Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreBCAJ Brieficles are short-format, web-only articles on contemporary topics of professional importance that are open-for-all to read & share.
Explore BrieficlesExplore past issues of BCA Journal & indulge in a treasure trove of high-quality professional content across format of print, videos & learning events from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreMonthly mouth-piece of BCAS, the BCA Journal is a leading publication that has been in continuous circulation for more than 53 years. Over the years the BCAJ has become synonymous with high-quality & authentic content across fields of finance, accounting, tax & regulatory matters. The BCAJ has wide circulation across India & commands huge respect amongst the Chartered Accountants` community.
Learn MoreFor queries, collaborations, and insights to forge, Drop a line, share thoughts, inquiries galore, At BCAJ, your messages, we eagerly explore.
Learn MoreNon-consideration of submissions made by assessee while
passing adjudication order, is an error apparent from record.
Facts
During
adjudication, petitioner asked for deduction of land value for determining
value of services and provided relevant information for calculation.
Adjudication got completed without considering such information and it was
stated that no corroborating and convincing evidences were produced.
Consequently, application for rectification of mistake apparent from record was
filed. The same was rejected by the department on the ground that this was not
an error apparent from record and it was Held that there cannot be a long drawn
process of reasoning on points if there are two opinions, relying on the
hon’ble Supreme Court’s decision in Sant
Lal Gupta vs. Modern Co-op. Group Housing Society 2010 (262) ELT 6 (SC).
Held
It
was Held that the power to rectify a mistake u/s. 74 of Finance Act, 1994 cannot be put under a straight
jacket formula and each case has to be tested on its own Facts. Adjudication
order did not discuss the relevance or irrelevance of records produced by
petitioner and did not examine records. This was undoubtedly an error apparent
from records. Further, opportunity of
being heard was not granted to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition
was allowed.