Sheriff Constructions v. ACIT
ITA No. 975/Bang./2008
A.Y. : 2005-2006. Dated : 23-12-2008
Facts :
The assessee-firm was owner of a property by
the name ‘The Summit’ from which rent of Rs.18,39,027 was declared and in
doing so, the assessee deducted association maintenance charges of
Rs.1,77,000. The AO disallowed the claim by holding that this is not an
allowable expenditure u/s.24 of the Act.
The CIT(A) upheld the order of the AO.
In an appeal before the Tribunal, the assessee
contended that since the association maintenance charges have to be paid by
the owner of the property, it depresses the annual letting value of the
property and thus the amount of rent which the property may be reasonably
expected to let from year to year would be an amount against which the
maintenance charges have to be reckoned with. Therefore, the association
maintenance charges were claimed u/s.23(1)(b) of the Act while computing the
annual letting value of the property.
Held :
The issue under consideration is squarely
covered in favour of the assessee in view of the decision of the Delhi Bench
of the Tribunal in the case of Neelam Cable Manufacturing Co. and the
decisions of Mumbai Bench of Tribunal in the case of Sharmila Tagore and
also in the case of Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. The Tribunal observed that no
order or judgment taking a contrary view was brought to its notice by the
Department. Accordingly, the AO was directed to deduct association
maintenance charges paid by the assessee to the Summit Apartment Owners’
Association while computing the annual letting value of the property u/s.23
of the Act.
Cases referred to :
Neelam Cable Manufacturing Co. v. ACIT, (1997) 63 ITD 1 (Del.)
Sharmila Tagore v.
JCIT, (2005) 93 TTJ 483 (Mum.)
Bombay Oil Industries,
ITA No. 550/Mum./ 2000 dated 15-11-2000.