Subscribe to BCA Journal Know More

January 2019

DECODING GST – CLAUSE BY CLAUSE ANALYSIS OF GST FORM 9C

By Sunil Gabhawalla / Rishabh Singhvi / Parth Shah
Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 29 mins

This article is oriented towards performing a clause by clause analysis
of GST Form-9C. GSTR-9C has been titled as a reconciliation statement driven
towards reconciliation of data as per books of accounts with the data reported
in the GSTR 9. Therefore, preparation of GSTR-9 has to be treated as being a
pre-cursor to the reconciliation statement to be prepared for GSTR-9C.

 

Foreword

 

We have all experienced multiple course corrections in the country-wide
GST implementation including the course correction in reporting front. For
instance, in April 2017, the ambitious plan of item level reporting (at output/
input level) in the form of GSTR-1/2/3 with GSTR-1A/2A was introduced. However,
in July 2017 GSTR-1/2/3 and its compliments have been suspended and replaced
with a surrogate return in the form of GSTR-3B condensed the information
requirement. The said form was meant to collect taxes and tide over the IT
preparedness in implementing this nation-wide law. There was a temporary shift
from item level reporting to aggregated level reporting in the returns.
Entities hence prepared internal workings (at item level) and only reported the
aggregate number in GSTR-3B. Then came October 2017 wherein the requirement to
file GSTR 1 was introduced.

 

The flip-flop in reporting formats and ambiguity in
law could have given scope for errors creeping into reporting or taxability.
The law permitted tax payers to rectify both these errors during the course of
the tax period with additional time granted until September 2018. Yet there
could be instances where errors remain unrectified. For such instances, GSTR-9
and 9C assume a higher significance for FY 2017-18. The Auditee should view the
exercise of GSTR 9 as an opportunity to review and rectify the ‘errors in
reporting’ and GSTR-9C as an opportunity to get an external view to taxability
and rectify ‘errors in taxability’.

 

Structure of Form 9C

 

Traditionally, scope of taxation under VAT/ Service tax/ Excise was
limited to business turnover. With advent of GST the gamut of taxation has
widened unimaginably – from financial / recorded transactions to
non-financial/unrecorded activities; from contractual events (written/ oral) to
non-contractual activities; from external transactions to internal events; from
revenue to capital / non-recurring items. The law has encompassed almost
everything one can imagine. We have in some sense transgressed from a
‘transaction based law’ to an ‘event based law’. The law drills deep into the
information mine of an organisation touching internal actions, behaviors and
movements. It is for this reason that 9C attempts to capture whole lot of
information which is beyond the trial balance/ balance sheet of an
organisation. The form has been structured as follows:

 

 

Part-I contains the basic details of registration. Part II, III, IV and
V are the reconciliation tables which are discussed below. It is pertinent to
note that any reconciliation is an examination of the presence/ absence of a
particular number in two comparatives. Therefore, prior to performing any
reconciliation, one needs to be clearly conscious of the composition of
starting point since all adjustments to be made to reach the other end are
based on the presence/ absence of that particular figure in the starting point.
All the clauses of Form-9C should be understood on the basis of this comparative.

 

Part II: Point No. 5: Reconciliation of turnover declared in audited
annual financial statements with turnover declared in Annual Return (GSTR-9)

 

This part reconciles the turnover level differences between audited data
and returned data. Conceptually, audited turnover would vary from returned
turnover on account of certain variances. While this part performs a two-way
reconciliation between audited accounts and GSTR-9, one would also have to
factor the background workings of GSTR-3B and make this a triangular
reconciliation to conclude on the tax level differences. The picture below
depicts the journey from BOA to GSTR-9 to GSTR-3B and back to BOA:

 

 

 

i.      Timing variance
(TV):
GST follows a monthly tax period and permits transactions to spill
over multiple months/ financial years but audited accounts freeze numbers
between two dates i.e. 01/04/XX to 31/03/XX. This spill-over effect creates
temporary differences in Y1 and reversing difference in a subsequent year (say
Y2). There could also be cases where the revenue recognition policy uses
different parameters in comparison to the GST time of supply provisions (eg. a
developer following percentage completion method of revenue recognition whereas
GST follows invoice/ receipt basis). Similarly, GST law requires the taxable
person to pay tax on advances received during the year though not recognised as
revenue, thus resulting in a timing difference between the BOA and returns.

 

ii.  Accounting variance (Permanent variance) (AV): As mentioned
earlier, GST encompasses events which may not be reflected in the entity level
books of accounts (say internal stock transfers, internal cross charges, etc)
and thus creates a permanent variance between two numbers.

 

iii.  Value variance
(Permanent variance) (VV): This represents variances arising on account
of difference in commercial value and GST value (section 15).

 

PART 5 & 6 – RECONCILIATION OF GROSS TURNOVER

 

This part reconciles the accounting turnover with the turnover reported
in GSTR-9. The GST turnover would be mapped from GSTR-9 (compilation of all
GSTR-1 returns) with subsequent year adjustments during the period April 2018
to September 2018 (such as rectification in errors in the amendment table,
etc.)

 

Clause Description

Intricacies

Auditor responsibility/ working Papers

Adjustments/ Illustrations

5A. Turnover as per audited financial statements
for the State/UT (for multi-GSTIN units under same PAN the turnover shall be
derived from the audited financial statement) – Starting Point

Report the revenue from operations of the entity
in the P&L for the financial year April 2017 to March 2018 (incl. the
non-GST period)

  •  Financial year 2017-18 numbers are to be
    adopted.  For entities having multiple
    registrations, the instruction of the form suggests that a GSTIN level
    turnover should be extracted from the audited turnover at entity level.
  •  Auditor should obtain the signed financial
    statements.  In case of multiple
    registrations, auditor should obtain GSTIN level data which aggregates to the
    audited figure under a representation letter.

Revenue excluding GST component should be adopted
from financial statements

 

No adjustment should be made to the financial
number and it should be directly planted into this clause. Any adjustments to
this number should be made only via form 9C.

 

  • This clause does not require a ‘State level
    Trial Balance’ and the auditor can rely on any suitable methodology in the
    company which extracts the registration level turnover from the revenue GL
    (such as cost centre, location codes, etc).
  •  Other income streams in separate schedules
    should not be included here. Only those having GST implications should be
    added as a separate line item.
  •   All
    subsequent clauses should also be applied at the GSTIN level only.
  •  The auditor should check if the audit
    adjustments on account of transfer pricing / IND-AS / provisions, etc., are
    accounted for in the books at registration level / consolidated level and
    accordingly, the registration level revenue should be arrived at.
  •  Auditor may consider documenting/ reporting the
    broad composition of the starting point as an observation in Part-B since all
    subsequent adjustments are dependent on this composition. 

 

5B. Unbilled revenue (UBR) at the beginning of the financial year(+)

5H. UBR at the end of the financial year (-)

UBR as reported in the Asset GL as on
01-04-2017and 31-03-2018 (+/-) to be taken at state level

  •  The objective of this clause is to adjust
    opening UBR which is billed during the GST period and eliminate fresh
    recognition of UBR by reducing it from the audited revenue
  •  It may be advisable to map the opening
    composition of UBR with billing under Service tax/ GST period
  • Auditor to document the revenue recognition
    policy and management’s view for its variance with the Time of Supply
    provisions
  • Delay in billing beyond the contractual due
    date may need to be analysed considering the provision of Time of Supply
    under GST.
  •  A MRL may be obtained with regards to details
    of Unbilled Revenue provision of earlier period reversed during the period
    under audit and fresh unbilled revenue provision created during the period of
    audit
  • Some entities have taken a conservative stand
    and considered UBR as their taxable turnover under Service tax (especially
    export entities).  In such case, a note
    that UBR has not been reported since there is no timing variance between
    revenue recognition and time of supply provisions could be provided.

5C. Unadjusted advances (UADV) at the beginning of the financial year
(-)

5I. UADV at the end of the financial year (+)

Report the UADV as on 31-03-2018 and 01-04-2017
as per BS/ location level accounts

  • Only taxable advances need to be included in
    the opening/ closing values i.e. advances on which tax has been paid
  • In case of decentralised billing/ accounting
    practiced during the service tax regime, it would be easy for the assessee to
    ascertain the state level opening UADV
  •  In case of service entities having centralised
    registration under service tax, the adjustments towards opening UADV and the
    service tax turnover may be recorded only in the Form 9C of the centralised
    office of the tax payer
  • Verify opening UADV with the state level
    billing in subsequent period to ensure accuracy of the data provided by the
    assessee and ensure there is no cross adjustments between branches
  •  If assessee has not offered advances to
    taxation during the service tax/ GST period, this clause would become
    redundant and an observation should be made in the certificate
  • Auditor to verify that tax has been paid and
    turnover has been reported in GSTR-9 at the time of receipt of advances which
    are comprised in the year end UADV
  •  In certain cases tax payers have paid the tax
    on advances based on an incorrect place of supply (i.e. IGST instead of
    CGST+SGST), necessary adjustments may need to be made at the tax level if not
    already adjusted in the returns. Refund of the incorrect tax may be sought by
    the assessee through a separate process (refer tax level reconciliation)

5D. Deemed Supply under Schedule I

Transactions without considerations are to be
captured here such as Branch transfers/ intra-entity cross-charges; principal
agent supplies, etc

  • This should include activities which are deemed
    to be supply under the GST law, i.e., covered under schedule I of the CGST
    Act but not included in the financial statements/ state level turnover.
  • Auditor should identify all such cases which
    might be covered under Schedule I of the CGST Act.
  •  Auditor may consider reconciling the delivery
    challans/ e-way bills generation data for completeness of the reporting.

 

 

  •  Some entities have practiced departmental
    accounting for state level registration and made consolidation adjustments at
    the time of preparation of financial statements.  One may verify whether the turnover in 5A
    already includes this figure
  • In case where state level data has been
    extracted from cost centres/ location codes, adjustments to the accounting
    turnover becomes necessary.
  • Fixed asset and other inventory registers may
    be examined to ascertain whether there are disposals/ write-off of business
    assets on which input tax credit has been availed
  •  For instance, branch transfer of goods can be
    identified based on the examination of the inventory registers for
    identification of inter-state stock movements and its reporting in GSTR-3B/1.
    Similarly, deemed supply of service between distinct persons can be
    identified by doing a revenue cost analysis for each registration and reviewing
    the documented policy in this regard.
  • Auditor should conduct a review of all assets
    and seek representation on the physical location/ presence within the
    respective States to determine whether there is any permanent transfer/
    disposal of assets
  • Auditors may consider caveating their report to
    the extent that auditing methodologies only facilitate review of identified
    branch transfers and that the certificate should not be construed as a
    comprehensive identification of all such deemed supplies
  • In case of supply of goods, tax payers have
    been exempted from payment of taxes at the time of receipt of advances.  In such cases, closing unadjusted advances
    for supply of goods would only comprise of receipts during July 2017 to Nov
    2017.

5E. Credit notes issued after the end of the financial year but
reflected in the annual return (+) : apparent error in signage

Credit notes u/s. 35 are issued for cases
involving change in taxable value or on account of goods return or deficient
supplies

  • Credit notes raised by an entity could be those
    which have a GST impact, i.e., satisfy the conditions prescribed u/s. 35 and
    those which do not have a GST impact (for example, account settlement credit
    notes or bad debts and so on).  This
    clause is meant to captures the former and that also only to the extent such
    credit notes are issued during the subsequent financial year in relation to
    supply made during the period under audit are reflected in the Annual return
    filed for the period under audit
  • The auditor will have to review the GSTR 1
    filed for the period from April to September of the next financial year and
    determine credit notes which are issued in relation to supply made during the
    period under audit and further analyse whether the same have been disclosed
    in the Annual return or not.
  • There is lack of clarity on this clause and we
    have to await an amendment to this clause.
    Credit notes raised during 18-19 are logically not required to be
    reported as part of the 17-18 reconciliation.
    It is highly probable that this clause might be amended

5J. Credit Notes accounted for in the audited
financial statement but are not permissible under GST (-): apparent error in
signage

Credit notes u/s. 35 are issued for reduction of
taxable turnover (such as price re-negotiation, short shipment, incorrect tax
rate, etc)

  • This clause would capture all such credit
    notes, where reduction in GST is not allowed u/s. 35 as discussed for the
    earlier clause.
  •  Identification of credit notes and reasons for
    reduction sought in the taxable turnover should be documented as working
    papers
  • Management may seek confirmations on reversal
    of credit on the recipient end

5F. Trade Discounts accounted for in the audited
financial statements but not permissible under GST

Trade discounts u/s. 15(3) could be those granted
at the time of supply or post supply

  • Trade discount here should be understood to
    include cash discounts, target discounts, incentives, etc. which do not
    satisfy the conditions prescribed u/s. 15(3) for non-inclusion in the value
    of taxable supply.
  • Auditor may consider conducting a sample
    analysis of major contracts to identify whether discounts given during the
    year on which section 15 (3) benefit has been claimed satisfy the parameters
    prescribed therein

Gratuitous discount given by a company on 100th
year celebration to its all India distributors may not be permissible under
this clause

5G. Turnover during April 2017-June 2017 (-)

Audited financial turnover at the location level
for the said period is to be reduced

  • The accounting turnover (net of all credit
    notes/ debit notes and accounting adjustments) which was used to arrive at
    the opening figure should be reduced to nullify the effect of pre-GST period
    revenue during the FY.

  • Turnover in excise/ service tax/ VAT returns are irrelevant for reporting
    here.
  •  Auditor would need to understand the process of
    ascertaining locational level turnover for April-June’17 especially under
    service tax regime since many assessee might have opted for centralised
    registration under service tax and would not have identified a turnover to a
    specific location
  •  A view with adequate disclosure may be given
    that consolidated turnover for April-June’17 is to be tagged to the state
    where service tax jurisdiction applies and the disclosure is not having any
    adverse tax consequences

5K. Adjustments on account of supply of goods by
SEZ units to DTA units (-)

Report DTA sales by SEZ unit

  •  ‘Removals’ from SEZ units are liable to custom
    duties as any other imported stock in the hands of the person who declares
    himself as an importer on record (generally the DTA buyer).  Since buyer discharges the customs duties
    on the basis of bill of entry for home consumption, it is not considered as a
    taxable supply by the SEZ unit even-though it is a turnover in the accounts
  •  Where the SEZ unit declares itself as an importer on record, pays
    the custom duties and also charges IGST on the stock transfer invoice to the
    DTA unit, this would form part of the turnover of the SEZ unit and no
    adjustments are required in this clause
  •  The auditor may obtain a list of all DTA sales by the SEZ unit and
    also obtain a copy of Bill of Entry filed by the customer as importer to
    satisfy that the onus of discharging tax was not on the SEZ unit but on the
    DTA unit buying the goods

 

  •  DTA clearances of capital goods by SEZ
    developers are not covered in this clause though principally similar implications
    would apply  (Section 30 of the SEZ Act
    operates only for SEZ Unit)

5L. Turnover for the period under Composition (-)

Accounting turnover during the period under
Composition Scheme to be excluded

  •  GSTR-4 data to be reconciled with accounting
    turnover under the composition schemeand then excluded under this clause.
  •  NIL
  •  NIL

5M. Adjustments in turnover u/s. 15 and rules
made thereunder  (+/-)

Variances in commercial value and GST value to be
aggregated and reported here

  • Section 15 and rules may require upward/
    downward adjustment to taxable value (such as air travel agent invoices/
    money-changer transactions, trading of used goods, admitted undervaluation in
    related party transactions, admitted Free-of cost supplies with external
    parties, etc)
  •  Auditor can ascertain this figure by a invoice-wise comparison of
    revenue GL and GST register (value column)
  • Auditor may study the upward/downward variance at a conceptual
    level and aggregate the same but is not required to attest the said
    quantification

 

  •  Certain value exemption notifications (such as
    sale of flats, sale of second hand pre-GST motor vehicles , etc) may also be
    included here eventhough they are not part of section 15

5N. Adjustments in turnover due to foreign
exchange fluctuations (+/-)

Difference in valuation due to forex rates
adopted for revenue recognition / GST valuation

  •  In respect of export of goods, the law requires
    the customs notified rates to be adopted but commercially agreed currency/
    forex rates may vary. Therefore, there will always be a difference in the
    value of export of goods reported in the Annual Return vis-à-vis books of
    accounts which will have to be reported here.
  • Auditor to examine the internal accounting policy in respect of
    adoption of foreign exchange rates. 
  • In addition, the auditors should obtain a statement of export of
    goods during the year with both, the figures as per books of accounts as well
    as the shipping bill plotted for verification and record purposes.
  • Certain accounting practices for companies who have hedged their
    foreign exchange exposures on export revenue may be examined

 

  •  Any variance in turnover due to difference in
    foreign exchange rates at the time of receipt of advance and time of its
    adjustments may need some reporting

5O. Adjustments in turnover due to reasons not
listed above (+/-)

Residual entry for all other adjustments

  •  All case-specific adjustments may be carried
    out here.  If the web-portal does not
    permit multiple sub-items, it may be advisable to maintain a internal working
    and upload a scanned copy if permitted by the web-portal

 Auditor to seek representation on this residual
adjustments and maintain working papers on the reasons for the adjustments
and its impact at the tax level. Missed reporting of outward supply should
not be reported here but reported as unreconciled difference

 Expense recoveries which are debited to the
profit and loss account

  •  High-sea sales/ drop shipments which are
    excluded from GST
  • Sale of fixed assets, residual value of
    destroyed goods, etc.

 

5R = 5Q-5P : Unreconciled difference between the Accounting
turnover (with adjustments) and the GSTR-9 turnover

Reasons for non-reconciliation to be provided
here

• It is absolutely essential to reconcile the two
turnovers to the last rupee to eliminate the possibility of compensating
reconciling items

  • Auditor cannot adopt a materiality test for this
    unreconciled difference (eg. a Re 10 +ve and Re 9 –ve may result in Re 1
    +ve).  Auditor to identify every
    difference
  •  It is also essential to comment whether tax is
    due on this difference and if yes, whether tax has been discharged and the
    relevant tax period. If tax has not been discharged, auditor may consider
    reporting the same as additional liability

 

 

PART 7& 8 – RECONCILIATION OF TAXABLE TURNOVER

 

This part aims at moving
from the reconciled total turnover as per accounts to the taxable turnover as
reported in GSTR-9.  By this stage, the
accounting turnover has been brought to the level of total turnover as per
GSTR-9. Any difference arising in this reconciliation table would primarily
be on account of: (a) short-reporting of non-taxable turnover in GSTR-1 (say
interest income); or (b) short reporting of taxable turnover; (c) incorrect
reporting head.  In the author’s view,
it may be advisable to rectify any short reporting of non-taxable turnover
and reporting errors of GSTR-1 in GSTR-9 itself so one is left only with
items having a final impact on the tax liability.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clause Description

Intricacies

Auditor responsibility/ working Papers

Adjustments/ Illustrations

7A. Annual Turnover after (+/-) adjustments above

Turnover as per accounts with the +/- adjustments

  •  This is an auto-filled data field

NIL

NIL

7B. Value of Exempted, Nil rates, Non-GST
supplies, No-Supply turnover (-)

Non taxable items comprised in GSTR-9 are
reported there

  •  Exempted refers to supplies arising from
    Notifications (Goods/ Services) u/s. 11 of the respective acts i.e. N-02/2017
    and 12/2017
  •  Documentation of the list of exemptions availed
    and compliance of exemption conditions may be examined on sample basis

This turnover should be reported net of debit
notes/ credit notes as available from the books of accounts

 

  • Turnover having partial exemption such as rate
    reduction of 18% to 5% or 0.1% or value reduction (in case of
    developers)  would not be reported here
  •  Non-GST supplies imply supply of Non-GST
    products (such as petroleum)
  •  No-Supply implies turnover covered under
    Schedule III i.e. sale of land, etc
  •   Documentation
    of the reasons provided by the assessee for treating the turnover as Non-GST/
    No-Supply, etc.

 

7C. Zero-rated supplies without payment of tax
(-)

Export Supplies and Supplies to SEZ units/
developers

  •  Export supplies of goods and services including
    to SEZ units / developers from accounts is to be extracted and reported here

 

  •  Auditor needs to maintain the LUT as part of
    its working papers and broad parameters on which the assessee has treat the
    transaction as export – a sampling may be undertaken for verification

Same as above

 

  • Tax type would be IGST even for same state SEZs
  • Sample verification of SEZ status of customers
    may be carried out on the GSTN portal

 

7D. Supplies on which tax is to be paid on
reverse charge basis (-)

Turnover of suppliers under RCM

  •  Supplies where the supplier records the
    turnover but does not pay the tax  are
    to be reported here
  •  Auditor needs to maintain the notification
    under which the assessee has taken the stand that RCM is being discharged by
    recipient
  •  Sample invoices for RCM declaration may be
    examined
  •  Same as above

7G = 7F – 7E : Taxable turnover as computed above
and compared with the Turnover as per GSTR-9

There could be +ve/ -ve result

  •  If everything has been captured above, 7G
    should ideally be NIL
  •  +ve implies GSTR-9 taxable turnover is greater
    than accounting taxable turnover indicating tax refund
  •  -ve implies GSTR-9 taxable turnover is lesser
    than accounting taxable turnover resulting in indicating tax payable
  •  Credible explanation should be provided at item
    level for the difference
  •  Auditor needs to ascertain all those cases
    where there is admittedly a tax liability which is payable but the same has
    not been considered by the assessee in its GST workings
  •  Where the tax payer represents to have
    discharged the tax liability in subsequent year GSTR-3B, a categorical
    representation is important on this point.

There should not be any un-explainable difference
at this stage.

 

 

PART 9, 10 & 11 – RECONCILIATION OF RATE WISE LIABILITY AND AMOUNT
PAYABLE THEREON

This part aims at
reconciling the above adjusted taxable turnover at the rate level (as per
accounts) with the tax liability reported in GSTR-3B.  Since the accounting turnover has undergone
changes prior to this level, one would have to perform a rate classification
(exempt, 6%, 12%, etc) even for the adjustments made until this point.  Therefore, workings for the adjustments
should be maintained at an item level.
This part is also important to examine whether there is any excess
collection of taxes by the tax payer.
The tax GL of the tax payer is the primary source of data for this
clause.

 

Clause Description

Intricacies

Auditor responsibility/ working Papers

Adjustments/ Illustrations

9. Reconciliation of rate wise liability and amount payable thereon

Rate wise liability as per accounts to be
reported here

  •  Account extracts computing the rate
    wise liability at the CGST/SGST and IGST level would have to be aggregated
    and reported here (Tax GL)
  •  This should also include rate wise RCM
    liability on inwards supplies of goods/ services
  •  Back-up workings of GSTR-3B would have
    to be examined with GSTR-9 to ascertain the differences at the tax level
  •  Errors due to using incorrect rates
    from HSN schedule could be reported here
  •  Auditor to maintain working papers of
    rate wise liability as per accounts vs. rate wise liability as per GSTR-9
  •  To the extent the variance is because
    of turnover level un-reconciled differences, as a consequence they may form
    part of the un-reconciled tax amounts
  •  Auditor can recommend any additional
    liability under this clause

 

GSTR-3B is primary document for discharge
of tax liability and the back-up workings would provide insights into the
tax level differences beyond those arising due to turnover level

 

 PART 12 & 13 – INPUT TAX CREDIT RECONCILIATION

This part performs an
analysis of the input tax credit availed as per accounts and that reported in
GSTR-3B.  The tax administration
expects that accounts are the sole basis for credit availment and hence
difference in accounting and receipt of goods/ services could be the primary
reason for any variance in credits. Practically, multiple errors have been
performed during the GST implementation.
This exercise is a good opportunity to rectify clerical errors (such
as claiming excess credit in a particular head) as well as eligibility errors
(such as blocked credits, year-end mandatory credit reversals, etc).  Importantly, this form should not be viewed
as a document to avail/ reclaim any missed credit or even adjust the same
with any output liability.

 

12A. ITC availed as per
audited financial statements for the state at GSTIN level

ITC ledger extracts for each GSTIN to be reported
here

  •  Account extracts computing the aggregate of ITC as recorded in
    accounts would be reported here. This figure should be net of any reversals
    made in accounts on the input tax credit front.
  •  Internal working should be made at the tax type level (CGST/ SGST or
    IGST) though the reporting is required to be done at the aggregate level.
  • GSTR-2A reconciliation summary of the tax payer could be examined for
    completeness.

 

  •  Working papers of rate wise input tax credit as per accounts vs.
    rate wise input tax credit used for GSTR-3B workings to be maintained.
  •  Auditor to ascertain if input tax credit availed in a particular
    state is mapped to another state in accounting systems.

 

ITC availed in accounts but not claimed in any of the transition/GST
returns may be written off/ ignored.

 

ISD credit availed in GSTR-3B but availed at a different location in
accounts may come up here.

 

 

12B. ITC booked in the earlier financial years
and claimed in current financial year (+)

Transition Credit of earlier financial years to
be reported here

  •   Transition return workings
    and the accounting treatment would have to be examined and reported here.
  •  Cases of capital goods claiming credit in accounts during FY16-17
    but reported in transition returns would also be covered.

 

  •  Auditor to document basis of claim of
    transition credit and the eligible duties/ taxes claimed u/s. 140.

Centralised Cenvat credit which is distributed
during transition may be adjusted appropriately.

12C. ITC booked in current financial year and
claimed in subsequent financial year (-)

ITC booked in accounts but availed in subsequent
financial year in returns

  •  GSTR-3B workings and the ITC register as per accounts may be
    reconciled on a line-item basis and the difference may be reported here.
  •  This ITC register data may also be compared with
    the ITC reported in GSTR-2A (Table 9 of GSTR-9).
  • Auditor need not propose any disallowance of
    input tax credit availed in GSTR-3B merely on the ground of non-reporting of
    invoice in GSTR-2A.

  • Auditor need not particularly verify conditions of section 16(2) for
    reporting this figure.

All figures reported here should be net of any
reversals or vendor credit notes.

14. Reconciliation of ITC at description level

Ledger level break-up of ITC credit

  •  This table appears to be a ledger-wise breakup
    of the expenses and the corresponding ITC reported in 12A/12B/12C.
  •  Auditor would need to obtain ledger level data
    and extract the expenses under each ledger on which ITC has been availed.

Column 4 : Amount of eligible ITC availed represents
the actual ITC availed in accounts net of the adjustments in 12B/C at the
ledger level.

 

  •  ITC from internal stock transfers which do not
    appear at a GL level may also be reported as a separate line item
  •  Prima facie examination of ledger
    nomenclature / narrations may be adopted for checking eligibility

 

13 & 15. Reconciliation of ITC at ledger
level

Reasons for non-reconciliation to be provided
here

  •  It is absolutely essential to reconcile the two
    turnovers to the last rupee to eliminate the possibility of compensating
    reconciling items
  •  Auditor cannot adopt a materiality test for
    this unreconciled difference (eg. a Re 10 +ve and Re 9 –ve may result in Re 1
    +ve).  Auditor to identify every
    difference

Eg. Admitted reversals of input tax credit not
reversed in GSTR-3B; availment of credit without receipt/ accounting of
goods/ services; credit availed at the wrong GSTIN location

 

 

 

Reporting horizon of GSTR-9C

Books of accounts have an annual time horizon and the GST-1/3B work on
monthly periodicity with hard close only in September following the respective
financial year.  This variance in period
poses a peculiar problem because of a lack of a revision option in GSTR-1/3B
and GSTN storing data based on reporting period rather than the document
date.  Let’s take similar yet
contradictory examples (i) debit note raised in FY17-18 delayed reporting in GSTR-3B/1
of 18-19 (ii) debit notes raised in FY17-18 and delayed reporting only in
GSTR-1 in 18-19 (iii) debit notes raised in FY18-19 for enhancement of a price
agreed in FY 17-18 and reported in GSTR-3B/1 if 18-19?  Let’s compare these example based on following
parameters

 

Parameter

Case – 1 : Delayed
reporting in 3B  & 1

Case – 2 : Delay in
reporting only in 1

Case – 3 : delay in
recognition

Original Invoice date

01-01-2018

01-01-2018

01-01-2018

Accrual of liability

January 2018

January 2018

January 2018 (*)

Debit note date/
Accounting entry

31-03-2018

31-03-2018

30-09-2018

Date of Reporting
additional turnover  in GSTR-9

Clause 10 certainly
capture this amendment

Clause 10 would capture
this amendment only at turnover level

Clause 10 would not
capture this and treated as 18-19 transaction

Date of Reporting
additional turnover  in GSTR-1

This would be a
reconciliation item at turnover and tax level for both 17-18 & 18-19

This will be a
reconciliation item only at turnover level for both 17-18 and 18-19

Transaction of purely
18-19 though accrual of liability in 17-18

 

 

Whether reporting in 9C is anchored to tax liability accrued in FY 17-18
or anchored to accounting and/or reporting the base document?  Section 9 r/w 12/13  provide the time of supply for the
‘transaction value’.  Legally speaking,
all liabilities accrued in 17-18 (either through current year/ subsequent year
adjustments) should be reported as part of Form-9C irrespective of the date of
accounting and reporting in GSTR-3B/1.
Procedurally, section 35(4) and rule 59 require reporting based on date
of issuance of base document.  Going by
this analogy, transactions accounted in 17-18 would form the basis and those
accounted subsequently (for any reasons) should not form part of 17-18.  The author believes that this second approach
should be adopted keeping in mind the true spirit of reconciliation i.e.
balance two values based on its composition.

 

Part – B : General points for Audit observations/
Comments

Part-B is the Auditor’s report over the correctness of contents of the
reconciliation statement.  The report
places an onus that the reconciling items are accurate having credible
reasoning.  This said report could have
two forms – (a) where the certification is by the person who has also conducted
the statutory audit; and (b) where the certification is placing reliance on the
audited books of accounts examined by another statutory auditor.  The prescribed format provides certain areas
where observations/ comment may be provided by the person certifying the
report.  Other general points for
consideration during this exercise are:

  •  GSTR-9 is a management document and auditor is not certifying the
    contents of GSTR-9.  Effectively implying
    that auditor is not expected to certify the legal aspects such as
    classification, place of supply, time of supply, eligibility of exemption/
    zero-rated conditions, valuation. etc.
  •           Compensating tax
    adjustments cannot be netted off.  Excess
    payment can only be refunded by way of a refund application.
  •           Observations should
    emphasise that audit methodologies are expected to give a reasonable and NOT an
    absolute assurance over the correctness of books of accounts and data reported
    in the form.
  •           Auditor’s recommendation
    of the liability would generally be resorted for admitted tax liabilities,
    numerical errors in reporting/ accounting, patent errors in taxability.   In matters having multiple view points,
    auditor may consider the management’s view under a representation.

 

Conclusion

From tax administration perspective, GSTR-9C is like an ‘appetizer’ in a
full course meal of assessments.  In
other words, it addresses the limited question prior to any assessment ie. are
reported values are correct when compared to the accounting records.  It gives a headstart of items included/
excluded from the returns and hence enables the officer to perform a Top-Down
analysis of the records of the entity.
Once this picture is laid out, the officer is equipped in examining the
nuts and bolts of each transaction (such as time of supply, place of supply,
valuation, rate of tax, eligibility/ ineligibility of credits, etc).   Auditor is merely a facilitator and is not
expected to be a judge over the auditee’s decision.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You May Also Like