Subscribe to BCA Journal Know More

February 2011

Income : Income u/s.56(2)(v) Loan received without interest and repaid : Not a receipt within the meaning of S. 56(2)(v) .

By K. B. Bhujle | Advocate
Reading Time 2 mins

New Page 1

Reported :

48 Income : Receipt without
consideration : Income u/s.56(2)(v) of Income-tax Act, 1961 : A.Y. 2006-07 :
Loan received without interest and repaid : Not a receipt within the meaning of
S. 56(2)(v) of the Act.

[CIT v. Saranapal Singh (HUF),
237 CTR 60 (P&H)]

The assessee had received
short-term loan without interest in the relevant year and the same was repaid.
The Assessing Officer added the said amount of loan to the total income treating
the same to be the receipt within the meaning of S. 56(2)(v) of the Income-tax
Act, 1961. The Tribunal deleted the addition and observed as under:



“(i) There is no dispute
regarding the nature and source of the impugned unsecured loans.

(ii) Merely because the
amount of loan has been raised without involving payment of interest, cannot
be seen to have vested the impugned amount with characteristics of an
income, within the meaning of S. 56(2)(v) of the Act.

(iii) The existence of
the expression ‘without considerstion’ in S. 56(2)(v) cannot distract from
the fact that in the impugned case, the sum of money received in question
carried a liability of its repayment and the same was not received by the
assessee with an absolute unfettered right of possession.”



On appeal by the Revenue,
the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held
as under :



“(i) The amount
contemplated u/s.56(2)(v) of the Act cannot include loan which is shown to
have been repaid.

(ii) In the facts and
circumstances of the present case, a concurrent finding of fact has been
recorded that the amount received was a short-term loan which was duly
repaid. The said amount cannot be treated as income of the assessee
u/s.56(2)(v) of the Act. Thus, no substantial question of law arises.”


 

You May Also Like