Renew Your Membership by 31st October 2024! Renew Now!

December 2012

2G Spectrum Auction Generates Plenty of Lessons

By Tarunkumar Singhal, Raman Jokhakar, Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 3 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
The 2G spectrum auction hasn’t quite hit the jackpot. It’s raised Rs 9,407 crore – far less than the government’s target of Rs 40,000 crore and niggardly compared to Rs 67,719 crore raised via 3G spectrum bidding. Look deeper and it’s clear expectations of market demand were pitched at outlandish levels. What the dud event did generate, however, is plenty of lessons.

First, CAG’s astronomical figure – Rs 1.76 lakh crore – flies out the window on being tested on the ground. Booty amassed in 2010 from sale of a restricted amount of 3G spectrum was hardly a realistic revenue-garnering benchmark. This isn’t to say the latest auction couldn’t have scored better, had the reserve price been less eye-popping and India’s investment climate more propitious. But that’s exactly why the government shouldn’t have been bamboozled to rush into an auction, using TRAI’s play-safe floor price. Nor is this to argue that the FCFS policy wasn’t messed with by former telecom minister A Raja. This is merely to reiterate that mobile telephony wouldn’t have soared had we been fixated on maximising revenue.

Second, outrage over corruption scandals shouldn’t blind us to issues of jurisdictional propriety and economic sense. It’s not for CAG or courts to dictate policy. In its response to the presidential reference on allocation of natural resources, the Supreme Court made this clear. Identifying ‘common good’ as the key criterion for resource disbursal, it said policymaking is the government’s turf. Yes, government must work with institutional checks and balances. But institutional overreach can lead to unhappy denouements, as with the lacklustre spectrum auction.

Third, resources are best mobilised through the expansion of telecom which fosters overall economic growth. But the sector can’t grow to potential with exorbitant costs of entry that would mar competition by barring smaller players, financially burden companies and raise prices for consumers. It’s important here that spectrum distribution isn’t opaque, whatever the modality. For instance, single-step e-auctions can work well with safeguards. So can a technology-enabled system where all licensees can access pooled spectrum. What we need now is to focus on practical ways to boost telecom infrastructure and transparency in policy implementation. What we don’t need is sound and fury over controversies blown out of all proportion. As we’ve seen, that only makes policymakers bungle on the side of caution, which chokes off investor feel-good and raises prices all round.

(Source: The Times of India dated 16-11-2012).

You May Also Like