Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

January 2009

S. 40A(2)(b) — Discount on sales given to sister concern not covered.

By Jagdish D. Shah, Jagdish T. Punjabi, Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 2 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d

New Page 1

Part B — Unreported Decisions

(Full texts of the following Tribunal decisions are available at the Society’s office on written request. For members desiring that the Society mails a copy to them, Rs.30 per decision will be charged for photocopying and postage.)

20 DCIT v. Orgo Chem Guj. Pvt. Ltd.

ITAT ‘H’ Bench, Mumbai

Before K. C. Singhal (JM) and

A. K. Garodia (AM)

ITA No. 7872 /Mum./2004

A.Y. : 2001-02. Decided on : 17-8-2007

Counsel for revenue/assessee : D. K. Rao/

Mayur A. Shah

S. 40A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 — Payments to relatives — Discount on sales given to sister concern — Whether covered under the provisions — Held, No.

 

Per K. C. Singhal :

Facts :

The assessee had given sales discount of Rs. 19.3 lacs to its sister concern. Since no such discount was given to other parties, the AO treated the same as unreasonable and disallowed it u/s.40A(2)(b). On appeal, the CIT(A) noted that the sales to other parties were only of meager amount, while the sale to sister concern was in bulk. Accordingly, the assessee’s appeal was alllowed.

 

Held :

According to the Tribunal, a bare reading of the provisions reveals that such provision could be invoked only where an expenditure was incurred in respect of which, payment was to be made to the sister concern. In case of discount on sales, no payment was made by the assessee as it only reduced the sale price. Therefore, relying on the Madhya Pradesh High Court decision in the case of Udhaji Shrikrishanadas, it held that the assessee’s case was not covered u/s.40A(2)(b).

 

Case referred to :

Udhaji Shrikrishanadas, 139 ITR 827 (M.P.)

You May Also Like