Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

June 2010

Appellate Tribunal — Passing of order — Reasonable time — Order passed after six months — Order set aside on ground of delay — S. 129B of Customs Act, 1962.

By Dr. K. Shivaram
Ajay R. Singh
Advocates
Reading Time 1 mins

New Page 1

[Shantilal Jain v. UOI, 2010 (252) ELT 326 (Bom.)]

In this case the impugned order was passed by the Customs,
Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal practically after a period of six
months from the date of hearing. The Bombay High Court set aside the order
without examining merits or demerits thereof and the appeal was restored to the
file of the
Tribunal for de novo hearing and decision afresh. The Court relied on the case
of Dewang Rasiklal Vora v. Union of India, 2003 (158) ELT 30 (Bom.); wherein it
was held that the judgment passed after considerable gap of time from the date
of hearing was
liable to be set aside, observing that justice should not only be done, but must
manifestly appear to
be done.

The Court also showed displeasure on the conduct of the
advocates signing the minutes of the order on behalf of the Revenue, which was
found to be not as per consensus between the advocates. The Court observed that
it was the obligation on the part of the advocate for the Revenue to protect the
interest of the Revenue and to be more diligent.

See Shivsagar Veg Restaurant v. CIT, (2009) 317 ITR 433 (Bom.)

Download PDF

You May Also Like

Translation of document : Filing of translated copy of document in Court is not additional evidence — Only requirement is that counsel should certify that translation is correct : Civil Procedure Code : O.13, R.4, General Rules (Civil) 1986, Rule 37.

Torts : Person losing his right hand due to electrocution — Electricity Board liable to compensate.