Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreBCAJ Brieficles are short-format, web-only articles on contemporary topics of professional importance that are open-for-all to read & share.
Explore BrieficlesExplore past issues of BCA Journal & indulge in a treasure trove of high-quality professional content across format of print, videos & learning events from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreMonthly mouth-piece of BCAS, the BCA Journal is a leading publication that has been in continuous circulation for more than 53 years. Over the years the BCAJ has become synonymous with high-quality & authentic content across fields of finance, accounting, tax & regulatory matters. The BCAJ has wide circulation across India & commands huge respect amongst the Chartered Accountants` community.
Learn MoreFor queries, collaborations, and insights to forge, Drop a line, share thoughts, inquiries galore, At BCAJ, your messages, we eagerly explore.
Learn MoreINTRODUCTION
Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) often have a scenario wherein the family sponsors the education of one of the members and he goes on to become a successful professional/businessman. In such a case, the question that one comes across is whether the joint family, which has funded his education, can stake a claim to his earnings? In other words, can the other family members state that whatever income / wealth the member has on account of the investment made by the family in his education and hence, they should also share in the same? Let us examine this quite interesting facet of family law.
HINDU LAW AND HUF
Hindu Law is a unique statute since part of it is codified by the Parliament whereas part of it is governed by customs, traditions, and usages. The answer to the above questions could be dissected into two scenarios ~ the position before 1930 and the position post-1930.
POSITION BEFORE 1930
Before 1930, the position in this respect was dictated by the ancient uncodified Hindu Law which was explained by a Division Bench ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of Chandrakant Manilal Shah vs. CIT (1992) 193 ITR 1 (SC). It held that before 1930, it was settled law that income