In September
2002, search proceedings were initiated in the case of YS and were
concluded in November 2002. A statement of KB was recorded. No
incriminating materials were found. On 12th September, 2002, a survey
was conducted in the business premises of the Assessee and incriminating
materials were identified and were impounded. Such material contained
the extract of a savings bank account in the name of B. His statement
was recorded on 12th September, 2002. The bank account contained heavy
deposits and withdrawals. After going through the statement, the
Assessing Officer came to the conclusion that this bank account
contained transactions related to assessee and it contained deposits in
respect of unaccounted sales and withdrawals. Therefore, he estimated
the undisclosed income on the basis of the deposits made in the bank
account and applied a certain rate of profit and computed the
undisclosed income. Therefore, a block assessment order was passed. The
Tribunal held that the income computed in the hands of the assessee as
undisclosed income could not have been taxed under the block assessment
and the income had to be considered for regular assessment.
On appeal by the Revenue, the Karnataka High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held as under:
“On
the basis of the incriminating material found in the course of survey
mainly because the material was put to the assessee and his statement
was recorded subsequent to the search, the material could not be held to
be relatable to the assessee. Therefore, the Appellate Authorities were
justified in holding that the material found in the course of survey
can become the subject matter of regular assessment and it could not
become the subject matter of block assessment.”