Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

September 2015

Special Leave Petition – Supreme Court refused to entertain the appeal, since the tax effect was nominal and the matter was very old.

By Kishore Karia Chartered Accountant Atul Jasani Advocate
Reading Time 1 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d

CIT vs. Central Bank of India (2015) 373 ITR 524 (SC);
CIT vs. Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd.(2015) 373 ITR 526 (SC);
CIT vs. Navodaya(2015) 373 ITR 637 (SC); and
CIT vs. Om Prakash Bagadia (HUF)(2015) 373 ITR 670 (SC)

The
Supreme Court refused to entertain the appeals having regard to the
fact that the tax effect was minimal leaving the question of law open.

Download PDF

You May Also Like

Interest from undisclosed sources – In case there has been a double taxation, relief must be accorded to the assessee

Export – Special Deduction – To avail benefit of section 80HHC, there has to be positive income from export business – section 80HHC