76. [2025] 126 ITR(T) 664 (Delhi - Trib.)
Arjun Rishi vs. ITO
ITA NO: 3020 (DEL.) OF 2023
A.Y.: 2017-18
DATE: 09.07.2025
Section 143(2) read with section 120 – Assessment framed by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer
FACTS
The assessee filed his return of income for the AY 2017–18 on 31.03.2018 declaring total income of ₹91,05,020. The case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS on issues relating to cash deposits, capital gains/loss on sale of property, and investment in immovable property.
Notice under section 143(2) was issued and served upon the assessee by the Income-tax Officer (ITO), followed by notice under section 142(1). The assessee complied and furnished the requisite details electronically. Thereafter, the assessment was completed by the ITO vide order dated 30.12.2019.
Before the Commissioner (Appeals), the assessee raised a jurisdictional objection contending that, in view of CBDT Instruction No. 1/2011 dated 31.01.2011, the pecuniary jurisdiction to assess cases where re