Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

November 2025

Section 254(2) – Rectification – Miscellaneous Applications before ITAT – ITAT the last fact finding authority under the Act – Non consideration of the judgments, which, at least prima facie were relevant, would certainly amount to a mistake apparent from the record.

By Ajay R. Singh, Advocate
Reading Time 11 mins

Gulermak TPL Joint Venture vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors. WITH Gulermak TPL Joint Venture vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors.

[WRIT PETITION (L) NO.27895 OF 2025 dated 30th September 2025 (Bombay) (HC)] Assessment year 2017-18 and 2018-19

Section 254(2) – Rectification - Miscellaneous Applications before ITAT – ITAT the last fact finding authority under the Act - Non consideration of the judgments, which, at least prima facie were relevant, would certainly amount to a mistake apparent from the record.

The Petitioner is an un-incorporated joint venture between Gulermak Agir Sanayi Insaat Ve Taahhut Sirketi, a company incorporated under the laws of Turkey, and registered in India under Section 380 of the Companies Act, 2013, and Tata Projects Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. The joint venture was formed by the parties to obtain and execute a contract with Lucknow Metro Rail Corporation Limited ("LMRCL"), a nodal agency established for the purpose of administering and regulating the Lucknow Metro Rail to be constructed in the city of Lucknow.

On 27th May 2016, the Petitioner had entered into a contract with LMRCL under which the Petitioner was to design and construct a

You May Also Like