Subscribe to BCA Journal Know More

July 2014

[2014] 45 taxmann.com 377 (Uttarakhand) Valley Hotel & Resorts vs. CCT.

By Puloma Dalal, Jayesh Gogri, Mandar Telang Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 2 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
Whether the State has right to levy VAT on 40% of the bill amount, if the said portion is treated as service portion liable to service tax under the Service Tax laws? Held – No.

The revisionist provides lodging and boarding facilities and restaurant service to its customers. On 06-06-2012, the Government of India, Ministry of Finance issued a notification amending the service tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 by virtue of which 40% of the billed value to the customer, for supply of food or any other article of human consumption or any drink in restaurant, was made liable to service tax. Thereafter, the revisionist moved an application u/s. 57 of the VAT Act, 2005, requesting not to charge VAT on 40% billed amount to the customer, as the same has already suffered service tax. The said application was rejected by the Commissioner, Commercial Tax, against which appeal was filed before the Commercial Tax Tribunal. The same was also dismissed. Aggrieved thereby, the present revision was filed.

The High Court held that Value Added Tax can be imposed on sale of goods and not on service, since service can be taxed only by service tax law. It further held that, the authority competent to impose service tax has also assumed competence to declare what is service and that the State has not challenged the same. Therefore, where element of service (i.e., 40% of the bill amount) has been so declared and brought under the service tax, no value added tax can be imposed thereon.

The High Court therefore set aside the order of the Tribunal and CCT later was directed to pass order afresh.

You May Also Like