Facts:
The figures depicted in the show-cause notice as well as adjudication order did not throw light as to what was the consideration received for different activities to bring them under the fold of law.
The appellant contended that since show-cause notice being basic foundation of any legal proceedings. For it to be valid it should have the substance of allegation and should be clear in all aspects.
Held:
Adjudicating authorities failed to pass a well-reasoned order. Neither did they speak on incidence of tax on each activity separately, nor did they test the activities of the appellant in detail to bring them under the tax net correctly. Appeal was allowed.