The Allahabad High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the assessee and held as under: “
(i) If on a cursory glance it appears that the demand raised has no leg to stand, it would be undesirable to require the assessee to pay full or substantive part of the demand. From the perusal of the materials brought on record, we are of the view that the Commissioner having himself expressed opinion on the order that there is enough strength in the plea of the assessee for stay of the demand, there was no occasion to direct for deposit of 30%.
(ii) In view of the above, we provide that during the pendency of the appeal the demand against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. However, the petitioner shall furnish adequate security in respect of the said 30% of the demand.”