Renew Your Membership by 31st October 2024! Renew Now!

June 2010

Representation in respect of Returns processed u/s.143(1) of the Income-tax Act, particularly at Mumbai.

By Bombay Chartered Accountants' Society
Reading Time 7 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d

Representation

To
The Chairman
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance
Government of India, North Block
Delhi-110001

Dear Sir,


Subject : Representation in respect of Returns
processed u/s.143(1) of the Income-tax Act, particularly at Mumbai.

We refer to the returns being processed by the income-tax
authorities u/s.143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

In this regard, we appreciate the steps taken by the Hon’ble
Finance Minister and the Department in trying to ensure that the returns are
speedily processed and the refunds are issued to assessees in a reasonable time
of their filing the returns.

Errors in the intimations :

However, the intimations recently issued u/s.143(1) of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 to various assessees contain many errors causing great
hardship to the assessees. Some of the common errors are listed below :

  • Credit for
    self-assessment tax, advance-tax and tax deducted at source has been not
    granted/short-granted.


  • Interest u/s.234C is
    charged in case of salaried employees even though no advance tax is payable by
    them or the advance tax payable by them is below the threshold limit of
    Rs.5,000. Additionally, many assessees have received intimations demanding a
    sum of Rs.1,200 towards deferment of tax payment u/s.234C.


  • Interest u/s.234C is
    charged even in case where the income is below taxable limit.


  • Interest u/s.234C is
    calculated before giving credit for taxes deducted at source.


  • Capital gains are taxed
    twice, once on special rates and again as part of the Total Income on normal
    rates.


  • Tax on short-term capital
    gains is calculated at normal rates instead of special rates prescribed.


  • Deduction u/s.80C and
    other sections of Chapter VI-A are not considered.


  • Income under one head of
    income is considered as income under another head or repeated under another
    head of income.


  • Tax demand is not rounded
    off. Even though the law states that taxes payable have to be rounded off to
    the nearest multiple of ten, demands are being raised for Re.1, Rs.3, etc.


  • In many cases, the due
    date for filing the return of income by assessees getting remuneration from a
    partnership firm as a partner of the firm and liable to tax audit, is taken as
    31 July instead of 30 September and consequently, interest u/s.234A is charged
    for late filing of the return of income.


  • The credit for dividend
    distribution tax paid is not granted resulting in huge tax demands.



Practical difficulties





  • Filing of
    rectification applications :



Due to the various errors, the assessees are under a burden
to prepare and submit an application u/s.154 of the Act for rectification of
the intimation issued to them so as to avoid making unnecessary tax payments.

Further, past experience of processing applications filed
u/s.154 by the Income-tax Department is not encouraging. Though the law states
that the applications filed u/s.154 have to be disposed of within six months
from the end of the month in which the applications are received, very few
orders u/s.154 are passed by the income-tax authorities within the time
prescribed and majority of the orders are not passed even after a considerable
period of time. It is very painful for the assessees to get an order u/s.154
passed by the income-tax authorities. Even after rigorous follow-up at the tax
offices, the orders u/s.154 are not passed in many cases.

Further, with the commencement of processing of returns for
assessment year 2009-10, the refunds if any may get adjusted against the
wrongful demand raised in processing the returns of assessment year 2008-09.





  • Entries in the
    income-tax return form :



As per Explanation (a)(i) to S. 143(1) of the Act, an
incorrect claim apparent from any information in the return shall be an item
which is inconsistent with another entry of the same or some other item in the
return of income. In this regard, we would like to bring to your kind
attention that the new income-tax forms issued for filing of the returns do
not allow attachment of any documents/evidence for claim of taxes paid and
deductions claimed. Thus, the returns filed will have only entries in the
return of taxes paid and deductions claimed and no supporting documents will
be available with the income-tax authorities while processing the returns of
income. Accordingly, the claim for advance tax paid, self-assessment tax paid,
taxes deducted/collected at source will be shown only at one place in the new
forms and accordingly, there cannot be any inconsistency and thus, denial of
credit in this regard is bad in law.


  • Place of filing the rectification applications :



(a) Further, in few cases, the intimation states that an
application u/s.154 is to be made to the Centralised Processing Centre at
Bangalore, which has only a Post Box Number. The postal authorities do not
accept registered post to a post box number and thus the assessees have no
knowledge as to when the application is received by the income-tax
authorities.

(b)     In Mumbai, the Salary Section have started accepting the applications u/s.154 of the Act, however, considering the errors in number of cases, it would take lot of time to accept the application u/s.154 and dispose of the same. There are number of small assessees who are not very conversant with the process as well as the working of the Department. In such cases, a suo moto action by the Department would be advisable.

Our request:

a) We understand that the errors mentioned above are due to software error in the computer programme. Accordingly, we request your good-self to kindly:

   b)  direct the income-tax authorities to suo moto pass an order u/s.154 of the Act after rectifying the errors mentioned above or in the alternative, to reprocess all the returns and issue a fresh intimation after rectifying the errors.

   c)  We request you to issue a Notification/Circular in this regard stating that all such intimations issued during the said period will be treated as null and void and that fresh intimations would be issued.

If such reprocessing is done, the whole exercise of writing letters by a large number of assessees to the Income-tax Department for rectification could be avoided and huge burden of receiving letters from the assessees and then dealing with the same can be dispensed with. It will also create goodwill in the minds of the general public.

Accordingly, we would really appreciate if a Circular/Notification is issued in this regard and fresh intimations are issued or orders u/s.154 of the Act are suo moto passed by the income-tax authorities rectifying the mistakes in the intimations issued.

Hope you would consider the above and issue a public clarification by way of a Notification/Circular and let all the recipients of such notices know what they are supposed to do. It is further requested that a copy of the said Notification be sent to the Bombay Chartered Accountants’ Society.

Thanking You,

Yours faithfully

For Bombay Chartered Accountants’ Society

Mayur Nayak           Kishor Karia                    Rajesh Shah
Vice-President    Chairman, Taxation     Co-chairman, Taxation Committee
                              Committee

You May Also Like