Subscribe to BCA Journal Know More

March 2013

Section 50C does not apply to transfer of immovable property held through company.

By Jagdish D. Shah
Jagdish T. Punjabi
Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 3 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
15. Irfan Abdul Kader Fazlani vs. ACIT ITAT Mumbai bench ‘I’ Mumbai BeforeI.P.Bansal(J.M.)andD.KarunakaraRao (A. M.)
ITA No. 8831/Mum/11
A.Y.: 2007-08.
Dated: 2-1-2013
Counsel for Assessee/Revenue: K. Shivaram & Paras S. Savla/P.K. Shukla

Section 50C does not apply to transfer of immovable property held through company.


Facts

The assessee was holding 306 equity shares of Rs. 100 each in a private company (‘the company’). The total share capital of the company was 3,813 equity shares of Rs. 100 each. The company owned two flats in a residential building and was earning rent income from the same. During the year under appeal the assessee sold the shares for Rs. 37.51 lakh and capital gain was offered on that basis. According to the AO the assesse engineered the sale of the shares of all other shareholders of the company and thereby effectively transferred the immovable property belonging to the company. According to him, it was an indirect way of transferring the immovable properties, being the flats in the building. He accordingly ‘pierced the corporate veil and invoked the provisions of section 50C and computed the capital gains by adopting the stamp duty value of the flats.

Held

The tribunal noted that the provisions of section 50C applies on fulfillment of two conditions viz., (i) when a transfer of “capital asset, being land or building or both” takes place; and (ii) the consideration for a transfer is less than the value “assessed” by any authority of a State Government for stamp duty purposes. It further observed that the term “transfer” as used in the provisions would only cover direct transfer. While in the case of the assesse, the assets transferred were shares in a company and not land and/or building. The flats were owned by the company who continues to remain its owner even after the transfer of the shares by the assesse. Secondly, the consideration for transfer received by the assesse is also not “assessed” by any authority. Thus, the other condition to attract the provisions of section 50C is also not complied with. According to it, since the provisions of section 50C are deeming provisions, the same have to be interpreted strictly in accordance with the spirit of the provisions. Therefore, the appeal filed by the assesse was allowed and it was held that the AO’s decision to invoke the provisions of section 50C to the tax planning adopted by the assessee was not proper and it does not have the sanction of the provisions of the Act.

You May Also Like