The Tribunal held in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal noted as under:
(1) It was true that the assessee-trust had been established since more than 100 years and it was running the school with hostel facilities attached to it.
(2) Amounts collected by the assessee-trust had been used for the purpose of running the school and hostel and also in constructing buildings. A major portion of the outgoings of the assessee-trust had been towards construction of buildings.
(3) If the object of the assessee-trust was to run educational institution and the assessee had been carrying on that activity alone, the construction of buildings and purchase of property could not be treated as a point against the assessee. The assessee might be purchasing properties and constructing buildings for the purpose of letting out to earn income necessary for carrying on the charitable activity in the nature of running the school and hostel.
(4) All the properties owned by the assessee-trust were held in trust for the purpose of carrying on charitable activities. There was nothing unlawful in the assessee acquiring assets and buildings.
(5) If the entire activities carried on by the assessee were charitable in nature, the expenses incurred for construction of buildings and purchase of assets also qualified to be considered as application of funds for charitable purposes.