Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

April 2025

Section: 254 (1): Principles of natural justice violated — impugned order passed without hearing the petitioner and / or his representative and without considering the written submissions:

By Ajay R. Singh, Advocate
Reading Time 8 mins

1. Vijay Shrinivasrao Kulkarni vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors.

[WP (C) No. 17572 OF 2024]

AY 2019-20

Dated: 4th February, 2025 (Bom) (HC)]

Arising from ITAT Pune ITA No.1159/Pun/2023 order dated 12th March 2024

Section: 254 (1): Principles of natural justice violated — impugned order passed without hearing the petitioner and / or his representative and without considering the written submissions:

The petitioner assessee in the present case is a 64 year old retired serviceman, who earned income primarily from salary for the Assessment Year 2019-20. He was then an employee of M/s. Pfizer Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd. posted at Aurangabad, from where he derived his salary income.

The petitioner filed his original income tax return for the A.Y. 2019-20 on 1 August 2019 declaring a total income of ₹57,84,740/- The petitioner had claimed relief under section 89(1) of the Act for an amount of ₹ 13,22,187/-. Subsequently, the petitioner’s case was selected for scrutiny. In response to notices, the petitioner submitted copies of computation of income, Form 26A

You May Also Like