Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreImportant Amendments by The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 – Charitable Trusts
Read MoreImportant Amendments by The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 – Capital Gains
Read MoreImportant Amendments by The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 – Buy-Back of Shares
Read MoreImportant Amendments by The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 – Re-Assessment Procedures
Read MoreImportant Amendments by The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 – Block Assessment
Read MoreImportant Amendments By The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 – Other Important Amendments
Read MoreBCAJ Brieficles are short-format, web-only articles on contemporary topics of professional importance that are open-for-all to read & share.
Explore BrieficlesExplore past issues of BCA Journal & indulge in a treasure trove of high-quality professional content across format of print, videos & learning events from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreMonthly mouth-piece of BCAS, the BCA Journal is a leading publication that has been in continuous circulation for more than 53 years. Over the years the BCAJ has become synonymous with high-quality & authentic content across fields of finance, accounting, tax & regulatory matters. The BCAJ has wide circulation across India & commands huge respect amongst the Chartered Accountants` community.
Learn MoreFor queries, collaborations, and insights to forge, Drop a line, share thoughts, inquiries galore, At BCAJ, your messages, we eagerly explore.
Learn MorePr. CIT - 1 Mumbai vs. SVD Resins & Plastics Pvt. Ltd
ITXA No. 1662 & 1664 of 2018
A.Ys.: 2009–2010 and 2010–2011
Dated: 7th August, 2024, (Bom) (HC)
14. Section 69C — Bogus Purchase — Genuineness of purchase transaction.
Briefly, the facts are that the assessee was engaged in the business of trading in resins and chemicals on wholesale basis. On information received from the DGIT (Investigation), Mumbai, the Assessing Officer (AO) invoked Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to reopen the completed assessment by issuing notice under Section 148 dated 12th March, 2013. In response thereto, the assessee filed a revised return on 20th March, 2013, as also sought the reasons as recorded by the AO. The AO was of the opinion that the assessee had made purchases amounting to ₹1,34,25,500 from six parties who were declared by the Sales Tax Department as ingenuine dealers. It is not in dispute that during the assessment proceedings, the assessee filed ledger accounts, confirmation of suppliers, purchase bills, delivery bank statements and other documentary evidences to justify the genuineness of the purchases. The AO nonetheless was of the opinion th