Maa Chintpurni Mining Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO ITA No. 28/Ranchi/2024 A.Y.: 2015-16 Date of Order: 13th August, 2024 Section: 250
36. Section 250(6) of the Act obligates the CIT(A) to state points for determination in appeal before him, the decision thereon and the reasons for determination. CIT(A) has no power to dismiss appeal of assessee on account of non-prosecution and without deciding on the merits of the case.
FACTS
The assessee, engaged in the business of mining, filed its return of income electronically on 29th October, 2015 declaring total income at ₹21,960. The case of the assessee was selected under limited scrutiny under CASS for the reason 'large share premium received during the year'. During the assessment proceedings, the assessee failed to substantiate the nature of amount received to the tune of ₹68,11,000 whether it was share premium or otherwise to the satisfaction of the AO.
The assessment order stated that the assessee did not make due compliance to notices issued from time to time. Thus, the Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s.144 of the Act assessing total income at ₹68,32,955 after making addition of ₹68,11,000 on account of unexplained ca