Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreBCAJ Brieficles are short-format, web-only articles on contemporary topics of professional importance that are open-for-all to read & share.
Explore BrieficlesExplore past issues of BCA Journal & indulge in a treasure trove of high-quality professional content across format of print, videos & learning events from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreMonthly mouth-piece of BCAS, the BCA Journal is a leading publication that has been in continuous circulation for more than 53 years. Over the years the BCAJ has become synonymous with high-quality & authentic content across fields of finance, accounting, tax & regulatory matters. The BCAJ has wide circulation across India & commands huge respect amongst the Chartered Accountants` community.
Learn MoreFor queries, collaborations, and insights to forge, Drop a line, share thoughts, inquiries galore, At BCAJ, your messages, we eagerly explore.
Learn More9 C I T (E), Pune vs. Lata Mangeshkar Medical Foundation
(2024) 464 ITR 706 (SC)
Charitable Purpose — Exemption — Principle of consistency — High Court upheld the order of the lower authorities which allowed the exemption based on earlier appellate orders which had become final — Special Leave Petition dismissed
The Assessee Trust was running a hospital by the name “Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital” in Pune. During the assessment proceeding for Assessment Year 2010–2011, the Assessing Officer (“AO”) denied the exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") and then vide assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Act, computed the total income at ₹18,16,02,520. The exemption under section 11 of the Act was denied because —
(i) The Assessee-Trust had not furnished proper information to the Charity Commissioner and there was a shortfall in making provisionsfor the Indigent Patients Fund (“IPF”). According to AO, Assessee should have credited an amount of ₹2.14 crores to the IPF as against ₹75.96 lakhs only.