Renew Your Membership by 31st October 2024! Renew Now!

December 2010

Fees received for assistance/services provided to Indian companies to whom loans, etc. are provided by the financial organisation from UK is business income — In absence of PE, is not chargeable to tax in India.

By Geeta Jani
Dhishat B. Mehta
Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 4 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d

New Page 3

Part C : Tribunal & AAR International Tax Decisions




JDIT v. M/s. Commonwealth Development Corporation

(2010) TII 102 ITAT-Mum.-Intl.

Article 7, 12(5) & 13 of India-UK DTAA

S. 2(28A) of Income-tax Act

Dated : 25-2-2010

11. Fees received for assistance/services provided
to Indian companies to whom loans, etc. are provided by the financial
organisation from UK is business income — In absence of PE, is not chargeable to
tax in India.

Upfront appraisal fee received by the UK financial
organisation constitutes ‘interest’ in terms of S. 2(28A) of the Income-tax Act
— However, such appraisal fee is not ‘interest’ in terms of India-UK DTAA.

Front-end fee recovered from the investee to whom
debt support is provided, is, ‘interest’, under the Income-tax Act as also DTAA.

Capital gain from transfer of shares in Indian
company is chargeable to tax in India.

Facts :

The assessee, a statutory corporation established
in the UK (CDC) was engaged in the business of providing loans to, and making
investment in shares of, Indian companies. The issue pertained to taxation of
the following four receipts :

(i) Director’s fees received from the Indian
companies for assistance/services rendered by CDC to Indian companies.

(ii) Appraisal fees received by CDC for
determining future profitability and worthiness for projects of Indian company
before CDC disbursed loans by way of convertible bonds, shares or debts to the
Indian Investees.

(iii) Front-end fee claimed to have been charged
for recovering cost of post-appraisal, other than cost of legal documents
which was the obligation of the investee.

(iv) CDC had sold certain shares of an Indian
company which were admittedly held as capital asset. It was the claim of CDC
that shares were held outside India and were sold outside India and hence not
taxable in India.

Held :

The ITAT held that :

  • Having regard to
    the earlier decision of the ITAT in appellant’s own case, assistance provided
    to the investee companies was not in the nature of fees for included services.
    In terms of DTAA, such income would not be taxable in India.



  • Upfront appraisal
    fee was ‘interest’ within the scope of S. 2(28A) of the Income-tax Act. In
    view of ITAT :



  • Upfront appraisal fee
    was charged before advancing loan or making investment of any kind.



  • S. 2(28A) covered
    service fee or other charges for debt incurred. Additionally, it also included
    service fee or other charges in respect of any credit facility which has not
    been utilised.



  • The first limb of
    S. 2(28A) which covered service fee/charge for debt incurred was not attracted
    in the present case as the appraisal fee was recovered even before any debt
    was incurred. However, being service fee for credit facility not utilised,
    such fee was ‘interest’.



  • Though such amount
    was ‘interest’ in term of the Income-tax Act, it was not ‘interest’ under DTAA
    as definition of interest under DTAA is restrictive and covered only income
    from debt claim.



  • Taxpayer’s
    contention that front-end fee is not related to debt investment is not
    acceptable. Front-end fee was charged by the taxpayer only if the investment
    was made in the form of debt and not for investment in the form of equity. No
    information was provided about the services for which front-end fee was
    charged. In the circumstances, the income was regarded as having direct nexus
    with the debt claim. Hence, it was ‘interest’ both in terms of the Income-tax
    Act as also DTAA.



  • Capital gain earned
    by CDC on transfer of shares of an Indian company was chargeable to tax in
    India. The ITAT rejected contention of the taxpayer that such income can be
    regarded as income arising from sale of asset outside India.



  • Share of a company
    represents bundle of rights. Though the shares are freely transferable, a
    contract between transferer and transferee regarding sale of shares is not
    complete till it is approved by the company and change of name in the register
    of a shareholder. The share in a company gives right to the shareholders to
    participate in profits as also in liquidation proceeds. Transfer of shares of
    an Indian company results in transfer of right to property/capital assets
    situated in India, irrespective of where the transfer is effected. In lieu
    thereof, charge to capital gain is attracted in terms of S. 9(1)(i) of
    Income-tax Act, which is not relieved by DTAA.

 

You May Also Like