16. [2017] 82 taxmann.com 456 (Mumbai- Trib.)
Shree Ranji Realties (P.) Ltd. vs. ITO
A.Y.: 2010-11
Date of Order: 9th June, 2017
FACTS
The assessment of total income of the assessee company having
investment in shares, mutual funds and immovable properties, etc. was
completed u/s. 143(3) of the Act.
Subsequent to completion of assessment, the Assessing Officer (AO)
noticed that the assessee had offered income under the head `Income from House
Property’ after deducting amount of unrealised rent under Rule 4 of the
Income-tax Rules, 1962 (“Rules”) and had claimed credit of TDS on both,
realized as well as unrealised rent. The
AO, in an order passed u/s. 154 of the Act restricted the credit of TDS to the
extent of actual amount of rent received.
Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal to the CIT(A) who
confirmed the action of the AO.
Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal to the Tribunal
where relying on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of T. S.
Balaram, ITO vs. Volkart Bros. [1971] 82 ITR 50 (SC), it was contended that
the issue is highly debatable and cannot be rectified u/s. 154 of the Act.
HELD
The Tribunal observed that –
(i) the facts are not in dispute that the
assessee has disclosed rental income but claimed deduction of unrealised rent
u/s. 23(1) read with rule 4 of the Rules;
(ii) the Unrealised rent is duly offered to tax by
the assessee at the first instance, and then the same is claimed as deduction from
Rental Income u/s. 23(1) of the Act r.w. Rule 4 of the rules;
(iii) the assessee duly fulfils all the conditions
as laid down in section 198 r.ws. 199 read with Rule 37A of the Act.
(iv) TDS had been deducted and paid to the Central
Government by the deductee and Payment / Credit of Rent Income has been
included in the accounts of the assessee;
(v) the deductor had duly filed requisite TDS
returns as per Rules and also issued TDS certificate to the assessee and the
same was furnished to the AO;
(vi) amount of TDS claimed, corresponding to claim
of unrealised rent, is duly offered to tax as income of the assessee, in view
of section 198 of the Act and also assessed by the AO.
It held that the Unrealised rent is deduction which is
claimed u/s. 23(1) of the Act, read with Rule 4 of the Rules, from the total
rental income offered during the year. The unrealised rent is not an exempt
income. As the total rental income (including unrealised rent) is duly offered
to tax under the head ‘Income from House Property’, corresponding TDS credit
needs to be allowed. The Tribunal observed that there are similar instances,
where although the deduction is allowed with respect to total income offered
during the year, still the claim of TDS with respect to such deduction is duly
allowable under the Act i.e. TDS credit is allowed on deduction of Income u/s.
8OIA, 8OIB, 80IC of the Act, etc. and also TDS credit is allowed on bad
debts claimed u/s. 36(1)(vii) of the Act.
Further, the issue is covered by the decision of co-ordinate
bench of this Tribunal in the case of Chander Shekhar Aggarwal (2006) 157 ITD
626 (Delhi).
The Tribunal held that the assessee’s action is in accordance
with provisions of section 199 of the Act and the assessee is eligible for seeking credit of the TDS amount.
The Tribunal set aside the order of the authorities below and
decided the issue in favour of the assessee. It also held that this issue is
highly debatable and cannot be acted upon by the revenue.