Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreExplore past issues of BCA Journal & indulge in a treasure trove of high-quality professional content across format of print, videos & learning events from the BCAS stable.
Learn More
Facts:
The appellant manufacturer of assessable goods availed mandap keeper’s services to celebrate the annual day function which was attended by the employees, their family members and employees of their sister units and claimed CENVAT credit thereon. They relied upon Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. 2011 (24) STR 645 (Kar) and Ultratech Cement Ltd. 2010 (20) STR 577 (Bom.) in support of their claim. The revenue rejected the claim relying on the decisions of Manikgarh Cement 2010 (20) STR 456 (Bom.) and Eicher Motors Ltd. 2010 (20) STR 281 (Tri.-Del.).
Held:
Considering the inapplicability due to facts being distinct than in the present case than in the cases of Manikgarh Cement (Supra) and Eicher Motors Ltd. (Supra), the Hon. Tribunal relying on Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. and Ultratech Cement Ltd., allowed the claim of the appellant wherein the facts were similar.
