Subscribe to BCA Journal Know More

September 2015

[2015] 59 taxmann.com 252 (Andhra Pradesh) K.V. Narayana Reddy vs. Addl. Commissioner.

By Puloma Dalal
Jayesh Gogri
Mandar Telang Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 2 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
Where appeals filed against the order-inoriginal are rejected by lower appellate authorities as barred by limitation, the said order cannot be entertained by the Court under writ jurisdiction.

Facts:
The assessee filed writ petition before the High Court as both the lower appellate authorities did not entertain the appeals filed by the petitioner on the ground that it was time barred and beyond permissible period for condonation. The contention of the petitioner was that attempt to prefer appeal unsuccessfully before the appellate authority does not preclude him from maintaining the writ as at present he is remediless.

Held:
Relying upon decision of the Court in the case of Resolute Electronics (P.) Ltd. vs. Union of India [WP No.1409 of 2015] and quoting judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Singh Enterprises vs. CCE [2008] 12 STT 21 (SC), the Court held that it is not legally permissible to accept the challenge to the order in writ jurisdiction when Appellant has unsuccessfully pursued other remedies for if it is done, the writ Court will unsettle a legally settled position. Thus, where appellate authority has already decided the matter against the petitioner, the writ Court is debarred from doing so as the same binds the writ Court applying the principle of res judicata, particularly, when the appellate authority’s orders are not challenged in the writ jurisdiction. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable.

You May Also Like