This article is oriented towards performing a clause by clause analysis
of GST Form-9C. GSTR-9C has been titled as a reconciliation statement driven
towards reconciliation of data as per books of accounts with the data reported
in the GSTR 9. Therefore, preparation of GSTR-9 has to be treated as being a
pre-cursor to the reconciliation statement to be prepared for GSTR-9C.
Foreword
We have all experienced multiple course corrections in the country-wide
GST implementation including the course correction in reporting front. For
instance, in April 2017, the ambitious plan of item level reporting (at output/
input level) in the form of GSTR-1/2/3 with GSTR-1A/2A was introduced. However,
in July 2017 GSTR-1/2/3 and its compliments have been suspended and replaced
with a surrogate return in the form of GSTR-3B condensed the information
requirement. The said form was meant to collect taxes and tide over the IT
preparedness in implementing this nation-wide law. There was a temporary shift
from item level reporting to aggregated level reporting in the returns.
Entities hence prepared internal workings (at item level) and only reported the
aggregate number in GSTR-3B. Then came October 2017 wherein the requirement to
file GSTR 1 was introduced.
The flip-flop in reporting formats and ambiguity in
law could have given scope for errors creeping into reporting or taxability.
The law permitted tax payers to rectify both these errors during the course of
the tax period with additional time granted until September 2018. Yet there
could be instances where errors remain unrectified. For such instances, GSTR-9
and 9C assume a higher significance for FY 2017-18. The Auditee should view the
exercise of GSTR 9 as an opportunity to review and rectify the ‘errors in
reporting’ and GSTR-9C as an opportunity to get an external view to taxability
and rectify ‘errors in taxability’.
Structure of Form 9C
Traditionally, scope of taxation under VAT/ Service tax/ Excise was
limited to business turnover. With advent of GST the gamut of taxation has
widened unimaginably – from financial / recorded transactions to
non-financial/unrecorded activities; from contractual events (written/ oral) to
non-contractual activities; from external transactions to internal events; from
revenue to capital / non-recurring items. The law has encompassed almost
everything one can imagine. We have in some sense transgressed from a
‘transaction based law’ to an ‘event based law’. The law drills deep into the
information mine of an organisation touching internal actions, behaviors and
movements. It is for this reason that 9C attempts to capture whole lot of
information which is beyond the trial balance/ balance sheet of an
organisation. The form has been structured as follows:
Part-I contains the basic details of registration. Part II, III, IV and
V are the reconciliation tables which are discussed below. It is pertinent to
note that any reconciliation is an examination of the presence/ absence of a
particular number in two comparatives. Therefore, prior to performing any
reconciliation, one needs to be clearly conscious of the composition of
starting point since all adjustments to be made to reach the other end are
based on the presence/ absence of that particular figure in the starting point.
All the clauses of Form-9C should be understood on the basis of this comparative.
Part II: Point No. 5: Reconciliation of turnover declared in audited
annual financial statements with turnover declared in Annual Return (GSTR-9)
This part reconciles the turnover level differences between audited data
and returned data. Conceptually, audited turnover would vary from returned
turnover on account of certain variances. While this part performs a two-way
reconciliation between audited accounts and GSTR-9, one would also have to
factor the background workings of GSTR-3B and make this a triangular
reconciliation to conclude on the tax level differences. The picture below
depicts the journey from BOA to GSTR-9 to GSTR-3B and back to BOA:
i. Timing variance
(TV): GST follows a monthly tax period and permits transactions to spill
over multiple months/ financial years but audited accounts freeze numbers
between two dates i.e. 01/04/XX to 31/03/XX. This spill-over effect creates
temporary differences in Y1 and reversing difference in a subsequent year (say
Y2). There could also be cases where the revenue recognition policy uses
different parameters in comparison to the GST time of supply provisions (eg. a
developer following percentage completion method of revenue recognition whereas
GST follows invoice/ receipt basis). Similarly, GST law requires the taxable
person to pay tax on advances received during the year though not recognised as
revenue, thus resulting in a timing difference between the BOA and returns.
ii. Accounting variance (Permanent variance) (AV): As mentioned
earlier, GST encompasses events which may not be reflected in the entity level
books of accounts (say internal stock transfers, internal cross charges, etc)
and thus creates a permanent variance between two numbers.
iii. Value variance
(Permanent variance) (VV): This represents variances arising on account
of difference in commercial value and GST value (section 15).
PART 5 & 6 – RECONCILIATION OF GROSS TURNOVER
This part reconciles the accounting turnover with the turnover reported
in GSTR-9. The GST turnover would be mapped from GSTR-9 (compilation of all
GSTR-1 returns) with subsequent year adjustments during the period April 2018
to September 2018 (such as rectification in errors in the amendment table,
etc.)
Clause Description |
Intricacies |
Auditor responsibility/ working Papers |
Adjustments/ Illustrations |
||||||||||||
5A. Turnover as per audited financial statements |
|||||||||||||||
Report the revenue from operations of the entity |
|
|
Revenue excluding GST component should be adopted
No adjustment should be made to the financial |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
5B. Unbilled revenue (UBR) at the beginning of the financial year(+) 5H. UBR at the end of the financial year (-) |
|||||||||||||||
UBR as reported in the Asset GL as on |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
5C. Unadjusted advances (UADV) at the beginning of the financial year 5I. UADV at the end of the financial year (+) |
|||||||||||||||
Report the UADV as on 31-03-2018 and 01-04-2017 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
5D. Deemed Supply under Schedule I |
|||||||||||||||
Transactions without considerations are to be |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
5E. Credit notes issued after the end of the financial year but |
|||||||||||||||
Credit notes u/s. 35 are issued for cases |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
5J. Credit Notes accounted for in the audited |
|||||||||||||||
Credit notes u/s. 35 are issued for reduction of |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
5F. Trade Discounts accounted for in the audited |
|||||||||||||||
Trade discounts u/s. 15(3) could be those granted |
|
|
Gratuitous discount given by a company on 100th |
||||||||||||
5G. Turnover during April 2017-June 2017 (-) |
|||||||||||||||
Audited financial turnover at the location level |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
5K. Adjustments on account of supply of goods by |
|||||||||||||||
Report DTA sales by SEZ unit |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
5L. Turnover for the period under Composition (-) |
|||||||||||||||
Accounting turnover during the period under |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
5M. Adjustments in turnover u/s. 15 and rules |
|||||||||||||||
Variances in commercial value and GST value to be |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
5N. Adjustments in turnover due to foreign |
|||||||||||||||
Difference in valuation due to forex rates |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
5O. Adjustments in turnover due to reasons not |
|||||||||||||||
Residual entry for all other adjustments |
|
Auditor to seek representation on this residual |
Expense recoveries which are debited to the
|
||||||||||||
5R = 5Q-5P : Unreconciled difference between the Accounting |
|||||||||||||||
Reasons for non-reconciliation to be provided |
• It is absolutely essential to reconcile the two |
|
|
||||||||||||
PART 7& 8 – RECONCILIATION OF TAXABLE TURNOVER
This part aims at moving
|
|||||||||||||||
Clause Description |
Intricacies |
Auditor responsibility/ working Papers |
Adjustments/ Illustrations |
||||||||||||
7A. Annual Turnover after (+/-) adjustments above |
|||||||||||||||
Turnover as per accounts with the +/- adjustments |
|
NIL |
NIL |
||||||||||||
7B. Value of Exempted, Nil rates, Non-GST |
|||||||||||||||
Non taxable items comprised in GSTR-9 are |
|
|
This turnover should be reported net of debit |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
7C. Zero-rated supplies without payment of tax |
|||||||||||||||
Export Supplies and Supplies to SEZ units/ |
|
|
Same as above |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
7D. Supplies on which tax is to be paid on |
|||||||||||||||
Turnover of suppliers under RCM |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
7G = 7F – 7E : Taxable turnover as computed above |
|||||||||||||||
There could be +ve/ -ve result |
|
|
There should not be any un-explainable difference |
||||||||||||
PART 9, 10 & 11 – RECONCILIATION OF RATE WISE LIABILITY AND AMOUNT
This part aims at
PART 12 & 13 – INPUT TAX CREDIT RECONCILIATION
This part performs an
|
|||||||||||||||
12A. ITC availed as per |
|||||||||||||||
ITC ledger extracts for each GSTIN to be reported |
|
|
ITC availed in accounts but not claimed in any of the transition/GST
ISD credit availed in GSTR-3B but availed at a different location in
|
||||||||||||
12B. ITC booked in the earlier financial years |
|||||||||||||||
Transition Credit of earlier financial years to |
|
|
Centralised Cenvat credit which is distributed |
||||||||||||
12C. ITC booked in current financial year and |
|||||||||||||||
ITC booked in accounts but availed in subsequent |
|
|
All figures reported here should be net of any |
||||||||||||
14. Reconciliation of ITC at description level |
|||||||||||||||
Ledger level break-up of ITC credit |
|
|
Column 4 : Amount of eligible ITC availed represents |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
13 & 15. Reconciliation of ITC at ledger |
|||||||||||||||
Reasons for non-reconciliation to be provided |
|
|
Eg. Admitted reversals of input tax credit not |
Reporting horizon of GSTR-9C
Books of accounts have an annual time horizon and the GST-1/3B work on
monthly periodicity with hard close only in September following the respective
financial year. This variance in period
poses a peculiar problem because of a lack of a revision option in GSTR-1/3B
and GSTN storing data based on reporting period rather than the document
date. Let’s take similar yet
contradictory examples (i) debit note raised in FY17-18 delayed reporting in GSTR-3B/1
of 18-19 (ii) debit notes raised in FY17-18 and delayed reporting only in
GSTR-1 in 18-19 (iii) debit notes raised in FY18-19 for enhancement of a price
agreed in FY 17-18 and reported in GSTR-3B/1 if 18-19? Let’s compare these example based on following
parameters
Parameter |
Case – 1 : Delayed |
Case – 2 : Delay in |
Case – 3 : delay in |
Original Invoice date |
01-01-2018 |
01-01-2018 |
01-01-2018 |
Accrual of liability |
January 2018 |
January 2018 |
January 2018 (*) |
Debit note date/ |
31-03-2018 |
31-03-2018 |
30-09-2018 |
Date of Reporting |
Clause 10 certainly |
Clause 10 would capture |
Clause 10 would not |
Date of Reporting |
This would be a |
This will be a |
Transaction of purely |
Whether reporting in 9C is anchored to tax liability accrued in FY 17-18
or anchored to accounting and/or reporting the base document? Section 9 r/w 12/13 provide the time of supply for the
‘transaction value’. Legally speaking,
all liabilities accrued in 17-18 (either through current year/ subsequent year
adjustments) should be reported as part of Form-9C irrespective of the date of
accounting and reporting in GSTR-3B/1.
Procedurally, section 35(4) and rule 59 require reporting based on date
of issuance of base document. Going by
this analogy, transactions accounted in 17-18 would form the basis and those
accounted subsequently (for any reasons) should not form part of 17-18. The author believes that this second approach
should be adopted keeping in mind the true spirit of reconciliation i.e.
balance two values based on its composition.
Part – B : General points for Audit observations/
Comments
Part-B is the Auditor’s report over the correctness of contents of the
reconciliation statement. The report
places an onus that the reconciling items are accurate having credible
reasoning. This said report could have
two forms – (a) where the certification is by the person who has also conducted
the statutory audit; and (b) where the certification is placing reliance on the
audited books of accounts examined by another statutory auditor. The prescribed format provides certain areas
where observations/ comment may be provided by the person certifying the
report. Other general points for
consideration during this exercise are:
Conclusion
From tax administration perspective, GSTR-9C is like an ‘appetizer’ in a
full course meal of assessments. In
other words, it addresses the limited question prior to any assessment ie. are
reported values are correct when compared to the accounting records. It gives a headstart of items included/
excluded from the returns and hence enables the officer to perform a Top-Down
analysis of the records of the entity.
Once this picture is laid out, the officer is equipped in examining the
nuts and bolts of each transaction (such as time of supply, place of supply,
valuation, rate of tax, eligibility/ ineligibility of credits, etc). Auditor is merely a facilitator and is not
expected to be a judge over the auditee’s decision.