Renew Your Membership by 31st October 2024! Renew Now!

December 2018

Section 37 of the Act and Rule 9A of IT Rules, 1962 – Business expenditure – capital or revenue expenditure – Expenditure incurred on account of abandoned teleserial – Revenue expenditure

By K. B. Bhujle
Advocate
Reading Time 2 mins
23. CIT vs. Prasad Productions; 407 ITR
541 (Mad):
  Date of order: 4th April,
2018
A. Y. 2002-03


Section 37 of the Act and Rule 9A of IT
Rules, 1962 – Business expenditure – capital or revenue expenditure –
Expenditure incurred on account of abandoned teleserial – Revenue expenditure


The following question was
raised before the Madras High Court in appeal filed by the Revenue:


“Whether in the facts and
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the write off
of expenditure incurred in respect of a teleserial that was abandoned could be
treated as business expenditure during the relevant assessment year, contrary
to the provisions of rule 9A of the Income-tax Rules?”
 


The Madras High Court
decided the appeal in favour of the assessee and held as under:


“i)    The issue as to whether the cost of production of an abandoned
teleserial/feature film shall be treated as revenue expenditure or capital
expenditure has to be decided as per the circular issued by the CBDT in
Circular No. 16 of 2015 dated 06/10/2015, wherein it is stated that the cost of
production of an abandoned feature film is to be treated as revenue expenditure
and allowed as per the provisions of section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.


ii)    This circular was taken note of by the Division Bench of this
court in Tiruvengadam Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (2016) 95 CCH 24 (Mad).
Though the circular pertains to a feature film, we find that there cannot be
any distinction between teleserial and feature film as the circular deals with
the aspects regarding to the cost of production of a film. Hence, Circular No.
16 of 2015 dated 06/10/2015 has full application to the facts of the present
case.


iii)    The appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the substantial
question of law as framed is answered in favour of the assessee and against the
Revenue.”

You May Also Like