Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

July 2023

Allied Laws

By Dr. K. Shivaram, Senior Advocate
Rahul K. Hakani | Shashi Bekal, Advocates
Reading Time 9 mins
15 Rasool Mohammed (Dead) Thru. LRs. vs. Anees Khan and others AIR 2023 (NOC) 315 (MP) Date of order: 24th March, 2023 Power of Attorney - Legal Heir appointed – Permission to lead evidence - [Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order 3, Rule 2] FACTS The original Plaintiff filed a civil suit for declaration and permanent injunction before the Trial Court. During the pendency of the civil suit, the original Plaintiff Rasool Mohammad expired, and a legal representative, i.e., wife, was added as the legal heir. The Plaintiff petitioner executed a Power of Attorney on 1st September, 2016 and authorised Zaheer Qureshi to proceed on behalf of her in the said civil suit. The Trial Court allowed the objection of the Respondents that the Power of Attorney holder was not competent to exhibit the documents on his behalf and therefore was not allowed to lead evidence. Hence, the appeal. HELD       The Court held that after perusal of the provisions of Order 3 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is evident that there is no provision for permitting the Power of Attorney holder to depose in place of the original plaintiff. The Petitioner being a lady aged about 55 years is duly competent to appear before the Court for deposition. In such circumstances, it is clear that the Power of Attorney holder cannot be permitted to depose if the Plai