goodwill of Rs. 60,065 lakh arising on consolidation of the subsidiaries in view of the measures for improving financial performance being taken by the management of the Company. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.

• Change of period of operating cycle

Tecpro systems ltd (31-03-2013)

From Notes to Accounts

In the previous year, the operating cycle was determine to be 12 months in view of the varying nature of contracts, customers, payment terms, project duration etc. Basis further analysis and considering additional guidance/clarity available related to implementation of revised schedule VI, the management is of the view that the Company has multiple operating cycles which are determined on the basis of the distinguishing features and characteristics of various categories of contracts.

Due to change in operating cycle during the current year, figures for the previous year have been regrouped for meaningful comparison of current and previous year classification. The impact of regrouping on significant financial statement items if summarised below:

levitra

FROM THE PRESIDENT

fiogf49gjkf0d
Dear members of BCAS family,

Appearing for any of the CA exams? I am not going to wish you luck, for I don’t believe in luck. Let me instead extend my congratulations to you for choosing this profession. It is one of the most respected, versatile and lucrative professions. I say this with confidence as I have received all this thanks to my being a CA. This profession has given me a solid grounding. It is not superficial. Thanks to the hours put in for the exams, I have proved to myself that I can work very hard if the situation calls for it. A very important aspect in my future career. All the juggling that we, as CA students, have to do between the library, coaching classes, office and then yet being socially active, teaches us the need for planning and prioritising. This is something that all successful people do all the time. It is thanks to the solid grind that this profession has given me, which encompasses self-study, articleship and tough exams, that I have benefitted a lot. That’s the power of the reputation of this course.

But for me the most important gain was the in-depth exposure to the businesses of my clients during articleship and thereafter. While the curriculum gave me financial acumen, I learned commerce from client interaction. This came in good stead when I headed business units for an MNC. Today, CAs can be seen in all walks of life. “Versatile CA” as the BCAS calendar for this year says. Mr. Nandan Nilekani – in politics and in the legislature, Mr. Shekhar Kapoor – in the film industry, Mr. Deepak Parekh -in the banking industry, Mr. Prannoy Roy and Mr. Ronnie Screwvala – in the media, to name a few. All these luminaries are CAs.

All of them went through the same rigmarole as I did and now you will. They had a dream and so do you. They worked hard and smart at the same age as you all are today. Are you willing to work hard too?

Recently we had Mr. Nilesh Vikamsey speak to over 400 students on how to study for the exam. He gave some excellent practical tips and tricks. The video is available on BCAS WebTV. Please do view it.

My daughter is appearing for her IPCC this May. As a father, I am pained to see her put in so many hours preparing for her exams. I am aware of so many parties, outings and other programmes she gives a skip. She doesn’t show it but I am sure she must be sad and somewhere deep down has doubts. Both, on whether she can clear her exams and whether all this is worth it. Fortunately, I am a CA and having gone it through myself, I know exactly what her state of mind is. But seeing her toil so much, much more than I did, I am confident she will triumph. If it is of any solace, let me tell you that sadly every CA student goes through this state of mind. And when you clear the exam all that is forgotten. You walk taller.

Hard work never killed anyone. But hard work has a pattern. Our bodies are designed to withstand hardships when we are young and healthy. With age, your ability to work hard diminishes. The smart people recognise this and put in as much hard work in their younger age and reap benefits of that as they grow older. Even if you want to one day at the age of 50 decide that now you will work hard, your body will not support you. So while you could and had no need, you didn’t and when you needed and were willing, the body failed you. Think what is smarter.

That doesn’t mean that it should be all work and no play. But what is the right balance? Should play be a reward for all the hard work or should hard work be a filler between the partying? If you take the 16-17 hours of your waking time, how much of these can be devoted to studies? Are 9-10 hours too much? The average hours put in daily by a working individual are over 10 hours. The really ambitious ones do this and more, easily and happily. Take any successful person as an example. Would Sachin Tendulkar have been the world’s best and most revered cricketer if not for the hours of practice he put into the sport at a very young age? At the start of his career, Shah Rukh Khan slept on the streets of Mumbai and worked day in and out to now become known as the King Khan. Till date he is reputed to be a workaholic. Dhirubhai Ambani was born in a middle class family. He made the famous Ambani family. He started working towards his goal from a very young age.

If you are appearing for the exams this May then you have already dreamt of being a CA, invested some time in either self-study or attending coaching classes, many of you even cleared IPCC and started articleships. But you have developed self-doubts; confidence is wavering, frustration setting in. Right? This is no time for such emotions. I urge you to not give up now. In fact, give it your best. Study like you have never studied before. Work hard. Take care of your health. Indulge in your favourite activities to refresh your minds. Eat well. Sleep well. Hug your parents. Pray not for results, but the ability to work hard. Assume the results will be just 3% again and believe you will be part of that 3%. Go watch Chak De! again. Watch that motivational speech again and again. He who perspires in practice bleeds not in war. If you dream of heaven, be prepared to die for it.

May I request all my CA friends reading this, to convey this message to their article students in their office and outside.

I once again compliment all the students. Yashasvi Bhavva.

Here’s wishing everyone happiness and love.

With Warm Regards
Naushad A. Panjwan

levitra

PART C: Information on & Around

fiogf49gjkf0d
Travel on Delhi Buses:

Data accessed through RTI has revealed that around 600 drivers of Delhi Buses are reportedly colour blind but are in service with the help of fake medical certificates. The issue has been highlighted by Information Commissioner M. Sridhar Acharyulu to Delhi CM Arvind Kejariwal.

RTI extortionists

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has prepared a list of 77 regular complainants who file bulk applications under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, seeking details of building plans to allegedly extort money from property owners.

The P-North Malad ward office has compiled a list of individuals who send RTI applications seeking details of under-construction or existing buildings and shops. Ward officials have received complaints from shop-owners that these applicants then demand money from them or threaten them with action.

“Minor irregularities such as putting up a grill or extension of a shop’s entrance by a few feet can be demolished by the BMC or regularized after paying a penalty. But these professional complainants extort money in exchange of a promise that no BMC action will be initiated on the structure,” said a civic official from the ward.

Worse, in case ward officials initiate action against the structures, these very complainants write to politicians and municipal commissioners against their initiative.

He added that while RTI is a useful tool, several individuals have started misusing it. “We conducted this exercise since it is getting difficult for us to differentiate between genuine RTI applications and frivolous ones. After the list was prepared, these 77 people have stopped sending in their application.”

Pay Rs. 55.43 lakh to get information!

Two senior regional transport officials in Thane face disciplinary action for demanding a “fee” of Rs. 55.43 lakh for providing information that is supposed to be given out free of cost under the Right to Information Act.

The complainant, Anil Mahadik, filed an RTI application at the regional transport office, seeking details of the number of autos and permit-holders in Thane. All it required for Public Information Officer I S Muzumdar, who is the Assistant Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner Sanjay Dole was to take a printout of the details-73,993 autos of which 36,887 had permits-which were readily stored in their computers, and hand them over to Mahadik. Instead, the two officials chose to harass the RTI applicant and demanded Rs 55.43 lakh from him as a fee for the information that they promised to compile in a CD.

After being apprised of the incident, Chief Information Commissioner Ratnakar Gaikwad rebuked Muzumdar and Dole for “irresponsible behaviour and ignorance of law” while disposing the RTI application by Mahadik. He directed transport commissioner V N More to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the two RTO officials and inform his office of the action by next month. Also ruling that the information should be provided to Mahadik free of cost and that all RTOs should display details of vehicles in their areas on their websites. Gaikwad told More to comply with the orders and submit a compliance report to his office.

(From the Times of India dated 24.01.2014)

levitra

PART B: RTI Act, 2005

fiogf49gjkf0d
Area Appeals Pending Complaints Pending
HQ 140 148
Greater Mumbai 5,394 550
Konkan 3,741 107
Pune 5,937 220
Aurangabad 3,262 493
Nashik 4,803 62
Nagpur 1,591 582
Amravati 4,184 1,256
Total 29,052 3,418
Above sad state of pendency worries all, specially, those who have to wait as long as two years to get hearing in one’s appeals or complaint. Chief information commissioner, Mr. Ratnakar Gaikwad has written to the Governor to prod the government to appoint Information Commissioners in five pending vacancies.

Public Concern for Government Trust has public interest litigation pending since more than a year in Bombay High Court in this connection.

levitra

FROM THE PRESIDENT

fiogf49gjkf0d
Every one of us eagerly waited for and watched Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s historic address to the Nation from the Red Fort on our 68th Independence Day. Over the last several years, a major ailment that has afflicted the vast majority, especially the educated middle class, is corrosive cynicism, as pointed out by the noted thinker Pratap Bhanu Mehta. He berated that the cynicism had become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Few believed anything could change, and so little changed. With this exhilarating address, the Prime Minister reinforced a much-needed hope that things can and will certainly change. The Prime Minister has rightly exhorted the Citizens to shed the attitude of “Mera Kya” and “Mujhe Kya” and contribute to the Nation building. This inspiring address will go a long way in helping the Citizen overcome the cynicism. Let us be a part of the change instead of remaining shackled as an argumentative Indian.

In this address, the Prime Minister raised an important and extremely critical issue that has been largely unaddressed in Independent India. An all pervasive filthiness has plagued large parts of our beloved country. A search on Google reveals millions of web pages full of articles about filth in India with nasty comments that make us feel deeply ashamed. Some critiques also allege that Indians by nature are unhygienic! The then environment minister Jairam Ramesh went to the extent of saying that if there was to be a Nobel Prize for dirt and filth, India would get it.

It has come as a pleasant surprise that the topmost leader in independent India is leading from the front in the combat against this menace of filth. Given the magnitude, this push coming from the highest level was perhaps overdue. As rightly stated by the Prime Minister Modi, the solution requires whole-hearted participation from every single Citizen of India. Mahatma Gandhiji made cleanliness an important priority in his ashrams, teachings and writing. He gave us the golden quote “Cleanliness is next to Godliness” He also said “…a meticulous sense of cleanliness, not only personal, but also in regard to one’s surroundings is the alpha and omega of corporate life”. Indeed a Clean India will be the right tribute to Mahatma Gandhi on his 150th birth anniversary in 2019. Let us all commit ourselves to this noble cause and contribute our mite to it.

It is not just physical space, the way society conducts itself has been affected by this filth. Corruption has enhanced the decline in ethical standards. Various institutions and organisations too have been afflicted by this malaise of corruption. They are in need of urgent clean-up as well. A case in point is recent revelations exposing corruption in Judiciary by Justice Katju in his blog. This has created a storm and triggered a debate about one of the most important pillars of our democracy. In reply to allegations that exposing corruption defames the judiciary, Justice Katju has rightly asked: does corruption by Judges defame the judiciary, or does exposing such corruption defame it? Hitherto, the response from the custodians has been largely to brush such issues under the carpet.

Going by the well-known quote by the U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, “Sunlight is the best disinfectant” from his book “Other People’s Money, and How the Bankers Use It” published in 1914, such open forum discussions will certainly help in the clean-up process. Incidentally, Justice Brandeis, while being a counsellor to President Woodrow Wilson, continued his investigations of the implications for democracy of the growing concentration of wealth in large corporations and set down his anti-monopoly views in this book that remain relevant even 100 years after it was first published.

In this season of being candid and forthright, the RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan, while delivering a lecture last month, expressed his concerns about crony capitalism. It was an admission that allegedly the rich and the influential have received land, natural resources and spectrum in return for payoffs to venal politicians. He lamented on how the vicious circle has perpetuated, whereas the poor and the underprivileged need the politician to help them get jobs and public services. The crooked politician needs the businessman to provide the funds that allow him to supply patronage to the poor and fight elections. The corrupt businessman needs the crooked politician to get public resources and contracts cheaply. And the politician needs the votes of the poor and the underprivileged.

The Governor suggests direct cash transfer instead of the promise of free or cheap public service as a solution to this problem. He believes that the financial inclusion and direct benefits transfer can be a way of liberating the poor from dependency on indifferently delivered public services, and thus indirectly from the venal but effective politician. This new approach seems ambitious and puts faith in the market economy. Let us hope that this innovation will eliminate corruption, reduce poverty and drive India towards true political independence.

As per the Annual Report of the Ministry of Finance for 2013-14, the gross non-performing assets (NPA s) of the public sector banks (PSBs) increased from Rs.1,55,890 crores (GNPA Ratio 3.84%) in March, 2013 to Rs.2,04,249 crores (GNPA Ratio 4.44%) in March 2014 (provisional). The Ministry reasons that the increase is due to sluggishness in the domestic growth in the recent past, slowdown in the recovery in the global economy and continuing uncertainty in the global markets. The recent arrest of the Chairman and Managing Director of a Public Sector Bank, however, suggests that growing political and bureaucratic interference in governance of the PSBs that has led to corrosive corruption is perhaps the major factor behind increase in the NPA s.

It seems that no lessons have been learnt from past episodes of such scandals and consequent bailouts. Bank finance is one more area that is in dire need of a clean-up. The debate is on as to how to improve the quality of governance in banks. Various suggestions are pouring in. However, the most effective remedy lies in stern and timely actions against the highly connected perpetrators without fear or fervour. While addressing recent meetings in Haryana and Maharashtra, the Prime Minister has termed corruption as a “disease and sin” deadlier than cancer and reiterated his Government’s commitment to banishing it from the country. One hopes these statements will translate into concrete and quick actions and help change the reality on the ground.

On the BCAS front, the new committees are lining up a slew of activities. The Human Resources Committee with the help of the Youth Brigade has planned a very ambitious program “JhanCAr”, a “Togetherness and Networking Carnival” for Chartered Accountants on 13th and 14th December, 2014. Do go through the announcement and look for further details of this very exciting event.

By the time this message reaches you, we will be celebrating the Teachers’ Day on 5th September. Our profession requires each one of us to be a student as well as a teacher and hence this day is special for us as well. I fondly remember all my Gurus, including my principals and seniors during my articleship and at the BCAS, and offer my deepest respect to each one of them. When we remember our great teachers, we should also think of how we should be a good teacher and mentor to the younger generation and be remembered for having inspired them and bringing positive changes in them.

levitra

Cancerous Corruption

fiogf49gjkf0d
“BJP defending communalism with nationalism.
Congress defending corruption with secularism. India living with
corruption as nationalism.”
– Ranvir Shorey.
Actor

Anti-Corruption Bureau of Maharashtra:

The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) plans to set up regional and zonal
offices across the city and state, following its success in trapping
many bribe-seeking government officials recently. Its office is in a
remote place at Pochkhanawala Road in Worli, and is not easily
accessible. The registration of complaints online has not helped much.
The ACB sources said the home department is likely to approve the plan
soon. If all goes according to plan, the ACB, like the Mumbai police
commissionerate, in the initial stages will be able to set up at least
four regional offices in the South, Central, North-West and North-East
Mumbai.

• The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) on 17th July launched
four mobile vans that will transverse the city and encourage citizens to
register corruption cases on the spot. Home minister R. R. Patil
flagged off these vehicles at the ACB’s Worli office.

The vans,
each manned by four cops, will be deployed in four regions of the city.
The south region van carrying banners with anti-corruption slogans shall
move in the areas of Mantralaya, the Bombay High Court, the old custom
house, sessions and other metropolitan courts, Public Works Department,
BMC, state and city police headquarters etc.

Director-General of
Police (ACB) Praveen Dixit said, “Our motto is to reach out to more
people who are compelled to pay bribes. Generally, people avoid
approaching us, but if we are at their doorstep we feel it would make a
lot of difference.” Additional CP, Vishwas Nangre-Patil said that on the
first day there was a good response from the public.

• A deputy
collector, a public works executive engineer, a senior police
inspector, and a principal of a leading college were among the 508
public servants trapped by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) in 375 graft
cases in the first four months of 2014. Significantly, in the entire
last year; the ACB had arrested 281 erring officials in 216 cases.
According to ACB records, the highest number of erring officials caught
this year was from the State Home Department (87), followed by Revenue
Department (79), Municipal Corporations (25), State Electricity
Distribution Company (16) and land records (11). More shocking was the
fact that a few senior police inspectors were caught taking bribes in
the police station itself. Admitting that the data was worrying, Mumbai
Police Commissioner, Rakesh Maria said he was determined to end the
menace. “I had a meeting with all deputy, additional and joint police
commissioners, and have drafted a comprehensive action plan to take on
the erring officials. The results will be visible in a time-bound
period,” he said. “We have prepared a list of the erring officers. We
will counsel them and take action against them. But if there is no
improvement, we ourselves will submit the list to the ACB for further
action.”

• In the above connection, it is interesting to note
what Mr. Julio Rebeiro, Chairman of Public Concern for Governance Trust
wrote in July to Mr. Pravin Dixit. Same is reproduced hereunder:


Graft Busters: Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) directorgeneral Pravin
Dixit has analysed every case registered by them under the Prevention of
Corruption Act. Significantly, his report on department-wise analysis
and the bribe details has been uploaded on the ACB’s website. Dixit
analysed the data of 36 departments and found that even for a minor
task, a bribe of Rs. 3 lakh is sought. In the civic body, one does not
get an NOC without paying off clerical staff, even for an early hearing
before the minister of state for revenue one has to shell out a bribe.
There was scope for graft in deletion or addition of names in the ration
card. The bribe amount was small, but alterations were not made without
greasing the staffer’s palm. From Dixit’s investigation, it has been
established beyond doubt that without coughing up money, even routine
work was not possible for a common man. According to the graft
investigator, in the departments of home, revenue, public health, public
works, law and judiciary, finance, urban development, energy, transport
or education, kickbacks were the norm. Dixit has done his job, if
bureaucrats study the report and amend the existing procedure for
obtaining routine certificates, it will be a huge relief for the aam
aadmi.

“Our intern, Rafael Pereira has helped to devise a
complaint in a Whatsapp format to facilitate anybody with a mobile
internet connection to make a complaint to the ACB whenever one comes
across an instance of corruption. The web based application may also
prove to be an attraction for the youth who are mostly electronic-savvy
and make them involved in the anti-corruption campaign.

We, at
the Public Concern for Governance Trust (PCGT), are ready to bear the
cost of the server and in collaboration with The Bombay Coding Company,
will be able to produce the application free of cost to ACB, in public
interest.

Hope we can start work on this application right away with your final nod.”

Transparency International
Corruption Perceptions Index 2013: Corruption remains a global threat:

• The Corruption Perceptions Index, 2013 serves as a reminder that the abuse of power, secret dealings and bribery continue to ravage societies around the world.

The
Index scores 177 countries and territories on a scale from 0 (highly
corrupt) to 100 (very clean). No country has a perfect score, and
two-thirds of countries score below 50. This indicates a serious,
worldwide corruption problem.

The world urgently needs a renewed
effort to crack down on money laundering, clean up political finance,
pursue the return of stolen assets and build more transparent public
institutions.

“It is time to stop those who get away with acts of
corruption. The legal loopholes and lack of political will in
government facilitate both domestic and cross-border corruption, and
call for our intensified efforts to combat the impunity of the corrupt.”

– Huguette Labelle, Chair, Transparency International

• Hereunder 10 countries with highest score:


Corruption and Media:
Research has shown that free and vibrant media is associated with lower corruption and a better response from governments.

Rudiger
Ahrend of the London School of Economics investigated connections
between corruption, human capital and press freedom in 30 countries. He
convincingly shows that lower level of press freedom is associated with
higher level of corruption throughout the world. The interesting part of
the finding was that mere increase in educational levels does not lead
to reduction in corruption. Corruption falls only in cases where higher
levels of education among the electorate are accompanied by increase in
freedom of press. In fact, a standalone increase in education sometimes
leads to increased corruption as the educated elite collude with
nefarious elements in society.

The above conclusions are not based on mere existence of negative correlations between freedom of press and corruption. Careful academic studies control for the influence of other factors that can influence both variables under study. For example, it is possible that some countries are less corrupt because of cultural reasons. It is possible that such countries also have a free press. Thus the driving force behind lesser corruption may be the dominant culture.

To control for such influences researchers use country fixed effects, which take care of all time invariant factors that are common to a country. it is possible that corruption gets reduced only during a year or so due to some event, such as the Anna Hazare movement. Such influences are taken care of by using time invariant effects. researchers also control for the impact of time varying factors such as economic growth, openness to trade, etc. After controlling for the influence of all these factors, they robustly estimate that increased press freedom is associated with lower levels of corruption.

Corruption Charge Against The Judge of The Bombay high court:
In a first of its kind courtroom drama, a defendant leveled allegations of corruption against a Bombay high Court judge, and asked her to recuse herself from the matter. The incident occurred during the hearing of the case between the Kuwaiti Royal family and film producer Sanjay Punamiya, pertaining to ownership of a Marine Drive flat. Punamiya’s advocate told the court that he was allegedly promised a favorable order if he coughed up rs. 25 lakh, and that he has filed a complaint against the judge with Chief justice of HC, CBI, among others and hence she should not hear the case.

Justice Roshan Dalvi, who was hearing the case, however, refused to relent and said that she will continue hearing the case. she asked for a copy of the complaint that Punamiya’s lawyers OD Kakade and Nilesh Ojha had filed against her. She then went through the nine-page complaint, while counsels representing faisal essa, former Kuwaiti consul- general and caretaker of the property waited.

The complaint alleged that Punamiya met justice dalvi’s husband shamim dalvi in march through another lawyer, and alleged that he was promised a favorable order in the case to be heard by justice dalvi if paid the amount. the meeting allegedly took place on 19th april in shamim dal- vi’s office at Yusuf Building in Fort. “Shamim Dalvi told the applicant (Punamiya) that he will have to pay an amount to get a favourable order.”

It is now reported:
Film producer sanjay Punamiya, who is facing contempt proceedings after he accused the Bombay high Court justice roshan dalvi of corruption, has once again tendered an unconditional apology to the judge, and has also submitted an assurance that he will not make such allegations against the high Court judges.

Placing  the  contempt  proceedings  before  Chief  justice mohit shah, justice dalvi noted that apologies tendered by Punamiya and his lawyers were “unacceptable,” that the affidavit filed by them shows “aggravated contempt.” She also noted that Punamiya and his lawyer had made “false unsubstantiated, scandalous and contemptuous allegations about the court’s integrity.”

Punamiya, now represented by senior counsel Pradeep sancheti, told a high Court division bench of Chief justice Mohit Shah and justice M. S. Sonak that he wanted to submit an affidavit withdrawing the allegations.

The  bench  drew  the  attention  of  sancheti  to  the  provisions of section 13(b) of the Contempt of Courts act, 1971, which provides that in any contempt proceeding, truth would be a valid defence if the court is satisfied that the allegations were true and in public interest.

Chief justice shah and justice sonak noted: “the appellant (Punamiya) wants to unconditionally withdrew the allegations set out in his letter/representation dated 5th may, 2014 and that he wishes to tender unconditional apology to this court with an assurance that he would not indulge in making such allegations against this court or any of the judges of this court.”

[All the above stories and information have been excerpt- ed from various press reports.]

ICAI and its members

fiogf49gjkf0d
1. Some Ethical Issues
The Ethical Standards Board of ICAI has given answers to some Ethical Issues on pages Page 37 – 38 of C. A. Journal for July, 2014. Some of these issues are as under:

(i) Issue:
Whether a firm can obtain an assurance engagement at a significantly lower fee level than that charged by the predecessor firm or quoted by other firms?

When a firm obtains an assurance engagement at a significantly lower fee level than that charged by the predecessor firm, or quoted by other firms, the threat created will not be reduced to an acceptable level unless;

(a) The firm is able to demonstrate that appropriate time and qualified staff are assigned to the task; and
(b) A ll applicable assurance standards, guidelines and quality control procedures are being complied with.

(ii) Issue:
When does the situation for Potential Conflict arise?

When the responsibilities to an employing organisation and the professional obligations to comply with the fundamental principles are in conflict, the situation of potential conflict arises for the Professional Accountant in service.

(iii) Issue:
What is the distinction between the two schedules to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949?

The two schedules are distinguished on the basis of gravity of misconduct and quantum of punishment for the misconduct, the second schedule pertains to a comparably graver misconduct and higher punishment.

(iv) Issue:
Can a member in practice render Management Consultancy and other services?

Yes, however, the areas covered under the Management Consultancy and other services have been summarised by the Council, appearing in the Code of Ethics, 2009 Edition.

(v) Issue:
Whether a member in practice is permitted to undertake the management of NRI funds?

No, a member is not permitted to undertake such assignment because the same is not covered under “Management Consultancy and Other Services” permitted to be rendered by the practicing members of the Institute.

(vi) Issue
Can a Chartered Accountant provide “Portfolio Management Services’ (PMS) as part of CA practice?

No, the Explanation to Clause (xix) of the definition of ‘Management Consultancy and other Services’ expressly bars the activities of broking, underwriting and Portfolio Management.

2. EAC Opinion
Accounting Treatment of Dividend Declared by Mutual Fund in Debt Fund Scheme under Dividend Re-Investment Plan.

Facts
A company (hereinafter referred to as ‘the company’) is a Maharatna Central PSU engaged in mining of coal having touched a production of 452 million tones during the 2012- 13 fiscal year. The company is a direct holding company of nine subsidiaries out of which eight are registered in India and the ninth one is registered in Mozambique.Two of its direct subsidiaries have further three and two sub-subsidiaries, respectively. Further, there are few joint ventures and associate companies which also form part of group accounts. The consolidated turnover of the company for the year 2012-13 was Rs. 88,281 crore with profit before tax of Rs. 24,979 crore. The main object of the company is to produce or otherwise engage generally in the production, sale and disposal of coal and its by products.

The company has stated that the company and its subsidiaries have surplus funds which are invested in bank Fixed Deposits (F.Ds) as well as in mutual funds (debt fund scheme). While the bank Fixed Deposits are shown under the Note ‘cash & bank balances,’ the investment in mutual fund is shown under the Note ‘current investments’ in the balance sheet. The term of the mutual fund is dividend re-investment plan which signifies that the dividend accruing on daily basis of Net Assets Value (NAV) of the scheme as on the date of declaration of dividend, results into increase in the number of total units held by the company.

Query:
In the above background, the company has sought the opinion of the EAC as to whether the dividend declared on a daily basis and credited in the form of additional units in the mutual fund account under debt fund dividend reinvestment plan should be recognised as revenue income as on the date of balance sheet in the final accounts of the company even if the same has not been redeemed/ encashed. If yes, the value at which such recognition is to be made? Or the present conservative practice of the company of not recognising the dividend declared and re-invested in the mutual fund–dividend re–investment plan on the balance sheet date due to non-encashment of such additional units be continued?

Opinion:
In view of the requirements of paragraph 13 of AS 9, the Committee notes that dividend income should be recognised at the time when the unit holder’s right to receive the payment thereof is established. The Committee is of the view that the right to receive is established when dividend is declared. In the extant case, the Committee notes from the Facts of the Case that dividend is declared on a daily basis and credited to the account of the company, which is represented by units determined on the basis of NAV per unit under initial investment of the units. This is reflected in the mutual fund account statement of the company. The Committee also notes from the Dividend Policy under one of the Schemes in the Key Information Memorandum, which is provided by the querist for the perusal of the Committee, that such reinvestment option was available in respect of a liquid fund wherein payout option on a periodic basis was also available. Thus, dividend was realisable both in cash or in kind, i.e., in the form of units of the fund as per the option exercised by the investor. The Committee is further of the view that nature of dividend would not change due to opting for reinvestment of dividend. Change in the value of reinvested units as a function of market price is a separate risk from the risk of investor’s right to receive the dividend. Accordingly, the Committee is of the view that the present practice of the company to defer the dividend declared and re-invested in the mutual fund scheme till the actual redemption of units and realisation of cash is not correct, rather it should be recognized as and when right to receive the dividend is established.

As regards the value at which dividend and investment should be recognised, the Committee is of the view that revenue from dividend should be recognised at the value of dividend received. Similarly, investments should be recognised at the issue price on the date of acquisition of each unit of mutual fund. With regard to any decline in the value of investments occurring subsequently due to market risks involved in mutual fund, viz., fluctuations in the NAV vis-à-vis interest rates etc., the Committee is also of the view that since current investments are carried at lower of cost and fair value, such decline/impairment in value of investment would be recognised while valuing the investments at the reporting date.

(Pl. Refer page nos. 65 to 67 of the C. A. Journal – July,2014)

3. I CAI News i) The following Campus Placement Programme for newly qualified C.As. has been organised by the ICAI during the months of August and September, 2014 (P. 119)

ii) Instructions to Members (P. 124) (a) A ppointment of Auditor of Government/Deemed Government Company:

As per relevant provisions of section 139 of the Companies act, 2013, the auditors of a government/ deemed government Company  are  to  be  appointed  by the Comptroller and auditor general of india, therefore it is instructed that members should not take up the statutory audit of any government/deemed government Company without getting the appointment letter issued by the O/o C & AG.

(b)    The hon’ble President of india addressed the iCai international Conference held in Kolkata in november, 2013. the gist of his address: (P.117)

In present times, we live in a world which offers a vista of opportunities for those who can handle the accompanying serious challenges. The subprime crisis and Eurozone crisis had adversely impacted the global economy including the BRICS nations. The same have reinforced of role of accounting professionals in discharging their responsibility to create public trust. Ethical standards would result in fruitful communication to stakeholders. a highly robust framework was required in the accounting/auditing/financial reporting, Psu accounting and accounting innovation. The ICAI has a big role to play in furthering india’s economic growth by providing inputs to the government in various fields as well as effective implementation of schemes such as mgrega.

Company Law

fiogf49gjkf0d
Full version of the Circular/Notification can be accessed at http://www.mca.gov.in

1. Clarification on Rules relating to Appointment and Qualification of Independent Directors.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide General Circular No 14/2014 dated 9th June, 2014 has issued Clarifications regarding –
a)
Pecuniary relationship of Independent Directors – in view of the
provisions of section 188 of Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”),
transactions in the ordinary course of business at arm’s length price
are not to be considered under pecuniary relationship.
b) R eceipt
of remuneration by Independent Director – clarified after consultation
with SEBI that ‘pecuniary relationship’ u/s. 149(6)(c ) of the Act, does
not include receipt of remuneration from one or more companies, by way
of fee provided u/s. 197 (5) of the Act for reimbursement of expenses
for participation in the Board and other meetings and profit related
commission approved by the members.
c) It is clarified that any
tenure of an Independent Directors on the date of commencement of the
Act shall not be counted for his appointment/holding of office of
Director under the Act. In view of the transitional period of one year
it is necessary that if it is intended to appoint Independent Directors
under the new Act, it must expressly be made u/s. 149(10)/(11) read with
Schedule IV of the Act, within one year from 01-04-2014.
d) A
ppointment of Independent Director for less than five years: The
appointment of an Independent Director is for a term ‘upto five years’
and hence for shorter periods is permissible. However, terms of lesser
periods would be treated as ‘term’ and an independent Director cannot be
appointed for more than ‘two consecutive terms.’
e) A ppointments of Existing Independent Directors would also need to be formalised by a letter of appointment.

2. Clarification regarding Register of Loans/Guarantee/ Security/making acquisition in the new format u/s. 186(9).

With
regard to the Register of Loans/Guarantee/Security/ making acquisition
to be maintained u/s. 186(9), read with Rule 12 of the Companies
(Meeting of Board and its Powers), the Ministry of Corporate Affairs
vide General Circular No. 15/2014 dated 9th June, 2014 has clarified
that the register maintained u/s. 372A of the Companies Act, 1956 would
remain and the new format would be applicable w.e.f 01-04-2014.

3. Clarification regarding PAN of Foreign Nationals.

The
Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide General Circular dated 10th June,
2014 No 16/2014, has further to the Circular No. 12/2014, clarified that
the circular for the Pan No. of Foreign Nationals was applicable to
subscriber/ promoter at the time of incorporation of the Company. In
absence of PAN, he shall furnish an undertakingin the prescribed format
attached to the circular, as an attachment to Form INC7.

4. Clarification regarding Filing of Form MGT-10.

The
Ministry of Corporate Affairs has vide General Circular No. 17/2014
dated 11th June, 2014 has informed stakeholders to fill Form MGT 10
physically, signed/certified by a professional and file it alongwith
required attachments in GNL-2 as a temporary arrangement till the Form
MGT-10 is made available.

5. Clarification for Filing of Form
INC-27 – for Conversion of Company from public to Private under the
provisions of Companies Act, 2013.

The Ministry of Corporate
Affairs vide General Circular No. 18/2014 dated 11th June, 2014, has
clarified that since section 14 (1) and 14(2) of Companies Act, 2013
have not been notified, the relevant section 31(2A) shall remain in
force and the delegated powers shall continue to remain with the ROC’s.
Thus applications have to be filed and disposed as per the earlier
provisions.

6. Clarification regarding matters relating to Share capital and debentures under Companies Act, 2013.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide General Circular No. 19/2014 dated 12th June, 2014 has clarified that:

a)
S hare transfer forms executed before 01-04-2014 – Form SH-4 is now to
be used as the new share Transfer Form w.e.f 01-04-2014 in place of
earlier 7B. It is clarified that where Form 7B is submitted to the
company within the period prescribed, it has to accept the registration
of transfers. In case of delay, the Company can decide to not accept the
transfer form and convey reasons for the nonacceptance as per
provisions of section 56(4) of the Act.
b) D elegation of powers by
Board under Rule 6(2)(a) – The Ministry has clarified that as per
section 179 and 180 and Regulation 71 of Table F of Schedule 1, for the
issue of duplicate share certificates can be delegated to a Committee of
Directors subject to regulations imposed by the Board.

7. Clarification with regard to voting through electronic means.

The
Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide General Circular No. 20/2014 dated
17th June, 2014 has decided not to treat the relevant provisions of
section 108 of Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 20 of Companies
(Management and Administration) Rules 2014 dealing with the exercise of
vote by members by electronic means as not mandatory till 31st December,
20I4 as compliance with procedural requirements, engagement of
Depository Agencies and the need for clarity on matter like demand for
poll/ postal ballot etc., will take some more time. The e-voting
procedure, clarifications on issues by stakeholders are provided in the
Annexure to the Circular.

8. Clarifications with regard to provisions of Corporate Social Responsibility u/s. 135 of the Companies Act, 2013.

The
Ministry of Corporate Affairs, vide Circular No. 21/2014, dated 18th
June. 2014, issued clarifications with regard to provisions of Corporate
Social Responsibility u/s. 135 of the Companies Act, 2013. The
following is clarified for CSR:

i. T he statutory provision and
provisions of CSR Rules, 2014, is to ensure that while activities
undertaken in pursuance of the CSR policy must be relatable to Schedule
VII of the Companies Act 2013, the entries in the said Schedule VII must
be interpreted liberally so as to capture the essence of the subjects
enumerated in the said Schedule. The items enlisted in the amended
Schedule VII of the Act, are broad-based and are intended to cover a
wide range of activities as illustratively mentioned in the Annexure.

ii.
It is further clarified that CSR activities should be undertaken by the
companies in project/programme mode [as referred in Rule 4 (1) of
Companies CSR Rules, 2014]. One-off events such as
marathons/awards/charitable contribution/advertisement/ sponsorships of
TV programmes etc., would not be qualified as part of CSR expenditure.

iii.
Expenses incurred by companies for the fulfillment of any Act/Statute
of regulations (such as Labour Laws, Land Acquisition Act etc.) would
not count as CSR expenditure under the Companies Act.

iv. S
alaries paid by the companies to regular CSR staff as well as to
volunteers of thecompanies (in proportion to company’s time/hours spent
specifically on CSR) can be factored into CSR project cost as part of
the CSR expenditure.

v. “Any financial year” referred under s/s.
(1) of section 135 of the Act read with Rule 3(2) of Companies CSR
Rule, 2014, implies ‘any of the three preceding financial years.’

vi.
E xpenditure incurred by Foreign Holding Company for CSR activities in
India will qualify as CSR spend of the Indian subsidiary if, the CSR
expenditures are routed through Indian subsidiaries and if the Indian
subsidiary is required to do so as per section 135 of the Act.

viii.    Contribution to Corpus of a trust/society/section 8 companies etc., will qualify as Csr expenditure as long as (a) the trust/ society/section 8 companies etc., is created exclusively for undertaking Csr activities or (b) where the corpus is created exclusively for a purpose directly relatable to a subject covered in schedule Vii of the act.

9.    Notification    for    Companies    (Acceptance    of deposits) Amendment Rules, 2014.

The ministry of Corporate affairs has on 6th june, 2014 has amended the Companies (acceptance of deposits) rules 2014, by insertion of proviso to rule 5(5) namely “Provided that the Companies may accept deposits without deposit insurance contract till 31st march, 2015.”

10.    Notification of section 74(3) and 74(2) relating  to repayment of deposits etc., accepted before commencement of the Act

The  ministry  of  Corporate  affairs  has  vide  Notification dated 6th June, 2014 notified that the provisions relating to s/s. 2 and 3 of section 74 of Companies act, 2013 are in force from 6th june, 2014.

11.    Amendment to Companies (Meetings and Powers of board) Rules, 2014.

The ministry of Corporate affairs has vide Notification dated 12th june. 2014 amended the Companies (meetings and Powers of Board) rules, 2014, by inserting rule 6 after explanation as follows:

“Provided that public companies covered under this rule which were not required to constitute audit Committee u/s. 292a of the Companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956) shall constitute their audit Committee within one year from the commencement of these rules or appointment of independent directors by them, whichever is earlier:

Provided further that, public companies covered under this rule shall constitute, their nomination and remuneration Committee within one year from the commencement of these rules or appointment of independent directors by them, whichever is earlier.”

12.    Amendment to Companies (declaration and Payment of dividend) Rules, 2014.

The  ministry  of  Corporate  affairs  has  vide  Notification dated 12th june, 2014 amended the Companies (declaration and Payment of dividend) rules, 2014 to substitute rule 3(5) as follows:

“3(5) no Company shall declare dividend unless  carried over previous losses and depreciation not provided in previous year or years are set off against profit of the Company of the current year.”

13.    Clarification with regard to format of annual return applicable for Financial year 2013-14 and fees to be charged by companies for allowing inspection of records
.

As per the provisions of section 92 of the act, 2013 it is required for very company to submit the annual return in format as given in form MGT-7 containing the particulars as they stood on the close of the financial year where- as as per section 159 of the Companies act, 1956, the annual return gave the position from the date of last annual general meeting till the date of current annual general meeting.

To clear the confusion, the Ministry has now clarified that the  format  of  annual  return  under  act,  2013  (form  – MGT-7) shall not be applicable to the Companies whose financial year ended on or before 1st April, 2014, i.e., the Companies are to file the Annual Return as per the old format (schedule V) as per act, 1956 within 60 days from the date of agm in form 20B. Fees for inspection of records and other documents.

Companies have also sought clarity on fees for allowing free of cost inspection of records under rule 14(2) and rule 16 of the Companies (management and administration) Rules, 2014. The ministry has clarified that until the requisite fee is specified by companies, inspections could be allowed without levy of fee.

14.    Clarification relating to incorporation of a Com- pany, i.e., Company incorporated outside india.

The ministry of Corporate affairs has vide Circular dated 25th june, 2014 informed that as per sections 2(68), 2(71) and 2(87) of the Companies act, 2013 there is no bar in the new act for a company incorporated outside india to incorporate a subsidiary either as a public company or a private company. an existing company, being a subsidiary of a company incorporated outside india, registered under the Companies act, 1956, either as private company or a public company by virtue of section 4(7) of that act, will continue as a private company or public company, as the case may be, without any change in the incorporation status of such company.

15.    Clarification with regard to holding shares in a fiduciary capacity by associate Company u/s. 2(6) of Companies Act, 2013.

The ministry of Corporate affairs has vide Circular dated 25-06-2013, in continuation of the general Circular no. 20/2013 dated 27-12-2013 clarified that the shares held by a company in another company in ‘fiduciary capacity’ shall not be counted for the purpose of determining the relationship of ‘associate company’ u/s. 2(6) of the Companies act, 2013. u/s. 2(6) “associate company,” in relation to another company, means a company in which that other company has a significant influence, but which is not a subsidiary company of the company having such influence and includes a joint venture company. Explanation — For the purposes of this clause, “significant influence” means control of at least 20% of total share capital, or of business decisions under an agreement.

16.    Clarification on applicability of residency requirements for resident director.

As per section 149(3) of the Companies act, 2013 every company must have at least one director who has stayed in india for a total period of not less than 182 days in the previous calendar year. The Ministry has clarified vide Circular dated 26th june, 2014 that the ‘residency requirement’ would be reckoned from the date of commencement of section 149 of the act, i.e., 1st april, 2014. The first ‘previous calendar year’ for compliance with these provisions would, therefore, be calendar year 2014. The period to be taken into account for compliance with these provisions will be the remaining period of calendar year 2014 (i.e., 1st april to 31st december). Therefore, on a proportionate basis, the number of days for which the director(s) would need to be resident in india, during calendar year 2014, shall exceed 136 days.

Regarding newly incorporated companies it is clarified that companies incorporated between 01-04-2014 to 30-09-2014 should have a resident director either at the incorporation stage itself or within six months of their incorporation. Companies incorporated after 30-09-2014 needs to have the resident director from the date of incorporation itself.

17.    Clarification with regard to use of the words’ Commodity Exchange” in the Company registration.

The ministry of Corporate affairs vide Circular dated 27th June, 2014, has clarified that the words Commodity Exchange’ in the name of the Company can only be allowed when a “No Objection Certificate” from the Forward Markets Commission (fmC) is furnished by the applicant. Also clarified that the NOC would also be required in cases of Companies registered with the words ‘Commodity exchange’ before the issue of this circular.

18.    Extension for filing of Form DPT 4 under Companies Act, 2013.

The ministry of Corporate affairs has granted extension of time for the period of two months, i.e., upto 31-08-2014 for filing of the Statement regarding deposits existing on the date of commencement of the Companies act, 2013 in form dPt 4 as per provisions 74(1) (a) under the act and Companies (acceptance of deposits) rules, 2014.

19.    Clarification on Form MGT 14 through STP mode.

The ministry of Corporate affairs vide Circular dated 9th july, 2014 has tried to simplify procedures for timely disposal of e-forms by taking the form MGT-14 on record using the straight through Process mode in all cases except in cases of change of name, objects clause, resolution for further issue of capital and conversion of companies.

20.    Registration of Names of Companies must be in Consonance with the Provisions of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of improper Use) Act, 1950.

The ministry of Corporate affairs vide circular dated 11th july, 2014, has directed ROC’s that when allotting names to Companies/LLP’s they must ensure that names of Companies must be in consonance with the Provisions of the emblems and names (Prevention of improper use) act 1950.

21.    Clarification on matters relating to related party.

The ministry of Corporate affairs has vide Circular dated 17th July, 2014 clarified the following in relation to related parties:

i.    For the second proviso of section 188(1), related party that cannot vote refers to the related party with reference only to the contract or arrangement for which the special resolution is being passed.

ii.    U/s. 188 – it is clarified that the requirements of section 188 will not be attracted for transactions arising out of Compromises, arrangements and amalgamations, dealt with under specific provisions of Companies act, 1956 or 2013.

iii.    Contracts already entered into  by  the  Company u/s. 297 of Companies act, 1956 before the commencement of section 188 of the Companies act, 2013, i.e., before 01-04-2014 will not require fresh approvals till the expiry of the original term unless any modification thereto is made.

22.    Extension of Validity of reserved Names.

The  ministry  of  Corporate  affairs  has  vide  Circular  no. 31/2014 dated 19-07-2014 intimated with respect to extension of time for the validity of reserved names made in form inC-1 under the Companies act, 2013 for which the service provider of mCa-21 has brought to the notice of ministry that there are numerous cases in this respect which allows the applicants to use the name approved within 60 days but that is at variance with the implementation at MCA thereby causing inconvenience to the stakeholders. Out of these cases, 1930 cases were those whose time limit expired on or before 19-07-2014, therefore it has been decided to extend the timeline upto 18th august, 2014. Further, those cases in which the names have been reserved but they are yet to be issued, the time period as indicated in the letters of intimation is allowed.

23.    Clarification on transitional period resolution passed under Companies Act, 1956.

The ministry has vide general Circular no. 32/2014 dated 23rd July, 2014 clarified that resolutions approved or passed by companies under relevant applicable provisions of the old act during the period from 1st september, 2013 to 31st march, 2014, can be implemented, in accordance with provisions of the old act, notwithstanding the repeal of the relevant provision subject to the conditions (a) that the implementation of the resolution actually commenced before 1st april, 2014 and (b) that this transitional arrangement will be available upto expiry of one year from the passing of the resolution or six months from the commencement of the corresponding provision in New Act whichever is later. It is also clarified that any amendment of the resolution must be in accordance with the relevant provision of the new act.

24.    Applicability of Second Proviso to section 203(1).

The  Central  government  vide  Notification  dated  25th July, 2014, has notified that for the purposes of applicability of second proviso to section 203 (1) of Companies act 2013 pertaining to individuals not be appointed or reappointed as the chairperson of the company, in pursuance of the articles of the company, as well as the managing directoror Chief Executive Officer of the company at the same time.
The following Class of companies:
•    Public companies with paid up capital of Rs. 100 core or more; and
•    With annual turnover of Rs. 1,000 crore or more (both as per the latest audited Balance Sheet); and
•    engaged in multiple businesses; and
•    have appointed Chief Executive Officer for each business shall be exempt.

25.    Cost Records and Cost Audit.

The ministry of Corporate affairs has on 2nd july issued notification relating to the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) rules, 2014 u/s. 148 of the Companies act, 2013. the new rules specify four classes of companies, i.e.:
i.    Companies engaged in the production of specified goods in strategic sectors,

ii.    Companies engaged in an industry regulated by a sectoral regulator or a ministry or department of Central government,

iii.    Companies operating in areas involving public interest,

iv.    Companies (including foreign companies other than those having only liaison offices) engaged in the production, import and supply or trading of fol- lowing medical devices….

Which shall be required to maintain cost records and who will be subject to cost audit. relevant e-forms would be made available on the MCA portal shortly.

26.    Amendment to the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014.

the ministry of Corporate affairs has vide Notification dat- ed 30th june, 2014 amended the Companies (Prospec- tus and allotment of securities) rules, 2014 whereby in rule 14, in sub-rule (2), in Clause (a), after the second proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:—

“Provided also that in case of an offer or invitation for non-con- vertible debentures referred to in the second proviso, made within a period of six months from the date of commencement of these rules, the special resolution referred to in the second proviso may be passed within the said period of six months from the date of commencement of these rules.”

27.    Amendment to the Companies (Miscellaneous) Rules, 2014.

The ministry of Corporate affairs vide Notification dated 17th  july,  2014,  has  amended  the  Companies  (miscellaneous) rules, 2014, by inserting

“11. applications or forms pending before Central gov- ernment,  regional  director  or  registrar  of  companies.- Any application or form filed with the Central Government or regional director or registrar (hereinafter referred to as `the authority’) prior to the commencement of these rules but not disposed of by such authority for want of any information or document shall, on its submission, to the satisfaction of the authority, be disposed of in accordance with the rules made  under  the  Companies  act,  1956 (1 of 1956).”

28. Companies (Specification of definitions details) Amendment Rules 2014.

the ministry of Corporate affairs has vide Notification dated 17th July, 2014 specified that in Rule 3 to the Companies (Specification of Definitions Detail) Rules, 2014 after the words ‘a director’ the words ‘other than an independent director’ shall be inserted.

30.  Amendment  to    the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014

the  ministry  of  Corporate  affairs  has  vide  Notification dated  24th  july,  2014  has  amended  the  Companies (management and administration) rules, 2014. in rule 9, after sub-rule (3), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-
“Provided that nothing contained in this rule shall ap- ply in relation to a trust which is created, to set up a mutual  fund  or  Venture  Capital  fund  or  such  other fund as may be approved by the securities and exchange Board of india.”

In rule 13,- (a) the words “either value or volume of the shares” shall be omitted;
(b)    The explanation shall be omitted.

In rule 23, in sub-rule (1), for the words “not less than five lakh rupees,” the words “not more than five lakh ru- pees” shall be substituted;

In rule 27, in sub-rule (1) and in the explanation, for the word “shall,” the word “may” shall be substituted.

Ethics and u

fiogf49gjkf0d
Shrikrishna (S) — Arey Arjun, we are meeting after a gap of four months. Where were you?

Arjun (A) — I was on a vacation. Now the war of audit and tax returns has started. So I resumed.

S — T hat may not be the only reason. You are looking quite disturbed.

A — Y es, very much. I am very unhappy with you.

S — O h! Why? What have I done?

A — A fter Mahabharata, you said you are introducing Kaliyug. That is the era of evil.

S — Y es. That was the plan of Brahma – the Creator. I am also bound by that.

A — But it is rather too much! Things are unbearable.

S — I t was bound to happen. It was predicted thousands of years ago.

A — Y es. But my friend is having such a nightmarish experience! I have lost my sleep. Henceforth, I will not trust anyone and will not help anyone! Not even close relatives.

S — But we had discussed the hazards of ‘good faith’ many times in the past. As a professional, one should have some skepticism.

A — T rue. But one of my CA friends had earlier helped his cousin out of the way. The cousin was like a vagabond, never settled in life.

S — Quite normal. Then?

A — O nce this cousin came to my friend and said he would start some big venture. He said some financier was willing to finance 90% of cost if he showed that he had 10% of his own.

S — T his is also normal. What next?

A — S o he requested my friend to give him a cheque of about 40 lakhs so that he could show it to the financer.

S — A nd your friend in good faith must have obliged him!

A — Y es! And now he is in deep trouble!

S — I can guess!

A — He wandered for four to five months from one financer to the other. And after five months, before the validity expired, he simply put it into his bank.

S — S o, your friend lost 40 lakh.

A — N o! What has happened is even worse than that!

S — O h! The cheque bounced?

A — Yes. And the cousin filed a suit under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

S — But he has to prove why the cheque was given.

A — H e fabricated a story that my friend had agreed to employ him on a salary of Rupees two lakh – per month; and he never paid for about two years! Now he paid it and the cheque bounced!

S — But, he has to prove it.

A — I n fact, my friend told the court that he was a low profile practitioner and would never even dream of employing any person on such a high salary! He had a CA working for him at about 40000 rupees whereas his cousin was not even qualified!

S — T hen wasn’t the Magistrate convinced?

A — That is the Kaliyug! It is difficult to prove a truth! S — I agree. It is difficult. But ultimately, truth alone will triumph.

A — That is alright. But for that, one has to sacrifice one’s life. He is convicted with six months’ imprisonment!

S — H as he not contested it?

A — H e has. But God alone knows when he will get justice. And on top of it, our Institute has initiated disciplinary proceedings against him!

S — Oh! Adding fuel to the fire! Poor fellow.

A — N ow we don’t know what view the Institute will take. While issuing the cheque, obviously there was no balance in my friend’s account.

S — I t is a big lesson for all of us. One needs to be ultracautious!

A — But, I want to ask you, if you are God, then this is your ‘Leela’ only. Why do you do such things? What pleasure you get out of it?

S — M aybe, in his earlier birth, your friend might have ditched someone. I need to see the records!

A — But now, you are also my cousin!!

S — H a! Ha!! Ha!!!

Note: The above dialogue between Sri Krishna and Arjuna describes one of those instances where a simple act, done by Members in good faith, can prove fatal. This act, though done out of innocence, may be regarded as a misconduct under Clause(2) Part IV Schedule I by the Institute, i.e., bringing disrepute to the profession. Hence, one needs to be very cautious and see to it that nothing is done in ‘good faith’ without proper documentation/safeguards

levitra

PART C: Information on & Around

fiogf49gjkf0d
Pending RTI Appeals & Complaints at Information Commission:

It is reported by Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) that huge pendency continues in various Commissions. The top two being:

Maharashtra – 34,158 as on 30-05-2014
Central – 21,946 as on 30-05-2014

Former Delhi CM Sheila Dikshit:

CM once had said: “If you cannot afford the electricity bill, then cut down your consumption.” Yet when it came to her electricity consumption, it was beyond imagination: She was using:
31 Air Conditioners
15 Desert Coolers
16 Air Purifiers
25 Heaters
12 Geysers

The above information was obtained by RTI query filed by RTI activist Mr. S.C. Agrawal. In reply the Central Public Works Department said that an expense of Rs. 16.81 lakh was incurred on the electrical renovation of the bungalow to customise it according to the needs of the then chief minister.

Sophisticated and Normal Weapons For Mumbai Police:

RTI activist, Chetan Kothari, procured following details in response to RTI query.

Sophisticated weapons acquired by state government for city cops, post 26/11:

40mm under barrel grenade launcher 391
Corner shot weapon system 15
Projector grenade 73
Rocket launcher 14
Automatic grenade launcher 50
Sniper rifle 8
51mm mortar 44
Cord detonating explosives (Meters) 475

Normal Arms and Ammunition procured after 26/11:
7.62 SLR Rifle 29,373
Glock pistols 1,277
AK-47 Rifle 3,975
9mm pistols 1,000
Stun Gun (N / E) 2,000
Tear Gas Gun 94
5.56 Insas Rifle 3,916
Machine gun (MP5, A3/%, SD6, KN) 2,061
9mm automatic pistols 1,029
Bullet Proof Jackets 4,500
5.56 Insas LMG 532

Reply also stated: These sophisticated weapons have been mainly procured from the US and Germany.

Mumbai police spokesperson DCP Mahesh Patil said the department has been using sophisticated weapons post 26/11. “These weapons provide the force with an added edge to combat any terror like situation. Experts from companies that deliver these weapons train the force in using them.

Deaths In 3 Civic Hospitals:
Right to Information query into the deaths in Mumbai’s civic – run hospitals threw up disturbing statistics – over the past 13 years one lakh patients died in Sion hospital, Ghatkopar’s Rajawadi Hospital and Mumbai Central’s BYL Nair Hospital.

RTI activists Anand Pargaonkar’s query was directed to all public hospitals in the city, but authorities of only three hospitals provided him with statistics of their mortality rate. Between 2001 to 2013, at Rajawadi hospital, 16,014 out of the 55 lakh patients (including out patients) died. At Nair hospital 29,650 out of 33 lakh admitted patients passed away. Most shockingly, 63,313 out of 1.94 crore patients admitted at Sion hospital died in this period. On an average, eight patients died in these hospitals every day.

Unit Trust of India:
In response to my RTI application, UTI provided me the information sought but also wrote:

 In this connection, we wish to inform you that Hon’ble Bombay High Court has granted stay on the order dated 6th August 2008 passed by the Central Information Commission on applicability of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act, 2005), on UTI Mutual Fund, UTI Asset Management Company Ltd and UTI Trustee Company Ltd. pursuant to a Writ Petition filed by these entities. As such the matter is sub-judice and the RTI Act, 2005 is not applicable on all the above entities.

levitra

PART B: RTI Act, 2005

fiogf49gjkf0d
Note: out of 21 items of Western India RTI Convention 2014 Declaration, 1 to 9 were reported in July ’14 issue of BCAJ. 10 to 21 are reported here under:

As
citizens and activists committed to building a transparent and
accountable democracy we have gathered together from more than 15 States
and Union Territories across the country in the city of Mumbai to
celebrate our victories, and to discuss and strategies to squarely face
current challenges. In this Western India RTI Convention, we pledge our
commitment to protect our constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights
and particularly emphasising the freedom of speech and expression which
is the bedrock of a free and democratic society in the absence of which
our right to information would lose much of its meaning and value. On
this day the 8th of June, 2014, we express our solidarity with all RTI
users, activists and their families who have suffered attacks on them
and resolve to defend our right to access information and express our
opinions without fear and pledge in particular to struggle to achieve
our collective vision as follows-

10. S everal serious problems
are plaguing the functioning of Information Commissions across the
country which must be urgently addressed by the appropriate authorities.
The Supreme Court’s direction in the Namit Sharma case which requires a
fair and transparent process for the appointment of information
commissioners from diverse fields of experience and expertise, must be
immediately implemented and shortlisted candidates be subject to
credible public scrutiny about their track record of supporting the
regime of transparency. The minutes of the selection committees must be
disclosed proactively. The number of Information Commissioners must be
determined through an assessment of the workload in each Information
Commission as the pendency is reaching alarming levels denying people
their fundamental right to information.

11. A ll Information
Commissions must set up a mechanism to monitor compliance with its
decisions and in particular with its orders imposing penalty on Public
Information Officers and recommendations for taking disciplinary action
against those who are violating the provisions of the Act persistently.
We express our deep concern over some pronouncements of High Courts
denying the appellant or complainant the opportunity to participate in
penalty proceedings before the Information Commissions. Appellants and
complainants must have the opportunity of participating and presenting
their views in all penalty proceedings which they have caused to be
launched and copies of all replies of the PIOs and deemed PIOs must be
shared with them in person as well displayed on the websites of
Information Commissions and the concerned public authorities.

12.
We are deeply concerned about several judgements of the Supreme Court
that are resulting in the curtailment of the scope of people’s right to
information and the express and implied powers of Information
Commissions. RTI users and activists in particular and the people in
general, must discuss and debate the implications of these judgements to
form a strong public opinion in favour of defending and expanding the
mechanism and processes of transparency established by the RTI Act.

13.
A s the exemptions u/s. 8 of the RTI Act are adequate for protecting
important public interests, all security and intelligence organisations
notified by the Central and State Governments u/s. 24 must be reviewed
immediately and such notifications should be withdrawn.

14. We
demand that all laws enacted by Parliament and the State Legislatures
conform to the regime of transparency established by the RTI Act. We
demand the immediate withdrawal of provisions that curtail the scope of
the people’s right to information in other laws and Rules such as the
Collection of Statistics Act, 2008, The National Investigation Agency
Act, 2008, The Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 2010, and the
Information Technology Rules, 2009. All authorities must ensure that no
Bill, Act, rule, regulation, or executive order curtails people’s
fundamental right to information as guaranteed by the Constitution.

15.
We appreciate the Central Government’s recently instituted policy on
pre-legislative consultation and demand that all Governments immediately
adopt a legally mandated process for formulating any law or policy
through widespread consultation with and effective participation of the
people. All draft MOUs and leases that the governments propose to sign
must be proactively disclosed to the people to enable them to give their
suggestions for change. 16. We demand that appropriate constitutional
mechanisms be put in place requiring the Central Government to place all
international treaties it signs before ratification before Parliament.
After signing treaties, they should be put out in the public domain,
subject to the exemptions provided under section 8 of the RTI Act.

17.
We demand that information about the finances, expenditure and working
of all societies, trusts, trade unions, cooperative societies, religious
and charitable institutions be made accessible to people under the RTI
Act.

18. We believe that WE THE PEOPLE, are the rightful owners
of our country’s natural resources. We demand equity and people’s
participation in decision making combined with complete transparency,
accountability in the management and use of all natural resources.

19.
We demand transparency in the ownership and the source and manner of
funding of all mass media agencies. Methods of enforcing accountability
of the media sector to the people must be explored, while protecting the
right to freedom of expression and the freedom of the press guaranteed
by the Constitution.

20. We are deeply concerned about the
attacks on the attempts to curb people’s right to free speech and
expression, especially those who voice political dissent or raise issues
of public concern in a democratic and constitutional manner. We are
also anguished by recent targeted attacks on academics for publishing
their research. We protest against all attempts at criminalising the
legitimate expression of dissent under Section 66A of the Information
Technology Act and demand withdrawal of all actions launched against
persons with the motive of punishing them for exercising their right to
free speech and expression.

21. We affirm all resolutions passed
at the workshops (annexed to this Declaration) held at the Western
India RTI Convention 2014.

levitra

PART A: Decision Of CIC

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section 8 (1) (i) of the RTI Act:
Facts:
Vide
RTI application dated 14-05-2013, the appellant sought copies of
documents including a copy of the cabinet decision in respect of certain
recommendation relating to pension of ex-servicemen and civilians.

CPIO/under secretary (pension policy) declined to provide the copies of documents sought as the same were graded as ‘secret’.

Before
the Commission, CPIO submitted that the Cabinet Secretary has made
certain recommendations dated 17-08-2012 relating to pension of ex –
servicemen and civilians, which was graded as ‘secret’. Orders accepting
these recommendations were issued on 17-01-13. However, as the document
was graded ‘Secret’ and the process of downgrading is pending, the
information sought was denied. Appellant submitted that there is no
secrecy involved and he should have been provided the information
sought.

Decision:
“Section 8 (1) (i) of the RTI Act
states that notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, there shall
be no obligation to give any citizen, Cabinet papers including records
of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other
officers, provided that the discussions of Council of Ministers, the
reasons thereof and the material on the basis of which the discussions
were taken, shall be made public after the decisions have been taken and
the matter is complete.”

“In the instant case, the
recommendations of the Committee have been accepted and formal orders
issued on17-01- 13. As such, the matter is complete as per the
provisions of section 8 (1) (i) and denial of information not tenable.”

The
Commission directed the CPIO to provide the information sought to the
appellant within two weeks from date of receipt of the order.

[P.K.
Bhargavan Pillai vs. Ministry of Defence, (Dept. of Ex Servicemen
Welfare (Pension Policy), New Delhi, File No. CIC/SS/A/2013/002508/RM,
Decided on: 24.04.2014, Citation: RTIR II (2014) 242(CIC)].

Substantially Financed
Vide
Clause 5 of the Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2014 certain amendment in section
10 of the Income- tax Act has been made which shall be effective from
the first day of April 2015. Relevant item therein is Clause (23 C) of
section 10.

Said Clause 5 (a) reads as under:
(a) In Clause (23C), –
(i) after sub-Clause (iiiac), the following Explanation shall be inserted, namely –

“Explanation,
– For the purposes of sub Clauses (iiiab) and (iiiac), any university
or other educational institution, hospital or other institution referred
therein, shall be considered as being substantially financed* by the
Government for any previous year, if the Government grant to such
university or other educational institution, hospital or other
institution exceeds such percentage of the total receipts including any
voluntary contributions, as may be prescribed, of such university or
other educational institution, hospital or other institution, as the
case maybe, during the relevant previous year”.

Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, defines the term “public authority”. Relevant provisions read as under:
(h) “public authority” means any authority or body or institution of self – government established or constituted-
(a)……..
(b)……..
(c)……..
(d) By notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government, and includes any –
(i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed*;
(ii) non – Government organisation substantially financed*,
directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government;

Recently,
CIC in the case of Madan Mohan Priva vs. Jan Kalyan Shiksha
Samiti/Samkalp has opined on sub Clause (d) of section 2 (h). I
reproduce some relevant paragraphs from the order:

“As per the
above definition before an NGO can be held to be Public Authority u/s.
2(h) (d) (ii), it has to satisfy the condition that it is “Substantially Financed.”

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Indian Olympic Association vs. Veeresh Malik and Ors (2010) IL R 4 Delhi 1] with regard to substantial financing has observed that the term “substantially financed” has not been defined.

*Highlighted by the author
According to the Legal Glossary – 1992 (published by the Govt. of India) the term means: finance:

1. the pecuniary resources of a government or a company.

2.
to provide with necessary funds. Oxford’s Shorter English Dictionary
defines the term “substantial” as follows: S ubstantial…. An adjective…

3. Of ample or considerable amount or size; sizeable, fairly large.

4. Having solid worth or value, of real significance; solid, weighty; important, worthwhile…

The
term “substantial” denotes something of consequence, and contrary to
something that is insignificant or trivial. It implies a matter of some
degree of seriousness. The question is whether the term itself suggests,
in the context of “substantial financing” a predominant or overwhelming
financing. In other words, does “substantial” read with “financing”
mean that the major funding should from the relevant source, i.e., state
or governmental source”.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in
Thalappalam Ser. Coop Bank Ltd & Ors. vs. State of Kerala [2013 (12)
SCALE 527] as to what is “substantial financing” has observed that:

“36.
The words “substantially financed” have been used in sections
2(h)(d)(i) and (ii), while defining the expression public authority as
well as section 2(a) of the Act, while defining the expression
“appropriate Government”. A body can be substantially financed, directly
or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government. The
expression “substantially financed”, as such, has not been defined under
the Act. “Substantial” means “in a substantial manner so as to be
substantial”. In Palser vs. Grimling (1948) 1 All ER 1, 1 (HL), while
interpreting the provisions of Section 10(1) of the Rent and Mortgage
Interest Restriction Act, 1923, the House of Lords held that
“substantial” is not the same as “not substantial” i.e. just enough to
avoid the de minimis principle. The word “substantial” literally means
solid, massive etc. Legislature has used the expression “substantially
financed” in sections 2(h)(d)(i) and (ii) indicating that the degree of
financing must be actual, existing, positive and real to a substantial
extent, not moderate, ordinary, tolerable etc.

38. Merely
providing subsidiaries, grants, exemptions, privileges etc., as such,
cannot be said to be providing funding to a substantial extent, unless
the record shows that the funding is so substantial to the body which
practically runs by such funding and but for such funding, it would
struggle to exist.
The state may also float many schemes generally
for the betterment and welfare of the co operative sector like deposit
guarantee scheme, scheme of assistance from NABARD etc., but those
facilities or assistance cannot be termed as “substantially financed” by
the State Government to bring the body within the fold of “public
authority” under section 2(h)(d)(i) of the Act. But, there are
instances, where private educational institutions getting 95% grant – in
– aid from the appropriate government, may answer the definition of
public authority under section 2(h)(d)(i).”

[Madan Mohan Priva
vs. Jan Kalyan Shiksha Samiti/Samkalp, File No.: CIC/AD/A/2013/000269 –
SA, Decided on: 30-05-2014, citation RTIR II (2014) 262 (CIC), Order
delivered by M. Sridhar Acharyulu, Central Information Commissioner].

[Ch. Rama Krishna Rao vs. Naval Ship Yard, Port Blair, (third Party: shri r. ajit Kumar) decided by the full bench on 05-05-2014. file no. CiC/Ls/a/2012/002430/rm.]

From published accounts

fiogf49gjkf0d
Section B:
• Provisions made pursuant to consent decree filed by FDA, USA prohibiting the company from manufacturing and distributing from one facility in to the US market and consequent comments in Audit Report (including CARO)
• Change in accounting policy for ESOPs pursuant to opinion of EAC of ICAI
• Write-down of inventory due to intentional incorrect inventory management systems followed

Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited: (15 months ended 31-03-2014)

From Significant Accounting Policies
Employee stock option based compensation
The Company follows SEBI guidelines for accounting of employee stock options. The cost is calculated based on the intrinsic value method, i.e., the excess of market price of underlying equity shares, as of the date of the grant of options over the exercise price of such options, is regarded as employee compensation and in respect of the number of options that are expected to ultimately vest, such cost is recognised on a straight line basis over the period over which the employees would become unconditionally entitled to apply for the shares. The cost recognised at any date at least equals the intrinsic value of the vested portion of the option at that date. Adjustment, if any, for difference in the initial estimate for number of options that are expected to ultimately vest and related actual experience is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss of that period. In respect of vested options that expire unexercised, the cost is reversed in the Statement of Profit and Loss of that period.

During the current period, the Company has changed its policy with respect to treatment of shares issued to Ranbaxy ESOP trust (‘ESOP trust’). As per a recent opinion of the Expert Advisory Committee (‘EAC’) of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, as on the reporting date, the shares issued to an ESOP trust but yet to be allotted to employees be shown as a deduction from the Share Capital with a corresponding adjustment to the loan receivable from ESOP Trust. Accordingly, the Company has shown shares held by the ESOP Trust on the reporting date as a deduction from the share capital.

Compilers’ Note: The EAC opinion referred above is reproduced in March 2014 issue of ‘Chartered Accountant’ of ICAI.

From Notes to Accounts
41 b) (i) The US FDA conducted an inspection at the Company’s manufacturing facility located in Toansa in January 2014. Consequent to the findings of the inspection, on 23rd January, 2014, the US FDA invoked the Consent Decree prohibiting the Company from manufacturing and distributing APIs from its Toansa manufacturing facility and finished drug products containing APIs, manufactured at this facility, into the US regulated market. The Company has since progressed in investigating the findings of the US FDA (as contained in Form 483) and has submitted its response to the US FDA.

(ii) Subsequent to the imposition of the Consent Decree at the Toansa manufacturing facility as mentioned above, regulators in some jurisdictions including those of European Union (‘EU’) countries have sought clarifications/took actions in respect of shipments from Toansa manufacturing facility. The Company is in dialogue with these regulatory agencies and is addressing their concerns. The Company expects to resume API bulk shipments to the EU countries from Toansa manufacturing facility upon receipt of clearances from relevant regulatory authorities.

(iii) The Department of Justice of the USA (‘US DOJ’), United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey has issued an administrative subpoena, dated 13th March, 2014, to the Company seeking information primarily related to the Company’s API Toansa manufacturing facility in India for which a Form 483 was issued by US FDA in January, 2014 (as explained in (i) above). The Company is fully cooperating with this information request and is in dialogue with the US DOJ for submission of the requisite information.

(iv) During the quarter ended 31st March, 2014, the Company has temporarily put on hold its operations from the API manufacturing facilities at Toansa to examine the manufacturing and quality processes and controls, voluntarily as a precautionary measure. The same is expected to be resumed shortly.

(v) The management is taking all necessary steps to resolve the above matters to the satisfaction of the concerned authorities. However, considering the above matters relating to the Toansa manufacturing facility, provisions (primarily relating to inventories, trade commitments, sales return etc.), amounting to Rs. 2,862.78 have been recognised in these financial statements. In calculating these provisions, the management has used the best information and estimates, presently available. Since the matter involves significant judgement and in view of the inherent uncertainty of the present situation, the actual amounts may differ eventually.

41(c) During the quarter ended 31st March, 2014, the Company has temporarily put on hold its operations from API manufacturing facility at Dewas to examine the manufacturing and quality processes and controls, consequent to receipt of certain internal information. Consequent to the findings of the above exercise, the carrying amount of inventory has been written down by Rs. 424. The attribution of this amount to any particular period/ year is not possible. The Company expects to resume the operations shortly.

From Auditors’ Report
Emphasis of Matter

Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to note 41 b) of the financial statements which explains in detail the prohibition imposed by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States of America on the Toansa manufacturing unit of the Company, and the communications received from/ actions taken by other regulators including the Department of Justice of the United States of America and regulators in European Union countries. Consequently, the Company has made provisions, to the extent of Rs. 2,862.78 million, on the basis of best information and estimates presently available with the Company. The basis and assumptions used by the management in calculating these provisions involve significant judgment and estimates (including those relating to inventories, sales return, trade commitments, realisability of tax assets, etc.). There are inherent uncertainties regarding the future actions of the regulators, the impact of which is not ascertainable at this stage and therefore, the actual amounts may eventually differ.

FROM CARO Report
Clause 10
The accumulated losses of the Company at the end of the current period are not less than 50% of its net worth (without adjusting accumulated losses). As explained to us, these are primarily due to provision created (net of reversal) for settlement with the Department of Justice (DOJ) of the United States of America for resolution of civil and criminal allegations by the DOJ (refer to note 8 of the financial statements) in the earlier years. The Company has incurred cash losses in the current period, though it had not incurred cash losses in the immediately preceding financial year.

Clause 17
According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company as at 31st March, 2014, we are of the opinion that short term funds of Rs. 35,175.73 million have been used for long-term purposes primarily on account of accumulated losses including those related to settlement with the DOJ of the United States of America for resolution of civil and criminal allegations by the DOJ (refer to note 8 of the financial statements).

Clause 21
As explained in note 41 c) of the financial statements; during the current period, the Company has written-down carrying amount of inventory by rs. 424 million, consequent to the findings of an exercise carried out by the management  in response to certain internal information received by   it. The findings primarily concluded intentional incorrect inventory management of certain intermediate products by certain manufacturing unit level staff resulting in yield mismanagement and consequent incorrect higher quantity of inventories. Being a pharmaceutical quality related technical matter, we have relied on the management’s assessment of the said adjustment. as informed to us, appropriate actions have been taken by the Company including strengthening of internal controls. subject to these comments, according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

From Directors’ Report
With regard to the comments contained in the auditors’ report, explanations are given below:-
(i)    The  accumulated  losses  of  the  Company  at  the  end of the current period are more than 50% of its net worth (Computed without adjusting accumulated losses) and the Company incurred cash losses in the current period (Clause x of the annexure to the auditors’ report).

The  accumulated  losses  are  primarily  due  to  provision created (net of reversal) for settlement with the department of  justice  (DOJ)  of  the  united  states  of  america  for resolution of civil and criminal allegations by the DOJ (refer to note 8 of the financial statements) in earlier years. The Company has incurred cash losses during the current period primarily due to US FDA related remediation costs and certain exceptional items including loss on foreign exchange option derivatives and inventory provision/write- off and other costs at toansa and mohali plants.

(ii)    Short-term funds used for long-term purposes (Clause xvii of the annexure to the auditors’ report). the Company had created a provision for settlement (net of reversal during the current period) with the doj during the year ended 31st December, 2011, which is currently reflected as payable of rs.29,238.60 million to a subsidiary (refer to note 8 of the financial statements). This has resulted in  long-term  funds  being  lower  by  rs.  35,175.73  million compared to long-term assets as at 31st march 2014. accordingly, short-term funds of rs. 35,175.73 million have been used for long-term purposes. the Company expects to overcome the situation in the near future.

(iii)    Procedures of physical verification of inventories and maintaining proper records of inventories and fraud reported on the Company (Clause (ii)(b), (c) and Clause (xxi) of the annexure to the auditors’ report) during the current period, the Company has written-down carrying amount of inventory by rs. 424 million, consequent to the findings of an exercise carried out by the management   in response to certain internal information received by   it. The findings primarily concluded intentional incorrect inventory management of certain intermediate products by  certain   manufacturing   unit   level   staff   resulting  in yield mismanagement and consequent  incorrect higher quantity of inventories. appropriate actions have been taken by the Company including strengthening of internal controls.

Indirect Taxes

fiogf49gjkf0d
Reduced late fee Trade Circular 13T of 2014 dated 02-08-2014

Dealer may file any of the returns for periods up to February, 2014 along with payment of tax and interest up to 30-09-2014 with reduced late fee of Rs.1,000/- instead of Rs.5,000/-.

Computerised Desk Audit (CDA) for the period 2011-12

Trade Circular 14T of 2014 dated 06-08-2014

Department has developed a system by which a facility is provided to the dealer to access and comply with the findings of the department electronically on the website and no need to visit sales tax officer if he agrees with the findings of the CDA system. This facility is not available to dealer whose case is selected for comprehensive assessment. Parameters for selection of cases in CDA and procedure to comply with findings are explained in this trade circular.

Amendments to various Acts administered by the Sales Tax Department

Trade Circular 15T of 2014 dated 06-08-2014
Salient features of the various amendments as per Maharashtra Act No. XXVII of 2014 have been explained in this trade circular.

levitra

From the President

fiogf49gjkf0d
Dear members of BCAS family,

Chai-Chunauti-Chunav

By the time this President’s page reaches your desks, the bulk of the voting would have been over and post counting on 16th May 2014, we will all see round two of this long winding tamasha. Horse trading will begin if no clear majority emerges. But that’s another story. All of us were so caught up with this well-orchestrated frenzy that talking about anything else was just not possible. We have done our bit by voting. Now, it’s out of our hands. Phew! But this message is not about that.

Trimurti

Our Government consists of three branches; the Executive, the Legislative and the Judiciary. According to the Constitution, the Legislative branch is to make the laws, the Judicial branch is to review the laws and make sure that they are Constitutional, and the Executive branch is to enforce the laws. We have all seen and read a lot about the current state of our Executive and the Legislative. I haven’t read much about the Judiciary. By the 73rd and 74th amendments to the Constitution, the Panchayat Raj system has become an institution for local governance, which makes our Judiciary very unique. We are all aware about the statistics of the pending cases, the pace of the discharge cases and many other issues that fraught our legal system. A Judicial Reform is the next big leap in our evolution that we are all waiting for. But this message is not about that.

UttejitUchhatamNyayalay

My message is about the emerging role of the Supreme Court (SC) in India. But before I progress, a few disclaimers:

1. These are my personal views and not that of the Bombay Chartered Accountants’ Society.

2. In the unlikely event of this message causing any kind of legal or other issue, the Editor of this journal be completely absolved of any repercussion.

3. I have the highest respect for our judiciary, in particular the Supreme Court.

4. Contempt of Court is not intended. As we all know, according to the Constitution, the role of the Supreme Court is that of a guardian of Constitution and that of a federal court. The Supreme Court has extensive original jurisdiction in regard to the enforcement of the fundamental rights. The Supreme Court also has the power to take cognisance of matters on its own.

NyayikSakriyata

The SC has come a long way since then. It has been playing an exemplary role in our democracy in discharging its constitutional duties. Nature abhors vacuum and hence, in recent times, time and again, we have seen that the SC has gone beyond deciding on the legality of a case. Many judgments have preambles which are ‘sermons’ to the Executive, Legislative or the society. Here are a few examples of such recent judgments which were sent to me by my friend CA. Anup Shah (he is an unwitting partner to this and he too maybe absolved).

1. Sahara’s case: the Court has placed Subroto Roy under its custody and is personally monitoring the repayment schedule proposed by Sahara.
2. Black Money / Liechtenstein Bank Accounts Case – the Court has again pulled up the Government for failing to reveal the names of all Liechtenstein Bank Account Holders.
3. 2G Case – Spectrum Allocation Case was personally monitored by the Apex Court.
4. Open Spaces in Mumbai –6 mt. wide open skirting around building projects and minimum 10% of project to be kept open to the sky.
5. Lal Batti – The Supreme Court slammed the indiscriminate use of the Red Beacon on Cars.
6. Vishaka’s Case: The Supreme Court laid down the law on Sexual Harassment in the absence of any legislation on the subject at that time.

One respects all the judgments and most of these sermons. But doesn’t this reek of Judicial Activism? Black’s Law Dictionary defines judicial activism as a “philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy, among other factors, to guide their decisions.”India has a recent history of judicial activism, originating after the Emergency which saw attempts made by the Government to control everything, including the judiciary. During the emergency period, the Government passed the 39th Amendment, which sought to limit judicial review for the election of the Prime Minister. Subsequently, the parliament, with most opposition members in jail during the emergency, passed the 42nd amendment which prevented any court from reviewing any amendment to the Constitution with the exception of procedural issues concerning ratification. A few years after the emergency, however, the SC rejected the absoluteness of the 42nd Amendment and reaffirmed its power of judicial review in the Minerva Mills case (1980). Another example of activism is the Public Interest Litigation which was an instrument devised by the courts to reach out directly to the public, and take cognizance though the litigant may not be the victim. Suo moto cognisance allows the courts to take up such cases on its own.

JiskaKaamUsikoSaaje

The original intent was that the three branches would be able to check and balance one another so that no single branch would be able to claim too much power. And this balance is sought to be changed time and again. At times the SC takes on the Legislative (Eg: drafting the Vishaka Guidelines) and the Executive (Eg: taking Subroto Roy in the SC custody) roles. The SC can uphold or overturn decisions of all lower courts. This highest of courts can make decisions that cannot easily be overturned. But the Legislative tends to reign supreme and the retrospective amendments post Vodafone judgment is an example of how the Government of India, instead of accepting the SC verdict, made retrospective amendments in the Incometax Act to nullify the effect of Vodafone’s case.

The trend has been supported as well as criticised.The New York Times author Gardiner Harris sums this up as “India’s judges have sweeping powers and a long history of judicial activism that would be all but unimaginable in the United States. In recent years, judges required Delhi’s auto-rickshaws to convert to natural gas to help cut down on pollution, closed much of the country’s iron-ore-mining industry to cut down on corruption and ruled that politicians facing criminal charges could not seek re-election. Indeed, India’s SC and Parliament have openly battled for decades, with the Parliament passing multiple constitutional amendments to respond to various SC rulings.”

We are glad that there is at least one wing of the government which has a conscience and has the courage to act upon it.Having said that, this trend is neither intended nor desired. If each wing of the government discharged its role diligently then this debate and tussle would not arise. We need the courts to discharge their primary duties, an area where there is a lot of scope for improvement. The vast number of pending cases is an area that needs highest attention. If the courts get distracted by activism then this issue will only get more severe. Justice delayed is justice denied.

Errata: In my previous communique I erroneously referred to Mr. Nandan Nilekani as CA. Correct examples would have been Mr. Rahman Khan,
Mr. Suresh Prabhu, Mr. Piyush Goyal and Mr. Harish Salve. I thank my friend Narayan Pasari for pointing out this error.

Here’s wishing everyone happiness and love.

With Warm Regards
Naushad A. Panjwani

levitra

ICAI and its Members

fiogf49gjkf0d
1. Disciplinary Cases Disciplinary Committee (DC) of ICAI has decided the following cases and held the concerned members as guilty of professional or other misconduct. These cases are reported in the publication of ICAI “Disciplinary Cases” VOL-1. Page Nos. given below are from this Book. The names of members are not given in order to maintain confidentiality.

(i) Case of Mr. A.J.

In this Case, member has been held to be guilty of professional misconduct in respect of following four charges.

(a) Member accepted the position as auditor of NCP Ltd (Company) for 2006-07 without first communicating with the previous auditor in writing. In this case the member was appointed as auditor by the company on 01-10-2006. The member stated that he had informed the previous auditor about this fact by letter dated 14-08-2007 Under Certificate of Posting. This was considered by DC as not sufficient communication.

(b) The member accepted the appointment as auditor of the Company without first ascertaining from it whether the requirements of sections 224/225 of the Companies Act have been complied with. The DC found that the member could not establish whether these provisions were complied with.

(c) The member failed to exercise due diligence and was grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties while carrying out the Audit for 2006-07. The DC has noted that there were serious mistakes and grave irregularities in the Financial Statements audited by the member. The member could not produce his working papers to explain his view point.

(d) The member accepted the appointment as Auditor of the Company although payment of the undisputed audit fee of the previous auditor was outstanding. The DC has found that the undisputed audit fees payable to previous auditors were outstanding. No satisfactory evidence for payment of the outstanding fees was produced by the Member.

The D.C. has, after due consideration of the submissions of the Member, awarded punishment by way of removal of the name of the Member from the Register of Members for a period of one year. (DC- Pages 57-66).

(ii) Case of Mr.MKJ

In this case the complaint against the member was that he accepted Tax Audit assignment of a partnership firm without first communicating with the previous Tax Auditor. Further, the complainant (previous Tax Auditor) had stated that the member accepted the tax audit although his undisputed audit fees were outstanding.

The D.C. found that the member sent letter to the previous auditor Under Certificate of Posting. Although this was not sufficient compliance with the requirement for communication, the member could prove that the Postal Department had delivered the letter of communication to the previous auditor. Therefore, this charge was not proved.

However, the D.C. has held that the member was aware of the fact that undisputed audit fees of the previous auditor was outstanding and no satisfactory evidence were produced as to why this was not paid. Therefore, on this count the member was held to be guilty of professional misconduct.

The D.C. has issued a letter of caution to the member advising him to be more careful in future in complying with the provisions of C.A. Act and Code of Ethics. ( DC Pages 74 – 81).

(iii) Case of Mr.S.A.

In this case, the member was found guilty of professional misconduct in respect of the following charges.

(a) The member accepted position as Auditor of Six Entities without communicating with the previous auditor in writing. The defence of the member was that he had verbally communicated with previous auditor and no objection was raised. This was not accepted as proper communication by D.C.

(b) The second charge was that the member accepted the audit of six entities although audit fees and other fees for Tax consultation due to previous auditor was outstanding. The member could not produce any evidence for the payment of outstanding fees. The D.C. held that the member was not required to ensure payment of fees for Tax consultation but as regards outstanding Audit Fees due to the outgoing auditor no effort was made to clear the same.

The D.C. held the member guilty on both counts and awarded the punishment of Reprimand to the Member.

2. Some Ethical Issues

The Ethical Standards Board of ICAI has given answers to some Ethical Issues as under on Pages 1008 – 1010 of the CA Journal for January, 2014.

(i) Issue No: 1:

Appointment of another Auditor at Adjourned A.G.M without Special Notice.

If any annual general meeting is adjourned without appointing an auditor, no special notice for removal or replacement of the retiring auditor received after the adjournment can be taken note of and acted upon by the company. In terms of section 190(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, special notice should be given to the Company at least fourteen clear days before the meeting in which the subject matter of the notice is to be considered. The meeting contemplated in section 190(1) undoubtedly is the original meeting.

(ii) Issue No: 2:

Charge of Fees by C.A in practice based on percentage of Turnover.

In terms of Clause (10) of Part I of First Schedule to the C.A. Act, it is not permitted for a Chartered Accountant or a firm of Chartered Accountants to charge fees on a percentage of turnover, except in the circumstances provided under Regulation 192 of the CA Regulations, 1988.

(iii) Issue No:3:

Whether a member in practice can be a director of company?

A member in practice is permitted generally to be a Director simpliciter in a Company provided he is not a Managing Director or Wholetime Director and is required to attend only the Board Meetings of the company and not paid any remuneration except sitting fees for attending the meetings.

(iv) Issue No: 4:

Whether a Chartered Accountant in practice is entitled to accept teaching assignment?

A Chartered Accountant in practice is allowed to accept teaching assignment in university, affiliated colleges, educational institution, coaching organisation, private tutorship, provided the direct teaching hours devoted to such activities taken together do not exceed 25 hours a week.

(v) Issue No: 5:

Undercutting Fees:

It is now possible for a C.A. in practice to accept a position as Auditor previously held by some other C.A. in such conditions as to constitute undercutting.

3. Rotation of Auditors:

ICAI had successfully objected to the introduction of the system of Rotation of Auditors for the last over six decades. Several Commissions and Parliamentary Committees had agreed that rotation of Auditors was not in the interest of the Accounting Profession as also for the Corporate Sector. Inspite of this, provision for rotation of auditors has now been introduced by enactment of new section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Detailed procedure for Rotation of Auditors as contained in section 139 has been stated in November, 2013 (Page 107), issue of B.C.A. Journal. Briefly stated, a firm of Chartered Accountants cannot continue as auditor of listed companies and other specified companies for more than 10 years. This period for sole proprietary concern is five years. After the expiry of this period, the same audit firm or its associate cannot be reappointed for a period of 5 years.

As stated earlier, the system of Rotation of Auditors u/s. 139 is to be applied only in Cases of Listed Companies and other Companies as may be prescribed by Rules. It may be noted that Draft Rule 10.3 provides that this system of Rotation of Auditors will apply to all Public and Private Companies, other than Small Companies and One-Person Companies. This provision is very harsh and almost of all Small and Medium sized Audit Firms will lose their medium sized Audit Clients. If a reference is made to section 149(4) it will be noticed that the requirement for appointment of Independent Directors on the Board of Companies applies to Listed Companies and other companies as notified by Rules. Draft Rule 11.2 provides that this requirement will apply to any Public Company having (i) paid-up capital of Rs.100 cr. or more, or (ii) Turnover of Rs. 300 crore or more or (iii) Aggregate Loans, Deposits etc. exceed Rs. 200 crore. There are similar other sections where similar powers are given to the government and the Draft Rules have equated Listed Companies with large Public Companies. ICAI should suggest that Draft Rule 10.3 should provide that the system of Rotation of Auditors should apply, besides listed Companies, to only large Public Companies having paid up capital exceeding Rs. 100 crore or so.

The Draft Rule 10.4(4)(i) is the most damaging rule in as much as it provides that for the purpose of rotation the period for which the auditor is holding office as auditor prior to commencement of the New Act shall be taken into account for calculating the period of 5 or 10 years. If this is implemented the existing small and medium sized Audit Firms will lose almost all their Audit Clients. They will cease to be auditors in almost all the companies where they have been auditors for 5 or 10 years during the next 3 years. This will put their Audit Staff, Articled Assistants and others in the most precarious position. Most of these firms will have to close down their Audit Practice. In some cases such firms will have to adopt unhealthy practice of canvassing for audit work. ICAI should strongly represent for amendment of this Draft Rule 10.4 (4) (i) so that it is specifically provided that period prior to enactment of section 139 is not counted for the limit of 5 or 10 years for reappointment of statutory auditors. It may be noted that Explanation below section 149
(11)    dealing with Independent Directors who can hold office for 10 years specifically provides that the period prior to enactment of the section is not to be considered for counting the period of 10 years.

4.    EAC Opinion:

Recognition of Distribution Network Acquired in a Business Acquisition as an Intangible Assets

Facts:

Company X (Company) was incorporated in February, 2011 as a wholly owned subsidiary of company Y. During the year 1st April, 2011 to 31st March, 2012, the company X acquired a business from company Z, an unrelated party, on a slump sale basis for an arm’s length consideration. Company Z is a leading manufacturer of kitchen appliances. The acquisition of business has led to company X becoming a leading player in this segment. As part of the acquisition, company X has acquired a large network of distributors, service centres, service points, retailers and manufacturing points.

The company operates through different channels, such as, the distributors, retailers, direct dealers, etc. More than 80% of the sales in the past were effected through the network of distributors (The distribution network).

The management of company X engaged a valuer to carry out the purchase price allocation. The intangible assets identified by the valuer for the purchase price allocation included brands and the distribution network. As per the valuation report, the distribution network was identified as an intangible asset and considering the time period over which the current distribution network was expected to contribute to the revenue of company X, the economic life of the distribution network was considered to be indefinite. However, the agreement appointing the distributor was valid till 31st March, 2012 and was renewable on mutual terms.

Query:

The querist has sought the opinion of the Expert Advisory Committee as to whether the distribution network acquired as part of the business acquisition in the case of the Company qualifies for recognition as an intangible asset as per AS 26.

EAC Opinion:

After considering paragraphs 6.1, 6.2 and 31(a) of AS 26 the Committee is of the view that for recognition, an intangible asset, even if acquired as part of a business purchase, should meet both the definition and recognition criteria specified in AS 26. The Committee notes from the Facts of the Case that the distribution network, being an arrangement for the marketing of the company’s product, is a non-monetary item without physical substance held for the purpose of supply of goods. Further, it appears from the Facts of the Case, that the existence of the distribution network is a factor for the acquisition of the business. So, while allocating the purchase consideration the valuer is able to identify the distribution network separately and also assign a value to it. This indicates that (i) the distribution network is identifiable; (ii) it is probable that future economic benefits attributable to the distribution network will flow to the company; and (iii) the cost of acquisition of the distribution network can be measured reliably.

Further, considering paragraphs 16 and 17 of AS 26 the Committee is of the view that the key terms of the distribution agreement mentioned by the querist indicate that the distribution network is controlled by the company at the time when it acquires the business, but the distribution agreement is valid only upto 31st March,2012 and the exchange (market) transactions for the same or similar distribution network are not available. In other words, there does not appear to be any control on distribution network either through legally enforceable rights or in any other way beyond 31st March,2012.

Hence, distribution network acquired as part of the business acquisition in the Company’s case qualifies for recognition as an intangible asset as per AS 26 only upto 31st March,2012.

[Refer page nos. 1038 – 1044 of C. A. Journal – January, 2014]

5.    ICAI  news:

(Note : Page Nos. given below are from C.A. Journal for January, 2014)

(i)    Empanelment of CA Firms on C& A.G. Panel for the year 2014-15

Applications are invited online from the firms of Chartered Accountants who intend to be empanelled with the office of C & A.G. for appointment as auditors of Government Companies/Corporations for the year 2014-15. The format of application will be available on the website www.saiinida.gov.in from 1st January, 2014 to 15th February, 2014. (P. 1118)

Campus Placement Programme – February – March, 2014

The Committee for Members in Industry of the ICAI is organising Campus Placement Programme for newly qualified Chartered Accountants at various centers all over India. Campus Placement Programme will be organised at various centres viz. Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhubaneswar, Chandigarh, Chennai, Coimbatore, Ernakulam, Hyderabad, Indore, Jaipur, Kanpur, Kolkata, Mumbai, Nagpur, New Delhi and Pune from 17th February, 2014 to 15th March, 2014. (For details refer Page 1122)

Ethics and u

fiogf49gjkf0d
Negligence – Failure to disclose a material fact

Arjuna (A) – Hey Bhagwan, last so many occasions you have been telling me the instances of negligence of a chartered accountant. Surely, it is a misconduct.

Shrikrishna (S) – Yes. That is clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule. But remember that it covers not only gross negligence, but also the lack of due diligence.

A – I understood. But I am now tired of listening to the stories of negligence. Tell me something else today.

S – Actually, although this is one of the most serious misconduct, this clause rarely operates alone. Quite often, alongwith this clause 7, one or both of the other two items are invoked.

A – What are they?

S – First is clause (5); and then (8). These are invoked simultaneously although the net result is clause (7).

A – Tell me one by one. Don’t confuse me by explaining all of them together.

S – OK. Let us start with clause (5). It says that if the auditor is aware of a material fact which is not disclosed in a financial statement; but disclosure of it is necessary, then it is a misconduct. In short, it is a failure in performing his duty.

A – But the primary duty of disclosure is that of Management. Our Council specifically makes us write such a remark in our audit report.

S – Agreed. But that does not absolve the Auditor of his duty to comment on such deficiencies. That is the very job of an auditor. Otherwise, on what basis can you say that the accounts give true and fair view?

A – But you know, many times, clients do not tell us the full facts. Or they pressurise us not to mention certain things.

S – If you start accepting such requests from the management, then you are not fit to be an auditor. Moreover, it is also your duty to ask for information.

A – We do ask; but often, we do not insist on it. And if we report certain things, we feel the client would be in deep trouble.

S – That is a mistake. Heavens are not going to fall if you report certain discrepancies.

A – I can tell you, in many companies, fixed assets register is never maintained properly. In fact, it is not maintained at all!

S – Yet, you write a standard remark in CARO report.

A – Yes. But tell me of some other instances.

S – I must have told you of a case of an auditor of an educational trust. A very prominent educational institution had schools and colleges at multiple locations. Highly placed people were on its governing body.

A – Then what happened?

S – It had opened many bank accounts required from time to time. Sometimes, accounts were opened for temporary purpose of receiving some grants; or for particular projects which were then completed.

A – Yes. It is quite normal.

S – One junior professional was their auditor. They told him that out of some 16 bank accounts, statement of 5 accounts were not available despite follow-up with respective banks.

A – That is a common difficulty. Accounts must have been inoperative.

S – They told him that there were hardly any transactions except perhaps a few internal transfers. He believed them and did not put any remark.

A – We also avoid putting any qualification in such cases. We feel shy of doing so!

S – That’s the trouble. In the subsequent year, there was some other auditor. He found the bank statements and noticed that there was an impact of about Rs. 30,000/-. Remember, the total collection of that Trust was more than Rs. 8 crore!

A – Oh. Then the impact was negligible!

S – Subsequent year’s auditor adjusted it in the Trust Fund in the next year and again did not put any remark. The adjustment was shown in the balance sheet without any explanation.

A – Actually, for educational trusts, there is no revenue impact. Who complained in this case?

S – Surprisingly, the Income Tax department complained! This again was not revealed in scrutiny assessment; but while processing the application for renewal of section 80 G certificate, the Director of Income Tax noticed it!

A – But why is the tax department bothered about such trivial things?

S – That’s your fate! Many times, even big blunders go unnoticed; and a small thing proves fatal. I also told you long back that whether any person’s interests are adversely affected or not is not material. Council wants to ensure that its member performed his duty diligently!

A – That is all right; but why small people are victimised? So in this case, what happened?

S – Unfortunately, auditors for both the years were held guilty of professional misconduct.

A – Oh my God! The first auditor should have mentioned the fact that bank statements were not made available. He should have stated a disclaimer to that effect.

S – Yes. Thus, it is a failure to disclose a material fact. Its impact on quantum may not be material; but in principle, it is a lapse when statements of 5 out of 16 banks accounts are not available.

A – Had he taken Management Representation Letter?

S – Yes, he had obtained MRL. But his ‘stars’ were unfavourable.

A – How then, are other clauses attracted?

S – Clause (8) talks about failure to obtain sufficient information which is necessary for expression of an opinion. The negligence or lack of due diligence is the resultant failure. One has to take care of all these clauses.

A – Yes. We often consider only ‘gross negligence’ as a misconduct.

S – Important point is when a punishment is awarded; it may be for each such clause. Thus, if one’s membership is suspended, it may be one or two months for each of these clauses!

A – Then I should be more vigilant and should write the report without any such psychological inhibitions. Without fear or favour!

S – For small lapse, consequences may be too harsh!

A – God, only you can save the audit profession!

Om Shanti!
NOTE :

The above dialogue between Shrikrishna and Arjun deals with the Clause (5) and (8) of Part 1 of the Second Schedule which are often invoked alongwith Clause (7):

Clause (5): fails to disclose a material fact known to him which is not disclosed in a financial statement, but disclosure of which is necessary in making such financial statement where he is concerned with that financial statement in a professional capacity.

Clause (8): fails to obtain sufficient information which is necessary for expression of an opinion or its exceptions are sufficiently material to negate the expression of an opinion

levitra

Cancerous Corruption

fiogf49gjkf0d
Mr. Stephen Covey: The lower the GDP, the higher the corruption index and India’s low GDP matches its high corruption.

Meaning of corruption
‘Cor’ means ‘Serious’ ‘Rupt’ means ‘Ruptured’. ‘Corrupt’ means ‘Seriously Ruptured’. When the system is seriously ruptured, that is ‘CORRUPTION’

Meghnad Desai (A prominent economist and Labour peer) writes: Corruption is not a microeconomic behaviour or a two player’s game but microeconomic structural distortion which connects several parts of the political economy.

Dilip Bobb, Group Editor, special projects and features of the Indian Express opines: The five sectors in which bribery and other corrupt practices are most persuasive include government and public sector; infrastructure and real estate; metals and mining; aerospace and defence; power and utilities.

The question is, does good governance translate into controlling corruption in developing economies? A recent World Bank report looked at various aspects to do with governance. One was whether good governance and anti corruption are the same thing. Governance is defined as traditions and institutions by which authority in a country is exercised for common good.

He writes “The truth is that, like death and taxes, corruption is almost a given in the Indian context and has been for many decades regardless of which government was in power.

Citizens hope that the new decisive government that India now has will contain corruption substantially if not eliminate it completely.

The latest 2014 survey commissioned by FICCI among corporates in India identifies corruption, bribery and corporate frauds as the most important risks, ahead of industrial disputes and unrest as well as political instability. Corruption was listed at the fourth place in similar survey FICCI did last year. India suffered losses of `36,400 crore due to corruption in the 12 months to September, 2013, says a survey by EY (Ernst and Young) and FICCI, excluding large corruption scandals – 2G, CWG etc.

The World Bank and IMF have some suggestions on how to tackle the menace of corruption:

a. Publicly black listing firms that have been shown to bribe in public procurement and “publish – what – you – pay” by multinationals competing for major contracts

b. E ffective implementation of freedom of information laws, (RTI in India) with easy access for all to government information

c. Disclosure of actual ownership structure and financial status of companies, media houses and domestic banks

d. Transparent (Web based) competitive procurement procedures

e. Country governance and anti corruption diagnostics and public expenditure tracking surveys

Sumant Sinha wrote in the Economic Times some time before:

The time has come for us to take our country back. Take it back from those who are either incompetent or corrupt and frequently both, from those who think nothing of exploiting others, from those who have either narrow sectarian or casteist views, from those who only think about furthering their own vested interest, from those who believe that spending time in jail on corruption charges is an act of valour to be redeemed once out on bail, from those who hobnob with such people and still state that their personal integrity is untarnished, from those who do not understand what it means to lead this great nation with its great culture and people, from the corrupt bureaucrats who have submitted themselves willingly to corruption around them, from the corruption inducing businessmen in India for whom making money at the expense of everything else is the only mantra, from the petty civil servant who has long back lost the concept of civil service and so on.

Citizens believe that the time has now come for India to redeem itself.

A recent study in Financial Times shows that relatives galore of Chinese politicians have become millionaires. The “princelings”, as children of top Chinese politicians are called, have riches that dwarf comparable Indian princelings.

Chetan Bhagat in the Times of India of 16.05.2014 listed the five areas towards which the new Government’s effort should be focused. One of them is:

Go after corruption. It bothers Indians and needs to be fixed. However at present, it also churns the wheels of our economic system.

Draconian measures or finger pointing will solve nothing. It might bring the country to a halt. You don’t solve a blood contamination disease by cutting of the arteries of the heart. You make the blood pure again, one small transfusion at a time.

You don’t want all the IAS officers or cops to stop working. You don’t want them to be corrupt either. Hence incentive structures, laws, and mind sets and empowerment all need to be looked at. Indians don’t want corruption to be solved in one week; they just want a leader with genuine intent to solve it. You have your time, but fix it.

The recently announced election results will bring this state of reality

A statement of Barack Obama :
We need to keep up the fight against corruption, which stifles innovation and is one of the biggest barriers to job creation and economic growth around the world.

levitra

ICAI and its members

fiogf49gjkf0d
Disciplinary Cases:
The Disciplinary Committee (DC) of the ICAI has decided on some cases about professional or other misconduct. These are reported in the publication “Disciplinary Cases” Vol -1. The page numbers given below are from this book. The names of the members are not given, in order to maintain confidentiality.

(i) Case of RBK:
In this case, the Bank had complained that the member has issued financial statements to 97 persons from the same place. The Bank had given loans to these persons on the basis of these statements. On inspection by the Bank, it was found that these persons had no business activity or source for repayment of loans.

During the inquiry, the DC found as under:
(a) T hat the member had issued projection statements which were signed by him without putting any date;
(b) T hat the projection statements did not disclose the exact years and instead stated years I, II, III, IV and V, creating ambiguity for the reader about the years for which projections were given;
(c) T hat in a number of cases, the member had issued two/three projection statements for the same individual certifying different figures;
(d) T hat the basis on which the said statements were issued were not disclosed by the member.

The explanation given by the member was that he had issued the certificates based on the information given by the parties. He could not produce any documents on which reliance was placed.

The DC also noticed that the Branch Managers who gave the advances had not made any inquiries about the capacity of the parties and loans were sanctioned without authority.

On the basis of the above, the DC held that the member allowed his name to be used in the projection statements, giving the impression that he vouches for the accuracy of the information. It also held that he failed to carry out his duties in a diligent manner and failed to obtain sufficient information for expression of his opinion. Therefore, the DC held the member guilty of professional misconduct under clauses (3), (7) and (8) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the C.A. Act.

The DC further noted that all the loans were given in contravention of the prescribed rules of the Bank and some officials at the Branch Level were involved in it. Moreover, all loans were recovered by the Bank and all accounts were closed. In view of this, the DC has taken a lenient view and awarded punishment by way of “Reprimand” to the Member (pages 126-134).

(ii) Case of R.P.R:
In this case, R.P.R. had conducted the Audit of a Cooperative Housing Society for the years 2003 to 2007 and given one Audit Report for all the four years. The allegation against him was that the Income & Expenditure Account for any of the years was not prepared and only the Balance Sheet as at 31-03-2007 was attached to the Audit Report. It was further alleged that the notes to the Audit Report were highly damaging. Therefore, he could not have stated that the accounts give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Society.

During the inquiry by DC the member explained as under:-

(a) T hat he prepared the Balance Sheet and Audit Report for the limited purpose of addressing litigation amongst the members of the Society;
(b) T hat he had relied on the audit done by the previous auditor and followed in the period covered under the Audit;
(c) That he had pointed out the deficiencies in his report by way of Annexure to the report;
(d) That no Income & Expenditure Account was prepared as the Project was under construction;
(e) T hat he had carried out the assignment to the best of his ability. However, he admitted that due to lack of experience, there could be some technical mistakes, but the same could not be said to be due to negligence on his part. He further stated that there was no malafide intention. It was admitted that he had not done audit of similar works earlier and therefore there could be some mistakes.

The DC noted that there were several mistakes in conducting the Audit and the member had not followed Auditing Standards i.e. AAS-28. Further, the member had admitted that there were mistakes in giving Audit Report due to lack of experience of similar audit. Therefore, the D.C held that the member was guilty of professional misconduct under clauses (7), (8) and (9) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the C.A. Act.

Looking to the facts of the case, the DC awarded punishment of “Reprimand” as the DC found that the mistakes were of technical nature and that the member had also shown remorse for his mistakes in the written representation (page 67 to 73).

2. Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB)

ICAI has constituted FRRB with the objective to improve the Financial Reporting Practices. Observations of FRRB after examining the Accounting Policies followed by Companies in their published financial statements have been published in the publication “Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements” Vol – II. Some of the observations of FRRB are given below. Page numbers. given below are from this publication.

(i) AS-2 (Inventory Valuation)
In the Annual Reports of some Companies, the accounting policy for valuation of Inventories simply states that Raw Materials, Stores and W.I.P are valued at the lower of cost and the net realisable value.

Observation of FRRB
: It may be noted that Companies have disclosed the policy for Valuation of Inventories, but they have not disclosed the cost formula used for Valuation of Inventories, which is required to be disclosed as per Para 26(a) of AS-2 (Page 11-12)

(ii) AS-2 (Inventory Valuation)
From the Schedule of “Inventories” given in the Annual Reports of some Companies, it has been noted that Inventories were described “As taken, Valued and Certified by the Management”.

Observation of FRRB: I t may be noted from the clarification given in the Guidance Note on “Audit of Inventories” that the use of the expression “As valued and certified by the Management” may lead the users of Financial Statements to believe that the auditor merely relied on the management’s certificate without carrying out any other appropriate audit procedures to satisfy himself about the existence and valuation of Inventories. Further, use of this type of wording indicates that there is a disclaimer for Inventories which should be avoided (page 12).

(iii) AS-2 (Inventory Valuation)
From the Schedule of Current Assets given in the Annual Report of a Company, it is noted that stock-in-trade also includes the stock of DEPB Receivables as well as Plant and Machinery retired from active use.

Observation of FRRB:
It may be noted that under Para 4 of AS-2, Inventories include finished goods, WIP, Raw Materials, Consumables, Loose tools etc. Therefore, DEPB Receivable should be treated as part of Loans and Advances and Plant & Machinery retired from active use should be included as part of Fixed Assets. Hence, they should not be included in Inventories (page 16-17).

3. Some of the Ethical Issues:
The Ethical Standards Board has given answers to some Ethical Issues on Pages 1612-1614 of C.A, Journal for May, 2014. Some of these issues are as under:-

(i) What is the Conceptual Framework Approach?
It is a framework that requires a professional accountant to identify, evaluate and address threats to compliance with the fundamental principles, rather than merely comply with a set of specific rules.

Professional accountants are required to apply this conceptual framework to identify threats to compliance with the fundamental principles, to evaluate their significance and, if such threats are other than clearly insignificant, then to apply safeguards to eliminate them or reduce them to an acceptable level such that compliance with the fundamental principles is not compromised.

(ii)    What are the threats involved while complying with the fundamental principles?

Compliance with the fundamental principles may potentially be threatened by a broad range of circumstances.  these  are  (a)  Self-interest  threats  (b) Self-review  threats  (c)  advocacy  threats  (d)  familiarity threats and (e) intimidation threats.

(iii)    What are the available safeguards that may eliminate or reduce the threats at an acceptable level?

Safeguards that may eliminate or reduce such threats to an acceptable level fall into two broad categories, viz.,
(a) Safeguards created by the profession, legislation or regulation; and (b) Safeguards in the work environment.

(iv)    What is Ethical Conflict resolution?
Ethical conflict resolution means to resolve a conflict in the application of Fundamental Principles while evaluating compliance with the fundamental principles.

4.    EAC Opinion
Accounting treatment of Subsequent expenditure on technological Upgradation/Improvements on Capital Assets:

Facts:

T company is a wholly-owned Government of india enterprise incorporated in the year 1965 with the main objective of setting up cement plants in deficit areas to cater to the needs of that area and other neighbouring States.  The  company   has  stated  that  though  it  is  the only Government of india enterprise in the country in the cement sector, its market share is less than 1% of the total market share in the country, thereby leading to severe competition from private entrepreneurs in the market. the company has one of its cement factories in one of the districts of Andhra Pradesh, that was commissioned in  the  year  1987.  The  plant  has  been  in  operation  for more than 25 years after its commissioning and most of its major equipments have outlived their lives.

Now the company having been declared sick by  the Bifr in the year 1996, due to erosion of its net worth,  no technological upgradation/modernisation could take place as was called for the cement industry due to fast technological changes. however, normal maintenance was carried out to keep the plant running. as many new cement plants with higher capacity and latest technology have been set up by private entrepreneurs in the vicinity of the plant of the company in Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, the company had been facing severe competition from private entrepreneurs in the industry and the company  is finding difficulty to operate the plant economically without modernisation/technology upgradation.Therefore, in place of changing the vital equipments with latest technology which entails substantial investment, the company made an endeavour to upgrade/improve icertain equipments with certain amount of expenditure with a view to increase the standard efficiency of the  vital equipments, increase its useful life and reduce the operating cost to the extent  possible. The company has, therefore, undertaken modernisation/upgradation of vital equipments, keeping energy efficiency and environment friendly technology in mind, to increase their standard performance with increase in overall productivity and standard operating efficiency of the plant.

Query:

In view of the above, the opinion of the eaC of ICAI is sought on the following issues: (a) Whether the cost of above modifications/upgradation/improvements can be capitalised along with the cost of concerned equipments and depreciation charged accordingly; or (b) Whether the cost of above modifications/ upgradations/improvements should be amortised/depreciated over a period of 10-15 years as the benefit of the above works would result in further increase in useful life of the equipments by not less than 10 years.

Opinion:

After considering paragraph 23 of Accounting Standard (aS) 10, ‘accounting for fixed assets’, the  Committee is of the view that expenditure on fixed assets subsequent to their installation may be categorised into (i) repairs and (ii) Improvements or betterments.   repairs, implies “the restoration of a capital asset to its full productive capacity after damage, accident, or prolonged use, without increase in the previously estimated service life or capacity”. it frequently involves replacement of parts. On the other hand, betterment is defined as “ … an expenditure having the effect of extending the useful life of an existing fixed asset, increasing its normal rate of output, lowering its operating cost, or otherwise adding to the worth of benefits it can yield. The cost of adopting a fixed asset to a new use is not ordinarily capitalised unless at least one of these tests is  met.  A betterment is distinguished from an item of repair or  maintenance  in that the latter has the effect of keeping the asset in   its customary state of operating efficiency without the expectation of adding future benefits.

Thus,  the  Committee  is  of  the  view     that  normally, expenditure on repairs, including replacement cost necessary to maintain the previously estimated standard of performance, is expensed in the same period. Similarly, the cost of adopting a fixed asset to a new use or modernisation of such asset without actually improving the previously estimated standard of performance is also expensed.

Accordingly, in the view of the Committee, only such expenditure that add new fixed asset units or that have the effect of improving the previously assessed standard of performance , e.g., an extension in the asset’s useful life, an increase in its capacity, or a substantial improvement in the quality of output or a reduction in previously assessed operating costs are capitalised. The  Committee is of the view that ‘previously assessed standard of performance’ is not the actual performance of the asset at the time of repair/improvement etc., but the standard performance of the same asset in its original state.

From  the  facts  of  the  case,  the  Committee  notes  that it has been stated that the expenditure has resulted in increased productivity, reduced operating costs and also enhanced the life of the equipments. however, the Company has not informed whether the increase in productivity or enhancing the life is beyond the previously assessed standard of performance of the concerned equipments. It is only the increase beyond the standard of performance of the concerned equipment in their original state, which is treated as betterment and related expenditure is capitalised.

After considering paragraph 23 of AS 26, the Committee is of the view that if the above upgradation/modernisation results into an increase in the useful life of the concerned asset the unamortised depreciable amount of the concerned asset along with  the  expenditure  incurred on upgradation/modernisation should be charged over the revised remaining useful life subject to the useful life implicit from the specified rates as per Schedule XIV to the Companies act, 1956. The Committee wishes to point out that such depreciation should be charged with reference to the ‘useful life’ and not with reference to ‘physical life’ of the asset.

FROM THE PRESIDENT

fiogf49gjkf0d
Dear members of BCAS family,

I am a movie buff. I remember dialogues and songs of more movies than most of you would remember case laws. (Okay, barring the likes of Pranav Sayta.) And hence, when I read some news or see some incident, either a relevant song or dialogue pops up in my mind. Take for example these two news items in January:

1. Posco steel plant, India’s biggest FDI, gets environmental approval

2. Cairn India under income tax lens over share sale

I am visualising a scene from old Hindi movies where the villain will brag “yahan log aate toh apni marzi se hai, par jaate hamari marzi se hai”. It is so frustrating to see that the same government stalling clearances on environmental grounds for eight years, grants clearances overnight when the minister changes. Did the environmental norms change overnight or the compliance occurred overnight? Is FDI welcome in India when the country needs it or is FDI welcome when the political compulsion sets in?

Someone please tell me this was done for the good of the economy and not with the polls in mind.

On the other hand were the events regarding Vodafone, Nokia and Shell not enough that we now have Cairn’s disinvestment coming under tax scanner? Are multinationals easy preys to meet huge deficits in tax collections? Why bother improving tax administration machinery? Why bother with tax defaulters who get away with bribery? Go after honest tax payers. Make frivolous additions. Disallow genuine expenses. Apply absurd interpretations and deny exemptions and deductions. Raise demands. If all that is not enough then hold up genuine, legitimate and in many cases, much needed refund.

Someone please tell me this was done for the good of the economy and not with the polls in mind.

Take another front page headline:

Currency notes issued before 2005 to be withdrawn post March 31: RBI

This reminds of another villainous dialogue “Hum toh doobenge sanam, par tumko bhi le doobenge”. The reason attributed for the withdrawal of pre 2005 notes is that it could counter black money and help weed out fake currency circulating through the system. Noble. Laudable. Much needed. But look at the timing. At a time when it is more than apparent that the odds of winning these elections are tilted against us, how do we make it difficult for them to win? Attack their poll contributors.

Someone please tell me this was done with a motive for the good of the economy and not with the polls in mind. “There have been issues like regulatory clearances but government realised and we have started working on those areas. Many clearances have been fast tracked. There are further reforms, including some structural reforms, in the pipeline.” – Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia.

Sir

“Bahut der se dar pe aankhein lagi thi, Huzuur aate-aate bahut der kar di.
Maseeha mere toone beemaar-e-gam ki , Dava laate-laate bahut der kar di”

As a citizen I am happy that finally we are back to doing business. But I cannot help rue the fact that we did digress. We did derail. We did not do business. We indulged in politics. We did not even do welfare. We did politics. We didn’t do governance. We did politics. We lost steam. We frittered opportunities. We did politics.

Someone please tell me this was done purely for the good of the economy and not with the polls in mind. But to be fair, it is not just the UPA playing politics. Every party is beating their war drums as a build up to the ensuing elections.

“India’s main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is considering a measure to scrap, or reduce, income tax”. Isn’t this a plank in an election manifesto designed to win over crucial middle-class and urban voters?

Free water, electricity, LPG and much more promised by all and sundry.

Minority statuses, Wars with neighbouring countries and Abolition of babudom by some.

The stakes are high. The spoils are aplenty. The bounty too large. The power too alluring. The greed for power too high. The interest of the nation secondary.

“Yeh Mehlon,Yeh Takhton,Yeh Taajon Ki Duniya,
Yeh Insaan Ke Dushman Samaajon Ki Duniya,
Yeh Daulat Ke Bhookhe Rawajon Ki Duniya,
Yeh Duniya Agar Mil Bhi Jaaye Toh Kya Hai.”

Someone please tell me all this is being promised purely for the good of the nation and not with the polls in mind.

There is a silver lining in the sky. There is light at the end of the tunnel. There is hope in my heart. By 2020, India is set to become the world’s youngest country with 64 per cent of its population in the working age group. In the ensuing elections, there will be about 15 crores first time voters. As a proportion, this works out to about one-fifth of the total electorate of 73 crores estimated by the Election Commission of India. These young adults would be anywhere between 18 and 23 years of age.

These voters are surely not going to be swayed by dynasties or dictators. They are going to vote for whichever party promises them a better future. A future not based on aid, subsidies, freebies or wishy washy lures. This generation is going to look for opportunities for economic advancement and wealth creation on their own competencies and steam. Just give good governance. Just create an enabling environment. Just stop the current nonsense. Agree that your business is politics but just don’t do only politics. Please please please do business too.

Meri taqdeer badal dengey mere jaanbaaz irade…!
Meri kismat nahi mahutaj mere hathon ki lakiron ki.
Yakeenan aasman se oonchi hogi meri mulk ki udaan..
Zara mere pairon se tere siyasat ki zanjeer toh hata de.

Here’s wishing everyone happiness and love.
With Warm Regards

levitra

ICAI and its members

fiogf49gjkf0d
1. Disciplinary Cases Disciplinary Committee (DC) of ICAI has decided the following cases which are reported in ICAI publication viz., “Disciplinary Cases” Vol. I Part – I and II

(i) Case of G.K.

In this case, Mr. G.K. used to audit the accounts of certain group companies and give statutory audit reports from 01-10-2005 to 26-09-2009. He did not reveal to the company management that his name was removed from Register of Members maintained by ICAI. It was further alleged that he had connived with one of the Directors of the company to defraud the other Directors.

The D.C. found that the name of Mr. G. K. was removed from the Register of Members for non payment of Fees and therefore he was not entitled to audit or give statutory audit reports. Therefore, Mr. G.K. had contravened the provisions of sections 8 and 24 of the C.A. Act. Section 24 provides for prosecution of such person and court can levy fine upto Rs. 5,000/- and under certain circumstances award punishment by way of imprisonment upto 6 months.

However, under the present proceeding, Mr. G.K. was held to have committed other misconduct under Clause (2) of Part IV of First Schedule and Clause (1) of part II of second schedule of C.A. Act on the first charge. As regards the second charge the D.C. held that this was not proved. The D.C. awarded punishment of removal of the name of Mr. G.K. from membership for 3 months (Reported on Pages 20 – 27 of Part I of Vol.I)

(ii) Case of V.K.

In this case, the member advised his client that capital gains tax of Rs. 6.91 lakh was payable as Advance Tax for A.Y. 2007-08. The member undertook to deposit Advance Tax on behalf of his client. The client paid Rs. 6.91 lakh to the member who deposited the cheque in his account. The member deposited only Rs. 0.91 lakh as Advance tax on behalf of his client. He, however, added the figure of Rs. 6 lakh in the Bank Challan to defraud the I.T. Dept. In other words, the member had misappropriated Rs. 6 lakh and cheated his client. When this fact came to the knowledge of his client, the member refunded the amount to his client with interest. He has also paid interest charged by the I.T. Dept.

The D.C. has found the member guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (10) of part I of second schedule of C.A. Act. The D.C. has held that amount collected from client for payment of Advance Tax was used by the member for his personal purpose in violation of the above clause. The fact that the member has returned the amount with interest can not absolve the member from his guilt.

On the consideration of the facts of this case, the D.C. has awarded punishment to the member and directed that his name be removed from the Register of Members for a period of 2 years. Further, the D.C. has imposed a fine of Rs. 50,000/- to be deposited within 90 days. (Reported on pages 28 – 36 of Part I of Vol.1).

(iii) Case of Mr. V. K. D.

In this case, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) reported to ICAI that the member (Statutory Auditor of NBFC Company) has submitted a certificate on 12-04-2007 stating that the company continues to undertake the business of NBFC requiring it to hold the certificate of registration u/s. 45-IA of the RBI Act. The RBI has stated that according to company’s letter dated 26- 03-2007 it had informed RBI that it had yet to start the commercial business. Hence, according RBI the Certificate of the Member was wrong. The charge against the Member was about gross negligence under Clause (7) of Part I of second schedule of CA Act.

The defence of the member was that he issued the certificate dated 12-04-2007 in response to the request letter from Company, whereby, he was requested to certify whether the company continues to carry on principal business of NBFC as on 31-03-2007. As per RBI press release No. 1998-99/1269 dated 08-04-1999, the Company’s financial assets should be more than 50% of its total assets and income from financial assets should be more than 50% of gross income. Both these tests are required to be satisfied as the determinant factor. It may be appreciated that the Respondent was not required or intended to verify and certify generally whether the Company has commenced the commercial business of which Respondent denies any knowledge or involvement.

The D.C., after hearing the Member and after verifying the documents produced by him, held that the company was meeting with criteria of NBFC as prescribed by RBI. It was also noted that the company was a private company and did not require to obtain business commencement certificate. Therefore, when the criteria of investment in Financial Assets and income from such assets was met and the Member gave the certificate keeping in mind the going concern concept. No mala fide intention was established. Therefore, giving benefit of doubt to the member, it was held that he was not guilty of professional misconduct. (Reported on Pages 6-12 of Part II of VoL-1).

2. Some Ethical Issues

The Ethical Standards Board of ICAI has given answers to some Ethical Issues. These are published on Pages 1171 – 1172 of CA Journal for February, 2014.

(i) Issue No.1

Whether an auditor is required to provide to the client or to main auditor of the Head Office of the same enterprise access to his audit working papers?

Working papers are the property of an auditor. An auditor is not required to provide the client access to his audit working papers. The main auditors of an enterprise do not have right of access to the audit working papers of the branch auditors, except in case it is required by the Regulatory norms.

(ii) Issue No.2

Whether Joint Auditors can demand the working papers of one another?

The working papers are the property of an auditor. Therefore, no joint Auditors can demand the working papers of the other Joint auditor.

(iii) Issue No.3

Whether a joint auditor will be responsible for the work done by other joint auditor?

Council direction under Clause (2) of Part 1 of the Second Schedule to the C.A. Act prescribes that in respect of audit work divided among the joint auditors, each joint auditor is responsible only for the work allocated to him, whether or not he has prepared a separate report on the work performed by him. However, on the other hand, all the joint auditors are jointly and severely responsible for the work which is not inter se divided among the auditors.

(iv) Issue No.4

Whether the statutory auditor can accept the system audit of same entity?

The statutory auditor can accept the assignment of a system audit of the same entity, provided it did not involve any scrutiny/review of financial data and information.

3. EAC Opinion:

Treatment of Mark to Market Losses on Principal only Currency Swap:

Facts:

A company is engaged in providing port and related infrastructure services (including SEZ) to various port and SEZ users.

The company has stated that when it approaches banks for long term loans to fund the capital expenditure for port project, it has the option of seeking a foreign currency loan (FCL) or a Rupee loan. In case FCL is not readily available, the company agrees to borrow Rupee loan. The sanction letter of bank could also provide the company the option to convert the undrawn portion of Rupee loan into FCL at a later date. Further, along with the sanction of Rupee loan, banks also sanction derivative limits so that the company could utilise the same for swapping drawn and outstanding Rupee loan amount into foreign currency facility. According to the company, it enters into derivative transaction by way of Principal Only Swap (POS) to the extent of outstanding Rupee loan in its balance sheet. As per the company, though POS transaction is an off balance sheet item, the same cannot be entered into unless there is an underlying outstanding loan in the balance sheet. Hence, it is clearly inter-linked to a balance sheet item.

The company has further stated that POS transaction with bank involves notional swap of the company’s Rupee loan with USD. As a result, the company has USD exposure through POS. The tenor of underlying Rupee loan of POS contract is same and notionally, the company swaps the Rupee loan with the USD loans. The bank which enters into the POS actually buys Rupee from the company and sells it USD. However, no cash flow takes place,  no entries  are passed in books and details of outstanding transaction are disclosed in the financial statements. Thus, effectively, what was a Rupee obligation of the company becomes a USD obligation with the POS.

According to the company, all POSs are monitored on a regular basis and, periodically, the company has interest inflow on account of differential interest rate on Rupee and USD borrowings. As per RBI directives, POS contracts are cancellable but once cancelled, cannot be renewed during tenure of the term loan and, hence, it is possible to have POS till the maturity of Rupee loan.

The   company   has   also   stated   that   for   such transactions, bank pays Rupee interest rate of, say 11% and the company pays USD interest rate of, say, 5%.  The difference is called ‘carry’. This means that if Rupee interest rate goes below 11% the company gets  benefited  as  ‘carry’  remains  same  and  vice versa, but the company has exposure on account of variation in INR/USD exchange rate. Effect of USD increase is still exchange rate difference and is still to be accounted for by way of Mark to Market (MTM) loss/gain. But, this is, again, only a memorandum (notional),  because,  just  as  the  exchange  rate differences  on  External  Commercial  Borrowings (ECBs), this also does not actually materialise till the loan is actually paid off.

The question arises about accounting for MTM losses/gains on such POS transaction along with receipt  of  ‘carry’  income  at  regular  intervals  in accordance with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). Notification dated 7th December, 2006 and subsequent extension vide Notifications dated  31st March, 2009 and 29TH December, 2011.

Query:

On these facts, the company has sought the opinion of the Expert Advisory Committee as to whether the mark to market losses on POS can be treated as exchange rate difference and, accordingly, can be recognised as per paragraphs 46 and 46A of AS11, notified by the Central Government.

EAC Opinion:

The Committee is of the view that the issue raised by the Company requires examination from two angles – firstly, whether the Rupee loan taken by the company becomes a foreign currency liability by the existence of POS transaction or whether it should, in substance, be treated as a foreign currency loan by the existence of POS transaction and, secondly, whether the POS transaction can be considered to be a foreign currency transaction within the scope of AS11.

A reading of AS11 indicatesthataccountingtreatment for only those forward exchange contracts which are entered into for hedging foreign currency risk where the underlying transaction is denominated in a foreign currency, or for trading or speculation purpose. The Committee notes from the Facts of the Case that the underlying transaction is a Rupee loan that does not give rise to any foreign currency risk. It is the POS transaction in the Company’s case that exposes the company to foreign currency risk rather than mitigating the same. Thus, the purpose of the POS is not hedging any foreign currency risk. The POS is not held for trading because the company is not a trader in foreign exchange. There may be speculation, if there is no underling transaction or if there is an underlying transaction but the intention is to speculate the movement in foreign exchange rate and to cancel the POS for booking profit at the opportune time. In the Company’s case, the POS has an underlying transaction viz., Rupee loan. But, the company’s intention is not to speculate the movement in foreign exchange rate and to cancel the POS at the opportune time for profit booking. This basic purpose of the POS transaction in the Company’s case is to take advantage of the difference between Rupee interest rate and USD interest rate. Its purpose is saving in interest cost though it exposes the company to foreign risk. The mere fact that the company might have considered likely foreign exchange loss in making the decision to enter into the POS  transaction,  in  itself,  does not make the POS as held for speculation purposes. Thus, the POS is not held for hedging any foreign currency risk or trading or speculation purposes. Hence, the POS is not a forward exchange contract within the scope of AS11 and therefore, is not a foreign currency transaction within the scope of AS 11,

Examination

Group I

Group II

Both Groups

(a) FINAL

Appeared

Passed

%

Appeared

Passed

%

Appeared

Passed

%

Nov.2013

51728

2932

5.67

54,786

4,026

7.35

32536

1013

3.11

May 2013

45822

6319

13.79

50,354

9,389

18.65

27,556

2764

10.3

Nov.2012

48320

13193

27.30

51,906

11,341

21.85

29,339

3804

12.9

(b) IPCC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nov 2013

122253

23,342

19.09

117834

21076

17.88

62033

5038

8.12

May 2013

124310

24,161

19.44

112465

16675

14.83

70504

8428

11.73

Nov.2012

100494

25269

25.14

96,181

20326

21.13

52531

5835

11.15


4.    ICAI News

(Note: Page Nos. given below are from C.A. Journal of February, 2014).

(i)    Extension of Last date for complying with CPE Hours

ICAI has notified that the last date for complying with requirement of CPE hours for the Block Period of 2011-2013 has been extended from 31-12-2013 to 31-03-2014 (ICAI Website).

(ii)    C A Examination Results

The Results of CA examination which have been recently declared are very strict. This will be noticed from the following comparative figures. (ICAI Website).

(iii)    New Branches of ICAI

Following New Branches of ICAI have been opened on 3rd January, 2014 (P.1280-1282).

(a)    Dibrugah (EIRC)
(b)    Tinsukia (EIRC)
(c)    Karimnagar (SIRC)
(d)    Warangal (SIRC)
(e)    Ongole (SIRC)

(iv)    Get CA Journal on Mobile

CA Journal will be available on ios (I pad/I Phone etc) and Android Devices from 01-03-2013 (Refer P.1279).

Ethics and u

fiogf49gjkf0d
Certification of projections:

Arjuna (A) – Oh God! I am really fed up. I feel I should not sign any document at all.

Shrikrishna (S) – What happened? You have been signing so many things – reports, certificates and what not!

A – Yes. But that is inviting trouble for myself.

S – If you sign diligently and carefully, why should there be any trouble. That is your very profession. That is your bread and butter.

A – I know. But people expect us to sign anything and everything under the sun! Regulators, Bankers make us sign any kind of certificate.

S – If you are not comfortable, don’t sign it. Who is forcing you to do so?

A – The relationship, Bhagwan, our relationship with client creates pressure on us.

S – Don’t make general statements. What exactly is your worry?

A – Now see, many of our clients apply for bank loans. They submit project reports. Quite often, it is prepared by us only.

S – Nothing wrong about it. Then?

A – Bankers insist that we should sign the projections.

S – How can you certify the projections? You should refuse.

A – That’s the difficulty. We CAs have not been taught to say ‘No’ at all. We try to help the client anyhow.

S – True. But client also should appreciate your difficulty.

A – That does not happen. It is a one-way traffic. They always expect us to compromise and oblige.

S – But they never reciprocate! Is it not?

A – You said it! The client sits on our head because he is impatient for the loan. The Banker also pressurises us. And many of us succumb to it.

S – Client takes the loan and in due course, becomes an NPA. Right?

A – Yes. And then the first scapegoat is the chartered accountant! Banks routinely file complaint to our Institute. We are trapped!

S – So clients emotionally blackmail you that they are not getting the loan because of your unwillingness to sign. In such a case, you should clearly tell them that your Institute does not permit you to sign any projections.

A – But I don’t understand why bankers insist on our doing irregular things?

S – Because that helps them save their skin. If anything goes wrong, they can pass the blame on you people.

A – But why can’t we sign the projections?

S – You are asking an elementary question. Paarth, you can certify only what is factual. That is the very meaning of ‘certificate’. Projections are essentially based on assumptions; and are always uncertain. If you venture to do that, you will be a ‘fortuneteller’ and not a chartered accountant.

A – Tell me, is there is no way out at all? Because if I refuse to sign, client says he can obtain signature from hundreds of other CAs.

S – You people lack unity. That is why people take you for a ride. The quacks bring disrepute to your profession. They can sign anything.

A – And that spoils our relationship with the client. He feels unhappy with us!

S – You should read and understand AAS-35 – now SAE 3400. It does permit you to sign projections if you fulfil certain conditions.

A – What are those conditions?

S – I can’t explain all the details. But broadly, the assumptions should be realistic and reasonable. They should be clearly stated. Even hypothetical assumptions should be consistent with the purpose of the information.

A – What other things should we see?

S – If any study or survey is done by some agency, you should obtain the report. You should also study the track record and history of the entity. Moreover, projections should be restricted to a reasonable time period in future. Further, you should also judge the management’s competence to prepare proper projections.

A – I think I should also read that SAE 3400 and show it to the client.

S – Most important, you should ensure a clear engagement letter and also insist that all the representations of the management are in writing and signed by them.

A – My friends at district level areas find it all the more difficult to tackle such situations. They have very limited work opportunities and have to compromise on many things.

S – And there is often an unhealthy rivalry.

A – I feel the Council or its Committee should take up the matter with the managements of the Banks and ask them not to insist on such things.

S – Yes. And your local associations and study circles also can make representations to the Banks.

A – There is yet another problem. One bank asked a CA to give a certificate that all statutory dues have been paid. How can one certify that? In our country, there are hundreds of laws. It is impossible to visualise all of them.

S – Very true. In such cases, you should specify the various laws that are commonly applicable to such entities and restrict your certificate to only those statutes. There cannot be a generalised certificate. Even under CARO, only specific laws are covered.

A – But tell me. If one gives such certificate, who is going to see that? Banks say it is just for their record.

S – So long as everything is smooth, there is no problem. But once the unit starts defaulting in servicing the loans, banks will take out all these certificates. And it is a serious misconduct. It is gross negligence as well as lack of due diligence. Many disciplinary cases are coming up on this count! And not following the accounting and auditing standards is clearly a misconduct.

A – I will take up this issue in our study circle and do something concrete to save our fellow-members.

S – Good. That is why you are so dear to me!

Om Shanti!


NOTE :

The above dialogue between Shrikrishna and Arjun deals with the Clause (3) of Part 1 of the Second Schedule which are often invoked alongwith Clause (7). It states that:

A chartered accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he-

Clause (3): permits his name or the name of his firm to be used in connection with an estimate of earnings contingents upon future transactions in a manner which may lead to the belief that he vouches for the accuracy of the forecast.

levitra

[2014] 36 STR 543 (Kar) CST, Bangalore vs. Team Lease Services Pvt. Ltd.

fiogf49gjkf0d
CENVAT credit on group mediclaim services is an input service under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

Facts:
The appellant claimed CENVAT Credit on input service on group mediclaim services for the period April 2007 to September 2010 and the said credit was allowed by the Tribunal. The revenue aggrieved by the Tribunal’s order filed the instant appeal.

Held:
The appeal was dismissed as reliance was placed on the cases of (i) Commissioner vs. Micro Labs Ltd. – 2011 (24) STR 272 (Kar) and (ii) Commissioner vs. Stanzen Toyotetsu India Pvt. Ltd. – 2011 (23) STR 44 of the same Court wherein the said CENVAT Credit was allowed.

levitra