Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

March 2011

Income-tax Act, 1961, section 244A — Interest u/s.244A(1)(b) is allowable and should be granted on refund of tax paid in pursuance of an order u/s.201 of the Act.

By Jagdish D. Shah
Jagdish T. Punjabi
Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 2 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d

New Page 1

18 Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. v. DDIT


ITAT ‘D’ Bench, Mumbai

Before J. Sudhakar Reddy (AM) and

V. Durga Rao (JM)

ITA No. 7509/Mum./2010

A.Y. : 1999-2000. Decided on : 28-1-2011

Counsel for assessee/revenue :

Jitendra Sanghavi/Dr. S. Senthil Kumar

 

Income-tax Act, 1961, section 244A — Interest
u/s.244A(1)(b) is allowable and should be granted on refund of tax paid in
pursuance of an order u/s.201 of the Act.

Per J. Sudhakar Reddy:

Facts:

The assessee hired M/s. Jardine Flemming as lead
managers for the GDR issue and paid commission to them as well as to their
associates without deducting tax at source u/s.195. The Assessing Officer (AO)
in an order passed u/s.201, after issuing the requisite notice and considering
the submissions made by the assessee, held that the assessee was liable to
deduct tax at source and accordingly directed the assessee to pay USD 26,76,750.
Aggrieved by the order of the AO the assessee preferred an appeal to the CIT(A)
who partly allowed the appeal. On further appeal to the Tribunal, the Tribunal
set aside the matter to the file of the AO. Consequently, the AO passed the
impugned order dated 7-3-2008 and determined a refund but did not grant interest
u/s.244A.

The CIT(A) rejected the claim by holding that the
assessee could not show that TDS was voluntarily deposited by it or under
protest u/s.195(2) and hence was not eligible for interest u/s.244A.

Aggrieved the assessee preferred an appeal to the
Tribunal.

Held:

The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to
interest u/s.244A. It was of the opinion that the issue stands covered in favour
of the assessee by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of ITO v. Delhi
Development Authority, (252 ITR 772) (SC) and also by the following orders of
the Tribunal, on which reliance was placed on behalf of the assessee :


(1) Tata Chemicals v. DCIT, 16 SOT 481
(Mum.)

(2) ADIT (IT) v. Reliance Infocomm Ltd.,
(ITA No. 6100 to 6110/M/2008)

(3) ADIT (IT) v. Reliance Infocomm Ltd.,
(ITA No. 5581/M/2008 and 5585/M/2008)

(4) DDIT (IT) v. Star Cruises (India) Travel
Services Pvt. Ltd.
, (ITA Nos. 6498 & 6500/M/06, C.O.os. 10 &
12/Mum./2009.)


The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.

You May Also Like