Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

September 2026

Raipur Development Authority v. Anup Kumar Sahu : Allottees have an unconditional right to refund for possession delays, even without formal contracts specifying the target completion date.

By Jagdish Punjabi, Chartered Accountant | Ritu Punjabi, Advocate
Reading Time 4 mins

7. MANU/CG/0356/2024

Chhattisgarh High Court

Raipur Development Authority v. Anup Kumar Sahu

Date of Order: 17.01.2024

An allottee has an unconditional right to refund under section 18(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 when there is delay of possession beyond the stipulated date notwithstanding the fact that delay was due to pending litigation and notwithstanding that there was no written agreement or formal contract expressly recording the date of possession.

FACTS

The Respondent filed an application before the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) under section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, (“the Act”) on the ground that he had not received the possession of the house. It was stated that the Respondent was allotted a 2 BHK Duplex Row House on 10.06.2016 for an amount of Rs. 18,25,000. The Respondent had deposited an amount of Rs. 18,21,250 upto 31.10.2017. However, even after four years of filing the application before the RERA, the Respondent did not get the possession of the said house. Vide a letter dated 27.08.2020, the promoter RDA required the Respondent t

You May Also Like