Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

August 2013

2013 (30) S.T.R. 593 (Tri.–Kolkata) Suchak Marketing Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata.

By Puloma Dalal, Jayesh Gogri, Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 1 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
No late fee for delay in filing ‘Nil’ Returns – Board Circular No.97/8/2007 – ST dtd.23-08-2007 relied upon. Facts:
The Appellant provided commercial or industrial construction service and got registered under the said category. They filed ‘NIL’ Returns for the period September 2005 – March 2008 on 18-11-2008. Consequently, penalty under Rule 7C of the Service Tax Rules was confirmed and the Appellant was directed to pay Rs. 12,000/- for each Return and further imposed penalty of Rs.2,000/- u/s. 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner (Appeals) dropped the penalty u/s. 77 but confirmed the penalty of Rs. 12,000/- against the Appellant under Rule 7C of the Rules. The Revenue contended that since the penalty u/s. 77 was already dropped, there was no reason to waive the late fees under the said Rule 7C.

Held:
Relying on Board Circular No. 97/8/2007 ST dated 23/08/2007 clarifying that, in absence of any service rendered, there is no requirement to file ST-3 Returns. Further invoking proviso to the said Rule 7C, the late fees for the NIL Returns were waived.
Download PDF

You May Also Like

2013 (30) S.T.R. 673 (Tri.-MUM) CCE, Mumbai – V vs. GTC Industries Ltd.

2013 (30) S.T.R. 634 (Tri.-Delhi) G.R. Movers vs. CCE, Lucknow.