Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

January 2017

15. [2016] 75 taxmann.com 270 (Visakhapatnam – Trib.) DCIT vs. Dr. Chalasani Mallikarjuna Rao A.Y.: 2007-08 Date of Order: 21st October, 2016

By C. N. Vaze
Shailesh Kamdar
Jagdish T. Punjabi
Bhadresh Doshi, Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 4 mins

Section 50C – Provisions of section 50C are applicable to sale by a registered un-possessory sale-cum-GPA.  

FACTS 

The assessee, a doctor by profession, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2007-08. The assessment was completed u/s. 143(3) of the Act. Subsequently, the assessment was re-opened, after recording reasons, u/s. 148 of the Act. In the course of re-assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) noticed that the assessee has sold a residential house property at Dr.No.32-7- 3A, P.S. Nagar, Vijayawada for a consideration of Rs. 60 lakh by way of registered un-possessory sale-cum-GPA vide document no.52/2007. As per the said document, the market value of the property for the purpose of payment of stamp duty has been fixed at Rs. 82,04,000/-. However, since the assessee had computed capital gains by adopting sale consideration of Rs. 60 lakh and claimed exemption u/s. 54 of the Act towards construction of another residential house property, the AO asked the assessee to show cause why provisions of section 50C should not be applied and capital gain computed with reference to value determined by Stamp Valuation Authorities. In response, the assessee submitted that the provisions of section 50C of the Act are not applicable since the assessee has transferred property by way of registered un-possessory sale-cum-GPA. According to the assessee, the provisions of section 50C of the Act apply where the property has been transferred by way of registered sale deed. The AO rejected the contentions of the assessee and computed capital gains by applying the provisions of section 50C of the Act.

Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal to CIT(A) who held that the provisions of section 50C of the Act have no application when the property has been transferred by way of un-possessory sale-cum-GPA. He further held that the provisions of section 50C of the Act are applicable when the property has been transferred for a consideration which is less than that of the guidelines value payable as per SRO, then the value as per the SRO has to be adopted on which stamp duty is payable by the transferor. Since, the impugned property was not registered, value as per SRO is not applicable. He allowed the appeal

Aggrieved, the revenue preferred an appeal to the Tribunal.

HELD

It is an admitted fact that the assessee has transferred property by way of registered sale-cum-GPA has transferred property by way of registered sale-cum-GPA and that the sale-cum-GPA is registered in the office of the SRO. The stamp duty authority has determined the market value of the property at Rs. 82,04,000/- and has collected ad hoc stamp duty of Rs. 50,000/-. The assessee has computed long-term capital gain by adopting sale consideration of Rs. 60 lakh shown in the sale deed. The only dispute is that whether the provisions of section 50C are applicable or not when the property is transferred by sale-cum-GPA. The Tribunal observed that in this case, the assessee himself has admitted long-term capital gain on transfer of asset. This clearly shows that the transfer took place within the meaning of section 2(47)(v) of the Act. The moment transfer took place within the meaning of section 2(47)(v) the deeming fiction provided u/s. 50C is applicable, when the sale consideration shown in the sale deed is less than the market value determined by the stamp duty authority for the purpose of payment of stamp duty. Since, there is a difference between consideration shown in the sale deed and the value determined by the SRO, the deeming provisions of section 50C are clearly applicable. It observed that it is illogical and improper on the part of the assessee to say that the transfer within the meaning of section 2(47)(v) takes place, but the provisions of section 50C are not applicable when the property has been transferred by way of un-possessory sale-cum-GPA. 

The Tribunal allowed this ground of appeal filed by the revenue.

You May Also Like