Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreBCAJ Brieficles are short-format, web-only articles on contemporary topics of professional importance that are open-for-all to read & share.
Explore BrieficlesExplore past issues of BCA Journal & indulge in a treasure trove of high-quality professional content across format of print, videos & learning events from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreMonthly mouth-piece of BCAS, the BCA Journal is a leading publication that has been in continuous circulation for more than 55 years. Over the years the BCAJ has become synonymous with high-quality & authentic content across fields of finance, accounting, tax & regulatory matters. The BCAJ has wide circulation across India & commands huge respect amongst the Chartered Accountants` community.
Learn MoreFor queries, collaborations, and insights to forge, Drop a line, share thoughts, inquiries galore, At BCAJ, your messages, we eagerly explore.
Learn More11 Survey : S. 69 and S. 133A of Income-tax Act, 1961 : A.Y. 2001-02 : Addition to income merely on the basis of the statement recorded in the course of survey : Not valid.
[CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son, 214 CTR 589 (Mad.)]
On 24-07-2001, survey action u/s.133A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was carried out in the premises of the assessee, wherein a statement of the partner was recorded offering an additional income of Rs.20,00,000 for the A.Y. 2001-02 and Rs.30,00,000 for the A.Y. 2002-03. The said statement was retracted by the assessee through a letter dated 3-8-2001. The Assessing Officer made additions to the income on the basis of the survey. The CIT(A) and the Tribunal deleted the addition.
On appeal by the Revenue, the Madras High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held as under :
“S. 133A does not empower any I. T. Authority to examine any person on oath, hence, any such statement has no evidentiary value and any admission made during such statement cannot, by itself, be made the basis for addition.”