Renew Your Membership by 31st October 2024! Renew Now!

May 2020

Income – Exemption u/s 10(24) of ITA, 1961 – Registered trade union – Amount received on settlement of dispute between company and its workers disbursed to workers – Amount not assessable in hands of trade union

By K. B. BHUJLE
Advocate
Reading Time 2 mins

11. Gujarat Rajya Kamdar Sabha Union Machiwadi vs. ITO

[2020] 421 ITR 341 (Guj.)

Date of order: 7th January, 2020

A.Y.: 2009-10

 

Income – Exemption u/s 10(24) of
ITA, 1961 – Registered trade union – Amount received on settlement of dispute
between company and its workers disbursed to workers – Amount not assessable in
hands of trade union

 

The assessee was a registered
trade union. Its managing committee passed a unanimous resolution that as a
result of a compromise arrived at between the assessee and a company in the
Labour Court, whatever amount was received from the company would be fully
distributed to the workers of the company. In such circumstances a settlement
was arrived at on 15th May, 2008, which was reduced into writing in
the form of a memorandum of settlement between the company, i.e, the employer,
and the assessee. In view of the settlement, the assessee received payment of
Rs. 60,96,818. The amount was assessed in the hands of the assessee as income
for the A.Y. 2009-10.

 

The Tribunal upheld the
assessment and the addition.

 

On appeal by the assessee the
Gujarat High Court reversed the decision of the Tribunal and held as under:

 

‘i) Once the factum of settlement was not disputed coupled with
the factum of receipt of a particular amount from the company, and the
amount had been distributed amongst the employees, the case would squarely
stand covered u/s 10(24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Though the contribution
from the employer was received as per the settlement agreement, it was only
incidental to the activities of the services of the assessee in resolving the
dispute between the member workers and the employer with the intention of
advancement of welfare of the members.

 

ii) The amount was not assessable as income of the assessee.’

You May Also Like