Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreBCAJ Brieficles are short-format, web-only articles on contemporary topics of professional importance that are open-for-all to read & share.
Explore BrieficlesExplore past issues of BCA Journal & indulge in a treasure trove of high-quality professional content across format of print, videos & learning events from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreMonthly mouth-piece of BCAS, the BCA Journal is a leading publication that has been in continuous circulation for more than 53 years. Over the years the BCAJ has become synonymous with high-quality & authentic content across fields of finance, accounting, tax & regulatory matters. The BCAJ has wide circulation across India & commands huge respect amongst the Chartered Accountants` community.
Learn MoreFor queries, collaborations, and insights to forge, Drop a line, share thoughts, inquiries galore, At BCAJ, your messages, we eagerly explore.
Learn MoreThe assessee had declared an income of Rs. 2,60,73,558/- from short term capital gains in the return of income. The Assessing Officer assessed it as income from business. He also levied penalty of Rs. 58,45,899/- u/s. 271(1)(c). The Tribunal deleted the penalty.
On appeal by the Revenue, the Delhi High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held as under:
“i) The amount in question, which formed the basis for the Assessing Officer to levy penalty, was in fact truthfully reported in the return. In view of this circumstance, that the Assessing Officer chose to treat the income some other head could not characterise the particulars reported in the return as “inaccurate particulars” or as suppression of facts.
ii) Therefore, the Tribunal was not in error in deleting the penalty.”