Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreBCAJ Brieficles are short-format, web-only articles on contemporary topics of professional importance that are open-for-all to read & share.
Explore BrieficlesExplore past issues of BCA Journal & indulge in a treasure trove of high-quality professional content across format of print, videos & learning events from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreMonthly mouth-piece of BCAS, the BCA Journal is a leading publication that has been in continuous circulation for more than 53 years. Over the years the BCAJ has become synonymous with high-quality & authentic content across fields of finance, accounting, tax & regulatory matters. The BCAJ has wide circulation across India & commands huge respect amongst the Chartered Accountants` community.
Learn MoreFor queries, collaborations, and insights to forge, Drop a line, share thoughts, inquiries galore, At BCAJ, your messages, we eagerly explore.
Learn More5 Educational Institution : Exemption u/s.
10(22) of Income-tax Act, 1961 : A.Y. 1997-98 : Institution run for educational
purposes : No evidence that capitation fees had been charged : Institution
entitled to exemption u/s. 10(22).
[CIT v. Khalsa Rural Hospital and Nursing Training
Institute, 304 ITR 20 (P&H)]
The assessee-trust was running a rural hospital and training
institute for nurses. During the course of assessment proceedings for the A.Y.
1997-98, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had claimed exemption
u/s.11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer disallowed the
exemption u/s.11 and made an addition of Rs.40 lakhs on account of capitation
fee. The Tribunal allowed exemption u/s.10(22) of the Act.
The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed the appeal filed by
the Revenue and held as under :
“There was nothing on record to show that the assessee-trust
was charging any capitation fee. The Assessing Officer had not found any
irregularity in the accounts of the trust. There was no document to show that
the trust was being run for any purpose of profit except that for any
educational purposes. The assesse was entitled to exemption u/s.10(22).”