Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

November 2011

Advance tax: Interest u/ss.234B and 234C: A.Y. 2007-08: Search and seizure: Cash seized of Rs.18 lakh and Rs.1.98 crore deposited by assessee on 31-1-2007 could be adjusted against advance tax liability for computing interest u/ss.234B and 234C.

By K. B. Bhujle, Advocate
Reading Time 3 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
[CIT v. Shri Jyotindra B. Mody (Bom.), ITA No. 3741 of 2010, dated 21-9-2011] In the course of the search proceedings on 10th, 11th and 12th January, 2007 cash amounting to Rs.18 lakh was found and seized. The assessee offered an income of Rs.6,32,79,857 and paid an additional amount of Rs.1.98 crore on 31-1-2007. Thereafter, by a letter dated 14-3-2007, the assessee requested to adjust the said amounts of Rs.18 lakh and 1.98 crore towards the advance tax liability. The Assessing Officer accepted the offered income. However, while computing interest u/ss.234B and 234C, he did not take into account the said amounts of Rs.18 lakh and 1.98 crore paid by the assessee towards the advance tax liability. The CIT(A) allowed the assessee’s claim. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue.

On appeal by the Revenue, the Bombay High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held as under:

“(i) The basic argument of the Revenue is that u/s.132B(1)(i), the amount seized during the course of search can be dealt with for discharging the existing liability under the Acts set out therein. In the present case, the tax liability in relation to the assessment year in question would get crystallised only after the assessment is completed and therefore, the request of the assessee for adjustment of the amounts in question towards the advance tax liability could not be entertained.

(ii) We see no merit in the above contention, because once the assessee offers to tax the undisclosed income including the amount seized during the search, then the liability to pay advance tax in respect of that amount arises even before the completion of the assessment. Section 132B(1)(i) of the Act does not prohibit utilisation of the amount seized during the course of search towards the advance tax payable on the amount of undisclosed income declared during the course of search.

(iii) In the present case, the assessee, prior to the last date for payment of last instalment of advance tax, had in fact by a letter dated 14-3-2007 requested the Assessing Officer to adjust the amount towards the existing advance tax liability. Since advance tax liability is to be computed and paid in accordance with the provisions of the Act even before the completion of the assessment, no fault can be found with the decision of the ITAT in holding that in the facts of the present case, the amounts in question were liable to be adjusted towards the existing advance tax liability.”

You May Also Like