68 Tapi JWIL JV vs. Income-tax Officer
[2023] 108 ITR(T) 27 (Delhi - Trib.)
ITA NO. 6722 (DELHI) OF 2018
A.Y.: 2014-15
Date of Order: 16th October, 2023
Sec. 40A(2)(b).: Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(b) is not justified on merely estimating that more income should have been earned from subcontracting without bringing any comparable figures.
FACTS
M/s TAPI Prestressed Products Ltd. (‘TPPL’) and M/s JITF Water Infrastructure Ltd. (‘JWIL’) had entered into an agreement to form a Joint Venture (JV) with the specific purpose of bidding for construction of 318 MLD 70 MGD Sewage Pumping Station etc. on design, build and operate basis. The contract was awarded by Delhi Jal Board to the assessee JV. TPPL had executed the work and raised bills for ₹15,02,04,381/- to the assessee JV. The assessee JV had raised bills for ₹15,52,33,963/- to Delhi Jal Board. The assessee JV had filed its ITR declaring total income of ₹1,75,600/-.
The AO had passed the assessment order u/s 143(3) in the status of AOP, determining the total income at