By Tarunkumar Singhal, Raman Jokhakar, Chartered Accountants
fiogf49gjkf0d
India has not issued a new bank licence since 2004. There is a persuasive case to be made that India’s banking sector needs to be more open; but aspects of the recent decision to award more licences are, none the less, disquieting. Well-informed voices from across the spectrum of opinion have, in the past few days, been raised against the proposal to allow large business conglomerates to set up banks if they have a “successful track record” – judged, presumably, by the licensing authority – and a minimum capital of Rs 500 crore. The head of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, C Rangarajan, has urged the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI) to start by issuing licences to “non-corporate businesses” first, and to look elsewhere only if there are no such qualified applicants.
The left-leaning Columbia University economics professor and Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz said in an interview that it would be “very risky” to allow companies to own banks. It was not allowed in the US, he added, and correctly so; the conflicts of interest that it would open up were “sufficiently great” and regulators would “not be able to circumscribe them easily — or at all”. And the right-leaning economist Percy Mistry has also said allowing industrial houses to run banks would leave “massive scope for malfeasance”. Japan, he pointed out, is one country where banks and industries are enmeshed with each other, and it is still to emerge from a twodecade- old financial crisis.
