Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

May 2017

14. Penalty: Section 271(1)(c) – A. Ys. 2003-04 to 2006-07- Assessing Officer initiating penalty proceedings for furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income and imposing penalty for concealment of income- Order imposing penalty to be made only on ground on which penalty proceedings initiated and not on fresh ground of which assessee had no notice- Penalty to be deleted

By K. B. Bhujle, Advocate
Reading Time 2 mins

CIT vs. Samson Perinchery; 392 ITR 4 (Bom):

The Assessing Officer issued notice for penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act, 1961 on the ground of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. However, he passed order imposing penalty on the ground of concealment of income. The Tribunal deleted the penalty on the ground that the initiation of penalty by the Assessing Officer was for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income while the order imposing penalty was for concealment of income and it could not be that the initiation would be only on one limb, i.e. for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income while imposition of penalty on the other limb, i.e. concealment of income.

On appeal by the Revenue, the Bombay High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held as under:

“i)  The satisfaction of the Assessing Officer with regard to only one of the two breaches u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act, for initiation of penalty proceedings would not permit penalty being imposed for the other breach. Thus, the order imposing penalty was to be made only on the ground on which the penalty proceedings were initiated and it could not be on a fresh ground of which the assessee had no notice.

    

ii)  The Tribunal rightly deleted the penalty. The appeals are dismissed.”

You May Also Like