Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

August 2024

Revision — Rectification of mistake — Time limit — Computation of long-term capital gains — Sale of flat inherited by the assessee and three others — Omission of claim of deduction of indexed renovation expenses in return of income — Rejection of application for rectification and revision on grounds that new claim not raised earlier — Revision Application within one year from the date of rectification order — AO accepting indexed renovation expenses in case of co-owner — Amount accepted in co-owner’s case to be accepted as correct and allowance to be made while computing long-term capital gain.

By Keshav Bhujle | Ritu Punjabi, Advocates
Reading Time 4 mins

34 Pramod R. Agrawal vs. Principal CIT

[2024] 464 ITR 367 (Bom.)

A.Y.: 2007–08

Date of order: 13th October, 2023

S. 48, 143(3), 154 and 264 of ITA 1961

Revision — Rectification of mistake — Time limit — Computation of long-term capital gains — Sale of flat inherited by the assessee and three others — Omission of claim of deduction of indexed renovation expenses in return of income — Rejection of application for rectification and revision on grounds that new claim not raised earlier — Revision Application within one year from the date of rectification order — AO accepting indexed renovation expenses in case of co-owner — Amount accepted in co-owner’s case to be accepted as correct and allowance to be made while computing long-term capital gain.

The assessee was a co-owner of a flat which was inherited by the assessee along with three others. The as

Read More
Download PDF

You May Also Like

Return of income — Delay in filing revised return — Condonation of delay — Power to condone — Meaning of “genuine hardship” — Power vested in authority to be judiciously exercised — Compensation received on compulsory land acquisition inadvertently declared as income — Payment of tax more than liability is “genuine hardship” — Department to enable assessee to file revised return of income.

Revision — Powers of Commissioner — Commissioner (Appeals) holding amounts included in fringe benefits tax return not chargeable to fringe benefits tax — Revision application for refund of fringe benefits tax — Revision application rejected on grounds of delay — Commissioner conferred with power to condone delay to do substantial justice — Commissioner (appeals) taking long time to dispose of appeal — Commissioner ought to have condoned delay — Order rejecting revision application quashed — Direction to condone delay and consider revision application on merits and pass reasoned order.