Renew Your Membership by 31st October 2024! Renew Now!

October 2015

Business expenditure-Capital or revenue expenditure – Section 37 – A. Y. 1998-99 – Machine not put to use on ground that technology had become obsolete – Expenditure incurred for development of machines is revenue expenditure

By K. B. Bhujle Advocate
Reading Time 1 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
CIT vs. Britannia Industries Ltd.; 376 ITR 299 (Cal):

In the previous year relevant to A. Y. 1998-99, the assessee had developed four machines at a cost of Rs. 46,26,552/. However, after the machines were developed, the assessee found that the technology used had already become obsolete. Therefore, the machines were not put to use for manufacturing purposes. The assessee claimed the expenditure as revenue expenditure. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim. CIT(A) held that the expenditure is allowable u/s. 37. The Tribunal upheld the allowance.

On appeal by the Revenue, the Calcutta High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held as under:

“The question whether the expenses incurred on account of development of machines was revenue expenditure or not basically is a question of fact and when the Tribunal had concurred with the views expressed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the view taken by them was a plausible view, no interference in the order of the Tribunal was warranted.”

Download PDF

You May Also Like

Total Income – Income of minor child of assessee from admission to the benefits of partnership cannot be taxed in the hands of the assessee u/s. 64(1) (iii) even when read with Explanation 2A where income earned by the trust cannot be utilised for the benefit of the minor during its minority.

Disallowance u/s. 14A – A. Y. 2004-05 – Section 14A will not apply if no exempt income is received or receivable during the relevant previous year