Subscribe to BCA Journal Know More

July 2012

CENVAT credit — Bills of entry showing address of some other unit but goods received at the factory — Credit cannot be denied even if it was not claimed immediately on receipt of goods and even if the address not mentioned on the bill of entry.

By Puloma Dalal
Jayesh Gogri
Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 1 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
43. (2012) 26 STR 395 (Tri.-Mumbai) SGS India Pvt. Ltd.

CENVAT credit — Bills of entry showing address of some other unit but goods received at the factory — Credit cannot be denied even if it was not claimed immediately on receipt of goods and even if the address not mentioned on the bill of entry.


Facts:

The appellant received goods at the factory, however, the bills of entry showed the address of their head office. Moreover, the credit was claimed after a span of one year. The Department relying on the case of Marmagoa Steel Ltd. (2004) 178 ELT 480 (T) denied the credit on two grounds: the address of the factory was not mentioned in the bills of entry and the credit was supposed to be claimed immediately on receipt of goods.

Held:

The case on which the Department was relying had been reversed by the Bombay High Court and such reversal has been affirmed by the Supreme Court 229 ELT 481 (SC). The credit cannot be denied to the appellant merely on the ground that credit was not taken immediately. The Tribunal further observed that not taking credit immediately affected the assessee more than the Revenue.

Download PDF

You May Also Like

Construction services — Construction completed before the introduction of Service tax on such services — However, completion certificate obtained by the appellant after the introduction of the levy — Held, it is a very small part of the contract and for that reason Service tax cannot be demanded.

(2012) 25 STR 290 (Tri.-Chennai) — Rajalakshmi Paper Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai.